Effects of trust and perceived benefits on consumer adoption of smart grid technologies: a mediation analysis

References

• Ajzen, I. 2001. “Nature and Operation of Attitudes.” Annual Review of Psychology 52: 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arfi, W. B., I. B. Nasr, G. Kondrateva, and L. Hikkerova. 2021. “The Role of Trust in Intention to Use the Iot in Ehealth: Application of the Modified Utaut in a Consumer Context.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 167: 120688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, C. J., and M. Conner. 2001. “Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A Meta-Analytic Review.” British Journal of Social Psychology 40: 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcombe, P., D. Rigby, and A. Azapagic. 2013. “Motivations and Barriers Associated with Adopting Microgeneration Energy Technologies in the UK.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 22: 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balta-Ozkan, N., R. Davidson, M. Bicket, and L. Whitmarsh. 2013. “Social Barriers to the Adoption of Smart Homes.” Energy Policy 63: 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1991. “Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigerna, S., C. A. Bollino, and S. Micheli. 2016. “Socio-economic Acceptability for Smart Grid Development - A Comprehensive Review.” Journal of Cleaner Production 131: 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolle, F., and P. E. Otto. 2010. “A Price Is a Signal: On Intrinsic Motivation, Crowding-Out, and Crowding-In.” Kyklos 63: 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2010.00458.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfman, N. C., and E. L. Vázquez. 2011. “A Cross-Cultural Study of Perceived Benefit Versus Risk as Mediators in the Trust-Acceptance Relationship.” Risk Analysis 31: 1919–1934. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01637.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfman, N. C., E. L. Vazquez, V. V. Gutierrez, and L. A. Cifuentes. 2008. “Trust, Acceptance and Knowledge of Technological and Environmental Hazards in Chile.” Journal of Risk Research 11: 755–773. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870801967184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-S., C.-L. Lin, and C.-H. Chang. 2014. “The Influence of Greenwash on Green Word-of-Mouth (Green WOM): The Mediation Effects of Green Perceived Quality and Green Satisfaction.” Quality and Quantity 48: 2411–2425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9898-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-S., C.-Y. Lin, and C.-S. Weng. 2015. “The Influence of Environmental Friendliness on Green Trust: The Mediation Effects of Green Satisfaction and Green Perceived Quality.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 7: 10135–10152. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-F., X. Xu, J. Adams, J. Brannon, F. Li, and A. Walzem. 2020. “When East Meets West: Understanding Residents’ Home Energy Management System Adoption Intention and Willingness to Pay in Japan and the United States.” Energy Research and Social Science 69: 101616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.-F., X. Xu, and L. Arpan. 2017. “Between the Technology Acceptance Model and Sustainable Energy Technology Acceptance Model: Investigating Smart Meter Acceptance in the United States.” Energy Research and Social Science 25: 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. H., F. Friis, S. Bettin, W. Throndsen, M. Ornetzeder, T. M. Skjølsvold, and M. Ryghaug. 2020. “The Role of Competences, Engagement, and Devices in Configuring the Impact of Prices in Energy Demand Response: Findings from Three Smart Energy Pilots with Households.” Energy Policy 137: 111142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claudy, M. C., M. Peterson, and A. O’Driscoll. 2013. “Understanding the Attitude-Behavior Gap for Renewable Energy Systems Using Behavioral Reasoning Theory.” Journal of Macromarketing 33: 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146713481605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cologna, V., and M. Siegrist. 2020. “The Role of Trust for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Behaviour: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 69: 101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consumer Electronics Association (CEA). 2011. Unlocking the Potential of the Smart Grid – A Regulatory Framework for the Consumer Domain of Smart Grid.
   Google Scholar
• Costa-Font, M., J. M. Gil, and W. B. Traill. 2008. “Consumer Acceptance, Valuation of and Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Food: Review and Implications for Food Policy.” Food Policy 33: 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby, S. J. 2020. “Demand Response and Smart Technology in Theory and Practice: Customer Experiences and System Actors.” Energy Policy 143: 111573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darby, S. J., C. Liddell, D. Hills, and D. Drabble. 2015. Smart Metering Early Learning Project: Synthesis Report. London: Department of Energy and Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1989. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology.” MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems 13: 319–339. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruin, E. N. M., and P. A. M. Van Lange. 1999a. “The Double Meaning of a Single Act: Influences of the Perceiver and the Perceived on Cooperative Behaviour.” European Journal of Personality 13: 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199905/06)13:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruin, E. N. M., and P. A. M. Van Lange. 1999b. “Impression Formation and Cooperative Behavior.” European Journal of Social Psychology 29: 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruin, E. N. M., and P. A. M. Van Lange. 2000. “What People Look for in Others: Influences of the Perceiver and the Perceived on Information Selection.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26: 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200264007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Freitas Netto, S. V., M. F. F. Sobral, A. R. B. Ribeiro, and G. R. L. Soares. 2020. “Concepts and Forms of Greenwashing: A Systematic Review.” Environmental Sciences Europe 32: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-0300-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delmas, M. A., and V. C. Burbano. 2011. “The Drivers of Greenwashing.” California Management Review 54: 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dileep, G. 2020. “A Survey on Smart Grid Technologies and Applications.” Renewable Energy 146: 2589–2625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.08.092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPersio, T., N. Liedtke, A. Rosenthal, A. Wallace, A. Morris, I. Bar-On, S. Halasah, and T. Abu Hamed. 2020. “Photovoltaic Technology in Southern Arava of Israel: An Analysis of Public Acceptance.” International Journal of Sustainable Energy 40: 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2020.1794865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, T. J., T. Baguley, and V. Brunsden. 2014. “From Alpha to Omega: A Practical Solution to the Pervasive Problem of Internal Consistency Estimation.” British Journal of Psychology 105: 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, T. C., and M. Siegrist. 2006. “Morality Information, Performance Information, and the Distinction Between Trust and Confidence.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 36: 383–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00012.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiser, J. R., S. Miles, and L. J. Frewer. 2002. “Trust, Perceived Risk, and Attitudes Toward Food Technologies.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32: 2423–2433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01871.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Communication from the Commission. Delivering the Internal Electricity Market and Making the Most of Public Intervention.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. Demand Response Status in Eu Member States.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. Annex to the Commission Recommendation on Energy Efficiency First: From Principles to Practice. Guidelines and Examples for Its Implementation in Decision-Making in the Energy Sector and Beyond.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2022a. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: REPowerEU Plan.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2022b. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Eu Solar Energy Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2024. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Securing our Future. Europe’s 2040 Climate Target and Path to Climate Neutrality by 2050 Building a Sustainable, Just and Prosperous Society.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliamentary Research Service. 2022. Energy Poverty in the EU.
   Google Scholar
• Fairchild, A. J., and H. L. McDaniel. 2017. “Best (but Oft-Forgotten) Practices: Mediation Analysis.” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 105: 1259–1271. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.117.152546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board on Research Integrity (TENK). 2019. The Ethical Principles of Research with Human Participants and Ethical Review In the Human Sciences in Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, J., C. Hirt, D. Bidwell, M. Gardner, and J. Dwyer. 2020. “Faring Well in Offshore Wind Power Siting? Trust, Engagement and Process Fairness in the United States.” Energy Research and Social Science 62: 101393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 2009. Predicting and Changing Behavior : The Reasoned Action Approach. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, J., V. Lushin, and D. Mandell. 2020. “Predicting Implementation: Comparing Validated Measures of Intention and Assessing the Role of Motivation When Designing Behavioral Interventions.” Implementation science communications 1: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00050-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flora, D. B. 2020. “Your Coefficient Alpha Is Probably Wrong, but Which Coefficient Omega Is Right? A Tutorial on Using R to Obtain Better Reliability Estimates.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 3: 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920951747.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, G., and R. Connolly. 2018. “Mobile Health Technology Adoption Across Generations: Narrowing the Digital Divide.” Information Systems Journal 28: 995–1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen, A., and R. Meyer. 2010. “Environmental Attitudes in Cross-National Perspective: A Multilevel Analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000.” European Sociological Review 26: 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frewer, L., J. Lassen, B. Kettlitz, J. Scholderer, V. Beekman, and K. G. Berdal. 2004. “Societal Aspects of Genetically Modified Foods.” Food and Chemical Toxicology 42: 1181–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2004.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S., and R. Jegen. 2001. “Motivation Crowding Theory.” Journal of Economic Surveys 15: 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, Y., H. Li, and Y. Luo. 2015. “An Empirical Study of Wearable Technology Acceptance in Healthcare.” Industrial Management and Data Systems 115: 1704–1723. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., E. Karahanna, and D. W. Straub. 2003. “Trust and Tam in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model.” MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems 27: 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerpott, T. J., and M. Paukert. 2013. “Determinants of Willingness to Pay for Smart Meters: An Empirical Analysis of Household Customers in Germany.” Energy Policy 61: 483–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R., and A. Nilsson. 2014. “Personal and Social Factors That Influence pro-Environmental Concern and Behaviour: A Review.” International Journal of Psychology 49: 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M. R. 2014. “Energy Policy and Research: The Underappreciation of Trust.” Energy Research and Social Science 1: 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.004.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., J. A. Kopec, J. Cibere, L. C. Li, and C. H. Goldsmith. 2016. “Population Survey Features and Response Rates: A Randomized Experiment.” American Journal of Public Health 106: 1422–1426. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handgraaf, M. J. J., M. A. V. L. Jeude, and K. C. de Appelt. 2013. “Public Praise Vs. Private Pay: Effects of Rewards on Energy Conservation in the Workplace.” Ecological Economics 86: 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.11.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T., C. Wilson, and R. Hauxwell-Baldwin. 2018. “Learning to Live in a Smart Home.” Building Research and Information 46: 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2017.1286882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., and M. Scharkow. 2013. “The Relative Trustworthiness of Inferential Tests of the Indirect Effect in Statistical Mediation Analysis: Does Method Really Matter?” Psychological Science 24: 1918–1927. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. L., T. P. Novak, and M. Peralta. 1999. “Building Consumer Trust Online.” Communications of the ACM 42: 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/299157.299175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijts, N. M. A., E. J. E. Molin, and L. Steg. 2012. “Psychological Factors Influencing Sustainable Energy Technology Acceptance: A Review-Based Comprehensive Framework.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16: 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijts, N. M. A., E. J. E. Molin, and B. van Wee. 2014. “Hydrogen Fuel Station Acceptance: A Structural Equation Model Based on the Technology Acceptance Framework.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 38: 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijts, N. M. A., and B. Van Wee. 2015. “The Evaluation of Hydrogen Fuel Stations by Citizens: The Interrelated Effects of Socio-Demographic, Spatial and Psychological Variables.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 40: 10367–10381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianole-Călin, R., and E. Druică. 2022. “A Risk Integrated Technology Acceptance Perspective on the Intention to use Smart Grid Technologies in Residential Electricity Consumption.” Journal of Cleaner Production 370: 133436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency (IEA). 2023. Renewables 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Jager, W. 2006. “Stimulating the Diffusion of Photovoltaic Systems: A Behavioural Perspective.” Energy Policy 34: 1935–1943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabeyi, M. J. B., and O. A. Olanrewaju. 2023. “Smart Grid Technologies and Application in the Sustainable Energy Transition: A Review.” International Journal of Sustainable Energy 42: 685–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2023.2222298.
   Google Scholar
• Kahma, N., and K. Matschoss. 2017. “The Rejection of Innovations? Rethinking Technology Diffusion and the Non-Use of Smart Energy Services in Finland.” Energy Research and Social Science 34: 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalkbrenner, B. J., and J. Roosen. 2016. “Citizens’ Willingness to Participate in Local Renewable Energy Projects: The Role of Community and Trust in Germany.” Energy Research and Social Science 13: 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahoca, A., D. Karahoca, and M. Aksöz. 2018. “Examining Intention to Adopt to Internet of Things in Healthcare Technology Products.” Kybernetes 47: 742–770. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2017-0045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjalainen, S. 2013. “Should It Be Automatic or Manual - the Occupant’s Perspective on the Design of Domestic Control Systems.” Energy and Buildings 65: 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, K., and S. Pornprasertmanit. 2016. “Confidence Intervals for Population Reliability Coefficients: Evaluation of Methods, Recommendations, and Software for Composite Measures.” Psychological Methods 21: 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, P. H., D. L. Ferrin, C. D. Cooper, and K. T. Dirks. 2004. “Removing the Shadow of Suspicion: The Effects of Apology Versus Denial for Repairing Competence- Versus Integrity-Based Trust Violations.” Journal of Applied Psychology 89: 104–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2016. “Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling.” In Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 4th ed., edited by D. A. Kenny and T. D. Little, 1–534. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kobus, C. B. A., E. A. M. Klaassen, R. Mugge, and J. P. L. Schoormans. 2015. “A Real-Life Assessment on the Effect of Smart Appliances for Shifting Households’ Electricity Demand.” Applied Energy 147: 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock, N., and G. S. Lynn. 2012. “Lateral Collinearity and Misleading Results in Variance-Based SEM: An Illustration and Recommendations.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 13: 546–580. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenheer, J., M. Nooij, and O. de Sheikh. 2011. “Own Power: Motives of Having Electricity Without the Energy Company.” Energy Policy 39: 5621–5629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., D. J. McAllister, and R. I. Bies. 1998. “Trust and Distrust: New Relationships and Realities.” Academy of Management Review 23: 438–458. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., T. Yigitcanlar, I. Erol, and A. Liu. 2021. “Motivations, Barriers and Risks of Smart Home Adoption: From Systematic Literature Review to Conceptual Framework.” Energy Research and Social Science 80: 102211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lineweber, D. C. 2011. “Understanding Residential Customer Support for - and Opposition to - Smart Grid Investments.” Electricity Journal 24: 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2011.09.005.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., T. Bouman, G. Perlaviciute, and L. Steg. 2020. “Effects of Competence- and Integrity-Based Trust on Public Acceptability of Renewable Energy Projects in China and the Netherlands.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 67: 101390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luarn, P., and H.-H. Lin. 2005. “Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use Mobile Banking.” Computers in Human Behavior 21: 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, T. P., and A. W. Montgomery. 2015. “The Means and End of Greenwash.” Organization and Environment 28: 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahardika, H., D. Thomas, M. T. Ewing, and A. Japutra. 2020. “Comparing the Temporal Stability of Behavioural Expectation and Behavioural Intention in the Prediction of Consumers pro-Environmental Behaviour.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 54: 101943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marikyan, D., S. Papagiannidis, and E. Alamanos. 2019. “A Systematic Review of the Smart Home Literature: A User Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 138: 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martijn, C., R. Spears, J. V. D. Pligt, and E. Jakobs. 1992. “Negativity and Positivity Effects in Person Perception and Inference: Ability Versus Morality.” European Journal of Social Psychology 22: 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman. 1995. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” Academy of Management Review 20: 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. 1999. Test Theory: A Unified Approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mi, L., X. Gan, Y. Sun, T. Lv, L. Qiao, and T. Xu. 2021. “Effects of Monetary and Nonmonetary Interventions on Energy Conservation: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 149: 111342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midden, C. J. H., and N. M. A. Huijts. 2009. “The Role of Trust in the Affective Evaluation of Novel Risks: The Case of Co2 Storage.” Risk Analysis 29: 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01201.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti, M., S. N. Djomo, H. Azadi, K. May, K. De Vos, S. Van Passel, and N. Witters. 2017. “A Systematic Review of Environmental and Economic Impacts of Smart Grids.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68: 888–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, R., K. Letheren, R. McAndrew, C. Glavas, and R. Russell-Bennett. 2019. “Are Households Ready to Engage with Smart Home Technology?” Journal of Marketing Management 35: 1370–1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1680568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, K. R., L. A. Reisch, and J. Thøgersen. 2016. “Sustainable User Innovation from a Policy Perspective: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Cleaner Production 133: 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Data Protection Ombudsman, 2023. Data Protection Act.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish, B., P. Heptonstall, R. Gross, and B. K. Sovacool. 2020. “A Systematic Review of Motivations, Enablers and Barriers for Consumer Engagement with Residential Demand Response.” Energy Policy 138: 111221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., and A. F. Hayes. 2008. “Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models.” Behavior Research Methods 40: 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, D. M., and J. A. Wolff. 1994. “The Time Interval in the Intention-Behaviour Relationship: Meta-Analysis.” British Journal of Social Psychology 33: 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01037.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., W. E. Bonifay, and M. G. Haviland. 2013. “Scoring and Modeling Psychological Measures in the Presence of Multidimensionality.” Journal of Personality Assessment 95: 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W., and R. E. Zinbarg. 2009. “Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the Glb: Comments on Sijtsma.” Psychometrika 74: 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesz, J., and M. Milligan. 2015. “Designing Electricity Markets for a High Penetration of Variable Renewables.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment 4: 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittase, M., E. Kirkland, D. M. Dudas, and A. V. Patel. 2020. “Survey Item Response Rates by Survey Modality, Language, and Sociodemographic Factors in a Large U.S. Cohort.” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention 29: 724–730. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. 2012. “Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling.” Journal of Statistical Software 48: 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, and C. Camerer. 1998. “Not so Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.” Academy of Management Review 23: 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schappert, M., and M. von Hauff. 2020. “Sustainable Consumption in the Smart Grid: From key Points to eco-Routine.” Journal of Cleaner Production 267: 121585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. 1999. “A Causal Model Explaining the Perception and Acceptance of Gene Technology.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29: 2093–2106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb02297.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., and G. Cvetkovich. 2000. “Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge.” Risk Analysis 20: 713–720. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.205064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., G. Cvetkovich, and C. Roth. 2000. “Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception.” Risk Analysis 20: 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.203034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siitonen, P., S. Honkapuro, S. Annala, and A. Wolff. 2023. “Customer Perspectives on Demand Response in Europe: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis.” Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy 19: 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2154986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., and D. D. F. Del Rio. 2020. “Smart Home Technologies in Europe: A Critical Review of Concepts, Benefits, Risks and Policies.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 120: 109663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamminger, R., and V. Anstett. 2013. “The Effect of Variable Electricity Tariffs in the Household on Usage of Household Appliances.” Smart Grid Renew Energy 4: 353–365. https://doi.org/10.4236/sgre.2013.44042.
   Google Scholar
• Stenner, K., E. R. Frederiks, E. V. Hobman, and S. Cook. 2017. “Willingness to Participate in Direct Load Control: The Role of Consumer Distrust.” Applied Energy 189: 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.10.099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strengers, Y. 2014. “Smart Energy in Everyday Life: Are You Designing for Resource Man?” Interactions 21: 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2621931.
   Google Scholar
• Terwel, B. W., F. Harinck, N. Ellemers, and D. D. L. Daamen. 2009. “Competence-Based and Integrity-Based Trust as Predictors of Acceptance of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage (ccs).” Risk Analysis 29: 1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01256.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomarken, A. J., and N. G. Waller. 2005. “Structural Equation Modeling: Strengths, Limitations, and Misconceptions.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 1: 31–65. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, G., C. Faure, J. Schleich, and M.-C. Guetlein. 2021. “The Heat Is Off! The Role of Technology Attributes and Individual Attitudes in the Diffusion of Smart Thermostats – Findings from a Multi-Country Survey.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 163: 120508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, A.-M. 2019. “Public Trust in Energy Suppliers’ Communicated Motives for Investing in Wind Power.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 61: 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanthournout, K., B. Dupont, W. Foubert, C. Stuckens, and S. Claessens. 2015. “An Automated Residential Demand Response Pilot Experiment, Based on Day-Ahead Dynamic Pricing.” Applied Energy 155: 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasiljevska, J., F. Gangale, L. Covrig, and A. M. Mengolini. 2021. Smart Grids and Beyond: An EU Research and Innovation Perspective. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., L. M. Maruping, and S. A. Brown. 2006. “Role of Time in Self-Prediction of Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 100: 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis. 2003. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.” MIS Quarterly 27: 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., J. Y. L. Thong, and X. Xu. 2012. “Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology.” MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems 36: 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkade, N., and J. Höffken. 2017. “Is the Resource Man Coming Home? Engaging with an Energy Monitoring Platform to Foster Flexible Energy Consumption in the Netherlands.” Energy Research and Social Science 27: 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers, V. H. M., and M. Siegrist. 2014. “Find the Differences and the Similarities: Relating Perceived Benefits, Perceived Costs and Protected Values to Acceptance of Five Energy Technologies.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 40: 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warkentin, M., S. Goel, and P. Menard. 2017. “Shared Benefits and Information Privacy: What Determines Smart Meter Technology Adoption?” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 18: 758–786. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Which? 2023. Consumer Trust in November 2022. https://www.which.co.uk/policy-and-insight/article/consumer-trust-in-november-2022-afK0E5z9FDI7.
   Google Scholar
• Whitfield, S. C., E. A. Rosa, A. Dan, and T. Dietz. 2009. “The Future of Nuclear Power: Value Orientations and Risk Perception.” Risk Analysis 29: 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01155.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C., T. Hargreaves, and R. Hauxwell-Baldwin. 2017. “Benefits and Risks of Smart Home Technologies.” Energy Policy 103: 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolske, K. S., P. C. Stern, and T. Dietz. 2017. “Explaining Interest in Adopting Residential Solar Photovoltaic Systems in the United States: Toward an Integration of Behavioral Theories.” Energy Research and Social Science 25: 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, I.-L., and J.-L. Chen. 2005. “An Extension of Trust and TAM Model with TPB in the Initial Adoption of on-Line tax: An Empirical Study.” International Journal of Human Computer Studies 62: 784–808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., H. Lee, and H. Zo. 2017. “User Acceptance of Smart Home Services: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior.” Industrial Management and Data Systems 117: 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-01-2016-0017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, S., and J. Lee. 2015. “Advancing Societal Readiness Toward Renewable Energy System Adoption with a Socio-Technical Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 95: 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.01.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., L. Jing, Q. Bai, W. Shao, Y. Feng, S. Yin, and M. Zhang. 2018. “Application of an Integrated Framework to Examine Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intention Toward Genetically Modified Food.” Food Quality and Preference 65: 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinbarg, R. E., W. Revelle, and I. Yovel. 2007. “Estimating Ωh for Structures Containing Two Group Factors: Perils and Prospects.” Applied Psychological Measurement 31: 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621606291558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinbarg, R. E., W. Revelle, I. Yovel, and W. Li. 2005. “Cronbach’s, Α Revelle’s Β and Mcdonald’s Ω H: Their Relations with Each Other and Two Alternative Conceptualizations of Reliability.” Psychometrika 70: 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar