Comparing compound pairs and single stimuli during match-to-sample to establish arbitrary stimulus classes with adults of typical development

References

• Albright, L., Reeve, K. F., Reeve, S. A., & Kisamore, A. N. (2015). Teaching statistical variability with equivalence-based instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48(4), 883–894. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Alvarez, B., & Perez-Gonzalez, L. A. (2011). Derived control by compound and single stimuli in matching-to-sample task in children. Psicothema, 23(3), 415–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonso-Alvarez, B., & Perez-Gonzalez, L. A. (2013). Hierarchy among intersecting equivalence classes formed by unitary and compound stimuli. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 14(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2013.11434441
   Google Scholar
• Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (2000). Equivalence outcome in single subjects as a function of training structure. The Psychological Record, 50(4), 603–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arntzen, E., Norbom, A., & Fields, L. (2015). Sorting: An alternative measure of class formation? Journal Of Mining And Environment, 65(4), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0132-5
   Google Scholar
• Augustson, E. M., Dougher, M. J., & Markham, M. R. (2000). Emergence of conditional stimulus relations and transfer of respondent eliciting functions among compound stimuli. The Psychological Record, 50(4), 745–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03395381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, D., Hegarty, N., & Smeets, P. M. (1997). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: A relational framing model of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14(1), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392916
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bolanos, J. E., Reeve, K. F., Reeve, S. A., Sidener, T. M., Jennings, A. M., & Ostrosky, B. D. (2020). Using stimulus equivalence-based instruction to teach young children to sort recycling, trash, and compost items. Behavior and Social Issues, 29(1), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-020-00028-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born, D. G., & Peterson, J. L. (1969). Stimulus control acquired by components of two color-form compound stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12(3), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1969.12-437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodsky, J., & Fienup, D. M. (2018). Sidman goes to college: A meta-analysis of equivalence-based instruction in higher education. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0150-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffington, D. M., Fields, L., & Adams, B. J. (1997). Enhancing equivalence class formation by pretraining of other equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 47(1), 69–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpentier, F., Smeets, P. M., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2002). Matching functionally same relations: Implications for equivalence-equivalence relations as a model for analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 52(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpentier, F., Smeets, P. M., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Equivalence as a model of analogy: Further analyses. The Psychological Record, 53, 349–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchfield, T. S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Dougher, M. J. (2018). Editorial: what Sidman did–historical and contemporary significance of research on derived stimulus relations. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0154-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchfield, T. S., & Fienup, D. M. (2010). Using stimulus equivalence technology to teach statistical inference in a group setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 763–768. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43_763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Stanley, C. R., Daar, J. H., & Williams, L. (2016). Derived equivalence relations of geometry skills in students with autism: An application of the PEAK-E curriculum. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 33(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s406160_016_0051_9
   Google Scholar
• Eikeseth, S., Rosales-Ruiz, J., Duarte, A., & Baer, D. M. (1997). The quick development of equivalence classes in a paper-and-pencil format through written instructions. The Psychological Record, 47(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03395225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber, R. S., Dickson, C. A., & Dube, W. V. (2016). Reducing overselective stimulus control with differential observing responses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., Arntzen, E., Nartey, R. K., & Eilifsen, C. (2012). Effects of a meaningful, a discriminative, and a meaningless stimulus on equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.97-163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., Landon-Jimenez, D. V., Buffington, D. M., & Adams, B. J. (1995). Maintained nodal distance effects after equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64(2), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1995.64-129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., Reeve, K. F., Rosen, D., Varelas, A., Adams, B. J., Belanich, J., & Hobbie, S. A. (1997). Using the simultaneous protocol to study equivalence class formation: The facilitating effects of nodal number and size of previously established equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67(3), 376–389. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1997.67-367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., Travis, R., Roy, D., Yadlovker, E., Aguiar-Rocha, L., & Sturmey, P. (2009). Equivalence class formation: A method for teaching statistical interactions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(3), 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fienup, D. M., Covey, D. P., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Teaching brain-behavior relations economically with stimulus equivalence technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fienup, D. M., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Efficiently establishing concepts of inferential statistics and hypothesis decision making through contextually controlled equivalence classes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43_19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fienup, D. M., & Critchfield, T. S. (2011). Transportability of equivalence-based programmed instruction: Efficacy and efficiency in a college classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44.435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fienup, D. M., Mylan, S. E., Brodsky, J., & Pytte, C. (2016). From the laboratory to the classroom: The effects of equivalence-based instruction on neuroanatomy competencies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25(2), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-015-9241-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallant, E. E., Reeve, K. F., Reeve, S. A., Vladescu, J. C., & Kisamore, A. N. (2021). Comparing two equivalence-based instruction protocols and self-study for teaching logical fallacies to college students. Behavioral Interventions, 36(2), 434–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrique, M., & Henklain, O. (2013). Stimulus equivalence and increase of correct responses in addition and subtraction problems. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto), 23(56), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-43272356201309
   Google Scholar
• Keintz, K. S., Miguel, C. F., Kao, B., & Finn, H. E. (2011). Using conditional discrimination training to produce emergent relations between coins and their values in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 909–913. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, S. D., & Critchfield, T. S. (1998). Classification of vowels and consonants by individuals with moderate mental retardation: Development of arbitrary relations via match-to-sample training with compound stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1998.31-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, A., Reeve, K. F., Jennings, A. M., Vladescu, J. C., Reeve, S. A., & Colasurdo, C. R. (2022). Comparing stimulus equivalence-based instruction to self-study of videos to teach examples of sign language to adults. Behavioral Interventions, 37(3), 713–731. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, E., & Russel, D. G. (1967). Suppression of learning about a hard cue by the presence of an easy cue. Psychonomic science, 8(9), 365–366. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03332242
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, D. C., & Cuvo, A. J. (1995). Stimulus equivalence instruction of fraction-decimal relations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1995.28-115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, N. J. (1971). An analysis of overshadowing and blocking. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23(1), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335557143000121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, R. W., Stromer, R., Mackay, H. A., & Demis, C. A. (1994). Matching to complex samples and stimulus class formation in adults with autism and young children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(6), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki, W. S., & Leith, C. R. (1973). Shared attention in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 19(2), 345–349. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1973.19-345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki, W. S., Riley, D. A., & Leith, C. R. (1976). The role of test stimuli in matching to compound samples by pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4(1A), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211977
   Google Scholar
• Marano-Frezza, K. E., Vladescu, J. C., Reeve, K. F., Sidener, T. M., & Cox, D. J. Training staff to create equivalence-based instruction materials in Qualtrics. (2022). The Psychological Record, 72(4), 647–663. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-021-00497-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, M. R., & Dougher, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60(3), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1993.60-529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguel, C. F., Frampton, S. E., Lantaya, C. A., LaFrance, D. L., Quah, K., Meyer, C. S., Elias, N. C., … Fernand, J. K. (2015). The effects of tact training on the development of analogical reasoning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 104(2), 96–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-González, L. A. (2001). Concept formation based on the relations among values of multi-component figures. Behavioural Processes, 56(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-6357(01)00169-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-González, L. A., & Alonso-Álvarez, B. (2008). Common control by compound samples in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2008.90-81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilgrim, C. (2016). Considering definitions of stimulus equivalence. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 17(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2016.1156312
   Google Scholar
• Regan, B., Vladescu, J. C., Reeve, K. F., & DeBar, R. M. (2018). Equivalence-based instruction with non-food items to increase portion-size estimation accuracy. The Psychological Record, 68(4), 537–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0299-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes-Giordano, K., & Fienup, D. M. (2015). Emergence of topographical responding following equivalence-based neuroanatomy instruction. The Psychological Record, 65(3), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0125-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riberio, D. M., Miguel, C. F., & Goyos, C. (2015). The effects of listener training on discriminative control by elements of compound stimuli in children with disabilities. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 104(1), 48–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, F. J., & Luciano, C. (2011). Cross-domain analogies as relating derived relations among two separate relational networks. The Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 95(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2011.95-369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 14(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1401.05
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sidman, M., & Cresson, O., Jr. (1973). Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77(5), 515–523.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, R. N. (1977). To err or not to err: A question for the instruction of psychomotor skills. Review of Educational Research, 47(3), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047003479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets, P. M., Schenk, J. J., & Barnes, D. (1995). Establishing arbitrary stimulus classes via identity-matching training and non-reinforced matching with complex stimuli. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(4), 311–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer, R., McIlvane, W. J., Dube, W. V., & Mackay, H. A. (1993a). Assessing control by elements of complex stimuli in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1993.59-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer, R., McIlvane, W. J., & Serna, R. W. (1993b). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43(4), 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03395901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer, R., & Stromer, J. B. (1990). The formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples. The Psychological Record, 40(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03399571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrace, H. S. (1963). Discrimination learning with and without “errors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1963.6-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toussaint, K. A., & Tiger, J. H. (2010). Teaching early braille literacy skills within a stimulus equivalence paradigm to children with degenerative visual impairments. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trucil, L. M., Vladescu, J. C., Reeve, K. F., DeBar, R. M., & Schnell, L. K. (2015). Improving portion-size estimation using equivalence-based instruction. The Psychological Record, 65(4), 761–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0146-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. I. (1972). Discrimination learning in the pigeon with two relevant cues, one hard and one easy. British Journal of Psychology, 63(3), 407–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1972.tb01289.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams, C. K., Tremblay, L., & Carnahan, H. (2016). It pays to go off-track: Practicing with error-augmenting haptic feedback facilitates learning of a curve-tracing task. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar