OK Google, help me learn: an exploratory study of voice-activated artificial intelligence in the classroom

References

• Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility! Computers & Education, 166, 104–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation & Accountability (Formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 21(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, B., Menicatti, R., Recchiuto, C. T., Lagrue, E., Pandey, A. K., & Sgorbissa, A. (2018, June). Culturally-competent human-robot verbal interaction. In 2018 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR) (pp. 388–395). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Canbek, N. G., & Mutlu, M. E. (2016). On the track of artificial intelligence: Learning with intelligent personal assistants. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 592. https://doi.org/10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3549
   Google Scholar
• Celik, I. (2023). Towards intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Reforming schools through technology, 1980–2000. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R. O., Park, T., & Vincent, J. (2021). A systematic narrative review of agent persona on learning outcomes and design variables to enhance personification. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 53(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1830894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, T. (2018). Creating an Alexa-enabled textbook exercise: An easy approach to custom automatic speech recognition application. KOTESOL Proceedings, 2018, 259. https://koreatesol.org/content/kotesol-proceedings-2018
   Google Scholar
• Dizon, G. (2017). Using intelligent personal assistants for second language learning: A case study of alexa. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dousay, T. A., & Hall, C. (2018). Alexa, tell me about using a virtual assistant in the classroom [Paper presentation]. Innovate Learning. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eley, E., & Berryman, M. (2019). Leading transformative education reform in New Zealand schools. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-018-0122-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusco, J., Ruiz, P., Narayanan, A. B. L., Pakhira, D., Jackson, T., Glazer, K., Eaglin, P., & Eguchi, A. (2021). School policies for integrating AI in classroom practices. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12265/130
   Google Scholar
• Godhe, A.-L., Lilja, P., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Making sense of making: Critical issues in the integration of maker education into schools. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 28(3), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1610040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, B. (2018). Technology and teacher–student interactions: A review of empirical research. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1450690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2002). The move from page to screen: The multimodal reshaping of school English. Visual Communication, 1(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100203
   Google Scholar
• Kepuska, V., & Bohouta, G. (2018, January). Next-generation of virtual personal assistants (Microsoft Cortana, Apple Siri, Amazon Alexa and Google Home). In 2018 IEEE 8th annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) (pp. 99–103). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, K. (2009). Literacy pedagogical content knowledge in secondary teacher education: Reflecting on oral language and learning across the disciplines. Language and Education, 23(6), 541–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780902822942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2008). Talk and the development of reasoning and understanding. Human Development, 51(1), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1159/000113158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Learning Media.
   Google Scholar
• Moreale, E., & Watt, S. (2003, March). An agent-based approach to mailing list knowledge management. In L. van Elst, V. Dignum & A. Abecker (Eds.), Agent-mediated knowledge management international symposium AMKM 2003 (pp. 118–129). Stanford, CA, USA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Øvereng, L. K. B., & Gamlem, S. M. (2022). Mapping the quality of teacher–pupil interactions in lessons with and without the use of tablets during a typical school day in first grade. Cambridge Journal of Education, 52(4), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2022.2031885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrotta, C., & Selwyn, N. (2020). Deep learning goes to school: Toward a relational understanding of AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1686017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Premo, J., Cavagnetto, A., Collins, L., Davis, W. B., & Offerdahl, E. (2021). Discourse remixed: Shifting science learning through talk. The Journal of Experimental Education, 91(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2021.1993771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, N. L., Adesope, O. O., & Gilbert, R. B. (2013). How effective are pedagogical agents for learning? A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.49.1.a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (1999). Social-self interaction and achievement behavior. Educational Psychologist, 34(4), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep34043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. (2023). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. European Journal of Education, Online first. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slemmer, D. L. (2002). The effect of learning styles on student achievement in various hypertext, hypermedia, and technology-enhanced learning environments: A meta-analysis. Boise State University.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J. (2020). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use. In M. Peters (Eds.). Encyclopedia of teacher education (pp. 1–5). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6111-1
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, J. (2017). Exploring AI language assistants with primary EFL students. In K. Borthwick, L. Bradley, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), CALL in a climate of change: adapting to turbulent global conditions – short papers from EUROCALL 2017 (pp. 317–321). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2017.eurocall2017.733
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, J. (2021). Speaking to machines: Motivating speaking through oral interaction with intelligent assistants. In T. Beaven & F. Rosell-Aguilar (Eds.), Innovative language pedagogy report (pp. 127–132). Researchpublishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.50.1247
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education (Vol. 45). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar