Forest damage and forest supply chains: a literature review and reflections

References

• Armstrong GW. 2004. Sustainability of timber supply considering the risk of wildfire. Forest Sci. 50(5):626–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack CL, McLarin M. 2017. Strategic forest planning and operational decisions under uncertainty. Aust Forestry. 80(2):1–9. doi: 10.1080/00049158.2017.1316444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congressional Research Service. 2022. Wildfire Statistics. Washington, United States. accessed 2023 July 5. https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/IF10244.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Craighead CW, Blackhurst J, Rungtusanatham MJ, Handfield RB. 2007. The severity of supply chain disruptions: design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision Sci. 38(1):131–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2007.00151.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel CJ, Ter-Mikaelian MT, Wotton BM, Rayfield B, Fortin MJ. 2017. Incorporating uncertainty into forest management planning: Timber harvest, wildfire and climate change in the boreal forest. For Ecol Manage. 400:542–554. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.06.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dymond CC, Tedder S, Spittlehouse DL, Raymer B, Hopkins K, McCallion K, Sandland J. 2014. Diversifying managed forests to increase resilience. Can J Forest Res. 44(10):1196–1205. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0146.
   Google Scholar
• EFI 2010. Destructive storms in European forests: past and forthcoming impacts. European Forest Institute. accessed 2023 July 5. https://efi.int/projects/storms-destructive-storms-european-forests-past-and-forthcoming-impacts
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency 2021. Forest fires in Europe. 2023 July 5 2023. https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/forest-fires-in-europe
   Google Scholar
• FPAMR 2021. Forest products annual market review 2020-2021. Geneva: United Nations and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Gonzalo J, Pukkala T, Borges JG. 2014. Integrating fire risk in stand management scheduling. An application to Maritime pine stands in Portugal. Ann Oper Res. 219(1):379–395. doi: 10.1007/s10479-011-0908-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier S, Bernier PY, Boulanger Y, Guo J, Guindon L, Beaudoin A, Boucher D. 2015. Vulnerability of timber supply to projected changes in fire regime in Canada’s managed forests. Can J for Res. 45(11):1439–1447. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0079.
   Google Scholar
• Hanewinkel M, Hummel S, Albrecht A. 2011. Assessing natural hazards in forestry for risk management: a review. Eur J Forest Res. 130(3):329–351. doi: 10.1007/s10342-010-0392-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC 2022. Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. contribution of working group ii to the 6th assessment report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston M, Hesseln H. 2012. Climate change adaptive capacity of the Canadian forest sector. For Policy Econ. 24:29–34. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärhä K, Anttonen T, Poikela A, Palander T, Laurén A, Peltola H, Nuutinen Y. 2018. Evaluation of salvage logging productivity and costs in windthrown Norway spruce-dominated forests. Forests. 9(5):280. doi: 10.3390/f9050280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leduc A, Bernier PY, Mansuy N, Raulier F, Gauthier S, Bergeron Y. 2015. Using salvage logging and tolerance to risk to reduce the impact of forest fires on timber supply calculations. Can J for Res. 45(4):480–486. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0434.
   Google Scholar
• Ma F, Lee JY, Camenzind D, Wolcott M. 2022. Probabilistic Wildfire risk assessment methodology and evaluation of a supply chain network. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 82:103340. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansuy N, Barrette J, Laganière J, Mabee W, Paré D, Gautam S, Ghafghazi S, Ghafghazi S. 2018. Salvage harvesting for bioenergy in Canada: From sustainable and integrated supply chain to climate change mitigation. WIREs Energy Environ. 7(5):e298. doi: 10.1002/wene.298.
   Google Scholar
• Mathey AH, Nelson H. 2010. Assessing forest management strategies under a mountain pine beetle attack in Alberta: exploring the impacts. Can J for Res. 40(4):597–610. doi: 10.1139/X10-006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock TQ, Taylor SW, Flower A, Mehlenbacher A, Montenegro A, Zwiers FW, Spittlehouse DL, Spittlehouse, D L. 2013. Pest outbreak distribution and forest management impacts in a changing climate in British Columbia. Environmental Science & Policy. 26:75–89. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.07.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mushakhian S, Ouhimmou M, Rönnqvist M. 2020. Salvage harvest planning for spruce budworm outbreak using multistage stochastic programming. Can J for Res. 50(10):953–965. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2019-0283.
   Google Scholar
• Netherer S, Kandasamy D, Jirosová A, Kalinová B, Schebeck M, Schlyter F. 2021. Interactions among Norway spruce, the bark beetle Ips typographus and its fungal symbionts in times of drought. J Pest Sci (2004). 94(3):591–614. doi: 10.1007/s10340-021-01341-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R. 2021. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 372:n160. doi:10.1136/bmj.n160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter B, Nelson J. 2005. Estimating harvest schedules and profitability under the risk of fire disturbance. Can J for Res. 35(6):1378–1388. doi: 10.1139/x05-073.
   Google Scholar
• Raulier F, Dhital N, Racine P, Tittler R, Fall A. 2014. Increasing resilience of timber supply: How a variable buffer stock of timber can efficiently reduce exposure to shortfalls caused by wildfires. For Policy Econ. 46:47–55. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2014.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijal B, Raulier F, Martell DL, Gauthier S. 2018a. The economic impact of fire management on timber production in the boreal forest region of Quebec, Canada. Int J Wildland Fire. 27(12):831–844. doi: 10.1071/WF18041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijal B, Raulier F, Martell DL. 2018b. A value-added forest management policy reduces the impact of fire on timber production in Canadian boreal forests. For Policy Econ. 97:21–32. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2018.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell MB, Kilgore MA, Blinn CR. 2017. Characterizing timber salvage operations on public forests in Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA. Int J For Eng. 28(1):66–72. doi: 10.1080/14942119.2017.1291064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint-Germain M, Greene DF. 2009. Salvage logging in the boreal and cordilleran forests of Canada: integrating industrial and ecological concerns in management plans. Forest Chron. 85(1):120–134. doi: 10.5558/tfc85120-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shekarian M, Parast MM. 2021. An Integrative approach to supply chain disruption risk and resilience management: a literature review. Int J Logist Res Appl. 24(5):427–455. doi: 10.1080/13675567.2020.1763935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidder AM, Kumar S, Laituri M, Sibold JS. 2016. Using spatiotemporal correlative niche models for evaluating the effects of climate change on mountain pine beetle. Ecosphere. 7(7):e01396. doi: 10.1002/ecs2.1396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanturf JA, Mansuy N. 2021. COVID-19 and forests in Canada and the United States: Initial assessment and beyond. Front for Glob Change. 4:666960. doi:10.3389/ffgc.2021.666960.
   Google Scholar
• Stock JR, Boyer SL. 2009. Developing a consensus definition of supply chain management: a qualitative study. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage. 39(8):690–711. doi: 10.1108/09600030910996323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenberg JW, Duinker PN, Bush PG. 2011. Exploring adaptation to climate change in the forests of central Nova Scotia, Canada. For Ecol Manage. 262(12):2316–2327. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.08.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang CS. 2006. Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int J Prod Econ. 103(2):451–488. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNECE/FAO. 2019. Draft forest products market statement. Geneva: Economic Commission for Europe Food and Agriculture Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Washington Post 2021 Dec 15. Cold, heat, fires, hurricanes and tornadoes: the year in weather disasters. Washington Post. accessed 2022 3 October. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/interactive/2021/weather-disasters-2021/
   Google Scholar
• Zubizarreta-Gerendiain A, Pukkala T, Peltola H. 2017. Effects of wind damage on the optimal management of boreal forests under current and changing climatic conditions. Can J for Res. 47(2):246–256. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0226.
   Google Scholar