The Test Adaptation Reporting Standards (TARES): reporting test adaptations

References

• American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME) (Eds.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bader, M., Jobst, L. J., Zettler, I., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2021). Disentangling the effects of culture and language on measurement noninvariance in cross-cultural research: The culture, comprehension, and translation bias (CCT) procedure. Psychological Assessment, 33(5), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. J. (2017). A more general model for testing measurement invariance and differential item functioning. Psychological Methods, 22(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2015). Adaptation of assessment scales in cross-national research: Issues, guidelines, and caveats. International Perspectives in Psychology, 5(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/ipp0000042
   Google Scholar
• Downes, M. J., Brennan, M. L., Williams, H. C., & Dean, R. S. (2016). Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS). BMJ Open, 6(12), e011458. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011458.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elosua, P., & Iliescu, D. (2012). Tests in Europe: Where we are and where we should go. International Journal of Testing, 12(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2012.657316
   Google Scholar
• Greiff, S., & Iliescu, D. (2017). A test is much more than just the test itself: Some thoughts on adaptation and equivalence. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(3), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández, A., Hidalgo, M. D., Hambleton, R. K., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2020). International Test Commission guidelines for test adaptation: A criterion checklist. Psicothema, 32(3), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliescu, D. (2017). Adapting tests in linguistic and cultural situations. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iliescu, D., Rusu, A., Greiff, S., Fokkema, M., & Scherer, R. (2022). Why we need systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the testing and assessment literature. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 38(2), 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Test Commission and Association of Test Publishers. (2022). Guidelines for technology-based assessment. www.InTestCom.org
   Google Scholar
• International Test Commission. (2001). The ITC guidelines on test use. www.InTestCom.org
   Google Scholar
• International Test Commission. (2014). The ITC statement on the use of tests and other assessment instruments for research purposes. www.InTestCom.org
   Google Scholar
• International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (Second edition). www.intestcom.org
   Google Scholar
• Sireci, S. G., Rios, J. A., & Powers, S. (2016). Comparing test scores from tests administered in different languages. In N. Dorans & L. Cook (Eds.) Fairness in educational assessment and measurement (pp. 181–202). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2015). Methodological aspects of cross-cultural research. In M. J. Gelfand, C.-Y. Chiu & Y.-Y. Hong (Eds.), Handbook of advances in culture psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 101–160). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed.), (pp. 257–300). Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Tanzer, N. K. (1997). Bias and equivalence in cross-cultural assessment: An overview. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47(4), 263–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeinoun, P., Iliescu, D., & El Hakim, R. (2021). Psychological tests in Arabic: A review of methodological practices and recommendations for future use. Neuropsychology Review, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-021-09476-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, M. (2020). Psychological test adaptation and development – how papers are structured and why. Psychological Test Adaptation and Development, 1(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1027/2698-1866/a000002
   Google Scholar