The role of crosslinguistic morphological congruency and L2 proficiency in the L3 acquisition of English plural marking

References

• Ambridge, B., Pine, J. M., Rowland, C. F., & Young, C. R. (2008). The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment) on children’s and adults’ graded judgements of argument-structure overgeneralization errors. Cognition, 106(1), 87–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelovska, T., & Hahn, A. (2017). L3 syntactic transfer: Models, new developments and implications. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Angelovska, T., Roehm, D., & Weinmüller, S. (2020). Uncovering transfer effects of dominance and proficiency in L3 English acquisition using the visual moving window paradigm and grammaticality judgments. Applied Linguistics Review. Published online by De Gruyteer Mouton, October 29, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23(4), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658307080557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2012). Behind the L2 status factor: A neurolinguistic framework for L3 research. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 61–78). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bardel, C., & Sánchez, L. (2017). The L2 status factor hypothesis revisited: The role of metalinguistic knowledge, working memory, attention and noticing in third language learning. In T. Angelovska & A. Hahn (Eds.), L3 syntactic transfer: Models, new developments and implications (pp. 85–101). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, I.-H. (2013). The English morpheme acquisition order: Does it really exist in English speaking of Korean elementary school learners? Journal of Language Science, 20(2), 213–236.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S. H., & Ionin, T. (2021). Plural marking in the second language: Atomicity, definiteness, and transfer. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716420000569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, G. (2000). Number. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Berkes, É, & Flynn, S. (2021). Vindicating the need for a principled theory of language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20095.fer
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710408668175
   Google Scholar
• Foryś-Nogala, M., Broniś, O., Opacki, M., & Otwinowska, A. (2020). Cross-linguistic influences, language proficiency and metalinguistic knowledge in L3 Italian subject placement. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2020.1811710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González Alonso, J., Rothman, J., Berndt, D., Castro, T., & Westergaard, M. (2017). Broad scope and narrow focus: On the contemporary linguistic and psycholinguistic study of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916653685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermas, A. (2010). Language acquisition as computational resetting: Verb movement in L3 initial state. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(4), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2010.487941
   Google Scholar
• Hermas, A. (2015). The categorization of the relative complementizer phrase in third-language English: A feature re-assembly account. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(5), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006914527019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopp, H. (2019). Crosslinguistic influence in the child third language acquisition of grammar: Sentence comprehension and production among Turkish-German and German learners of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 23(2), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006917752523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, G. (2003). The acquisition of the English plural morpheme by native Mandarin Chinese-speaking children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(6), 1297–1311. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/101)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, N., Novokshanova, E., Masuda, K., & Wang, X. (2011). Morphological congruency and the acquisition of L2 morphemes. Language Learning, 61(3), 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00627.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, K., Kim, K., & Kim, H. (2021). Children's interpretation of negation and quantifier scope in L3 English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(3), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728920000395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köpcke, K., & Wecker, V. (2017). Source- and product-oriented strategies in L2 acquisition of plural marking in German. Morphology, 27(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-016-9292-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lago, S., Mosca, M., & Stutter Garcia, A. (2021). The role of crosslinguistic influence in multilingual processing: Lexicon versus syntax. Language Learning, 71(S1), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12412
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, B., & McLean, S. (2016). Loanwords and vocabulary size test scores: A case of different estimates for different L1 learners. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(3), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1210611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. H. A. (1999). Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8(1), 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306431442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linck, J. A., Osthus, P., Koeth, J. T., & Bunting, M. F. (2014). Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(4), 861–883. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luk, Z. P. S., & Shirai, Y. (2009). Is the acquisition order of grammatical morphemes impervious to L1 knowledge? Evidence from the acquisition of plural -s, articles, and possessive’s. Language Learning, 59(4), 721–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami, A., & Alexopoulou, T. (2016). L1 influence on the acquisition order of English grammatical morphemes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 365–401. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263115000352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odlin, T. (2003). Crosslinguistic influence. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook on second language acquisition (pp. 436–486). Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Puig-Mayenco, E., & Marsden, H. (2018). Polarity-item anything in L3 English: Where does transfer come from when the L1 is Catalan and the L2 is Spanish? Second Language Research, 34(4), 487–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658317747926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig-Mayenco, E., Rothman, J., & Tubau, S. (2020). Language dominance in the previously acquired languages modulates rate of third language (L3) development over time: A longitudinal study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(5), 1641–1664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1792408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, J. (2010). On the typological economy of syntactic transfer: Word order and relative clause high/low attachment preference in L3 Brazilian Portuguese. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2-3), 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2010.011
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, J. (2011). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310386439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, J. (2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the typological primacy model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891300059X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, J., González Alonso, J., & Puig-Mayenco, E. (2019). Third language acquisition and linguistic transfer. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200103
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (2021). The full transfer/full access model and L3 cognitive states. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 11(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20055.sch
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, S. J., & Milroy, L. (1999). Bilingual language acquisition by Korean schoolchildren in New York City. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728999000243
   Google Scholar
• Slabakova, R. (2016). Second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slabakova, R. (2017). The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916655413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H. S., & Schwartz, B. D. (2009). Testing the fundamental difference hypothesis: L2 adult, L2 child, and L1 child comparisons in the acquisition of Korean wh-constructions with negative polarity items. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(2), 323–361. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728901000220
   Google Scholar
• Westergaard, M. (2021). Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition: Pros and cons. Second Language Research, 37(3), 481–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320945761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y. (2017). Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The linguistic proximity model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916648859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar