Artificial Intelligence in Influencer Marketing: A Mixed-Method Comparison of Human and Virtual Influencers on Instagram

References

• Al-Qablan, T. A., M. H. Mohd Noor, M. A. Al-Betar, and A. T. Khader. 2023. “A Survey on Sentiment Analysis and Its Applications.” Neural Computing and Applications 35 (29): 21567–21601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08941-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arsenyan, J., and A. Mirowska. 2021. “Almost Human? A Comparative Case Study on the Social Media Presence of Virtual Influencers.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 155: 102694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assenmacher, D., L. Clever, L. Frischlich, T. Quandt, H. Trautmann, and C. Grimme. 2020. “Demystifying Social Bots: On the Intelligence of Automated Social Media Actors.” Social Media + Society 6 (3): 205630512093926. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120939264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtiari, K. 2020, April 6. “Influencer Fatigue Sets Stage for a New Generation of Creators.” Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kianbakhtiari/2020/04/06/influencer-fatigue-sets-the-stage-for-a-new-generation-of-creators/?sh=14c1fed12535
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, S. 2021, March 20. “Even Better Than the Real Thing? Meet the Virtual Influencers Taking over Your Feeds.” The Drum. https://www.thedrum.com/news/2020/03/20/even-better-the-real-thing-meet-the-virtual-influencers-taking-over-your-feeds
   Google Scholar
• Brandwatch. 2020. “Crimson Hexagon: ForSight User Guide.” https://www.brandwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Crimson-Hexagon-ForSight-User-Guide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, G., J. Drenten, and M. J. Piskorski. 2021. “Influencer Celebrification: How Social Media Influencers Acquire Celebrity Capital.” Journal of Advertising 50 (5): 528–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1977737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnell, K., M. J. George, A. R. Kurup, M. K. Underwood, and R. A. Ackerman. 2021. “Associations between Self-Reports and Device-Reports of Social Networking Site Use: An Application of the Truth and Bias Model.” Communication Methods and Measures 15 (2): 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2021.1918654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chacon, B. 2018, December 9. “How to Calculate Your Instagram Engagement Rate.” Later. https://later.com/blog/instagram-engagement-rate/
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan, G. S., R. Nahta, Y. K. Meena, and D. Gopalani. 2023. “Aspect Based Sentiment Analysis Using Deep Learning Approaches: A Survey.” Computer Science Review 49: 100576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhry, A., J. Han, X. Xu, and Y. Huang. 2022. ““I Felt a Little Crazy following a ‘Doll’” Investigating Real Influence of Virtual Influencers on Their Followers.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6 (GROUP): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3492862.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Corporate Finance Institute. 2022, April 29. “Engagement Rate: The Level of Engagement Generated from a Created Content or a Brand Campaign.” https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/ecommerce-saas/engagement-rate/
   Google Scholar
• De Veirman, M., V. Cauberghe, and L. Hudders. 2017. “Marketing through Instagram Influencers: The Impact of Number of Followers and Product Divergence on Brand Attitude.” International Journal of Advertising 36 (5): 798–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1348035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirel, A. 2020. “An Examination of a Campaign Hashtag (# OptOutside) with Google Trends and Twitter.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 20 (3): 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2020.1840460.
   Google Scholar
• Demirel, A. 2022. “Voluntary Simplicity: An Exploration through Text Analysis.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 46 (1): 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaoui, C., C. M. Webster, and L. P. Tan. 2017. “Social Media Sentiment Analysis: Lexicon versus Machine Learning.” Journal of Consumer Marketing 34 (6): 480–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-03-2017-2141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibble, J. L., T. Hartmann, and S. F. Rosaen. 2016. “Parasocial Interaction and Parasocial Relationship: Conceptual Clarification and a Critical Assessment of Measures.” Human Communication Research 42 (1): 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downer, K., C. Wells, and C. Crichton. 2019. “All Work and No Play: A Text Analysis.” International Journal of Market Research 61 (3): 236–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785318821849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, C., A. Groeppel-Klein, and K. Müller. 2022. “Consumers’ Responses to Virtual Influencers as Advertising Endorsers: Novel and Effective or Uncanny and Deceiving?” Journal of Advertising 52 (4): 523–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2154721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambino, A., J. Fox, and R. A. Ratan. 2020. “Building a Stronger CASA: Extending the Computers Are Social Actors Paradigm.” Human-Machine Communication 1: 71–86. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.1.5.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, D. C. 2002. “Parasocial Interaction: A Review of the Literature and a Model for Future Research.” Media Psychology 4 (3): 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, W., and X. Li. 2017. “Engaging Fans on Microblog: The Synthetic Influence of Parasocial Interaction and Source Characteristics on Celebrity Endorsement.” Psychology & Marketing 34 (7): 720–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R. D., K. F. MacDorman, C. C. Ho, and S. Vasudevan. 2008. “Sensitivity to the Proportions of Faces That Vary in Human Likeness.” Computers in Human Behavior 24 (5): 2456–2474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, L., C. J. Vargo, Z. Pan, W. Ding, and P. Ishwar. 2016. “Big Social Data Analytics in Journalism and Mass Communication: Comparing Dictionary-Based Text Analysis and Unsupervised Topic Modeling.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 93 (2): 332–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016639231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, J., S. Li, P. Shah, and M. S. Eastin. 2023. “The “Mixed” Reality of Virtual Brand Endorsers: Understanding the Effect of Brand Engagement and Social Cues on Technological Perceptions and Advertising Effectiveness.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 23 (2): 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2023.2185557.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., and C. Goldhoorn. 2011. “Horton and Wohl Revisited: Exploring Viewers’ Experience of Parasocial Interaction.” Journal of Communication 61 (6): 1104–1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01595.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. L., B. C. Britt, W. Evans, S. W. Rush, N. A. Towery, and A. C. Adamson. 2020. “Can Social Media Listening Platforms’ Artificial Intelligence Be Trusted? Examining the Accuracy of Crimson Hexagon’s (Now Brandwatch Consumer Research’s) AI-Driven Analyses.” Journal of Advertising 50 (1): 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1809576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiort, A. 2022, February 15. “Yes, Virtual Influencers Are Taking Jobs. Virtual Humans. https://www.virtualhumans.org/article/yes-virtual-influencers-are-taking-jobs
   Google Scholar
• Horton, D., and R. R. Wohl. 1956. “Mass Communication and Parasocial Interaction: Observations on Intimacy at a Distance.” Psychiatry 19 (3): 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassambara, A. 2021. “rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests.” R package version 0.7.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rstatix
   Google Scholar
• Kätsyri, J., K. Förger, M. Mäkäräinen, and T. Takala. 2015. “A Review of Empirical Evidence on Different Uncanny Valley Hypotheses: Support for Perceptual Mismatch as One Road to the Valley of Eeriness.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 390. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, S., R. Mulcahy, and J. Parkinson. 2020. “When Less Is More: The Impact of Macro and Micro Social Media Influencers’ Disclosure.” Journal of Marketing Management 36 (3-4): 248–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1718740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kietzmann, J., J. Paschen, and E. Treen. 2018. “Artificial Intelligence in Advertising: How Marketers Can Leverage Artificial Intelligence along the Consumer Journey.” Journal of Advertising Research 58 (3): 263–267. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2018-035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. 2022. “Keeping up with Influencers: Exploring the Impact of Social Presence and Parasocial Interactions on Instagram.” International Journal of Advertising 41 (3): 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1886477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and H. Song. 2016. “Celebrity’s Self-Disclosure on Twitter and Parasocial Relationships: A Mediating Role of Social Presence.” Computers in Human Behavior 62: 570–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowtun, A. 2020, December 9. “How to Actually Get Verified on Social Media.” Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinessdevelopmentcouncil/2020/12/09/how-to-actually-get-verified-on-social-media/?sh=47b8b0004553
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D., and C. D. Ham. 2023. “AI versus Human: Rethinking the Role of Agent Knowledge in Consumers’ Coping Mechanism Related to Influencer Marketing.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 23 (3): 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2023.2217830.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. A., and M. S. Eastin. 2021. “Perceived Authenticity of Social Media Influencers: Scale Development and Validation.” Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing 15 (4): 822–841. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-12-2020-0253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. A., S. Sudarshan, K. L. Sussman, L. F. Bright, and M. S. Eastin. 2022. “Why Are Consumers following Social Media Influencers on Instagram? Exploration of Consumers’ Motives for Following Influencers and the Role of Materialism.” International Journal of Advertising 41 (1): 78–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2021.1964226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. D., Y. Yang, T. Russell-Rose, and F. Li. 2004. “RCV1: A New Benchmark Collection for Text Categorization Research.” Journal of Machine Learning Research 5 (Apr): 361–397.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., A. C. Burns, and Y. Hou. 2017. “An Investigation of Brand-Related User-Generated Content on Twitter.” Journal of Advertising 46 (2): 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1297273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, J., D. Kemp, and Y. W. G. Song. 2022. “Instagram Influencers in Health Communication: Examining the Roles of Influencer Tier and Message Construal in COVID-19-Prevention Public Service Announcements.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 23 (1): 14–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2022.2140316.
   Google Scholar
• Lou, C. 2022. “Social Media Influencers and Followers: Theorization of a Trans-Parasocial Relation and Explication of Its Implications for Influencer Advertising.” Journal of Advertising 51 (1): 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1880345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, C., and S. Yuan. 2019. “Influencer Marketing: How Message Value and Credibility Affect Consumer Trust of Branded Content on Social Media.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 19 (1): 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.153350.
   Google Scholar
• Lou, C., S. S. Tan, and X. Chen. 2019. “Investigating Consumer Engagement with Influencer-vs. Brand-Promoted Ads: The Roles of Source and Disclosure.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 19 (3): 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2019.1667928.
   Google Scholar
• Lou, C., S. T. J. Kiew, T. Chen, T. Y. M. Lee, J. E. C. Ong, and Z. Phua. 2023. “Authentically Fake? How Consumers Respond to the Influence of Virtual Influencers.” Journal of Advertising 52 (4): 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2149641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDorman, K. F., R. D. Green, C. C. Ho, and C. T. Koch. 2009. “Too Real for Comfort? Uncanny Responses to Computer Generated Faces.” Computers in Human Behavior 25 (3): 695–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier, D., A. Waldherr, P. Miltner, G. Wiedemann, A. Niekler, A. Keinert, B. Pfetsch, G. Heyer, U. Reber, T. Häussler, et al. 2018. “Applying LDA Topic Modeling in Communication Research: Toward a Valid and Reliable Methodology.” Communication Methods and Measures 12 (2-3): 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1430754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, M., K. F. MacDorman, and N. Kageki. 2012. “The Uncanny Valley [From the Field].” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine 19 (2): 98–100. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moustakas, E., N. Lamba, D. Mahmoud, and C. Ranganathan. 2020, June. “Blurring Lines between Fiction and Reality: Perspectives of Experts on Marketing Effectiveness of Virtual Influencers.” In 2020 International Conference on Cyber Security and Protection of Digital Services (Cyber Security), Dublin, Ireland, 1–6. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberSecurity49315.2020.9138861.
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, S., M. Dumas, S. Maskey, G. McAllister, and D. K. Park. 2017. “Computational Data Sciences and the Regulation of Banking and Financial Services.” In From Social Data Mining and Analysis to Prediction and Community Detection, edited by Mehmet Kaya, Özcan Erdoǧan, and Jon Rokne, 179–209. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, T. 2020, October 29. “Virtual Influencers Make Real Money While COVID Locks Down Human Stars.” Bloomberg Businessweek. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2020-10-29/lil-miquela-lol-s-seraphine-virtual-influencers-make-more-real-money-than-ever
   Google Scholar
• Park, J., J. M. Lee, V. Y. Xiong, F. Septianto, and Y. Seo. 2021. “David and Goliath: When and Why Micro-Influencers Are More Persuasive than Mega-Influencers.” Journal of Advertising 50 (5): 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2021.1980470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puschmann, C., and A. Powell. 2018. “Turning Words into Consumer Preferences: How Sentiment Analysis Is Framed in Research and the News Media.” Social Media + Society 4 (3): 205630511879772. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118797724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinecke, L., and S. Trepte. 2014. “Authenticity and Well-Being on Social Network Sites: A Two-Wave Longitudinal Study on the Effects of Online Authenticity and the Positivity Bias in SNS Communication.” Computers in Human Behavior 30: 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E., B. M. Stewart, and D. Tingley. 2019. “Stm: An R Package for Structural Topic Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 91 (2): 1–40. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal-Von Der Pütten, A. M., and N. C. Krämer. 2014. “How Design Characteristics of Robots Determine Evaluation and Uncanny Valley Related Responses.” Computers in Human Behavior 36: 422–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M., E. M. Perse, and R. A. Powell. 1985. “Loneliness, Parasocial Interaction, and Local Television News Viewing.” Human Communication Research 12 (2): 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1985.tb00071.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusticus, S. A., and C. Y. Lovato. 2019. “Impact of Sample Size and Variability on the Power and Type I Error Rates of Equivalence Tests: A Simulation Study.” Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 19 (1): 11.
   Google Scholar
• Schramm, H., and T. Hartmann. 2008. “The PSI-Process Scales. A New Measure to Assess the Intensity and Breadth of Parasocial Processes.” COMM 33 (4): 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2008.025.
   Google Scholar
• Silge, J., and D. Robinson. 2016. “Tidytext: Text Mining and Analysis Using Tidy Data Principles in R.” The Journal of Open Source Software 1 (3): 37. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00037.
   Google Scholar
• Snowball. n.d. “An English Stop Word List.” http://snowball.tartarus.org/algorithms/english/stop.txt
   Google Scholar
• Spottswood, E. L., and J. T. Hancock. 2016. “The Positivity Bias and Prosocial Deception on Facebook.” Computers in Human Behavior 65: 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, J. P., P. Linda Breves, and N. Anders. 2022. “Parasocial Interactions with Real and Virtual Influencers: The Role of Perceived Similarity and Human-Likeness.” New Media & Society : 146144482211029. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221102900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. 2008. “The MAIN Model: A Heuristic Approach to Understanding Technology Effects on Credibility.” In Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility, edited by Miriam J. Metzger and Andrew J. Flanagin, 73–100. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262562324.073.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, V. L., and K. Fowler. 2021. “Close Encounters of the AI Kind: Use of AI Influencers as Brand Endorsers.” Journal of Advertising 50 (1): 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1810595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, L., C. Lai, and J. D. Moore. 2018. “Polarity and Intensity: The Two Aspects of Sentiment Analysis.” arXiv preprint arXiv: 1807.01466. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.01466.
   Google Scholar
• Travers, M. 2023, September 22. “A Psychologist Explains Why We ‘Hate-Watch’ Cringe TV.” Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2023/09/22/a-psychologist-explains-why-we-hate-watch-cringe-tv/?sh=72e052c795ba
   Google Scholar
• Utz, S. 2015. “The Function of Self-Disclosure on Social Network Sites: Not Only Intimate, but Also Positive and Entertaining Self-Disclosures Increase the Feeling of Connection.” Computers in Human Behavior 45: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, A. 2006. “Advertising Engagement: A Driver of Message Involvement on Message Effects.” Journal of Advertising Research 46 (4): 355–368. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0021849906060429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, D. 2021, February 4. “Influencer Marketing’s Surprising Rise of the “Everyperson”. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesagencycouncil/2021/02/04/influencer-marketings-surprising-rise-of-the-everyperson/?sh=3373ef163b23
   Google Scholar
• Xu, G., Y. Meng, X. Qiu, Z. Yu, and X. Wu. 2019. “Sentiment Analysis of Comment Texts Based on BiLSTM.” IEEE Access 7: 51522–51532. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., P. Chuenterawong, H. Lee, Y. Tian, and T. M. Chock. 2023. “Human versus Virtual Influencer: The Effect of Humanness and Interactivity on Persuasive CSR Messaging.” Journal of Interactive Advertising 23 (3): 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2023.2189036.
   Google Scholar
• Yencken, L. [@larsyencken]. 2011. “stopwords.txt.” Freely Available Stopword List, Balancing Coverage and Size [Data Frame]. GitHub. https://gist.github.com/larsyencken/1440509?permalink_comment_id=3559938
   Google Scholar
• Yun, J. T., C. M. Segijn, S. Pearson, E. C. Malthouse, J. A. Konstan, and V. Shankar. 2020. “Challenges and Future Directions of Computational Advertising Measurement Systems.” Journal of Advertising 49 (4): 446–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2020.1795757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., S. Wang, and B. Liu. 2018. “Deep Learning for Sentiment Analysis: A Survey.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 8 (4): 1253. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar