The technocentric consensus: a discourse network analysis of the European circular economy debate

References

• ACR+. (2020). ACR+ position paper on the new Circular economy action plan. Accessed on 05-08-2023. https://acrplus.org/images/position-papers/2020_03_13_ACR_Position_Paper_New_Circular_Economy_Action_Plan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Business Europe. (2020). The new circular economy action plan - Business Europe comments. Accessed on 25-11-2022. https://www.businesseurope.eu/publications/new-circular-economy-action-plan-businesseurope-comments
   Google Scholar
• Calisto Friant, M., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Salomone, R. (2020). A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calisto Friant, M., Vermeulen, W. J. V., & Salomone, R. (2021). Analysing European Union circular economy policies: Words versus actions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 337–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Circle Economy. (2021). Circularity Gap Report 2021. Retrieved November 25, 2022, https://www.circularity-gap.world/2021
   Google Scholar
• Corvellec, H., Stowell, A. F., & Johansson, N. (2021). Critiques of the circular economy. Journal of Industrail Ecology, 26(2), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauvergne, P. (2018). Why is the global governance of plastic failing the oceans? Global Environmental Change, 51, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, S. (2021). Varieties of framing the circular economy and the bioeconomy: Unpacking business interests in European policymaking. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23(2), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1894106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECOS. (2019). Evaluating the Circular Economy Action Plan: Where does the EU really stand? Retrieved August 5, 2023, https://ecostandard.org/wp-content/uploads/CE-Implementation-Response-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EEB. (2020). A circular economy within ecological limits. European Environmental Bureau: Brussels. Retrieved November 25, 2022, Https://eeb.org/library/a-circular-economy-within-ecological-limits/
   Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015). Growth within: a circular economy vision for a competitive Europe. Retrieved November 25, 2022, Https://emf.thirdlight.com/link/8izw1qhml4ga-404tsz/@/preview/1?o
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, M., Tse, T., & Soufani, K. (2017). Is the circular economy a new fast-expanding market? Thunderbird International Business Review, 59(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21764
   Google Scholar
• EuroCommerce. (2020). Contribution to Circular Economy Action Plan Roadmap. Retrieved August 5, 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12095-Circular-economy-new-action-plan-to-increase-recycling-and-reuse-of-products-in-the-EU/F502808_en
   Google Scholar
• European Economy and Social Committee. (2019). EESC opinion: Delivering on the circular economy action plan. Retrieved August 10, 2023, https://www.eesc.europa.eu/en/our-work/opinions-information-reports/opinions/delivering-circular-economy-action-plan
   Google Scholar
• European Social Partners. (2021). European Social Partners’ Project on Circular Economy - Final Report. European Trade Union Confederation – Head of Trade Union Policy. Retrieved November 25, 2022, https://www.etuc.org/en/publication/european-social-partners-project-circular-economy-and-world-work-0
   Google Scholar
• Fitch-Roy, O., Benson, D., & Monciardini, D. (2020). Going around in circles? Conceptual recycling, patching and policy layering in the EU circular economy package. Environmental Politics, 29(6), 983–1003. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1673996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friends of the Earth Europe. (2016). ‘Better regulation’: Failing the test. Retrieved August 5, 2023, https://foeeurope.org/sites/default/files/resource_use/2016/how-better-regulation-sabotaged-circular-economy-package.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gansner, E. R., Koren, Y., & North, S. (2005). Graph drawing by stress majorization. In J.Pach (Ed.), Graph drawing (Vol. 3383, pp. 239–250). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31843-9_25.
   Google Scholar
• Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – a new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgakakis, D., & Rowell, J. (Eds.). (2013). The field of Eurocracy: Mapping EU actors and professionals. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2002). Discourse analysis and the study of policy making. European Political Science, 2(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2002.49
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646
   Google Scholar
• Hasselbalch, J. A. (2019). Framing brain drain: Between solidarity and skills in European labor mobility. Review of International Political Economy, 26(6), 1333–1360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1626755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, K. (2021). The limits of the loops: Critical environmental politics and the circular economy. Environmental Politics, 30(1–2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1816052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, K., & Lynch, N. (2016). Diversifying and de-growing the circular economy: Radical social transformation in a resource-scarce world. Futures, 82, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEEP. (2020). Delivering a circular economy within the planet’s boundaries: An analysis of the new EU Circular Economy Action Plan. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP) and Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI): Brussels and Stockholm. Retrieved December 19, 2023, https://ieep.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Analysis-of-the-EU-Circular-Economy-Action-Plan-2020_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IEEP. (2022). Trade for an inclusive circular economy. Institute for European Environmental Policy: Brussels. Retrieved November 10, 2022, https://ieep.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/2022-06-15-inclusive-circular-trade-barrie-et-al.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Joachim, J., & Locher, B. (2008). Transnational activism in the UN and the EU: A comparative study. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchherr, J., Reiki, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchherr, J., Yang, N.-H. N., Schulze-Spüntrup, F., Heerink, M. J., & Hartley, K. (2023). Conceptualizing the circular economy (Revisited): An analysis of 221 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 194, 107001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., & Birkie, S. E. (2018). Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 544–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P. (2013). Reconceptualizing major policy change in the advocacy coalition framework. A discourse network analysis of German pension politics. The Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 169–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P. (2017). Discourse network analysis: Policy debates as dynamic networks. In J. N. Victor, A. H. Montgomery, & M. N. Lubell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political networks (pp. 301–325). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P., Gruber, J., & Bossner, F. R. (2019). Discourse network analyzer manual. Retrieved November 25, 2022, https://github.com/leifeld/dna
   Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P., & Haunss, S. (2012). Political discourse networks and the conflict over software patents in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51(3), 382–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2011.02003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leipold, S. (2019). Discourse analysis of environmental policy revisited: Traditions, trends, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1660462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leipold, S. (2021). Transforming ecological modernization ‘from within’ or perpetuating it? The circular economy as an EU environmental policy narrative. Environmental Politics, 30(6), 1045–1067. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1868863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mah, A. (2021). Future-Proofing capitalism: The paradox of the circular economy for plastics. Global Environmental Politics, 21(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merli, R., Preziosi, M., & Acampora, A. (2018). How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 703–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm, E., Hasselbalch, J., Holmberg, K., & Nielsen, T. D. (2022). Narrating plastics governance: Policy narratives in the European plastics strategy. Environmental Politics, 31(3), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1915020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RREUSE. (2022). Delivering a just transition to a circular economy. Retrieved August 5, 2023, https://rreuse.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/just-transition-briefing-rreuse-2022.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Simoens, M. C., & Leipold, S. (2021). Trading radical for incremental change: The politics of a circular economy transition in the German packaging sector. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23(6), 822–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1931063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valeche-Altinel, C., Wachholz, C., & Engström, M. (2021). A low-carbon and circular industry for Europe. Think 2030, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, the Institute for European Environmental Policy, Retrieved November 25, 2022, https://ieep.eu/news/think2030-a-low-carbon-and-circular-industry-for-europe
   Google Scholar
• Zero Waste Europe. (2020). Zero Waste Europe response to the new Circular Economy Action Plan Consultation. Retrieved August 10, 2023, https://zerowasteeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/zero_waste_europe_policybriefing_response-to-the-new-ce-action-plan_en.pdf
   Google Scholar