Teacher’s perceptions of pedagogical practices in innovative learning spaces

References

• American National Standards Institute, Inc. 1997. Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index (ASA S3.5). New York: American National Standards: Acoustics Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Atkin, J., M. Chester, B. Cleveland, M. Culkin, J. Calzini, M. Davies, M. Featherston, T. Goddard, D. Hes, and P. Jamieson. 2009. Take 8 Learning Spaces: The Transformation of Educational Spaces for the 21st Century. Manuka, ACT: Australian Institute of Architects.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway.: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC, USA: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C. 2011. “The (Im)materiality of Educational Space: Interactions between Material, Connected and Textual Dimensions of Networked Technology Use in Schools.” E-Learning and Digital Media 8 (3): 214–227. doi:10.2304/elea.2011.8.3.214.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. 2020. “Teaching in an Inspiring Learning Space: An Investigation of the Extent to Which One School’s Innovative Learning Environment Has Impacted on Teachers’ Pedagogy and Practice.” Research Papers in Education 35 (2): 185–204. doi:10.1080/02671522.2019.1568526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardellino, P., and P. Woolner. 2020. “Designing for Transformation–a Case Study of Open Learning Spaces and Educational Change.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 28 (3): 383–402. doi:10.1080/14681366.2019.1649297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., T. Nicholson, P. Yeoman, and P. Thibaut. 2020. “Space Matters: Framing the New Zealand Learning Landscape.” Learning Environments Research 23 (3): 307–329. doi:10.1007/s10984-020-09311-4.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., and P. Yeoman. 2018. “Framing Learning Entanglement in Innovative Learning Spaces: Connecting Theory, Design and Practice.” British Educational Research Journal 44 (6): 1120–1137. doi:10.1002/berj.3483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, P., and D. Edwards. 2014. “Restructuring Teaching and Learning in Open-Plan Schools.” In Adapting to Teaching and Learning in Open-Plan Schools, edited by V. Brian, P. Cox, C. Deed, D. Edwards, C. Farrelly, and M. Keefe, 59–78. Rotterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dovey, K., and K. Fisher. 2014. “Designing for Adaptation: The School as Socio-Spatial Assemblage.” The Journal of Architecture 19 (1): 43–63. doi:10.1080/13602365.2014.882376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards‐Groves, C., R. Brennan, S. Kemmis, I. Hardy, and P. Ponte. 2010. “Relational Architectures: Recovering Solidarity and Agency as Living Practices in Education.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 18 (1): 43–54. doi:10.1080/14681360903556814.
   Google Scholar
• Fenwick, T., R. Edwards, and P. Sawchuk. 2011. Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Tracing the Socio-Material. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frelin, A., and J. Grannäs. 2020. “Teachers’ Pre-Occupancy Evaluation of Affordances in a Multi-Zone Flexible Learning Environment–Introducing an Analytical Model.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 1–17. doi:10.1080/14681366.2020.1797859.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. 2017. “Sociomateriality in Posthuman Practice Theory.” In The Nexus of Practices: Connecting Constellations and Practitioners, edited by A. Hui, T. Schatzki, and E. Shove, 38–51. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gulson, K. N. 2015. “Relational Space and Education Policy Analysis.” In Education Policy and Contemporary Theory, edited by K. Gulsen, M. Clarke, and E. Bendex-Petersen, 219–229. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. J. 2014. “Teachers as Placemakers: How Primary School Teachers Design, Manage and Maintain Learning Spaces as Part of Their Daily Workflow.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. 2005. “Classrooms and the Design of Pedagogic Discourse: A Multimodal Approach.” Culture & Psychology 11 (3): 309–320. doi:10.1177/1354067X05055519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kariippanon, K. E., D. P. Cliff, S. L. Lancaster, A. D. Okely, and A.-M. Parrish. 2018. “Perceived Interplay between Flexible Learning Spaces and Teaching, Learning and Student Wellbeing.” Learning Environments Research 21 (3): 301–320. doi:10.1007/s10984-017-9254-9.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., and P. Grootenboer. 2008. “Situating Praxis in Practice: Practice Architectures and the Cultural, Social and Material Conditions for Practice.‘‘ Stephen Kemmis & Tracey J Smith (eds). In Enabling Practice, 37–62. Rotterdam/Taipei: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to actor-network Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., and K. Hetherington. 2000. “Materialities, Spatialities, Globalities.” In Knowledge, Space, Economy, edited by J. Bryson, P. Daniels, N. Henry, and J. Pollard, 45–60. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Li, P., T. M. Froese, and G. Brager. 2018. “Post-Occupancy Evaluation: State-of-the-Art Analysis and State-of-the-Practice Review.” Building and Environment 133: 187–202. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.02.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, K., S. Francisco, and S. Kemmis. 2017. Exploring Education and Professional Practice. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Montiel, I., A. M. Mayoral, J. Navarro Pedreño, and S. Maiques. 2019. “Acoustic Comfort in Learning Spaces: Moving Towards Sustainable Development Goals.” Sustainability 11 (13): 3573. doi:10.3390/su1133573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D. 2018. “Assembling Spaces of Learning ‘In’ Museums and Schools: A Practice-based Sociomaterial Perspective.” In Spaces of Teaching and Learning. Understandings Teaching-Learning Practice, edited by R. Ellis and P. Goodyear. Singapore: Springer, p. 13–29. doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7155-3_2.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D., B. Cleveland, and H. Aberton. 2015. “Learning Spaces and Pedagogic Change: Envisioned, Enacted and Experienced.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 23 (4): 575–595. doi:10.1080/14681366.2015.1055128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, D., and C. Morrison. 2017. “Re/Assembling ‘Innovative’ Learning Environments: Affective Practice and Its Politics.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 49 (8): 749–758. doi:10.1080/00131857.2016.1278354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, K. 2021. “‘The Best Guess for the Future?’ Teachers’ Adaptation to Open and Flexible Learning Environments in Finland.” Education Inquiry 12 (3): 282–300. doi:10.1080/20004508.2020.1816371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development. 2015. Schooling Redesigned: Towards Innovative Learning Systems. Paris: Educational Research and Innovation, OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pääkkönen, R., T. Vehviläinen, J. Jokitulppo, O. Niemi, S. Nenonen, and J. Vinha. 2015. “Acoustics and New Learning Environment–a Case Study.” Applied Acoustics 100: 74–78. doi:10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 2019. “The Material Dimension of Social Life.“ Schatzki , Theodore R (eds). In Social Change in a Material World, 51–77. London: UK. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, K. 2016. “Re-placing Flexibility. Flexibility in Learning Spaces and Learning.” In The Translational Design of Schools, edited by K. Fisher, 51–82. London: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Woolner, P., and U. Stadler-Altmann. 2021. “Openness – Flexibility – Transition. Nordic Prospects for Changes in the School Learning Environment.” Education Inquiry 12 (3): 301–310. doi:10.1080/20004508.2021.1957331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoman, P., and S. Wilson. 2019. “Designing for Situated Learning: Understanding the Relations between Material Properties, Designed Form and Emergent Learning Activity”. British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (5): 2090–2108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar