Achieving Organizationality Through Authorship Affordances — A Communicative Episode of Telegram Polling from 2019 Hong Kong

References

• Ahrne, G., and Brunsson, N. (2011). Organization outside organizations: the significance of partial organization. Organization, 18(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410376256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banjo, S., Lung, N., Lee, A., & Dormido, H. (2019, August 22). How Hong Kong’s leaderless protest army gets things done. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2019-hong-kong-airport-protests/
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa, S., & Milan, S. (2019). Do not harm in private chat apps: Ethical issues for research on and with WhatsApp. Westminster Papers in Communication & Culture, 14(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bencherki, N., & Cooren, F. (2011). Having to be: The possessive constitution of organization. Human Relations, 64(12), 1579–1607. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711424227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit-Barné, C., & Cooren, F. (2009). The accomplishment of authority through presentification: How authority is distributed among and negotiated by organizational members. Management Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909335414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beraldo, D. (2020). Movements as multiplicities and contentious branding: Lessons from the digital exploration of #Occupy and #Anonymous. Information, Communication & Society, 25(8), 1098–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1847164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beraldo, D., & Milan, S. (2019). From data politics to the contentious politics of data. Big Data & Society, 6(2), 205395171988596. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719885967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammaerts, B. (2012). Protest logics and the mediation opportunity structure. European Journal of Communication, 27(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112441007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Bencherki, N., Chaput, M., & Vásquez, C. (2015). The communicative constitution of strategy-making: Exploring fleeting moments of strategy. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of strategy as practice (2nd ed., pp. 365–388). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011). Communication, organizing and organization: An overview and introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611410836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobusch, L., & Schoeneborn, D. (2015). Fluidity, identity, and organizationality: The communicative constitution of Anonymous: Fluidity, identity, and organizationality. Journal of Management Studies, 52(8), 1005–1035. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., & Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective. In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 237–258). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fayard, A.-L., & Weeks, J. (2014). Affordances for practice. Information and Organization, 24(4), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesher Fominaya, C. (2010). Central concepts and debates: Collective identity in social movements. Sociology Compass, 4(6), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00287.x
   Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P., Marogna, F., & Alzetta, C. (2019). When “positive posting” attracts voters: User engagement and emotions in the 2017 UK election campaign on Facebook. Social Media + Society, 5(4), 205630511988169. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119881695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbaudo, P., & Treré, E. (2015). In search of the ‘we’ of social media activism: Introduction to the special issue on social media and protest identities. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 865–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, L. (2002). Social movements, leadership, and democracy: Toward more utopian mistakes. Journal of Women’s History, 14, 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2002.0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420–1443. https://doi.org/10.1086/226707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, C. (2013). Organizing spaces: Meeting arenas as a Social movement infrastructure between organization, network, and institution. Organization Studies, 34(5–6), 705–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613479232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensby, A. (2017). Open networks and secret Facebook groups: exploring cycle effects on activists’ social media use in the 2010/11 UK student protests. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1201421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (1998). The emotions of protest: Affective and reactive emotions in and around social movements. Sociological Forum, 13(3), 397–424. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022175308081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., & Lauriault, T. P. (2015). Small data in the era of big data. GeoJournal, 80(4), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-014-9601-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kow, Y. M., Nardi, B., & Cheng, W. K. (2020). Be water: Technologies in the leaderless anti-ELAB movement in Hong Kong. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. (2020). Solidarity in the anti-extradition bill movement in Hong Kong. Critical Asian Studies, 52(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2020.1700629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F., & Chan J. M. (2016). Digital media activities and mode of participation in a protest campaign: a study of the Umbrella Movement. Information, Communication & Society, 19(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1985). The symbolic challenge of contemporary movements. Social Research, 52(4), 789–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present. Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Hutchinson Radius.
   Google Scholar
• Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes: Collective action in the information age. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2015a). From social movements to cloud protesting: The evolution of collective identity. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan, S. (2015b). When algorithms shape collective action: Social media and the dynamics of cloud protesting. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 205630511562248. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115622481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milan, S., & van der Velden, L. (2016). The Alternative Epistemologies of Data Activism. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2), 57–74.
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S., & Barbosa, S. (2020). Enter the WhatsApper: Reinventing digital activism at the time of chat apps. First Monday, 25(12). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i12.10414
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, A. (2019, August 22). How Hong Kong’s protests are affecting its economy. The Conversation. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0205
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F. (2006). It was like a fever: Storytelling in protest and politics. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon, M., & Kohlberger, M. (2022). Twitter as a leadership actor—A communication as constitutive of organizing perspective on a ‘leaderless’ social movement. Leadership, 18(5), 656–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150221107271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2020). Deplatforming: Following extreme Internet celebrities to telegram and alternative social media. European Journal of Communication, 35(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323120922066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeneborn, D., Kuhn, T. R., & Kärreman, D. (2019). The communicative constitution of organization, organizing, and organizationality. Organization Studies, 40(4), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618782284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R., & Cooren, F. (1997). What makes communication ‘organizational’? Journal of Pragmatics, 27(4), 409–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00044-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting, T. (2020). From ‘be water’ to ‘be fire’: Nascent smart mob and networked protests in Hong Kong. Social Movement Studies, 19(3), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1727736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130
   Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2012). Social movements as information ecologies: Exploring the coevolution of multiple internet technologies for activism. International Journal of Communication, 6(19). https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1681/797
   Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2015). Reclaiming, proclaiming, and maintaining collective identity in the #YoSoy132 movement in Mexico: An examination of digital frontstage and backstage activism through social media and instant messaging platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 18(8), 901–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treré, E. (2020). The banality of WhatsApp: On the everyday politics of backstage activism in Mexico and Spain. First Monday, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i12.10404
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez, C., Bencherki, N., Cooren, F., & Sergi, V. (2018). From ‘matters of concern’ to ‘matters of authority’: Studying the performativity of strategy from a Communicative Constitution of Organization (CCO) approach. Long Range Planning, 51(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, D. (2019, June 30). How apps power Hong Kong’s “leaderless” protests. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-48802125
   Google Scholar
• Weiskopf, R. (2020). Algorithmic decision-making, spectrogenic profiling, and hyper-facticity in the age of post-truth. Le Foucaldien, 6(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.16995/lefou.62
   Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (2012). Narrative tools and the construction of identity. In M. Schultz, S. Maguire, A. Langley, & H. Tsoukas (Eds.), Constructing identity in and around organizations (pp. 128–146). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zammuto, R. F., Griffith, T. L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D. J., & Faraj, S. (2007). Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science, 18(5), 749–762. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar