School finance centralization and revenue levels: evidence from a school finance reform

References

• Card, D., & Payne, A. A. (2002). School finance reform, the distribution of school spending, and the distribution of student test scores. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1), 49–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00177-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, R., & Roy, J. (2015). Housing markets and residential segregation: Impacts of the Michigan school finance reform on inter- and intra-district sorting. Journal of Public Economics, 122, 110–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, R., & Roy, J. (2017). Effect of constraints on tiebout competition: Evidence from a school finance reform. Regional Studies, 51(5), 765–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1142666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhary, L. (2009). Education inputs, student performance and school finance reform in Michigan. Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2007.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courant, P. N., & Loeb, S. (1997). Centralization of school finance in Michigan. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(1), 114–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199724)16:1<114:AID-PAM6>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downes, T. A., & Shah, M. P. (2006). The effect of school finance reforms on the level and growth of per-pupil expenditures. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(3), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327930pje8103_1
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez, R., & Rogerson, R. (1999). Education finance reform and investment in human capital: Lessons from California. Journal of Public Economics, 74(3), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00046-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. A. (1989). Did Serrano cause proposition 13? National Tax Journal, 42(4), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41788814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. A. (1996). How Serrano caused proposition 13. Journal of Law & Politics, 12, 607–636.
   Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C. M. (2001). All school finance equalizations are not created equal. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1189–1231. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman, J. (2017). Does money matter in the long run? Effects of school spending on educational attainment. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(4), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20150249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K., Johnson, R. C., & Persico, C. (2016). The effect of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(1), 157–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafortune, J., Rothstein, J., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2016). School finance reform and the distribution of student achievement. NBER working paper No. 22011.
   Google Scholar
• Lafortune, J., Rothstein, J., & Schanzenbach, D. W. (2018). School finance reform and the distribution of student achievement. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20160567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb, S. (2001). Estimating the effects of school finance reform: A framework for a federalist system. Journal of Public Economics, 80(2), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00083-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manwaring, R. L., & Sheffrin, S. M. (1997). Litigation, school finance reform, and aggregate educational spending. International Tax and Public Finance, 4(2), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008661519528
   Google Scholar
• Murray, S. E., Evans, W. N., & Schwab, R. M. (1998). Education-finance reform and the distribution of education resources. American Economic Review, 88(4), 789–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Revenue and Tax Analysis. (2002) . School finance reform in Michigan; proposal A: Retrospective. Michigan Department of Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Papke, L. E. (2005). The effects of spending on test pass rates: Evidence from Michigan. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 821–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, J. (2011). Impact of school finance reform on resource equalization and academic performance: Evidence from Michigan. Education Finance and Policy, 6(2), 137–167. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, F., & Sonstelie, J. (1995). Did Serrano cause a decline in school spending? National Tax Journal, 48(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41789137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, D. P. (2011a). Lifting all boats? Finance litigation, education resources, and student needs in the post-Rose era. Education Finance and Policy, 6(4), 455–485. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, D. P. (2011b). Suing for your supper? Resource allocation, teacher compensation and finance lawsuits. Economics of Education Review, 30(5), 1034–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sontelie, J., Brunner, E., & Ardon, K. (2000). For better or for worse? School finance reform in California. Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfers, J. (2006). Did unilateral divorce laws raise divorce rates? A reconciliation and new results. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1802–1820. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer, R., & Jones, J. T. (2005). Unintended consequence of centralized public school funding in Michigan education. Southern Economic Journal, 71(3), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2005.tb00656.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar