COOL IT! The objective racism of carceral technofixes

References

• Angwin, J. (2016, May 23). Sample-COMPAS-Risk-Assessment-COMPAS-“Core”. ProPublica. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/2702103-Sample-Risk-Assessment-COMPAS-CORE.html#document/p4/a296597
   Google Scholar
• Associated Press. (2020, August 10). AP was there: Watts riots erupt in Black LA neighborhood. AP News. https://apnews.com/article/riots-race-and-ethnicity-los-angeles-ca-state-wire-lifestyle-99b967751b4a8021034111ef63df488a
   Google Scholar
• Bao, M., Zhou, A., Zottola, S., Brubach, B., Desmarais, S., Horowitz, A., Lum, K., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2021). It's compaslicated: The messy relationship between rai datasets and algorithmic fairness benchmarks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.05498.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the New Jim Code. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, d., & Elish, M. C. (2018, November 13). Don’t believe every AI you see. The Ethical Machine. https://ai.shorensteincenter.org/ideas/2018/11/12/dont-believe-every-ai-you-see-1
   Google Scholar
• Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, PMLR, 81, 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Chouldechova, A. (2017). Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. Big Data, 5(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2016.0047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christin, A. (2016). From daguerrotypes to algorithms: Machines, expertise, and three forms of objectivity. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society, 46(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/2908216.2908220
   Google Scholar
• Chun, W. H. K. (2018). Queering homophily. In C. Apprich, W. H. K. Chun, F. Cramer, & H. Steyerl (Eds.), Pattern discrimination (pp. 59–97). Meson Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, W. H. K. (2021). Discriminating Data: Correlation, Neighborhoods, and the New Politics of Recognition. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (2022). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2021). Objectivity. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. Y. (2003). Are prisons obsolete? Seven Stories Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. L., Williams, A., & Yang, M. W. (2021). Algorithmic reparation. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211044808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieterich, W., Mendoza, C., & Brennan, T. (2016). COMPAS risk scales: Demonstrating accuracy equity and predictive parity. Northpointe Inc. https://go.volarisgroup.com/rs/430-MBX-989/images/%20ProPublica_Commentary_Final_070616.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. (2004). The irreducible complexity of objectivity. Synthese, 138(3), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SYNT.0000016451.18182.91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhouse, L., Lum, K., Conti-Cook, C., & Ciccolini, J. (2019). Layers of bias: A unified approach for understanding problems with risk assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Equivant. (2019, April 4). Practitioner’s guide to COMPAS core. https://www.equivant.com/wp-content/uploads/Practitioners-Guide-to-COMPAS-Core-040419.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Equivant. (n.d). Home. Retrieved May 17, 2023, from https://www.equivant.com/
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, A. W., Bechtel, K., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2016). False positives, false negatives, and false analyses: A Rejoinder to “Machine bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. It’s biased against blacks”. Federal Probation, 80(2), 38–46.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, B., & Nissenbaum, H. (1996). Bias in computer systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 14(3), 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1145/230538.230561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, R. W. (2002). Fatal couplings of power and difference: Notes on racism and geography. The Professional Geographer, 54(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, R. W. (2007). Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gouldin, L. P. (2016). Disentangling flight risk from dangerousness. BYU Law Review, 2016(3), 837–898.
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. (2020). The false promise of risk assessments: Epistemic reform and the limits of fairness. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 594–606). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harcourt, B. E. (2015). Risk as a proxy for race: The dangers of risk assessment. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 27(4), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2015.27.4.237
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. G. (1992). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “Strong Objectivity”? In L. Alcoff, & E. Potter (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton, E. (2017). From the war on poverty to the war on crime: The making of mass incarceration in America. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huesemann, M., & Huesemann, J. (2011). Techno-fix: Why technology won’t save us or the environment. New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, E. (1924). Civilization and climate. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, E. (1945). Mainsprings of civilization. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, S. F. (2018). Alvin Weinberg and the promotion of the technological fix. Technology and Culture, 59(3), 620–651. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2018.0061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, S. F. (2020). Techno-fixers: Origins and implications of technological faith. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joque, J. (2020). Revolutionary mathematics: Artificial intelligence, statistics and the logic of capitalism. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Y. (September 1, 2022). Intelligence under racial capitalism: From eugenics to standardized testing and online learning. Monthly Review. https://monthlyreview.org/2022/09/01/intelligence-under-racial-capitalism-from-eugenics-to-standardized-testing-and-online-learning/
   Google Scholar
• Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2016). Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.05807.
   Google Scholar
• Koechlin, T. (2019). Whitewashing capitalism: Mainstream economics’ resounding silence on race and racism. Review of Radical Political Economics, 51(2), 562–671. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613419873229
   Google Scholar
• Koopman, C. (2019). How we became our data: A genealogy of the informational person. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, J., Mattu, S., Kirchner, L., & Angwin, J. (2016, May 23). How we analyzed the COMPAS recidivism algorithm. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/how-we-analyzed-the-compas-recidivism-algorithm
   Google Scholar
• Lindtner, S. (2020). Prototype nation: China and the contested promise of innovation. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long, hot summer hits Los Angeles: Cops and people seek to cool it. (1965, August 14). The Chicago Defender (National Edition).
   Google Scholar
• Martelle, S. (2015, August 12). Opinion: Viewing the Watts riots through different eyes. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-watts-reactions-kennedy-king-johnson-eisenhower-20150810-story.html
   Google Scholar
• Mayson, S. G. (2019). Bias in, bias out. The Yale Law Journal, 128(8), 2218–2300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbadiwe, T. (2018). Algorithmic injustice. The New Atlantis, (54), 3–28.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of the Internet. Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, D. F. (1993). A world without women: The Christian clerical culture of western science. Alfred A. Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Niel, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, C. (2006). Beyond the welfare state? The new political economy of welfare (3rd ed.). Penn State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, D. (2005). Forced passages: Imprisoned radical intellectuals and the US Prison Regime. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, C. (2018). Accounting for slavery: Masters and management. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner, L. (2004). Introduction. In L. Rosner (Ed.), The technological fix: How people use technology to create and solve problems (pp. 1–9). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schwerzmann, K. (2021). Abolish! Against the use of risk assessment algorithms at sentencing in the US criminal justice system. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1883–1904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00491-2
   Google Scholar
• Sims, C. (2017). Disruptive fixation: School reform and the pitfalls of techno-idealism. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spillers, H. J. (1987). Mama’s baby, papa’s maybe: An american grammar book. Culture and Countermemory: The American Connection, 17(2), 64–18.
   Google Scholar
• Starke, C., Baleis, J., Keller, B., & Marcinkowski, F. (2022). Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Big Data & Society, 9(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221115189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, N. (1982). The idea of race in science: Great Britain 1800-1960. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. (2020). Vectors of control: The carceral laboratory and the politics of reform, 1961–2019 [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Weheliye, A. G. (2014). Habeas viscus: Racializing assemblages, biopolitics, and black feminist theories of the human. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A. M. (1967a). Can technology replace social engineering? American Behavioral Scientist, 10(9), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764201000903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A. M. (1967b). Social problems and national socio-technical institutes. In National Research Council, Applied Science and Technological Progress: A report to the Committee on Science and Astronautics, U.S. House of Representatives, By the National Academy of Sciences (pp. 415–434). The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A. M. (1978). Beyond the technological fix. Institute for Energy Analysis, Oak Ridge Associated Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A. M., & Bresee, J. C. (1968). On the air-conditioning of low cost housing. Alvin Weinberg Archive Collection (Box AW043, File Number F00320B), Oak Ridge, TN, United States. https://7027.sydneyplus.com/archive/final/Portal/CMOR.aspx?lang=en-US
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, B. (2020). Calculating race: Racial discrimination in risk assessment. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wynter, S. (2003). Unsettling the coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom: Towards the human, after man, its overrepresentation—an argument. CR: The New Centennial Review, 3(3), 257–337. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar