Estimating the economic value of timber products potentially saved from wildfires by improving forest road standards

References

• Akay AE, Sivrikaya F, Sakar D. 2010. Evaluating the efficiency of fire helicopter located in Arsuz-Antakya in fire fighting activities. The 1st International Turkey & Japan Environment and Forestry Symposium; Nov 02-05; Trabzon, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Akay AE, Wing GM, Sivrikaya F, Sakar D. 2012. A GIS-based decision support system for determining the shortest and safest route to forest fires: a case study in Mediterranean region of Turkey. Environ Monit Assess. 184(3):1391–1407. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2049-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akay AE, Podolskaia E, Uçar Z. 2021. Effects of improving forest road standards on shortening the arrival time of ground-based firefighting teams accessing to the forest fires. Eur J For Eng. 7(1):32–38. doi: 10.33904/ejfe.952174.
   Google Scholar
• Akay AE, Serin H, Sessions J, Bilici PM. 2021. Evaluating the effects of improving forest road standards on economic value of forest products. Croat J For Eng. 42(2):245–258. doi: 10.5552/crojfe.2021.851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akay AE, Erkan N, Bilici E, Uçar Z, Güney CO. 2022. How forest road reengineering improves the effectiveness of firefighting activities? COFE-FORMEC-IUFRO; Oct 4-7; Corvallis, OR, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Van LA, Akça A. 2007. Forest mensuration. Vol. 13. Dordrecht, Holland: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Bellisario J, Kallerman P, Cowan G, Raisz A. 2017. The true cost of wildfires analyzing the impact of wildfires on the California economy. San Francisco, CA: Bay Area Council Economic Institute; p. 31.
   Google Scholar
• Bilici E. 2009. A study on the Integration of firebreaks and fireline with forest roads networks and it’s planning and construction (A case study of Gallipoly national park) Istanbul university. Fac For J Ser A. 59(2):86–102.
   Google Scholar
• Butry DT, Mercer ED, Prestemon JP, Pye JM, Holmes TP. 2001. What is the price of catastrophic wildfire? J For. 99(11):9–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drazen A. 2000. Political economy in macroeconomics. Princeton University Press. doi: 10.1515/9780691188003.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan GH, Brown TC. 2005. An alternative incentive structure for wildfire management on national forest land. For Sci. 51(5):387–395.
   Google Scholar
• Durán-Medraño R, Varela E, Garza-Gil D, Prada A, Vázquez MX, Solino M. 2017. Valuation of terrestrial and marine biodiversity losses caused by forest wildfires. J Behav Exp Econ. 71:88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2017.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eker Ö, Abdurrahmanoğlu DM. 2018. An analysis on the expenses of combating forest fires: case of Kahramanmaraş regional directorate of forestry. Turk J For Sci. 2(1):34–48. doi: 10.32328/turkjforsci.400491.
   Google Scholar
• Erkan N 1996. Stand growth simulation for pinus brutia Ten. Southeast Anatolia Forestry Research Institute, Technical Bulletin, No:1, Elazığ, Turkey, p. 148.
   Google Scholar
• Erkan N, Yalçın A, Aydın AC. 2009. Estimation of wood production losses in Serik-Tşağıl forest fire. Forest Fire Fighting Symposium; Jan 7-10; Antalya. p. 427–433. (In Turkish)
   Google Scholar
• Flannigan MD, Amiro BD, Logan KA, Stocks BJ, Wotton BM. 2006. Forest fires and climate change in the 21st century. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 11(4):847–859. doi: 10.1007/s11027-005-9020-7.
   Google Scholar
• GDF. 2008. Fire action plan. General Directorate of Forestry. Kahramanmaraş Forest Regional Directorate, Kahramanmaraş. p. 106.
   Google Scholar
• GDF. 2012. Strategic plan (2013-2017), General directorate of forestry. Ankara: Strategy Development Department; p. 98.
   Google Scholar
• GDF. 2021. Forestry statistics 2021. [accessed 2023 Jan 29]. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/tr/e-kutuphane/resmi-istatistikler.
   Google Scholar
• GDF. 2022. Annual financial report, Exploitation and Marketing Department. General Directorate of Forestry: Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes JFP. 2006. Forest fires in Portugal: how they happen and why they happen. Int J Environ Stud. 63(2):109–119. doi: 10.1080/00207230500435304.
   Google Scholar
• Güney CO, Sarı A, Cekim HO, Küçüksille EU, Şentürk Ö, Gülsoy S, Özkan K. 2022. An advanced approach for leaf flammability index estimation. Int J Wildland Fire. 31(3):277–290. doi: 10.1071/WF21022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gümüş S, Hatay TY, Okan SÜ. 2019. An evaluation of General situation and importance of forest roads: Turkish forestry. 2nd International Symposium of Forest Engineering and Technologies, (FETEC 2019); Sep 4–6; Tiran, Albania.
   Google Scholar
• Kalıpsız A 1963. Türkiye’de karaçam meşcerelerinin tabii bünyesi ve verim kudreti üzerine araştırmalar. Or. Gen. Md. Yayın No:339/7, Ankara
   Google Scholar
• Karya D, Hasan H, Kadir EA. 2017. Impact of forest fire to economic and environment in Riau Province Indonesia. Int Bus Manage. 11(2):474–477.
   Google Scholar
• Küçükosmanoğlu Y 2006. Effects of the forest fires on the physical and mechanical properties of Calabrian Pine (Pinus brutia Ten.) [ MSc thesis]. Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences. p. 130.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez JRM, Machuca MH, Díaz RZ, Silva FR, González-Cabán A. 2011. Economic losses to Iberian swine production from forest fires. For Policy Econ. 13(8):614–621. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paveglio TB, Brenkert-Smith H, Hall T, Smith AM. 2015. Understanding social impact from wildfires: advancing means for assessment. Int J Wildland Fire. 24(2):212–224. doi: 10.1071/WF14091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plucinski MP. 2019. Contain and control: wildfire suppression effectiveness at incidents and across landscapes. Curr For Rep. 5(1):20–40. doi: 10.1007/s40725-019-00085-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolskaia E, Ershov D, Kovganko K. 2020. Comparison of data sources on transport infrastructure for the regional forest fire management. Managing forests in the 21st century, Conference at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (Potsdam 2020), Postdam, Germany; p. 59.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer J, Thompson DK, Povak N. 2019. Measuring initial attack suppression effectiveness through burn probability. Fire. 2(4):60. doi: 10.3390/fire2040060.
   Google Scholar
• Riera P, Signorello G, Thiene M, Mahieu PA, Navrud S, Kaval P, Rulleau B, Mavsar R, Madureira L, Meyerhoff J, et al. 2012. Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: good practice guidelines. J For Econ. 18(4):259–270. doi: 10.1016/j.jfe.2012.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson C, Handmer J, Betts R. 2013. Estimating the economic, social and environmental impacts of wildfires in Australia. Environ Hazards. 12(2):93–111. doi: 10.1080/17477891.2012.703490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun O, Eren ME, Orpak M 1977. Determination of single tree and wood type ratios per unit area in basic tree species. TÜBİTAK/TOVAG Project No: 288, Ankara, p. 119.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas D, Butry D, Gilbert S, Webb D, Fung J. 2017. The costs and losses of wildfires. NIST Spec Publ. 1215(11). doi: 10.6028/NIST.SP.1215.
   Google Scholar
• TIBD. 2010. Traffic inspection branch directorate, İstanbul. [accessed 2021 May 15]. http://trfdenetleme.iem.gov.tr/asiri_hiz.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Wang D, Guan D, Zhu S, Kinnon MM, Geng G, Zhang Q, Zheng H, Lei T, Shao S, Gong P, et al. 2021. Economic footprint of California wildfires in 2018. Nat Sustain. 4(3):252–260. doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-00646-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wotton BM, Martell DL, Logan KA. 2003. Climate change and people-caused forest fire occurrence in Ontario. Clim Change. 60(3):275–295. doi: 10.1023/A:1026075919710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar