Amplification, evasion, hijacking: algorithms as repertoire for social movements and the struggle for visibility

References

• Abidin, C., & Baudinette, T. (2020 , July 1) The civic Hijinks of K-Pop’s super fans, data & society. https://points.datasociety.net/the-civic-hijinks-of-k-pops-super-fans-ae2e66e28c6.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. (2020). Cloud ethics. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J. D., & Cooley, L. (2010). Narrative capacity, resistance performance, and the “shape” of new social movement networks. Communication Studies, 61(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510971003752668
   Google Scholar
• Beraldo, D., & Milan, S. (2019). From data politics to the contentious politics of data. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 2053951719885967. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719885967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat, P., & Klein, O. (2020). Covert hate speech: White nationalists and dog whistle communication on Twitter. In G. Bouvier & J. E. Rosenbaum (Eds.), Twitter, the public sphere, and the chaos of online deliberation (pp. 151–172). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Breindl, Y., & Briatte, F. (2010). Digital network repertoires and the contentious politics of digital copyright in France and the European Union. Internet, Politics, Policy 2010: An Impact Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: Exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2018). If. then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bucher, T. (2020) (Big) data and algorithms. Looking for meaningful patterns. In Lievrouw, L. A. & Loader, B. D. (eds), Routledge handbook of digital media and communication (pp. 87–98). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Casemajor, N. (2015). Digital materialisms: Frameworks for digital media studies. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 10(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.209
   Google Scholar
• Chancellor, S., Pater, J., Clear, T., Gilbert, E., & De Choudhury, M. (2016). #thyghgapp: Instagram content moderation and lexical variation in pro-eating disorder communities. Georgia Institute of Technology. 1. http://www.munmund.net/pubs/cscw16_thyghgapp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cotter, K. (2019). Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram. New Media & Society, 21(4), 895–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818815684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N. (2014). Inaugural: A necessary disenchantment: Myth, agency and injustice in a digital world. The Sociological Review, 62(4), 880–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Powell, A. (2014). Big data from the bottom up. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 2053951714539277. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714539277
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolata, U. (2017). Social movements and the internet: The sociotechnical constitution of collective action (No. 2017-02). SOI Discussion Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Escorcia, A., (2014). LoQueSigueTV. https://loquesigue.tv/
   Google Scholar
• Etter, M., & Albu, O. B. (2021). Activists in the dark: Social media algorithms and collective action in two social movement organizations. Organization, 28(1), 68–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508420961532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenstra, R. A., Tormey, S., Casero-Ripollés, A., & Keane, J. (2017). Refiguring democracy: The Spanish political laboratory. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. F. (2020). Democracy reloaded: Inside Spain’s Political laboratory from 15-M to podemos. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galis, V., & Neumayer, C. (2016). Laying claim to social media by activists: A cyber-material détournement. Social Media+ Society, 2(3), 2056305116664360. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116664360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher. (2017). Mexico: articles about bots and trolls. https://erin-gallagher.medium.com/news-articles-about-bots-trolls-in-mexican-networks-7b1e551ef4a6
   Google Scholar
• Gangneux, J. (2020). Tactical agency? Young people’s (dis) engagement with WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger. Convergence, 1354856520918987(2), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520918987
   Google Scholar
• Gerrard, Y. (2018). Beyond the hashtag: Circumventing content moderation on social media. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4492–4511. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818776611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, 167(2014), 167.
   Google Scholar
• Gravante, T. (2020). Forced disappearance as a collective cultural trauma in the ayotzinapa movement. Latin American Perspectives, 47(6), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X20951773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, G. (2018, July 17). Search ‘idiot’ get trump: How activists are manipulating Google images. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jul/17/trump-idiot-google-images-search
   Google Scholar
• Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview (Vol. 37). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. J., Bailey, M., & Welles, B. F. (2020). # HashtagActivism: Networks of race and gender justice. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. (2015). Hijacking# myNYPD: Social media dissent and networked counterpublics. The Journal of Communication, 65(6), 932–952. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, N., Agarwal, P., & Pruthi, J. (2015). HashJacker-detection and analysis of hashtag hijacking on Twitter. International Journal of Computer Applications, 114(19), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.5120/20085-2111
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, T. (2016). Who is talking? Some remarks on nonhuman agency in communication. Communication Theory, 26(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, T. (2020). Making it personal: Algorithmic personalization, identity, and everyday life. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. The Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H. (2018). Living with data: Aligning data studies and data activism through a focus on everyday experiences of datafication. Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, 1, 18-30.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H., Poell, T., & van Dijck, J. (2015). Data and agency. Big Data & Society, 2(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715621569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2018). The end of media logics? On algorithms and agency. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4653–4670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818779750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, G., & Elmer, G. (2013). The research politics of social media platforms. Culture Machine, 14, 1-17.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. (2020). Shifting dynamics of contention in the digital age: Mobile communication and politics in China. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2019). Audiences in an age of datafication: Critical questions for media research. Television & New Media, 20(2), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418811118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maly, I. (2018, October 28). Algorithmic populism and algorithmic activism. Diggit Magazine. https://www.diggitmagazine.com/articles/algorithmic-populism-activism
   Google Scholar
• Maly, I. (2019). New right metapolitics and the algorithmic activism of Schild & Vrienden. Social Media+ Society, 5(2), 2056305119856700. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119856700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2015). When algorithms shape collective action: Social media and the dynamics of cloud protesting. Social Media+ Society, 1(2), 2056305115622481. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115622481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2017). Data activism as the new frontier of media activism. In V. Pickard & G. Yang (Eds.), Media activism in the digital age (pp. 151–163). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, R., Koltai, K., Grasso, I., Schafer, J., Klentschy, C. (2021) Content moderation avoidance strategies, virality project. https://www.viralityproject.org/rapid-response/content-moderation-avoidance-strategies-used-to-promote-vaccine-hesitant-content
   Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ohlheiser, A. (2020, June 5). How K-pop fans became celebrated online vigilantes, MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/06/05/1002781/kpop-fans-and-black-lives-matter/
   Google Scholar
• Parks, L., & Starosielski, N. (Eds.). (2015). Signal traffic: Critical studies of media infrastructures. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, J. D. (2015). The marvelous clouds: Toward a philosophy of elemental media. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plantin, J. C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816661553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantin, J. C., & Punathambekar, A. (2019). Digital media infrastructures: Pipes, platforms, and politics. Media, Culture & Society, 41(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718818376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfe, B. (2005). Building an electronic repertoire of contention. Social Movement Studies, 4(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830500051945
   Google Scholar
• Romano, A. (2020, June 22) How K-pop fans are weaponizing the internet for black lives matter, Vox.Com. https://www.vox.com/2020/6/8/21279262/k-pop-fans-black-lives-matter-fancams-youtubers-protest-support
   Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E., Isin, E., & Bigo, D. (2017). Data politics. Big Data & Society, 4(2), 2053951717717749. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717717749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, M. (2021 , July 1) Cops are playing music during filmed encounters to game YouTube’s copyright striking. But will it work? Mashable. https://mashable.com/article/police-playing-music-copyright-youtube-recording
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1986). The contentious French: Four centuries of popular struggle. Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2008). Contentious performances. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2010). Regimes and repertoires. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2015). Contentious politics (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tonnesen, N. O. D. (2020). “Two can play at that game”: Communicating dissent as a micro-celebrity in a restricted national twittersphere”. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2020i0.11200
   Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2016). The dark side of digital politics: Understanding the algorithmic manufacturing of consent and the hindering of online dissidence. IDS Bulletin, 47(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2016.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2018). From digital activism to algorithmic resistance. In G. Meikle (Ed.), The Routledge companion to media and activism (pp. 367-375). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid media activism: Ecologies, imaginaries, algorithms. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velkova, J., & Kaun, A. (2021). Algorithmic resistance: Media practices and the politics of repair. Information, Communication & Society, 24(4), 523–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1657162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willson, M. (2017). Algorithms (and the) everyday. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1200645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, S. C., & Tucker, J. A. (2020). Bots and computational propaganda; Automation for communication and control. In N. Persily (Ed.), Social media and democracy (pp. 89–110). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, G. (2016). Narrative agency in hashtag activism: The case of #blacklivesmatter. Media and Communication, 4(4), 13. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v4i4.692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.
   Google Scholar