A meta-analysis of the relationship between Wonderlic test scores and school success

References

• Beatty, A. S., Walmsley, P. T., Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., & Koch, A. J. (2015). The reliability of college grades. Educational Measurement, 34(4), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12096
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. T. (2022). Untested admissions: Examining changes in application behaviors and student demographics under test-optional policies. American Educational Research Journal, 59(1), 180–216. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312211003526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, C. M., Clark, M. A., & McClure, T. K. (2011). Racial/ethnic differences in criterion-related validity of cognitive ability tests: A qualitative and quantitative review. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 881–906. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carretta, T. R., & Ree, M. J. (2022). Corrections for range restriction: Lessons from 20 research scenarios. Military Psychology, 34(5), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2021.2022067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, T. A. (1968). Test bias: Prediction of grades of negro and white students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5(2), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1968.tb00613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlke, J. A., Sackett, P. R., & Kuncel, N. R. (2019). Effects of range restriction and criterion contamination on differential validity of the SAT by race/ethnicity and sex. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(6), 814–831. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlke, J. A., & Wiernik, B. M. (2019). psychmeta: An R package for psychometric meta-analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 43(5), 415–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621618795933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Corte, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2006). Predicting adverse impact and mean criterion performance in multistage selection. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the Scholastic Assessment Test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15(6), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00687.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higdem, J. L., Kostal, J. W., Kuncel, N. R., Sackett, P. R., Shen, W., Beatty, A. S., & Kiger, T. B. (2016). The role of socioeconomic status in SAT–freshman grade relationships across gender and racial subgroups. Educational Measurement, 35(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12103
   Google Scholar
• Knapp, G., & Hartung, J. (2003). Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate. Statistics in Medicine, 22(17), 2693–2710. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, K. A., Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2008). ACT and general cognitive ability. Intelligence, 36(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koljatic, M., Silva, M., & Sireci, S. G. (2021). College admissions tests and social responsibility. Educational Measurement, 40(4), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12425
   Google Scholar
• Kuncel, N., Tran, K., & Zhang, S. (2020). Measuring student character: Modernizing predictors of academic success. In M. Oliveri & C. Wendler (Eds.), Higher education admissions practices: An international perspective (pp. 276–302). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108559607.016
   Google Scholar
• Mau, W., & Lynn, R. (2001). Gender differences on the Scholastic Aptitude Test, the American College Test, and college grades. Educational Psychology, 21(2), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410020043832
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, M. A., Rothstein, H. R., & Whetzel, D. L. (2006). Publication bias: A case study of four test vendors. Personnel Psychology, 59(4), 927–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00059.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, P. L., Bevier, C. A., Bobko, P., Switzer, F. S. I., & Tyler, P. (2001). Ethnic group differences in cognitive ability in employment and educational settings: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 54(2), 297–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00094.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saboe, M., & Terrizzi, S. (2019). SAT optional policies? Do they influence graduate quality, selectivity, or diversity? Economics Letters, 174, 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Arneson, J. J., Cooper, S. R., & Waters, S. D. (2009). Does socioeconomic status explain the relationship between admissions tests and post-secondary academic performance? Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Schmill, S. (2022, March 28). We are reinstating our SAT/ACT requirement for future admissions cycles. MIT Admissions. Retrieved from https://mitadmissions.org/blogs/entry/we-are-reinstating-our-sat-act-requirement-for-future-admissions-cycles/.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., Oswald, F. L., Kim, B. H., Gillespie, M. A., & Ramsay, L. J. (2004). The impact of justice and self-serving bias explanations of the perceived fairness of different types of selection tests. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12(1–2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00271.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, W., Sackett, P. R., Kuncel, N. R., Beatty, A. S., Rigdon, J. L., & Kiger, T. B. (2012). All validities are not created equal: Determinants of variation in SAT validity across schools. Applied Measurement in Education, 25(3), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2012.687615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel, P., Fariborzi, H., & Hendijani, R. (2023). An application of modern literature review methodology: Finding needles in ever-growing haystacks. In Sage research methods: Business. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529667417
   Google Scholar
• Sterne, J. A. C., & Egger, M. (2005). Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. In H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment, and adjustments (pp. 99–110). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. K. (2004). The SAT II: Minority/majority test-score gaps and what they could mean for college admissions. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1318–1334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00278.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Iddekinge, C. H., Roth, P. L., Raymark, P. H., & Odle-Dusseau, H. N. (2012). The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: An updated meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 499–530. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westrick, P. A., Le, H., Robbins, S. B., Radunzel, J. M. R., & Schmidt, F. L. (2015). College performance and retention: A meta-analysis of the predictive validities of ACT® scores, high school grades, and SES. Educational Assessment, 20(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.99761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonderlic, E. F. (1992). Wonderlic Personnel Test and Scholastic Level Exam user’s manual. Wonderlic and Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wonderlic, E. F., & Hovland, C. I. (1939). The Personnel Test: A restandardized abridgment of the Otis S-A test for business and industrial use. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23(6), 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056432
   Google Scholar