1,067
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Imagining sovereign futures: the marriage equality movement in Taiwan

ORCID Icon
Pages 462-478 | Received 07 Dec 2020, Accepted 11 Nov 2021, Published online: 09 Dec 2021

References

  • Ahn, J.-H., & Lin, T. (2019). The politics of apology. International Communication Gazette, 81(2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518802947
  • Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire. In V. Rao & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and public action (pp. 59–84). Stanford.
  • Bairner, A., & Hwang, D.-J. (2011). Representing Taiwan. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 46(3), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690210378460
  • Beckert, J. (2013). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations in the economy. Theory and Society, 42(3), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-013-9191-2
  • Brown, K. P. (2016). The prospectus of activism: Discerning and delimiting imagined possibility. Social Movement Studies, 15(6), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1191338
  • Chang, W.-C. (2009). An isolated nation with global-minded citizens. NTU Law Review, 4 , 203–235 .
  • Chen, C. (2019). Migrating marriage equality without feminism. Cornell International Law Journal, 52, 65–107.
  • Chen, K. (2008). Disciplining Taiwan. Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, 4(4), 185–210.
  • Chen, P. J. (2018). Decolonizing love: Ambivalent love in contemporary (anti)sexual movements of Taiwan and South Korea. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 19(4), 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2018.1543250
  • Colker, R. (2015). The freedom to choose to marry. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 30(2), 383–427.
  • Dinerstein, A., & Deneulin, S. (2012). Hope movements: Naming mobilization in a post-development world. Development and Change, 43(2), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2012.01765.x
  • Farthing, L., & Kohl, B. (2013). Mobilizing memory: Bolivia’s enduring social movements. Social Movement Studies, 12(4), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.807728
  • Frye, M. (2012). Bright futures in Malawi’s New Dawn: Educational aspirations as assertions of identity. American Journal of Sociology, 117(6), 1565–1624. https://doi.org/10.1086/664542
  • Go, J., & Watson, J. (2019). Anticolonial nationalism from imagined communities to colonial conflict. European Journal of Sociology, 60(1), 31–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000397561900002X
  • Goldstein, S. (2016). Taiwan: Asia’s Orphan? (The National Bureau of Asian Research Special Report 62).
  • Gongaware, T. (2011). Keying the past to the present: collective memories and continuity in collective identity change. Social Movement Studies, 10(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.545226
  • Harris, F. (2006). It takes a tragedy to arouse them: Collective memory and collective action during the civil rights movement. Social Movement Studies, 5(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830600621159
  • Ho, J. (2010). Queer existence under global governance: A Taiwan exemplar. Positions: East asia Cultures Critique, 18(2), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-2010-013
  • Ho, M. (2015). Occupy congress in Taiwan: Political opportunity, threat, and the sunflower movement. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15(1), 69–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800004173
  • Ho, M. (2019). Taiwan’s road to marriage equality: Politics of legalizing same-sex marriage. The China Quarterly, 238, 482–503. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741018001765
  • Hsiau, A. (2000). Contemporary Taiwanese cultural nationalism. Routledge.
  • Hsu, C.-Y., & Yen, C.-F. (2017). Taiwan: Pioneer of the health and well-being of sexual minorities in Asia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1577–1579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1036-z
  • Hsu, S. (2017). The China factor and Taiwan’s civil society organizations in the sunflower movement. In D. Fell (Ed.), Taiwan’s social movements under Ma Ying-jeou (pp. 134–153). Routledge.
  • Hsu, V. H. (2015). Colors of rainbow, shades of family. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 16(2), 154–164 https://www.jstor.org/stable/43773705.
  • Huang, H. T.-M. (2011). Queer politics and sexual modernity in Taiwan. HKU.
  • Huang, K. (2017). “Cultural war” in a globalized east. Review of Religion and Chinese Society, 4(1), 108–136. https://doi.org/10.1163/22143955-00401006
  • Hughes, C. (1997). Taiwan and Chinese nationalism. Routledge.
  • Jeffrey, C., & Dyson, J. (2016). Now: Prefigurative politics through a north Indian lens. Economy and Society, 45(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2016.1143725
  • Kang, J., Kim, J.-O., & Wang, Y. (2015). Salvaging national pride: The 2010 taekwondo controversy and Taiwan’s quest for global recognition. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 50(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690212474264
  • Kleres, J., & Wettergren, Å. (2017). Fear, hope, anger, and guilt in climate activism. Social Movement Studies, 16(5), 507–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1344546
  • Kong, T. (2019). Transnational queer sociological analysis of sexual identity and civic‐political activism in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(5), 1904–1925. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12697
  • Krumbein, F. (2020). Rainbow Island: Taiwan’s struggle for marriage equality. Journal of Human Rights, 19(4), 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2020.1803055
  • Ku, E. (2020). ‘Waiting for my red envelope’: Discourses of sameness in the linguistic landscape of a marriage equality demonstration in Taiwan. Critical Discourse Studies, 17(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1656655
  • Lee, C. K. (2018). The specter of global China. Chicago.
  • Lee, P.-H. (2017). Queer activism in Taiwan: An emergent rainbow coalition from the assemblage perspective. The Sociological Review, 65(4), 682–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026116681441
  • Lin, S. S. (2016). Taiwan’s China dilemma. Stanford.
  • Liu, P. (2015). Queer marxism in two Chinas. Duke.
  • Lu, J. (2020). Shifting public opinion in different cultural contexts: Marriage equality in Taiwan. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 21(1), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1353/gia.2020.0030
  • Maeckelbergh, M. (2011). Doing is believing: Prefiguration as strategic practice in the alterglobalization movement. Social Movement Studies, 10(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2011.545223
  • Mains, D. (2011). Hope is cut. Temple.
  • Martin, F. (2003). Situating sexualities. HKU.
  • Miller, T. (2017). China’s Asian dream. Zed Books.
  • Mische, A. (1995). Projecting democracy: The formation of citizenship across Youth Networks in Brazil. International Review of Social History, 40(S3), 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859000113628
  • Mische, A. (2009). Projects and possibilities: Researching futures in action. Sociological Forum, 24(3), 694–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01127.x
  • Mukherjee, K. (2019). Conflict in India and China’s contested borderlands. Routledge.
  • Paternotte, D. (2015). Global times, Global debates? Same-sex marriage worldwide. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22(4), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxv038
  • Puar, J. (2007). Terrorist assemblages. Duke.
  • Rich, T. (2017). Electoral paths and support for same-sex marriage legislation: Evidence from Taiwan’s mixed-member system. International Political Science Review, 38(5), 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116633207
  • Richardson, D. (2005). Desiring sameness? The rise of a neoliberal politics of normalisation. Antipode, 37(3), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00509.x
  • Roth, B. (2009). The entity that dare not speak its name. East Asia Law Review, 4, 91–124 https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/etalr4&div=8&id=&page=.
  • Schulz, M. (2016). Debating futures: Global trends, alternative visions, and public discourse. International Sociology, 31(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580915612941
  • Smithey, L. (2009). Social movement strategy, tactics, and collective identity. Sociology Compass, 3(4), 658–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00218.x
  • Soehl, T., & Karim, S. (2021). How legacies of geopolitical trauma shape popular nationalism today. American Sociological Review, first published online. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224211011981
  • Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095521
  • Vigh, H. (2009). Motion squared. Anthropological Theory, 9(4), 419–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499609356044
  • Wang, C. (2017). ‘The future that belongs to us’: Affective politics, neoliberalism and the sunflower movement. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(2), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877916683824
  • Wang, H. (2000). Rethinking the Global and the National. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(4), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051338
  • Wimmer, A., & Feinstein, Y. (2010). The rise of the nation-state across the world, 1816 to 2001. American Sociological Review, 75(5), 764–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410382639
  • Yates, L. (2015). Rethinking prefiguration: Alternatives, micropolitics and goals in social movements. Social Movement Studies, 14(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2013.870883
  • Zhong, Y. (2016). Explaining National Identity Shift in Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(99), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1104866

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.