Digital technology and networked spaces in outdoor education: reflections upon presenting at an international webinar

References

• Ackland, R. (2013). Web social science: Concepts, data and tools for social scientists in the digital age. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Akcil, U., & Bastas, M. (2020). Examination of university students’ attitudes towards e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic process and the relationship of digital citizenship. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, P. (2019). Influences on Anglophone approaches to outdoor education. In J. Parry & P. Allison (Eds.), Experiential learning and outdoor education (pp. 28–36). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: Perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asfeldt, M., Purc-Stephenson, R., Rawleigh, M., & Thackeray, S. (2021). Outdoor education in Canada: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 21(4), 297–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, C. (2009). The backchannel: How audiences are using twitter and social media and changing presentations forever. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, J., & Greenaway, R. (1995). Why adventure?: The role and value of outdoor adventure in young people’s personal and social development: A review of research. Coventry: Foundation for Outdoor Adventure.
   Google Scholar
• Beames, S. (2017). Innovation and outdoor education. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 20(1), 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Beames, S., & Atencio, M. (2008). Building social capital through outdoor education. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 8(2), 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Beery, T. H. (2013). Nordic in nature: Friluftsliv and environmental connectedness. Environmental Education Research, 19(1), 94–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belotto, M. J. (2018). Data analysis methods for qualitative research: Managing the challenges of coding, interrater reliability, and thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2622–2633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolliger, D. U., McCoy, D., Kilty, T., & Shepherd, C. E. (2021). Smartphone use in outdoor education: A question of activity progression and place. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 21(1), 53–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2008). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2015). Social media: A phenomenon to be analyzed. Social Media + Society, 1(1), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Breivik, G. (2021). ‘Richness in ends, simpleness in means!’ on Arne Naess’s version of deep ecological Friluftsliv and its implications for outdoor activities. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 15(3), 417–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauberghe, V., Van Wesenbeeck, I., De Jans, S., Hudders, L., & Ponnet, K. (2021). How adolescents use social media to cope with feelings of loneliness and anxiety during COVID-19 lockdown. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 24(4), 250–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, V., Sandford, A., LaGrone, M., Charbonneau, K., Kong, J., & Ragavaloo, S. (2022). An exploration of instructors’ and students’ perspectives on remote delivery of courses during the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(3), 512–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Convery, I., & Cox, D. (2012). A review of research ethics in internet-based research. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 6(1), 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbertson, B., Socha, T. L., & Potter, T. G. (2004). The double-edged sword: Critical reflections on traditional and modern technology in outdoor education. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 4(2), 133–144.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1–28). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dimock, M. (2019). Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center, 17(1), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Faarlund, N. (2007). Defining friluftsliv. In B. Henderson & N. Vikander (Eds.), Nature first: Outdoor life the friluftsliv way (pp. 56–61). Toronto: Natural Heritage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fawns, T. (2022). An entangled pedagogy: Looking beyond the pedagogy—technology dichotomy. Postdigital Science and Education, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The theory of affordances. The People, Place, and Space Reader, 56–60.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, L. M., Wong-Wylie, G., Rempel, G. R., & Cook, K. (2020). Expanding qualitative research interviewing strategies: Zoom video communications. The Qualitative Report, 25(5), 1292–1301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, N., & Clark, M. (2007). The ethical dilemmas and challenges of ethnographic research in electronic communities. International Journal of Market Research, 49(6), 781–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassell, L. A., Peterson, J., & Pantanowitz, L. (2021). Pushed across the digital divide: COVID-19 accelerated pathology training onto a new digital learning curve. Academic Pathology, 8, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C. (2008). Questioning the generational divide: Technological exoticism and adult constructions of online youth identity. In D. Buckingam (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 71–92). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, P. (2002). Outdoor education in Scotland. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 2(2), 149–168.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, D. (2019). Digital technology and outdoor learning: A framework for decision-making. Horizons, 86(Summer), 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, D., & Thomas, G. (2020). Digital technology and outdoor experiential learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 20(2), 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hills, D., & Thomas, G. (2021). Digital technology in outdoor education Thomas, G., Dyment, J., Prince, H. eds. In Outdoor environmental education in higher education (pp. 147–159). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the internet: Embedded, embodied, and everyday. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2021). Looking at the ‘field’ through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qualitative Research 22 3 , 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, B. N., & Beer, D. (2021). Quantified nostalgia: Social media, metrics, and memory. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeyaraman, M. M., Al-Yousif, N., Robson, R. C., Copstein, L., Balijepalli, C., Hofer, K., … Abou-Setta, A. M. (2020). Inter-rater reliability and validity of risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A study protocol. Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassner, L. D., & Cassada, K. M. (2017). Chat it up: Backchanneling to promote reflective practice among in-service teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(4), 160–168.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, C., Chen, F., & Yang, J. (2014). Exploration of tensions in a mobile-technology supported fieldtrip: An activity theory perspective. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 12(2), 104–117.
   Google Scholar
• Lobe, B., Morgan, D., & Hoffman, K. A. (2020). Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loynes, C. (1998). Adventure in a bun. Journal of Experiential Education, 21(1), 35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, P., & Moore, K. (2004). Adventures in paradox. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 8(2), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• MacIsaac, S., Kelly, J., & Gray, S. (2018). ‘She has like 4000 followers!’: The celebrification of self within school social networks. Journal of Youth Studies, 21(6), 816–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E. (2018). Why do people share fake news? A sociotechnical model of media effects. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2(2), 474–512.
   Google Scholar
• McCrindle, M. (2021). Generation Alpha. Paris: Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey–Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, K. (2015). Children’s media culture in a big data world. Journal of Children and Media, 9(2), 266–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norsk senter for forskningsdata (NSD). (2022, June 20). Hvordan gjennomføre et prosjekt uten å behandle personopplysninger? Retrieved from: https://www.nsd.no/personverntjenester/oppslagsverk-for-personvern-i-forskning/hvordan-gjennomfore-et-prosjekt-uten-a-behandle-personopplysninger/
   Google Scholar
• Ofcom. (2021). Online Nation: 2021 report. Retrieved from Ofcom’s Research and Data website: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/220414/online-nation-2021-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Outdoor Education Australia, OEA. (2021). About Outdoor Education Australia. Retrieved from https://outdooreducationaustralia.org.au/about/
   Google Scholar
• Özkul, D., & Humphreys, L. (2015). Record and remember: Memory and meaning-making practices through mobile media. Mobile Media & Communication, 3(3), 351–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., & Cook, J. (2009). Mobile learning: Structures, agency, practices. NEW YORK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, P. G., & Wattchow, B. (2008). Slow pedagogy and placing education in post-traditional outdoor education. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 12(1), 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, K., & Papacharissi, Z. (2014). The place where our social networks reside: Social media and sociality. In M. B. Oliver & A. A. Raney (Eds.), Media and social life (pp. 159–207). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, J. (2021a). Social media and the production of memory: Introducing “Pastpresenting” [blog post]. https://jackreed95blog.wordpress.com/2021/12/16/pastpresenting/
   Google Scholar
• Reed, J. (2021b). What is the Postdigital? Why might it matter for outdoor experiential education? The Ontario Journal of Outdoor Education, 33(2), 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, J. (2022a). Postdigital outdoor and environmental education. Postdigital Science and Education, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, J. (2022b). The methodology wars and outdoor and environmental education: Feminism, positivism, and causation. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, J., & Dunn, C. (2022). Life in 280 characters: Social media, belonging, and community during the COVID-19 pandemic. In R. Chan, R. Allen, & K. Bista (Eds.), Online teaching and learning in higher education during COVID-19: International perspectives and experiences (pp. 81–92). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, J., & Smith, H. (2021). ‘Everything we do will have an element of fear in it’: Challenging assumptions of fear for all in outdoor adventurous education. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1–13. doi:10.1080/14729679.2021.1961092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, J., van Kraalingen, I., & Hills, D. (2022). Call for papers for special issue on digital technology and networked spaces in adventure education and outdoor learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. K., Pavlakis, A. E., & Richards, M. P. (2021). It’s more complicated than it seems: Virtual qualitative research in the COVID-19 era. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roulet, T. J., Gill, M. J., Stenger, S., & Gill, D. J. (2017). Reconsidering the value of covert research: The role of ambiguous consent in participant observation. Organizational Research Methods, 20(3), 487–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaal, S., & Lude, A. (2015). Using mobile devices in environmental education and education for sustainable development - Comparing theory and practice in a nation wide survey. Sustainability, 7(8), 10153–10170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soga, M., & Gaston, K. J. (2016). Extinction of experience: The loss of human–nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(2), 94–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stolle, E. P., & Frambaugh-Kritzer, C. (2022). Critical friendship as a research tool: examining the critical friend definition continuum Butler, B. M., Bullock, S. M. eds. . In Learning through collaboration in self-study (pp. 25–38). Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sugiura, L., Wiles, R., & Pope, C. (2017). Ethical challenges in online research: Public/private perceptions. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 184–199.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. R. (2012). Skype: An appropriate method of data collection for qualitative interviews? The Hilltop Review, 6(1), 54–60.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF (2020). How many children and young people have internet access at home? Estimating digital connectivity during the COVID-19. https://data.unicef.org/resources/children-and-young-people-internet-access-at-home-during-covid19/
   Google Scholar
• van Kraalingen, I. (2021). A systematized review of the use of mobile technology in outdoor learning. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1–19. doi:10.1080/14729679.2021.1984963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kraalingen, I. (2022). Theorizing technological mediation in the outdoor classroom. Postdigital Science and Education, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wattchow, B. (2001). A pedagogy of production: Craft, technology and outdoor education. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 5(2), 19–27.
   Google Scholar