Translation as meaning-construction under co-textual and contextual constraints: A model for a material approach to translation

References

• Armstrong, Guyda. 2016. “Response by Armstrong to ‘Translation and the Materialities of Communication’.” Translation Studies 9 (1): 102–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bassnett, Susan, and David Johnston. 2019. “The Outward Turn in Translation Studies.” The Translator 25 (3): 181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateman, John A, Janina Wildfeuer, and Tuomo Hiippala. 2017. Multimodality: Foundations, Research and Analysis. A Problem-Oriented Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Karen. 2018. “Translation and the Desacralization of the Western World: From Performativity to Representation.” Alif 38: 91–120.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Karen. 2019. “The New Iconicity: Challenges for Translation Theory and Practice.” Translation Matters 1 (2): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Blumczynski, Piotr. 2016. Ubiquitous Translation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bohm, David. 1980. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chesterman, Andrew. 2017. Reflections on Translation Theory: Selected Papers 1993–2014. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Andy, and David Chalmers. 1998. “The Extended Mind.” Analysis 58 (1): 7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coldiron, A. E. B. 2016. “Response by Coldiron to ‘Translation and the Materialities of Communication’.” Translation Studies 9 (1): 96–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentzler, Edwin. 2017. Translation and Rewriting in the Age of Post-Translation Studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gorlée, Dinda L. 1994. Semiotics and the Problem of Translation: with Special Reference to the Semiotics of Charles S. Peirce. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 2004. Production of Presence. What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haapaniemi, Riku, and Emma Laakkonen. 2019. “The Materiality of Music: Interplay of Lyrics and Melody in Song Translation.” Translation Matters 1 (2): 62–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hartama-Heinonen, Ritva. 2013. “Semiotico-translation-theoretical Reverberations Revisited.” Sign Systems Studies 40 (3-4): 299–318.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke, and Fabio Alves. 2021. “Introduction.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited by Fabio Alves, and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, 1–21. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. 1959. “On Linguistic Aspects of Translation.” In On Translation, edited by Reuben A. Brower, 232–239. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Littau, Karin. 2016. “Translation and the Materialities of Communication.” Translation Studies 9 (1): 82–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marais, Kobus. 2019. A (Bio)Semiotic Theory of Translation: The Emergence of Social-Cultural Reality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merrell, Floyd. 2000. Change through Signs of Body, Mind and Language. Prospect Heights: Waveland.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1994. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Charlottesville: Intelex.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, Anders. 2017. The Idea of a Text and the Nature of Textual Meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Pym, Anthony. 1992. “The Relations between Translation and Material Text Transfer.” Target 4 (2): 171–189.
   Google Scholar
• Pym, Anthony. 2004. The Moving Text: Localization, Translation, and Distribution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Reiß, Katharina, and Hans J Vermeer. 2013. Towards a General Theory of Translational Action: Skopos Theory Explained. Translated by Christiane Nord. Manchester: St. Jerome.
   Google Scholar
• Risku, Hanna, and Regina Rogl. 2021. “Translation and Situated, Embodied, Distributed, Embedded and Extended Cognition.” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited by Fabio Alves, and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, 478–499. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Douglas. 2016. Semiotranslating Peirce. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sealey, Alison. 2019. “Translation.” Target 31 (3): 305–327.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, Naomi. 2006. Faithful Renderings: Jewish-Christian Difference and the Politics of Translation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Short, T. L. 2007. Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, George. 1975. After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Susam-Saraeva, Şebnem. 2021. “Representing Experiential Knowledge: Who May Translate Whom?” Translation Studies 14 (1): 84–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tietze, Susanne, Rebecca Piekkari, and Kaisa Koskinen. 2022. “Translation Approaches within Organisation Studies.” In Translation beyond Translation Studies, edited by Kobus Marais, 119–139. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• TRANSLATA. 2021. “4th International Conference on Translation and Interpreting Studies: Future Perspectives in Translation and Interpreting Studies.” Call for Papers. University of Innsbruck, 20–22 September 2021. https://www.uibk.ac.at/translation/translata-2021/index.html.en.
   Google Scholar
• Zwischenberger, Cornelia. 2019. “From Inward to Outward: The Need for Translation Studies to Become Outward-Going.” The Translator 25 (3): 256–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar