Policy instruments for governing water in cross-border metropolitan areas, the case of Greater Geneva

References

• Alam, U., Dione, O., & Jeffrey, P. (2009). The benefit-sharing principle: Implementing sovereignty bargains on water. Political Geography, 28(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2008.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W. (1977). Statecraft: An introduction to political choice and judgment. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, M. D., Walther, S. C., & Tirrell, A. (2021). Transboundary Water and paradiplomacy in the San Diego-Tijuana binational region.
   Google Scholar
• Brack, W., Hollender, J., de Alda, M. L., Müller, C., Schulze, T., Schymanski, E., Slobodnik, J., & Krauss, M. (2019). High-resolution mass spectrometry to complement monitoring and track emerging chemicals and pollution trends in European water resources. Environmental Sciences Europe, 31(1), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bréthaut, C., & Pflieger, G. (2019). Governance of a transboundary river: The Rhône. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. E., Johnson, R. M., & Larson, E. H. (2004). Prices, devices, people, or rules: The relative effectiveness of policy instruments in water conservation 1. Review of Policy Research, 21(5), 637–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00099.x
   Google Scholar
• Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2022). Instrumentation in policy design: Policy tools-from devices to activators. In Peters, & Fontaine (Eds.), Research Handbook of Policy Design. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, H. H., Basu, M., Hoshino, S., Onitsuka, K., & Shimizu, N. (2021). The role of territorial conflicts in multi-municipal water governance: A case study from Taipei Metropolis. Local Environment, 26(2), 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2021.1886066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, P. K., Musango, J. K., & May, N. D. (2017). Urban metabolism: A review with reference to Cape Town. Cities, 70, 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de los Cobos, G. (2018). The Genevese transboundary aquifer (Switzerland-France): The secret of 40 years of successful management. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 20, 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Dore, J., Lebel, L., & Molle, F. (2012). A framework for analysing transboundary water governance complexes, illustrated in the Mekong Region. Journal of Hydrology, 466-467, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (1975). Comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassenforder, E., & Barone, S. (2018). Institutional arrangements for water governance. International Journal of Water Resources Development.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henstra, D. (2016). The tools of climate adaptation policy: Analysing instruments and instrument selection. Climate Policy, 16(4), 496–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1015946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, L. A. (1990). Border commuter workers and transfrontier metropolitan structure along the United States-Mexico border. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 5(2), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog, L. A., & Sohn, C. (2019). The co-mingling of bordering dynamics in the San Diego–Tijuana cross-border metropolis. Territory, Politics, Governance, 7(2), 177–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1983). The tools of government. MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2007). Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: Reflections on the tools of government after two decades. Governance, 20(1), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00347.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (1991). Policy instruments, policy styles, and policy implementation: National approaches to theories of instrument choice. Policy Studies Journal, 19(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1991.tb01878.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments—From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowi, T. J. (1966). Distnbution, regulation, redistribution. The function of the governments. In R. B. Ripley (Ed.), Public policies and their politics Techniques of government control (pp. 27–40). New York W W Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Mirumachi, N. (2015). Transboundary water politics in the developing world. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1992). Crafting institutions for self-governing institutions. ICS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2000). Policy instruments and public management: Bridging the gaps. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(1), 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano, O., & Akhmouch, A. (2019). Water governance in cities: Current trends and future challenges. Water, 11(3), 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Villanueva, V., Stoffel, M., Bussi, G., Francés, F., & Bréthaut, C. (2015). Climate change impacts on discharges of the Rhone River in Lyon by the end of the twenty-first century: Model results and implications. Regional Environmental Change, 15(3), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0707-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortle, J., & Horan, R. D. (2013). Policy instruments for water quality protection. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 5(1), 111–138. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-091912-151903
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, C. (2014). The border as a resource in the global urban space: A contribution to the cross-border metropolis hypothesis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Leopold, L. (2019). Aligning climate governance with Urban Water Management: Insights from transnational city networks. Water, 11(4), 701. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Meene, S. J., Brown, R. R., & Farrelly, M. A. (2011). Towards understanding governance for sustainable urban water management. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 1117–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Brandeler, F. (2022). Scalar Mismatches in Metropolitan Water Governance, Water Governance - Concepts, Methods, and Practice, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08061-6_10.
   Google Scholar
• Varone, F., Reynard, E., Kissling-Näf, I., & Mauch, C. (2002). Institutional resource regimes: The case of water management in Switzerland. Integrated Assessment, 3(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1076/iaij.3.1.78.7412
   Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. (1998). Policy instruments: Typologies and theories. Carrots, sticks, and sermons: Policy Instruments and Their Evaluation, 5, 21–58.
   Google Scholar
• Vergara, A., & Rivera, D. (2018). Legal and institutional framework of water resources. In G. Donoso (Ed.), Water policy in Chile, global issues in water policy (Vol. 21, pp. 67–85). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76702-4_5.
   Google Scholar
• Vij, S., Warner, J., & Barua, A. (2020). Power in water diplomacy. Water International, 45(4), 249–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2020.1778833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlachos, E., & Braga, B. (2001). The challenge of urban water management. In C. Maksimovic & J. A. Tejada-Guibert (Eds.), Frontiers in urban water management: Deadlock or hope (pp. 1–36). IWA Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., Heikkila, T., DeLeon, P., & Sabatier, P. A. (2012). Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Sciences, 45, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiering, M., & Verwijmeren, J. (2012). Limits and borders: Stages of transboundary water management. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 27(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2012.750949
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. (1999). International river basins of the world. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 15(4), 387–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900629948682
   Google Scholar
• Yoffe, S., Wolf, A., & Giordano, M. (2003). Conflict and cooperation over international freshwater resources: Indicators of basins at risk. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 39(5), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb03696.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony – a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8(5), 435–460. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2006.054
   Google Scholar