Economic analysis of the feller buncher in Brazilian Eucalyptus plantations: modeling with time series

References

• Akron S, Demir E, Taussig RD. 2020. Real options and asymmetric volatility in light of the firm’s growth opportunities. Invest Anal J [Internet]. 49(2):105–117. doi: 10.1080/10293523.2020.1755928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandr A, Ivan B, Igor Z. 2021. Analysis of platform leveling systems for tracked feller-buncher machines. Invent [Internet]. 6(96):1–14. doi: 10.3390/inventions6040096.
   Google Scholar
• Alghalith M, Floros C, Gkillas K. 2020. Estimating stochastic volatility under the assumption of stochastic volatility of volatility. Risks [Internet]. 8(2):35. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9091/8/2/35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvares CA, Stape JL, Sentelhas PC, de Gonçalves JLM, Sparovek G. 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol Zeitschrift. 22(6):711–728. doi: 10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B3 S.A. - Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão. 2022. Cotações históricas. [accessed 2022 February 13]. http://www.b3.com.br/pt_br/market-data-e-indices/servicos-de-dados/market-data/historico/mercado-a-vista/cotacoes-historicas/.
   Google Scholar
• Baillie RT, Han YW. 2019. Long memory volatility, central bank intervention and uncovered interest rate parity in the 1920s exchange markets. Korean Econ Rev [Internet]. 35(1):183–203. doi: 10.22841/KERDOI.2019.35.1.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belderbos R, Tong TW, Wu S. 2020. Portfolio configuration and foreign entry decisions: a juxtaposition of real options and risk diversification theories. Strateg Manag J [Internet]. 41(7):1191–1209. doi: 10.1002/smj.3151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhowmik R, Wang S. 2020. Stock market volatility and return analysis: a systematic literature review. Entropy [Internet]. 22(552):1–18. doi: 10.3390/e22050522.
   Google Scholar
• Brătian V, Acu AM, Oprean-Stan C, Dinga E, Ionescu GM. 2021. Efficient or fractal market hypothesis? A stock indexes modelling using geometric Brownian motion and geometric fractional brownian motion. Mathematics [Internet]. 9(22):2983. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/22/2983.
   Google Scholar
• Camargo DA, Munis RA, Miyajima RH, Lima RCA, Simões D. 2023. An evaluation of machine operator exposure to occupational noise during harvesting and extraction operations in Brazilian eucalyptus plantations. Int J For Eng [Internet]. 34(1):35–41. doi: 10.1080/14942119.2022.2083048.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell RM, Anderson NM, Daugaard DE, Naughton HT. 2018. Financial viability of biofuel and biochar production from forest biomass in the face of market price volatility and uncertainty. Appl Energy [Internet]. 230:330–343. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantegril P, Paradis G, LeBel L, Raulier F. 2019. Bioenergy production to improve value-creation potential of strategic forest management plans in mixed-wood forests of Eastern Canada. Appl Energy [Internet]. 247:171–181. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi KJ, Lim B, Park J. 2020. Evaluation of the reverse mortgage option in Korea: a long straddle perspective. Int J Financ Stud [Internet]. 8(3):55. https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/8/3/55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogley T, Nason JM. 1995. Effects of the Hodrick-Prescott filter on trend and difference stationary time series implications for business cycle research. J Econ Dyn Control [Internet]. 19(1–2):253–278. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/016518899300781X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad JL, Dahlen J. 2019. Productivity and cost of processors in whole-tree harvesting systems in southern pine stands. For Sci [Internet]. 65(6):767–775. doi: 10.1093/forsci/fxz036.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland T, Antikarov V. 2001. Real options: a practitioner’s guide. 1st ed. New York City, EUA: Texere.
   Google Scholar
• Deng C, Zhang S, Lu Y, Li Q. 2020. Determining the ecological compensation standard based on forest multifunction evaluation and financial net present value analysis: a case study in Southwestern Guangxi, China. J Sustain For [Internet]. 39(7):730–749. doi: 10.1080/10549811.2020.1723644.
   Google Scholar
• Götz TB, Hecq AW. 2019. Granger causality testing in mixed-frequency VARs with possibly (co)integrated processes. J Time Ser Anal [Internet]. 40(6):914–935. doi: 10.1111/jtsa.12462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CWJ. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Essays Econom Vol II Collect Pap Clive W J Granger [Internet]. 37(3):424–438. doi: 10.2307/1912791.
   Google Scholar
• Grigoli F, Mills Z. 2014. Institutions and public investment: an empirical analysis. Econ Gov. 15(2):131–153. doi: 10.1007/s10101-013-0137-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gülci N, Yüksel K, Gülci S, Serin H, Bilici E, Akay AE. 2021. Analysis of a feller-buncher productivity: a case study of whole-tree harvesting from Marmara region, Turkey. Ann For Res [Internet]. 64(1):99–110. doi: 10.15287/afr.2021.2033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SK, Han HS. 2020. Productivity and cost of whole-tree and tree-length harvesting in fuel reduction thinning treatments using cable yarding systems. Forest Sci Technol. 16(1):41–48. doi: 10.1080/21580103.2020.1712264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodrick RJ, Prescott EC. 1997. Postwar U.S. business cycles: an empirical investigation. J Money Credit Bank [Internet]. 29(1):1–16. doi: 10.2307/2953682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2022. Machinery for forestry — feller-bunchers — terms, definitions and commercial specifications. United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan JP. 2022. Emerging markets bond index + BR (Org.). [accessed 2022 February 15]. http://www.ipeadata.gov.br/ExibeSerie.aspx?serid=40940&module=M.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang Q, Xin Z, Li Y, Ma S, Zhang Q. 2020. Differential dynamic decision-making model for multi-stage investment of scenic area. Alexandria Eng J [Internet]. 59(4):2819–2826. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1110016820302957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jourgholami M, Karami S, Tavankar F, Lo Monaco A, Picchio R. 2020. Effects of slope gradient on runoff and sediment yield on machine-induced compacted soil in temperate forests. Forests. 12(49):1–19. doi: 10.3390/f12010049.
   Google Scholar
• Kim B, Kim C, Han SU, Bae JH, Jung J. 2020. Is it a good time to develop commercial photovoltaic systems on farmland? An American-style option with crop price risk. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 125(109827):1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109827.
   Google Scholar
• Lahrsen S, Mologni O, Magalhães J, Grigolato S, Röser D. 2022. Key factors influencing productivity of whole-tree ground-based felling equipment commonly used in the pacific northwest. Can J For Res [Internet]. 52(4):450–462. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2021-0266.
   Google Scholar
• Latief R, Lefen L. 2018. The effect of exchange rate volatility on international trade and foreign direct investment (Fdi) in developing countries along “one belt and one road. Int J Financ Stud [Internet]. 6(4):86. doi: 10.3390/ijfs6040086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Li W, Chen H. 2020. Importance sampling for monte carlo simulation to evaluate collar options under stochastic volatility model. E A M Ekon a Manag. 23(2):144–155. doi: 10.15240/tul/001/2020-2-010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin P, Xiong Y, Xu Z, Wang W, Shao R. 2022. Risk assessment of TBM jamming based on Bayesian networks. Bull Eng Geol Environ [Internet]. 81(1):47. doi: 10.1007/s10064-021-02511-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Kadziński M, Liao X, Mao X, Wang Y. 2020. A preference learning framework for multiple criteria sorting with diverse additive value models and valued assignment examples. Eur J Oper Res [Internet]. 286(3):963–985. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livdan D, Nezlobin A. 2021. Investment, capital stock, and replacement cost of assets when economic depreciation is non-geometric. J Financ Econ [Internet]. 142(3):1444–1469. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg C, Abman R. 2022. Maize price volatility and deforestation. Am J Agric Econ [Internet]. 104(2):693–716. doi: 10.1111/ajae.12246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitah M, Smutka L. 2019. The Development of world sugar prices. Sugar Tech [Internet]. 21(1):1–8. doi: 10.1007/s12355-018-0618-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins JC, Camargo DA, Munis RA, Simões D. 2022. Real options approach: case study applied to a nursery to produce eucalyptus forest seedlings in Brazil. For Syst [Internet]. 31(3):e020. doi: 10.5424/fs/2022313-18447.
   Google Scholar
• Mensi W, Hammoudeh S, Al-Jarrah IMW, Sensoy A, Kang SH. 2017. Dynamic risk spillovers between gold, oil prices and conventional, sustainability and Islamic equity aggregates and sectors with portfolio implications. Energy Econ [Internet]. 67:454–475. doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.08.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minli Z, Wenpo Y. 2012. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method applied in the real estate investment risks research. Phys Procedia [Internet]. 24:1815–1821. doi: 10.1016/j.phpro.2012.02.267.
   Google Scholar
• Moody’s. 2022. Rating action. [accessed 2022 February 13]. https://www.moodys.com/research/Moodys-altera-perspectiva-do-rating-do-Brasilpara-estvel-de–PR_382015?cy=bra&lang=pt.
   Google Scholar
• Moon Y, Baran M. 2018. Economic analysis of a residential PV system from the timing perspective: a real option model. Renewable Energy. 125:783–795. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munis RA, Martins JC, Camargo DA, Simões D. 2022a. Dynamics of Pinus wood prices for different timber assortments: comparison of stochastic processes. Bois Forêts des Trop [Internet]. 351:45–52. doi: 10.19182/bft2022.351.a36392.
   Google Scholar
• Munis RA, Martins JC, Camargo DA, Simões D. 2022b. Incorporating management flexibility: a real options approach harvesting eucalyptus plantations. Aust For [Internet]. 85(3):133–140. doi: 10.1080/00049158.2022.2137959.
   Google Scholar
• Naderpour H, Kheyroddin A, Mortazavi S. 2019. Risk assessment in bridge construction projects in Iran using Monte Carlo simulation technique. Pract Period Struct Des Constr [Internet]. 24(4):04019026. doi: 10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisade Corporation. 2022. Software risk analysis and risk modeling, vers 7.6.0. Palisade Corporation. https://www.palisade-br.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Pan P, McDonald T, Smidt M, Dias R. 2022. Use of vision and sound to classify feller-buncher operational state. Int J For Eng [Internet]. 33(2):129–138. doi: 10.1080/14942119.2022.2037927.
   Google Scholar
• Pareja Vasseur JA, Marin Sánchez FH, Tuesta Reategui V. 2020. GARCH-type volatility in the multiplicative quadrinomial tree method: An application to real options. Contaduría y Adm [Internet]. 66(2):244. doi: 10.22201/fca.24488410e.2021.2331.
   Google Scholar
• Procházka P, Honig V, Bouček J, Hájková K, Trakal L, Soukupová J, Roubík H. 2021. Availability and applicability of wood and crop residues for the production of wood composites. Forests [Internet]. 12(641):1–15. doi: 10.3390/f12050641.
   Google Scholar
• Qin Q, Huang Z, Zhou Z, Chen Y, Zhao W. 2022. Hodrick–Prescott filter-based hybrid ARIMA–SLFNs model with residual decomposition scheme for carbon price forecasting. Appl Soft Comput [Internet]. 119:108560. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2022. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2022. R foundation for computing statistical. Austria, Vienna: R Foundation for Computing Statistical.
   Google Scholar
• Regula J, Germain R, Bick S, Zhang L. 2018. Assessing the economic viability of loggers operating tree-length harvest systems in the northeast. J For. 116(4):347–356. doi: 10.1093/jofore/fvy006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro JA, Pereira PJ, Brandão EM. 2020. A real options approach to optimal bidding in construction projects considering volume uncertainty. Manag Decis Econ [Internet]. 41(4):631–640. doi: 10.1002/mde.3126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. 2022. S&P global timber & forestry index. [accessed 2022 February 15]. https://portugues.spindices.com/indices/equity/sp-global-timber-and-forestry-index.
   Google Scholar
• Sapol SJ, Szajnfarber Z. 2020. Revisiting flexibility in design: an analysis of the impact of implementation uncertainty on the value of real options. J Mech Des Trans ASME [Internet]. 142(12):1–11. doi: 10.1115/1.4047682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šimović PP, Tafro A. 2021. Pricing the volatility risk premium with a discrete stochastic volatility model. Mathematics [Internet]. 9(2038):1–15. doi: 10.3390/math9172038.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha AK. 2021. The reliability of geometric Brownian motion forecasts of S&P500 index values. J Forecast [Internet]. 40(8):1444–1462. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/for.2775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Magagnotti N, Schweier J. 2017. Trends and perspectives in coppice harvesting. Croat J For Eng. 38(2):219–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• To T, Heleno M, Valenzuela A. 2022. Risk-constrained multi-period investment model for distributed energy resources considering technology costs and regulatory uncertainties. Appl Energy [Internet]. 319:119210. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolosana E, Spinelli R, Aminti G, Laina R, López-Vicens I. 2018. Productivity, efficiency and environmental effects of whole-tree harvesting in Spanish coppice stands using a drive-to-tree disc saw Feller-Buncher. Croat J For Eng. 39(2):163–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Treasury. 2022. Daily treasury long term rate data. [accessed 2022 February 13]. https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/TextView.aspx?data=yield.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Li J, Ren X. 2022. Asymmetric causality of economic policy uncertainty and oil volatility index on time-varying nexus of the clean energy, carbon and green bond. Int Rev Financ Anal [Internet]. 83:102306. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zobiri F, Deconinck G. 2021. Prosumer centric flexibility market with geometric Brownian motion pricing method. In: 2021 IEEE PES Innov Smart Grid Technol Eur (ISGT Eur [Internet]. [place unknown]: IEEE; p. 1–6. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9639936/.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Johnson DM, Wang J, Yu C. 2016. Cost, energy use and GHG emissions for forest biomass harvesting operations. Energy [Internet]. 114:1053–1062. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Yin J. 2021. Assessment of investment decisions in bulk shipping through fuzzy real options analysis. Marit Econ Logist [Internet]. 25(1):122–139. doi: 10.1057/s41278-021-00201-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Zhu Y, Cheng HW, Zheng R, Meng D, Yang Y. 2021. A review on semitransparent solar cells for agricultural application. Mater Today Energy [Internet]. 22:100852. doi:10.1016/j.mtener.2021.100852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar