757
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Section: Visual Intervention and the (Re)enactment of Democracy

‘What do we see when we look at people on the move’? A visual intervention into civil sphere and symbolic boundary theory

REFERENCES

  • Alba, R. 2005. “Bright vs. Blurred Boundaries: Second-Generation Assimilation and Exclusion in France, Germany, and the United States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 28: 20–49.
  • Alexander, J. C. 2006. The Civil Sphere. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Alexander, J. C. 2007. “The Meaningful Construction of Inequality and the Struggles Against It: A ‘Strong Program’ Approach to How Social Boundaries Change.” Cultural Sociology 1 (1): 23–30.
  • Alexander, J. C. 2008. “Iconic Experience in Art and Life.” Theory, Culture & Society 25 (5): 1–19.
  • Alexander, J. C. 2010. “The Celebrity-Icon.” Cultural Sociology 4 (3): 323–336.
  • Alexander, J. C. 2019. “Frontlash/Backlash: The Crisis of Solidarity and the Threat to Civil Institutions.” Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 48 (1): 5–11.
  • Azoulay, A. 2008. The Civil Contract of Photography. New York: Zone.
  • Banks, J. 2012. “Unmasking Deviance: The Visual Construction of Asylum Seekers and Refugees in English National Newspapers.” Critical Criminology 20 (3): 293–310.
  • Bansak, K., J. Hainmueller, and D. Hangartner. 2016. “How Economic, Humanitarian, and Religious Concerns Shape European Attitudes Toward Asylum Seekers.” Science 354 (6309): 217–222.
  • Bellah, R. N. 2015. “Religion and the Civil Sphere: A Global Perspective.”.” In Solidarity, Justice and Incorporation. Thinking Trough the Civil Sphere, edited by P. Kivisto, and G. Sciortino, 32–56. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bleiker, R., D. Campbell, E. Hutchison, and X. Nicholson. 2013. “The Visual Dehumanisation of Refugees.” Australian Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 398–416.
  • Brubaker, R. 2017. “Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: The European Populist Moment in Comparative Perspective.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (8): 1191–1226.
  • Cangià, F. 2017. “Emotions and Symbolic Boundaries. Reflections on Youths’ Views About Migration in Italy.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (10): 1720–1738.
  • Czech Statistical Office (CSO). 2022a. “Data on Number of Foriegners.” https://www.czso.cz/csu/cizinci/number-of-foreigners-data.
  • Czech Statistical Office (CSO). 2022b. “Foreigners: International Protection.” https://www.czso.cz/csu/cizinci/1-ciz_rizeni_azyl.
  • Doerr, N. 2017. “Bridging Language Barriers, Bonding Against Immigrants: A Visual Case Study of Transnational Network Publics Created by far-Right Activists in Europe.” Discourse & Society 28 (1): 3–23.
  • Ferreira, V. S. 2014. “Artes e Manhas da Entrevista Compreensiva.” Saúde e Sociedade 23 (3): 979–992.
  • Flick, U. 2014. “Mapping the Field.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by U. Flick, 3–18. London: Sage.
  • Gallup International. 2022. “Voice of the People: Public Opinion of European Citizens on the War in Ukraine.” https://www.gallup-international.bg/en/45766/public-opinion-of-european-citizens-on-the-war-in-ukraine/.
  • Geertz, C. 1973. Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
  • Green, J. E. 2009. The Eyes of the People: Democracy in an Age of Spectatorship. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Hall, S. 1973. “Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse.” http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/2962/1/Hall%2C_1973%2C_Encoding_and_Decoding_in_the_Television_Discourse.pdf.
  • Hariman, R., and J. L. Lucaites. 2011. No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy. Reprint ed. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
  • Jaworsky, B. N. 2016. The Boundaries of Belonging. Online Work of Immigration-Related Social Movement Organizations. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Jaworsky, B. N. 2021. “The ‘Thirteenth Immigrant’? Migration and Populism in the 2018 Czech Presidential Election." In Populism in the Civil Sphere, edited by J. C. Alexander, P. Kivisto and G. Sciortino, 152–177. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Lamont, M. 1992. Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class Morality and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lamont, M., and V. Molnár. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28 (1): 167–195.
  • Malkki, L. H. 1995. Purity and Exile: Violence, Memory, and National Cosmology among Hutu Refugees in Tanzania. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
  • McAreavey, R., and B. Krivokapic-Skoko. 2019. “In or Out? Understanding How Social and Symbolic Boundaries Influence the Economic Integration of Transnational Migrants in Non-Metropolitan Economies.” Sociologia Ruralis 59 (2): 329–349.
  • Merton, R. K. 1948. “The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy.” The Antioch Review 8 (2): 193–210.
  • Messing, V., and B. Ságvári. “Still Divided but More Open: Mapping European Attitudes Towards Migration before and after the Migration Crisis.” http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/budapest/15322-20190505.pdf.
  • MI CR. 2022. Počty osob s uděleným pobytovým oprávněním v souvislosti s válkou na Ukrajině. https://www.mvcr.cz/clanek/informativni-pocty-obyvatel-v-obcich.aspx?fbclid = IwAR2_nWYKSZ778elQyubyEYWmMPrSp8ejwZZmOY6QIkAg9Hb0fmKKOHG0r18.
  • Moser, G. 2021. “Familial Ties and Citizen Claims. Photography and Early Civil Rights Activism in African–Canadian Newspapers.” Visual Studies, 36 (4–5): 300–323.
  • Müller, J.-W. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Nathansohn, R., and D. Zuev, eds. 2013. Sociology of the Visual Sphere. New York: Routledge.
  • Ndione, L. C., and E. Remy. 2018. “Combining Images and Words in Order to Understand the Cultural Meaning of Practices: What Photo-Elicitation Reveals.” Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition) 33 (3): 61–84.
  • Olesen, T. 2020. “The Role of Photography in the Production and Problematization of Online Affective Debates: Struggles Over Solidarity and Identity During the 2015 Refugee Crisis in Denmark.” The Sociological Review 68 (5): 965–981.
  • Patton, M. Q. 2014. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
  • Rétiová, A., Rapoš Božič, I., Klvaňová, R., & Jaworsky, B. N. (2021). “Shifting Categories, Changing Attitudes: A Boundary Work Approach in the Study of Attitudes toward Migrants.” Sociology Compass, 15(3), e12855.
  • Richard, V. M., and M. K. E. Lahman. 2015. “Photo-elicitation: Reflexivity on Method, Analysis, and Graphic Portraits.” International Journal of Research & Method in Education 38 (1): 3–22.
  • Roberts, K. M. 2022. “Populism and Polarization in Comparative Perspective: Constitutive, Spatial and Institutional Dimensions.” Government and Opposition, 57 (4): 680–702.
  • Schober, A. ed. 2020. Popularisation and Populism in the Visual Arts. Attraction Images. New York/London: Routeledge.
  • Szörényi, A. 2006. “The Images Speak for Themselves? Reading Refugee Coffee-Table Books.” Visual Studies 21 (1): 24–41.
  • Thornberg, R., and K. Charmaz. 2014. “Grounded Theory and Theoretical Coding.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, edited by U. Flick, 153–169. London: Sage.
  • Tkaczyk, M. 2017. “Between Politicization and Securitization: Coverage of the European Migration Crisis in Czech Online News Media.”.” Communication Today 8 (2): 90–111.
  • Ulbricht, C. 2019. “From Culture to Class - Legitimate Boundary Making in German Immigration Debates on Southern and Eastern Europeans.” Comparative Migration Studies 7: 1–19. doi:10.1186/s40878-019-0133-7.
  • Van Gorp, B. 2005. “Where is the Frame?” European Journal of Communication 20 (4): 484–507.
  • Volek, J., and M. Urbániková. 2017. “In the Spiral of Mistrust: On the Decline of Public Trust in Czech Journalists.”.” Central European Journal of Communication 10 (19): 159–179.
  • Ward, D. G. 2019. “Public Attitudes Toward Young ImmigrantMen.” American Political Science Review 113 (1): 264–269.
  • Wilmott, A. C. 2017. “The Politics of Photography: Visual Depictions of Syrian Refugees in U.K. Online Media.” Visual Communication Quarterly 24 (20): 67–82.
  • Zelizer, B. 2005. “Death in Wartime.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 10 (3): 26–55.