Objective identification of Lepidocyclina (Foraminifera) species from the Eocene of Cuba based on growth-invariant morphometric characters

References

• Adams, C. G. (1983). Speciation, phylogenesis, tectonism, climate and eustasy: factors in the evolution of Cenozoic larger foraminiferal bioprovinces. The Emergence of the Biosphere: Systematic Association, 23, 255–289.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C. G. (1987). On the classification of the Lepidocyclinidae (Foraminiferida) with redescriptions of the unrelated Paleocene genera Actinosiphon and Orbitosiphon. Micropaleontology, 33, 289–317. https://doi.org/10.2307/1485571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnini, C., Fornaciari, E., Raffi, I., Catanzariti, R., Pälike, H., Backman, J., & Rio, D. (2014). Biozonation and biochronology of Paleogene calcareous nannofossils from low and middle latitudes. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 47(2), 131–181. https://doi.org/10.1127/0078-0421/2014/0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetti, A., Di Carlo, M., & Pignatti, J. (2010). Embryo size variation in larger foraminiferal lineages: stratigraphy versus paleoecology in Nephrolepidina praemarginata (R. Douvillé, 1908) from the Majella Mt. (Central Apennines). Journal of Mediterranean Earth Sciences, 2, 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Benedetti, A. & Pignatti, J. (2013). Conflicting evolutionary and biostratigraphical trends in Nephrolepidina praemarginata (Douvillé, 1908) (Foraminiferida). Historical Biology, 25, 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2012.713949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetti, A. & Schiavinotto, F. (2023). Evolutionary trends in the Mediterranean Nephrolepidina: new chronosubspecies and biostratigraphic constraints. Historical Biology, 35(4), 518–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2022.2054711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggren, W. A., Kent, D. V., Swisher III, C. C., & Aubry, M. P. (1995). A revised Cenozoic geochronology and chronostratigraphy. Geocronology Timescales and Global Stratigraphic Correlation, SEPM Special Publication, 54, 129–212.
   Google Scholar
• BouDagher-Fadel M. K., & Price, G. D. (2010). Evolution and paleogeographic distribution of the lepidocyclinids. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 40, 79–108. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.40.1.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brönnimann, P., & Rigassi, D. (1963). Contribution to the geology and paleontology of the area of the city of La Habana, Cuba, and its surroundings. Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 56(1), 193–480.
   Google Scholar
• Butterlin, J. (1981). Claves para la determinación de macroforaminíferos de México y del Caribe, del Cretácico Superior al Mioceno Medio. Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo.
   Google Scholar
• Butterlin, J. (1987). Origine et évolution des Lépidocyclines de la région des Caraıbes. Comparaisons et relations avec les Lépidocyclines des autres regions du Monde. Revue de Micropaléontologie, 29, 203–219.
   Google Scholar
• Caudri, C. M. B. (1996). The larger Foraminifera of Trinidad (West Indies). Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae, 89(3), 1137–1310.
   Google Scholar
• Chaproniere, G. C. H. (1980). Biometrical studies of early Neogene larger Foraminiferida from Australia and New Zealand. Alcheringa, 4, 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/03115518008618929
   Google Scholar
• Cole, W. S. (1941). Stratigraphic and paleontologic studies of wells in Florida. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin, 19, 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, W. S. (1944). Stratigraphic and paleontologic studies of wells in Florida No. 3. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin, 29, 1–168.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, W. S. (1945). Stratigraphic and paleontologic studies of wells in Florida No. 4. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin, 28, 1–160.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, W. S. (1952). Eocene and Oligocene larger foraminifera from the Panama Canal Zone and vicinity. US Geological Survey Professional Paper, 244, 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, W. S. (1956). Jamaican larger Foraminifera. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 36, 203–233.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, W. S. (1960). Variability in embryonic chambers of Lepidocyclina. Micropaleontology, 6, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.2307/1484465
   Google Scholar
• Cole, W. S. (1963). Illustrations of the conflicting interpretations of the biology and classification of certain larger Foraminifera. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 46, 6–63.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, W. S., & Ponton, G. M. (1934). New species of Fabularia, Asterocyclina, and Lepidocyclina from the Florida Eocene. American Midland Naturalist, 15(2), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/2420242
   Google Scholar
• Coletti, G., Bosio, G., Collareta, A., Malinverno, E., Bracchi, V. A., Di Celma, C., Basso, D., Stainbank, S., Spezzaferri, S., Cannings, T. & Bianucci, G. (2019). Biostratigraphic, evolutionary, and paleoenvironmental significance of the southernmost lepidocyclinids of the Pacific coast of South America (East Pisco Basin, southern Peru). Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 96, 102372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2019.102372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushman, J. A. (1918). The larger fossil foraminifera of the Panama Canal Zone. Bulletin of the US National Museum, 103, 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Cushman, J. A. (1920). The American species of Orthophragmina and Lepidocyclina. USGS Professional Paper, 125-D, 39–105.
   Google Scholar
• de Mello e Sousa, S. H., Fairchild, T. R., & Tibana, P. (2003). Cenozoic biostratigraphy of larger foraminifera from the Foz do Amazonas basin, Brazil. Micropaleontology, 49(3), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.2113/49.3.253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douvillé, H. (1917). Les Orbitoides de l'Ile de la Trinité. Comptes Rendus hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, 164, 841–849.
   Google Scholar
• Drooger, C. W. (1993). Radial Foraminifera; morphometrics and evolution: Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen. Afdeeling Natuurkunde. Eerste Reeks, 41, 1–242.
   Google Scholar
• Drooger, C. W., & Freudenthal, T. (1964). Associations of Miogypsina and Lepidocyclina at some European localities. Eclogae geologica helvetica, 57, 509–528.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, O. J. (1964). Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics, 6, 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eames, F. E., Banner, F. T., Blow, W. H., & Clarke, W. J. (1962). Fundamentals of mid-Tertiary stratigraphical correlation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x
   Google Scholar
• Frost, S. H., & Langenheim, R. L. (1974). Cenozoic reef biofacies. Tertiary larger foraminifera and scleractinian corals from Chiapas, Mexico. Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalb.
   Google Scholar
• García-Delgado, D., & Torres-Silva, A. I. (1997). Sistema Paleógeno. In K. E. Nuñez & G. F. Furrazola-Bermúdez (Eds.), Estudios sobre Geología de Cuba (pp. 115–140). Centro Nacional de Información Geológica.
   Google Scholar
• Grimsdale, T. F. (1959). Evolution in the American Lepidocyclinidae (Cainozoic Foraminifera): An interim view. Proceedings Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam, Series B, 62, 8–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gümbel, C. W. (1868). Beiträge zur Foraminiferenfauna der Nordalpinen Eocängebilde. Abhandlungen der Mathematisch-Physicalischen Classe der Koniglich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 10, 581–730.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, Ø. (2021). PAST. Paleontological Statistics (Version 4.06). Natural History Museum, University Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Hohenegger, J. (2011). Growth-invariant meristic characters tools to reveal phylogenetic relationships in Nummulitidae (Foraminifera). Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences, 20(6), 655–681. https://doi.org/10.3906/yer-0910-43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenegger, J. (2014). Species as the basic units in evolution and biodiversity: Recognition of species in the Recent and geological past as exemplified by larger foraminifera. Gondwana Research, 25(2), 707–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2013.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenegger, J., & Torres-Silva, A. I. (2017). Growth-invariant and growth-independent characters in equatorial sections of Heterostegina shells relieve phylogenetic and paleobiogeographic interpretations. Palaios, 32(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.2110/palo.2015.092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenegger, J., & Torres-Silva, A. I. (2020). Methods for testing ontogenetic changes of neanic chamberlets in lepidocyclinids. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 50(2), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsjfr.50.2.182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohenegger, J., Torres-Silva, A. I., & Eder, W. (2022). Interpreting morphologically homogeneous (Paleo-)populations as ecological species enables comparison of living and fossil organism groups, exemplified by nummulitid foraminifera. Journal of Earth Science, 33, 1362–1377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-021-1567-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H. (1933). Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24, 417–441, 498–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0070888
   Google Scholar
• Hottinger, L. (1997). Shallow benthic foraminiferal assemblages as signals for depth of their deposition and their limitations. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France, 168(4), 491–505.
   Google Scholar
• Hottinger, L. (1998). Shallow benthic foraminifera at the Paleocene-Eocene boundary. Strata, 9, 61–64.
   Google Scholar
• Iturralde‐Vinent, M. A. (1994). Cuban geology: a new plate‐tectonic synthesis. Journal of Petroleum Geology, 17(1), 39–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-5457.1994.tb00113.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iturralde‐Vinent, M. A. (1995). Cuencas sedimentarias del Paleoceno-Eoceno de Cuba. Boletín de la Sociedad Venezolana de Geología, 20(1–2), 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kantshev, I., Boyanov, I., Popov, N., Cabrera, R., Goranov, A., Iolkicev, I., Kanszirski, M., & Stancheva, M. (1976). Geología de la provincia de Las Villas. Resultado de las investigaciones y levantamiento geológico a escala, 1:250 000 [Unpublished report]. Academia de Ciencias de Cuba y Bulgaria, Instituto de Geología y Paleontología.
   Google Scholar
• Less, G., Frijia, G., Özcan, E., Saraswati, P. K., Parente, M., & Kumar, P. (2018). Nummulitids, lepidocyclinids and Sr-isotope data from the Oligocene of Kutch (western India) with chronostratigraphic and paleobiogeographic evaluations. Geodinamica Acta, 30, 183–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/09853111.2018.1465214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locker, S. (1967). Neue Coccolithophoriden (Flagellata) aus dem Alttertiär Norddeutschlands. Geologie, 16, 361–364.
   Google Scholar
• Martini, E. (1971). Standard Tertiary and Quaternary calcareous nannoplankton zonation. In A. Farinacci (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second Planktonic Conference, Roma 1970 (pp. 739–785). Tecnoscienza.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. F., Robinson, E., Özcan, E., Jiang, M. M., & Robinson, N. (2022). A larger benthic foraminiferal zonation for the Eocene of the Caribbean and Central American region. Carnets de Géologie, 22(11), 409–565. https://doi.org/10.2110/carnets.2022.2211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, E., Torres-Silva, A. I., Ćorić, S., & Briguglio, A. (2016). Integrated biostratigraphy across the Eocene/Oligocene boundary at Noroña, Cuba, and the question of the extinction of orthophragminids. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 49(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1127/nos/2015/0069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton S. G. (1833). Supplement to the "Synopsis of the organic remains of the ferruginous sand formation of the United States," contained in vols. XVII and XVIII of this journal. American Journal of Science and Arts, 23, 288–294.
   Google Scholar
• Orue-Etxebarria, X., Pujalte, V., Bernola, G., Apellaniz, E., Baceta, J. I., Payros, A., & Tosquella, J. (2001). Did the Late Paleocene thermal maximum affect the evolution of larger foraminifers? Evidence from calcareous plankton of the Campo Section (Pyrenees, Spain). Marine Micropaleontology, 41(1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8398(00)00052-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. N., Olsson, R. K., Huber, B. T., Hemleben C., & Breggren, W. A. (Eds.). (2006). Atlas of Eocene planktonic Foraminifera. Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication, 41, 513 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, E. (1996). Using larger foraminifers in high resolution biostratigraphy: an example from the Eocene of the Gulf of Mexico and northern Caribbean. Palaios, 11(3), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.2307/3515231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, E. (2004). Zoning the White Limestone Group of Jamaica using larger foraminiferal genera: a review and proposal. In S. K. Donovan (Ed.), The Mid-Cainozoic White Limestone Group of Jamaica (pp. 39–75) Cainozoic Research, 3(1–2).
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, E., & Wright, R. M. (1993). Jamaican Paleogene larger foraminifera. In R. M. Wright & E. Robinson (Eds.), Biostratigraphy of Jamaica (pp. 283–345). Geological Society of America Memoir.
   Google Scholar
• Saraswati, P. K. (1994). Biometric study of Lepidocyclina (Nephrolepidina) from Kutch, Saurashtra and Quilon (India). Geological Society of India, 44, 79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraswati, P. K. (1995). Biometry of early Oligocene Lepidocyclina from Kutch, India. Marine Micropaleontology, 26, 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8398(95)00018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheibner, C., Speijer, R. P., & Marzouk, A. M. (2005). Turnover of larger foraminifera during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum and paleoclimatic control on the evolution of platform ecosystems. Geology, 33, 493–496. https://doi.org/10.1130/G21237.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavinotto, F. (1994a). Biometry of the neanic stage of Upper Chattian Nephrolepidina morgani (Lemoine & R. Douvillé). Geologica Romana, 29, 291–306.
   Google Scholar
• Schiavinotto, F. (1994b). Neanic state biometry in Nephrolepidina praemarginata (R. Douvillé, 908). Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana, 112, 805–824.
   Google Scholar
• Schiavinotto, F. (2010). Neanic stage biometry in Nephrolepidina from the upper Oligocene of lonedo (lugo di Vicenza–northern Italy). Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 49, 173–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavinotto, F. (2016). Neanic acceleration in Nephrolepidina from the Oligo-Miocene Mt. Torretta section (L’Aquila, central Apennines): biometric results and evolutionary, taxonomic and biostratigraphic remarks. Journal of Mediterranean Earth Sciences, 8, 63–87.
   Google Scholar
• Schiavinotto, F., & Benedetti, A. (2022). Nephrolepidina and unispiralled Miogypsinidae from the Oligo-Miocene toe-of-slope succession of Gran Sasso (L'Aquila, Central Apennines-Italy): biometric and evolutionary remarks. Micropaleontology, 67(5), 483–514. https://doi.org/10.47894/mpal.67.5.04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra-Kiel, J., Hottinger, L., Caus, E., Drobne, K., Ferrández, C., Jauhri, A. K., Less, G., Pavlovec, R., Pignatti, J., Samso, J. M., Schaub, H., Sirel, E., Strougo, A., Tambareau, Y., Tosquella, J., & Zakrevskaya, E. (1998). Larger foraminiferal biostratigraphy of the Tethyan Paleocene and Eocene. Bulletin de la Société géologique de France, 169(2), 281–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirotti, A. (1982). Phylogenetic classification of Lepidocyclinidae: a proposal. Bollettino della Societa Paleontologica Italiana, 21, 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S. H. (1936). Lepidocyclina zeijlmansi nov. sp., eine poly-lepidine Orbitoidide von Zentral-Borneo, nebst Bemerkungen über die verschiedenen Einteilungsweisen der Lepidocyclinen. Ingenieur in Nederlandsch-Indie, Mijnbouw en Geologie, 1, 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Silva, A. I., Hohenegger, J., Ćorić, S., Briguglio, A., & Eder, W. (2017). Biostratigraphy and evolutionary tendencies of Eocene heterostegines in Western and Central Cuba based on morphometric analyses. Palaios, 32(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.2110/palo.2016.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Silva, A. I., Eder, W., Hohenegger, J., & Briguglio, A. (2019). Morphometric analysis of Eocene nummulitids in western and central Cuba: taxonomy, biostratigraphy and evolutionary. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 17(7), 557–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2018.1446462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vlerk, I. M. (1959). Problems and principles of Tertiary and Quaternary stratigraphy: Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 115, 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.JGS.1959.115.01.04
   Google Scholar
• Van der Vlerk, I. M. (1963). Biometric research on Lepidocyclina. Micropaleontology, 9, 425–426. https://doi.org/10.2307/1484502
   Google Scholar
• Van Wessen, E. J. (1978). Study of Lepidocyclinidae from South-East Asia, particularly from Java and Borneo. Utrecht Micropalaeontological Bullettin, 19, 1–163.
   Google Scholar
• Varol, O. (1989). Palaeocene calcareous nannofossil biostratigraphy. In J. Crux & S. van Veck (Eds.), Nannofossils and their applications (pp. 267–310). Ellis Horwood.
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan, T. W., & Cole, W. S. (1941). Preliminary report on the Cretaceous and Tertiary larger foraminifera of Trinidad British West Indies. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 30, 1–137.
   Google Scholar
• Ward Jr., J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar