Towards inclusive schooling policies in Finland: a multiple-case study from policy to practice

References

• Ainscow, M., T. Booth, and A. Dyson. 2006. Improving Schools, Developing Inclusion. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Avramidis, E., and B. Norwich. 2002. “Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Integration/Inclusion: A Review of the Literature.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 17 (2): 129–147. doi: 10.1080/08856250210129056
   Google Scholar
• Basic Education Act (642/2010). Accessed May 4, 2014. http://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/1998/en19980628.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brunila, K. 2012. “From Risk to Resilience: The Therapeutic Ethos is Youth Education.” Education Inquiry 3 (3): 451–464. doi: 10.3402/edui.v3i3.22046
   Google Scholar
• Bussing, R., F. A. Gary, C. E. Leon, C. W. Garvan, and R. Reid. 2002. “General Classroom Teachers’ Information and Perceptions of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.” Behavioral Disorders 27 (4): 327–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, P., and J. Schneider. 1992. Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dockrell, J. E., B. M. Shield, and K. Rigby. 2003. “Acoustic Guidelines and Teacher Strategies for Optimising Learning Conditions in Classrooms for Children with Hearing Problems.” In Access: Achieving Clear Communication Employing Sound Solutions, edited by D. Fabry and C. DeConde Johnson, 217–229. Chicago, IL: Phonak.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A., A. Howes, and B. Roberts. 2002. “A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of School Level Action for Promoting Participation by All Students (EPPI-Centre Review, Version 1.1*).” In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education. http://www.forskningsradet.no/servlet/Satellite?c=Rapport&cid=1253986430399&lang=no&pagename=kunnskapssenter%2FHovedsidemal
   Google Scholar
• Finn, J. D., G. M. Pannozzo, and C. M. Achilles. 2003. “The ‘Why’s’ of Class Size: Student Behaviour in Small Classes.” Review of Educational Research 73 (3): 321–368. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3516038 doi: 10.3102/00346543073003321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish National Board of Education. 2011. Equal Education. Accessed May 4, 2014. http://www.oph.fi/english/education
   Google Scholar
• Graham, L. J., and M. Jahnukainen. 2011. “Wherefore Art Thou, Inclusion? Analysing the Development of Inclusive Education in New South Wales, Alberta and Finland.” Journal of Education Policy 26 (2): 263–288. doi:10.1080/02680939.2010.493230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, P. 2010. “Approaches to Empirical Research on Inclusive Education.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 12 (3): 199–209. doi:10.1080/15017410903385052
   Google Scholar
• Juusenaho, R. 2004. Peruskoulun Rehtoreiden Johtamisen Eroja Sukupuolien Näkökulma. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Printing House.
   Google Scholar
• Kivirauma, J. 1999. “Oppivelvollisuuskoulun vammaispolitiikka.” In Pyörätuolitango. Näkökulmia vammaisuuteen, edited by S. Nouko-Juvonen, 49–76. Helsinki: Edita.
   Google Scholar
• Kivirauma, J., K. Klemelä, and R. Rinne. 2006. “Segregation, Integration, Inclusion – The Ideology and Reality in Finland.” European Journal of Special Needs Education 21 (2): 117–133. doi: 10.1080/08856250600600729
   Google Scholar
• Klonsky, M. 2002. “How Smaller Schools Prevent School Violence.” Educational Leadership 59 (5): 60–65. http://ehis.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.utu.fi:2048/ehost/detail?vid=32&sid=bec30a7a-db09-4959-84928ed4c176f2f0%40sessionmgr115&hid=115&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=trh&AN=6503385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koay, T. L., L. Lim, W. K. Sim, and J. Elkins. 2006. “Learning Assistance and Regular Teacher’s Perceptions of Inclusive Education in Brunei Darussalam.” International Journal of Special Education 21 (1): 131–143.
   Google Scholar
• Kuorelahti, M., and T. Vehkakoski. 2009. Tukitoimet kunnossa perusopetuksessa? Erityisopetuksen toimivuus ja kouluviihtyvyys oppilaiden, vanhempien ja koulun opetushenkilöstön arvioimana. Kuopio: Snellman- instituutti.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 1996. Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mietola, R. 2014. Hankala erityisyys. Etnografinen tutkimus erityisopetuksen käytännöistä ja erityisyyden muotoutumisesta yläkoulun arjessa [Troubling Special. An Ethnographic Study on Practices of Special Education and Formation of Special in the Everyday Life of Lower Secondary School]. Helsingin yliopisto, Käyttäytymistieteiden laitos. Kasvatustieteellisiä tutkimuksia 255.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2007. Special Education Strategy. Reports of the Ministry of Education, Finland. Accessed May 4, 2014. http://www.minedu.fi/OPM/Julkaisut/2007/Erityisopetuksen_strategia.html?lang=fi&extra_locale=en
   Google Scholar
• Nye, B., L. V. Hedges, and S. Konstantopoulos. 2000. “The Effects of Small Classes on Academic Achievement: The Results of the Tennessee Class Size Experiment.” American Educational Research Journal 37 (1): 123–151. doi:10.3102/00028312037001123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pihlaja, P. 2009. “Erityisen tuen käytännöt varhaiskasvatuksessa – näkökulmana inkluusio.” Kasvatus 49 (2): 146–157.
   Google Scholar
• Sapon-Shevin, M. 2007. Widening the Circle: The Power of the Inclusive Classroom. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stasz, C., and B. M. Stecher. 2000. “Teaching Mathematics and Language Arts in Reduced Size and Non-reduced Size Classrooms.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 22 (4): 313–329. doi: 10.3102/01623737022004313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teittinen, A. 2008. “Normaliteetin rajat ja rakenteet [The Borders and Structures of Normality].” In Muuttuvat marginaalit: näkökulmia vammaistutkimukseen [Changing Margins: The Disability Research Perspective], edited by J. Kivirauma, 126–148. Kehitysvammaliiton tutkimuksia 1/2008.
   Google Scholar
• Teittinen, A. 2011. “Onko diagnoosi tarpeellinen? Pohdintoja lääketieteellisten diagnoosien yhteiskunnallisista merkityksistä.” In Alkoholin vaurioittamat: raskaudenaikaisen alkoholinkäytön vaikutukset lapsen elämään, edited by S. Vaarla, 164–181. Helsinki: Kehitysvammaliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, S. 2012. “The Irresistible Rise of the SEN Industry.” Oxford Review of Education 38 (3): 267–286. doi: 10.1080/03054985.2012.692055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. 1994. The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Vehkakoski, T. 2006. “Ominaisuuksista oireyhtymiksi. Neuropsykiatriset diagnoosit ja neurotieteelliset selitysmallit vammaisuuden tuottajina.” In Vammaisuuden tutkimus, edited by A. Teittinen, 237–264. Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
   Google Scholar
• Warnock Report. 1978. Special Educational Needs: Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, J. 1993. Kansas Class Size/Caseload Study. KS: Northeast Kansas Education Service Center. Accessed May 4, 2014. http://nekesc.org/kids/CSCL/summary.html
   Google Scholar