References
- Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope. Polity.
- Charitsis, V., & Laamanen, M. (2022). When digital capitalism takes (on) the neighbourhood: Data activism meets place-based collective action. Social Movement Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2123314
- Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2016). The mediated construction of reality. Polity.
- Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. (2019). The costs of connection: How data colonizes human life and appropriates it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
- Hayden, T. (Ed.). (2002). The Zapatista reader. Bold Type Books.
- Lash, S. (2007). Power after hegemony: Cultural studies in mutation. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075956
- Li, Y.-T., & Whitworth, K. (2023). Coordinating and doxing data: Hong Kong protesters’ and government supporters’ data strategies in the age of datafication. Social Movement Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2023.2178404
- Marcos, S. (2001). Our word is our weapon. Serpent’s Tail.
- McIlwain, C. (2020). Black software: The internet and racial justice, from the AfroNet to black lives matters. Oxford University Press.
- Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Hutchinson Radius.
- Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging codes. Cambridge University Press.
- Milan, S., Beraldo, D., & Fominaya, C. F. (Eds.). (2024). Contentious data. The shifting space of social movement research in datafied societies. Special issue. Social Movement Studies.
- Milan, S., & Berardo, D. (2024). Data in movement. The social movement society in the age of datafication. Social Movement Studies.
- Muravyov, D. (2022). Doubt to be certain: Epistemological ambiguity of data in the case of grassroots mapping of traffic accidents in Russia. Social Movement Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2128327
- Poon, M. (2024). Achieving organizationality through authorship affordances — a communicative episode of telegram polling from 2019 Hong Kong. Social Movement Studies, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2023.2296868
- Postill, J. (2014). Democracy in an age of viral reality: A media epidemiography of Spain’s indignados movement. Ethnography, 15(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138113502513
- Treré, E., & Bonini, T. (2022). Amplification, evasion, hijacking: Algorithms as repertoire for social movements and the struggle for visibility. Social Movement Studies, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2143345
- Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776
- Wright, J. (2022). “The future of the internet hangs in the balance”: The perception and framing of political opportunity and threat in the contentious politics of data. Social Movement Studies, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2022.2123313
- Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilisation. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5
- Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. Profile Books.