89
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Using mental model approach for ascertaining socio-cultural perceptions of forest-based ecosystem services among female forest landowners in Georgia, United States

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abel N, Ross H, Walker P. 1998. Mental models in rangeland research, communication and management. The Rangeland Journal. 20(1):77. doi: 10.1071/RJ9980077.
  • Asah ST, Blahna DJ. 2020. Involving stakeholders’ knowledge in Co-designing social valuations of biodiversity and ecosystem services: implications for decision-making. Ecosystems. 23(2):324–337. doi: 10.1007/s10021-019-00405-6.
  • Balasubramanian K, Mook A, Kadam P, Dwivedi P. 2023. Do male and female family forest landowners have different training needs? A case study from Georgia, United States. International Association for Society and Natural Resources (IASNR) Conference, Portland, Maine.
  • Berget C, Mook A, Dwivedi P. 2023. The role of learning sources in familiarity with conservation programs: the gendered case of family forest landowners in Georgia, United States. For Trees Livelihood. 32(4):244–267. doi: 10.1080/14728028.2023.2251037.
  • Borgatti SP. 1996. ANTHROPAC 4.0. Natick (MA): Analytic Technologies.
  • Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC. 2002.
  • Borgatti SP, Halgin DS. 1999. Elicitation techniques for cultural domain analysis. In: Schensul J, LeCompte M, Editors. The ethnographer’s toolkit 3. Walnut Creek, CA: Altimira Press. p. 115–151.
  • Butler BJ, Butler SM, Caputo J, Dias J, Robillard A, Sass EM. 2021. Family forest ownerships of the United States, 2018: results from the USDA forest Service, National Woodland Owner Survey. [accessed 2022 May 1]. https://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/62180
  • Butler BJ, Hewes JH, Dickinson BJ, Andrejczyk K, Butler SM, Markowski-Lindsay M. 2016. Family forest ownerships of the United States, 2013: findings from the USDA forest service’s national woodland survey. For. 114(6):638–647. doi: 10.5849/jof.15-099.
  • Butler SM, Huff ES, Snyder SA, Butler BJ, Tyrrell M. 2018. The role of gender in management behaviors on family forest lands in the United States. For. 116(1):32–40. doi: 10.5849/jof.2016-076R2.
  • Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J. 2012. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ. 74:8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.
  • Coelho-Junior MG, de Oliveira AL, da Silva-Neto EC, Castor-Neto TC, de Tavares O AA, Basso VM, Turetta APD, Perkins PE, de Carvalho AG. 2021. Exploring plural values of ecosystem services: local peoples’ perceptions and implications for protected area management in the atlantic forest of Brazil. Sustainability. 13(3):1019. doi: 10.3390/su13031019.
  • Creamer SF, Blatner KA, Butler BJ. 2012. Certification of family forests: what influences owners’ awareness and participation? JFE. 18(2):131–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2011.12.001.
  • Creighton JH, Baumgartner DM, Blatner KA. 2002. Ecosystem management and nonindustrial private forest landowners in Washington State, USA. Small-Scale For. 1(1):55–69. doi: 10.1007/s11842-002-0005-z.
  • Dorji T, Brookes JD, Facelli JM, Sears RR, Norbu T, Dorji K, Chhetri YR, Baral H. 2019. Socio-cultural values of ecosystem services from oak forests in the Eastern Himalaya. Sustainability. 11(8):2250. doi: 10.3390/su11082250.
  • Faccioli M, Czajkowski M, Glenk K, Martin-Ortega J. 2020. Environmental attitudes and place identity as determinants of preferences for ecosystem services. Ecol Econ. 174:106600. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106600.
  • Friedrichsen CN, Daroub SH, Monroe MC, Stepp JR, Wani SP. 2018. Mental models of soil management for food security in peri-urban India. Urban Agric Region Food Syst. 3(1):170002. doi: 10.2134/urbanag2017.08.0002.
  • Friedrichsen CN, Monroe MC, Daroub SH, Stepp JR, Wani SP. 2020. Impact of mental models on constructed wetland maintenance in semi-arid India. Water Practice Tech. 15(4):1144–1157. doi: 10.2166/wpt.2020.087.
  • García-Llorente M, Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, López-Santiago CA, Aguilera PA, Montes C. 2012. The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: an ecosystem service approach. Environ Sci Policy. 19–20:136–146. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.006.
  • Georgia Forestry Association. 2021. #1 Forestry State in the nation. Georgia: Georgia Forestry Association. [accessed 2022 Feb 12]. https://gfagrow.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/2021-Report_1-Forestry-State-in-the-Nation.pdf.
  • Georgia Forestry Commission, US Forest Service Southern Region. 2023. State and private forestry fact sheet Georgia 2023. Georgia [accessed 2023 Nov 27]. https://apps.fs.usda.gov/nicportal/temppdf/sfs/naweb/GA_std.pdf.
  • Handwerker WP, Wozniak DF. 1997. Sampling strategies for the collection of cultural data: an extension of boas’s answer to Galton’s problem. Curr Anthropol. 38(5):869–875. doi: 10.1086/204675.
  • Hausmann A, Slotow R, Burns JK, Minin ED. 2016. The ecosystem service of sense of place: benefits for human well-being and biodiversity conservation. Environ Conserv. 43(2):117–127. doi: 10.1017/S0376892915000314.
  • Hendee JT, Flint CG. 2014. Incorporating cultural ecosystem services into forest management strategies for private landowners: an Illinois case study. For Sci. 60(6):1172–1179. doi: 10.5849/forsci.13-710.
  • Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 15(9):1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
  • Huff ES. 2017. A national perspective on women owning woodlands (WOW) networks. Ext. 55(2). doi: 10.34068/joe.55.02.08.
  • Hundemer S, Monroe MC. 2020. A Co-orientation analysis of producers’ and environmentalists’ mental models of water issues: opportunities for improved communication and collaboration. Environ Commun. 15(3):320–338. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2020.1828128.
  • Jones N, Ross H, Lynam T, Perez P. 2014. Eliciting mental models: a comparison of interview procedures in the context of natural resource management. Ecol Soc. 19(1):434–440. doi: 10.5751/ES-06248-190113.
  • Jones N, Ross H, Lynam T, Perez P, Leitch A. 2011. Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecol Soc. 16(1):art46. doi: 10.5751/ES-03802-160146.
  • Joshi S, Arano KG. 2009. Determinants of private forest management decisions: a study on West Virginia NIPF landowners. For Policy Econ. 11(2):118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.005.
  • Kearney AR, Kaplan S. 1997. Toward a methodology for the measurement of knowledge structures of ordinary people: the conceptual content cognitive map (3CM). Environ Behav. 29(5):579–617. doi: 10.1177/0013916597295001.
  • Kreye MM, Adams DC, Ghimire R, Morse W, Stein T, Bowker JM. 2017. Forest Ecosystem Services: Cultural Values. In: Sills EO, Moore SE, Cubbage FW, McCarter KD, Holmes TP, Mercer DE, Editors. Trees at work: economic accounting for forest ecosystem services in the U.S. South. Asheville (NC): U.S. Department of Agriculture. p. 11–30.
  • Lambert S, Gray J, McCollum J, Brandeis T, Brown M 2023. Georgia’s forests, 2019. Asheville (NC): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station Report No.: SRS-RB-236. [accessed 2023 Oct 20]. https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/treesearch/66189.
  • Leahy J, Lyons P. 2021. Place attachment and concern in relation to family forest landowner behavior. Forests. 12(3):295. doi: 10.3390/f12030295.
  • Low SM, Altman I. 1992. Place attachment: a conceptual inquiry. Human Environ Behav Adv Theory Res. 12:1–12.
  • Lukacic O, Catanzaro P, Huff ES, Hamunen K. 2023. Women on the land: perspectives on women-owned forest land in the Eastern United States. Soc Nat. 1–18. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2022.2161682.
  • Majumdar I, Laband D, Teeter L, Butler B. 2009. Motivations and land-use intentions of nonindustrial Private forest landowners: comparing inheritors to noninheritors. For Sci. 55(5):423–432. doi: 10.1093/forestscience/55.5.423.
  • Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, García-Llorente M, Montes C. 2014. Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol Indic. 37:220–228. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis; a report of the Millennium ecosystem assessment. Washington DC: Island Press (The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment series).
  • Miner J, Dwivedi P, Izlar R, Atkins D, Kadam P. 2021. Perspectives of four stakeholder groups about the participation of female forest landowners in forest management in Georgia, United States. PLoS One. 16(8):e0256654. [accessed 2021 Oct 20]. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256654.
  • Miner J, Goyke N, Dwivedi P. 2022. Developing a typology of female forest landowners in Georgia, United States. For Trees Livelihood. 31(2):71–85. doi: 10.1080/14728028.2022.2048316.
  • Mook A, Dwivedi P. 2023. Shifting forest landownership interests over the life-course of female forest landowners in rural Georgia, United States. J Rural Stud. 100:103008. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103008.
  • Mook A, Goyke N, Dwivedi P. 2022. Conservation intentions and place attachment among male and female forest landowners. Rural Socl. 87(3):817–846. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12434.
  • Moore R, Williams T, Rodriguez E, Hepinstall-Cymmerman J. 2011. Quantifying the value of non-timber ecosystem services from Georgia’s private forests. Georgia Forestry Foundation. https://gatrees.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Quantifying-the-Value-of-Non-Timber-Ecosystem-Services-from-Georgias-Private-Forests.pdf.
  • Mugavin ME. 2008. Multidimensional scaling: a brief overview. Nurs Res. 57(1):64. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000280659.88760.7c.
  • Oswalt SN, Smith WB, Miles PD, Pugh SA 2019. Forest resources of the United States, 2017: a technical document supporting the forest service 2020 RPA assessment. Gen Tech Rep WO-97 Washington DC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. p. 97. [accessed 2021 May 7]. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/all/57903.
  • Paniotova-Maczka D, Matczak P, Jabkowski P. 2021. Place attachment and views on tree management. Front Psychol. 12. [accessed 2023 Oct 11]. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639830
  • Poudyal N, Cho SH, Bowker JM. 2008. Demand for resident hunting in the Southeastern United States. Hum Dimens Wildl. 13(3):158–174. doi: 10.1080/10871200801922965.
  • Ryfield F, Cabana D, Brannigan J, Crowe T. 2019. Conceptualizing ‘sense of place’ in cultural ecosystem services: a framework for interdisciplinary research. Iss Environ Sci Tech. 36:100907. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100907.
  • Schelhas J, Zhang Y, Zabawa R, Zheng B. 2012. Exploring family forest landowner diversity: place, race, and gender in Alabama, United States. Int J For Res. 5(1):1–21.
  • Scholte SSK, van Teeffelen AJA, Verburg PH. 2015. Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation: a review of concepts and methods. Ecol Econ. 114:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.007.
  • Snyder SA, Butler BJ. 2012. A national assessment of public recreational access on family forestlands in the United States. For. 110(6):318–327. doi: 10.5849/jof.11-090.
  • Sturrock K, Rocha J. 2000. A Multidimensional Scaling Stress Evaluation Table. Field Method. 12(1):49–60. doi: 10.1177/1525822X0001200104.
  • Sun X, Sun C, Munn IA, Hussain A. 2009. Knowledge of three regeneration programs and application behavior among Mississippi nonindustrial private forest landowners: a two-step sample selection approach. J Forest Econ. 15(3):187–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2008.05.001.
  • Tarrant MA, Cordell HK. 2002. Amenity values of public and Private forests: examining the value–attitude relationship. Environ Manag. 30(5):0692–0703. doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2722-7.
  • Tian N, Poudyal NC, Hodges DG, Young TM, Hoyt KP. 2015. Understanding the factors influencing nonindustrial private forest landowner interest in supplying ecosystem services in Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee. Forests. 6(11):3985–4000. doi: 10.3390/f6113985.
  • Tindall DB, Davies S, Mauboules C. 2003. Activism and conservation behavior in an environmental movement: the contradictory effects of gender. Soc Nat. 16(10):909–932. doi: 10.1080/716100620.
  • Velasco-Muñoz JF, Aznar-Sánchez JA, Schoenemann M, López-Felices B. 2022. An analysis of the Worldwide research on the socio-cultural valuation of forest ecosystem services. Sustainability. 14(4):2089. doi: 10.3390/su14042089.
  • Wear DN, Greis JG. 2013. The southern forest futures project: technical report. Gen Tech Rep SRS-GTR-178. Asheville (NC): USDA-Forest Service, Southern Research Station. p. 1–542. doi: 10.2737/SRS-GTR-178.
  • Weller SC. 2007. Cultural consensus theory: applications and frequently asked questions. Field Method. 19(4):339–368. doi: 10.1177/1525822X07303502.
  • Wilkes-Allemann J, Deuffic P, Jandl R, Westin K, Lieberherr E, Foldal C, Lidestav G, Weiss G, Zabel A, Živojinović I, et al. 2021. Communication campaigns to engage (non-traditional) forest owners: a European perspective. For Policy Econ. 133:102621. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102621.
  • Xiao C, McCright AM. 2015. Gender differences in environmental concern: revisiting the institutional trust hypothesis in the USA. Environ Behav. 47(1):17–37. doi: 10.1177/0013916513491571.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.