Discrimination and equivalence class formation in adults using non-differential and differential consequences

References

• Arntzen, E. (2012). Training and testing parameters in formation of stimulus equivalence: Methodological issues. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 13(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2012.11434412
   Google Scholar
• Arntzen, E., Dechsling, A., & Fields, L. (2021). Expansion of arbitrary stimulus classes and function-transfer measured by sorting performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 115(1), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arntzen, E., Granmo, S., & Fields, L. (2017). The relation between sorting tests and matching-to-sample tests in the formation of equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 67(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0209-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arntzen, E., Grondahl, T., & Eilifsen, C. (2010). The effects of different training structures in the establishment of conditional discriminations and the subsequent performance on the tests for stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 60(3), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arntzen, E., & Hansen, S. (2011). Training structures and the formation of equivalence classes. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 12(2), 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2011.11434397
   Google Scholar
• Arntzen, E., Norbom, A., & Fields, L. (2015). Sorting: An alternative measure of class formation? The Psychological Record, 65(4), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0132-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres-Pereira, V., & Arntzen, E. (2019). Emergence of large equivalence classes as function of training structures. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 45(1), 20–47. https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v45.i1.70864
   Google Scholar
• Ayres-Pereira, V., & Arntzen, E. (2021). A descriptive analysis of baseline and equivalence class performances under many-to-one and one-to-many structures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 115(2), 540–560. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogård-Antonsen, A., & Arntzen, E. (2020). Matching-to-sample performance in older and younger adults. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 22(1), 22–39. Doi. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2020.1863068
   Google Scholar
• Camara, M. R., Ducatti, M., & Schmidt, A. (2017). Identity matching to sample and exclusion performance in elderly with and without neurocognitive disorders. Behavioral Interventions, 32(4), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estéves, A. F., Overmier, B., & Fuentes, L. J. (2003). Differential outcomes effect in children: Demonstration and mechanisms. Learning and Motviation, 34(2), 148–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-9690(02)00510-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estéves, A. F., Vivas, A. B., Alonso, D., Marí-Beffa, P., Fuentes, L. J., & Overmier, J. B. (2007). Enhancing challenged students’ recognition of mathematical relations through differential outcomes training. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60(4), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210600820039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., Arntzen, E., & Doran, E. (2020). Yield as an essential measure of equivalence class formation, other measures, and New determinants. The Psychological Record, 70, 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00377-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., Doran, E., & Foxe, J. J. (2021). Equivalence class formation when responding is separated from sample and comparison stimuli: Working memory, priming, and sorting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 115(1), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratiglioni, L., De Ronchi, D., & Agüero-Torres, H. (1999). Worldwide prevalence and incidence of dementia. Drugs & Aging, 15(5), 365–375. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199915050-00004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, B., Overmier, J. B., & Thompson, T. (1997). Food- and nonfood-related differential outcomes in equivalence learning by adults with Prader-Willi syndrome. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 101(4), 374–386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• López-Crespo, G., Plaza, V., Fuentes, L., & Estévez, A. (2009). Improvement of age-related memory deficits by differential outcomes. International Psychogeriatrics, 21(3), 503–510. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610209008576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki, P., Overmier, J. B., Delos, S., & Gutmann, A. J. (1995). Expectancies as factors influencing conditional discrimination performance of children. The Psychological Record, 45, 45–71. https://www.proquest.com/docview/212670814/CCD7942BCCD54654PQ/12?accountid=27513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, J. E., Elliffe, D., & Virués-Ortega, J. (2019). Quantifying the effects of the differential outcomes procedure in humans: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(3), 870–892. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, O., Waugh, K., & Chambers, K. (2002). Differential outcomes effect: Increased accuracy in adults learning Kanji with stimulus specific rewards. The Psychological Record, 52(3), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok, L. W., Estévez, A. F., & Overmier, J. B. (2010). Unique outcome expectations as a training and pedagogical tool. The Psychological Record, 60(2), 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok, L. W., & Overmier, J. B. (2007). The differential outcomes effect in normal human adults using a concurrent-task within-subjects design and sensory outcomes. The Psychological Record, 57(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morfín, L. R. M., Flores, C., & Overmier, J. B. (2018). The differential outcomes effect using sensory outcomes in a many-to-one matching-to-sample task. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 34, e3427. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e3427
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-González, L. A., & Moreno-Sierra, V. (1999). Equivalence class formation in elderly persons. Psicothema, 11(2), 325–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza, V., López-Crespo, G., Antúnez, C., Fuentes, L. J., & Estévez, A. F. (2012). Improving delayed face recognition in Alzheimer’s disease by differential outcomes. Neuropsychology, 26(4), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, M., Bryce, R., Albanese, E., Wimo, A., Ribeiro, W., & Ferri, C. P. (2013). The global prevalence of dementia: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimer‘s & Dementia, 9(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rustad Bevolden, K., & Arntzen, E. (2018). How robust is the correspondence between responding on matching-to-sample tests and sorting tests? Norwegian Journal of Behavior Analysis, 45, 125–142. http://www.nta.atferd.no/journalissue.aspx?IdDocument=729
   Google Scholar
• Schieber, F. (2003). Human factors and aging: Identifying and comensating for age-related deficits in sensory and cognitive function. In K. W. Schaie & N. Charness (Eds.), Impact of technology on successful aging (pp. 42–84). Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Authors Cooperative.
   Google Scholar
• Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74(1), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidman, M. (2013). Techniques for describing and measuring behavioral changes in Alzheimer’s patients. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 14(1), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2013.11434452
   Google Scholar
• Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. Matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steingrímsdóttir, H.S., & Arntzen, E. (2014). Performance by older adults on identity and arbitrary matching-to-sample tasks. The Psychological Record, 64(4), 827–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0053-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steingrímsdóttir, H. S., & Arntzen, E. (2016). Eye movements during conditional discrimination training. The Psychological Record, 66(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0156-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steingrímsdóttir, H. S., Boye-Hansen, S., Åsland, H. G., Brogård-Antonsen, A., & Arntzen, E. (2021). Social significant stimuli in training of conditional discriminations in participant with neurocognitive disorder. Norwegian Journal of Behavior Analysis, 48, 221–242. Retrieved from. https://atferd.no/tidsskrift/nta/
   Google Scholar
• Urcuioli, P. (2005). Behavioral and associative effects of differential outcomes in discrimination learning. Learning and Behavior, 33(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. M., & Milan, M. A. (1995). Age differences in the formation of equivalence classes. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and SocialSciences, 50(4), P212–P218. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/50B.4.P212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelinski, E. M., Dalton, S. E., & Hindin, S. (2011). Cognitive changes in healthy older adults. Generations Journal, 35, 13–20. Retrieved from. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/cognitive-changes-healthy-older-adults/docview/906522569/se-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar