Dispelling the Myth of the “Queen Bee Syndrome”: Assessing Women’s Professional Relationships with Women in Christian Higher Education

References

• Allen, R. B. (2019, November 21). Get on board with reverse mentoring. Chief Learning Officer. https://www.chieflearningofficer.com/2019/11/21/get-on-board-with-reverse-mentoring/
   Google Scholar
• American Council on Education. (2023). The American college president: 2023 edition. https://www.acenet.edu/Research-Insights/Pages/American-College-President-Study-2023.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Arvate, P. R., Galilea, G. W., & Todescat, I. (2018). The queen bee: A myth? The effect of top-level female leadership on subordinate females. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, article 8, 139–168.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlvig, J., & Longman, K. A. (2014). Contributors to women’s leadership development in Christian higher education: A model and emerging theory. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 23(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2014.862196
   Google Scholar
• Dahlvig, J. E., & Longman, K. A. (2021). Women’s leadership in higher education: Addressing glass ceilings and sticky floors. In N. S. Niemi & M. B. Weaver-Hightower (Eds.), The handbook of gender equity in higher education (pp. 29–52). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Derks, B., Ellemers, N., Van Laar, C., & De Groot, K. (2011). Do sexist organizational cultures create the queen bee? The British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610X525280
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, B., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 456–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 627–647. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.53503267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl, A. B., & Dzubinski, L. M. (2017). An overview of gender-based leadership barriers. In S. R. Madsen (Ed.), Handbook of research on gender and leadership (pp. 271–286). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrow, S., Chandler, D. E., Murphy, W. M., & Kram, K. E. (2012). A review of developmental networks: Incorporating a mutuality perspective. Journal of Management, 38(1), 210–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duguid, M. (2011). Female tokens in high-prestige work groups: Catalysts or inhibitors of group diversification? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N. (2001). Individual upward mobility and the perceived legitimacy of intergroup relations. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 205–222). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellemers, N., van den Heuvel, H., de Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? The British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(Pt 3), 315–338. https://doi.org/10.1348/0144666042037999
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellemers, N., Rink, F., Derks, B., & Ryan, M. K. (2012). Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this). Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 163–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, R. J., & Rhode, D. L. (2010). Women and leadership: Defining the challenges. In N. Nohria & R. Khurana (Eds.), Handbook of leadership theory and practice (pp. 377–410). Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ertug, G., Brennecke, J., Kovács, B., & Zou, T. (2022). What does homophily do? A review of the consequences of homophily. Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), 38–69. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0230
   Google Scholar
• Gero, M., & Garrity, E. (2018). When women lead: Cultivating diversity from the top. In L. E. Devnew, M. J. Le Ber, M. Torchia, & R. J. Burke (Eds.), More women on boards: An international perspective (pp. 225–240). Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, S. K. (2008). The developmental relationships of women leaders in career transition: Implications for leader development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 10(5), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422308323935
   Google Scholar
• Henriksson, C., & Friesen, N. (Eds.). (2012). Introduction. In N. Friesen, C. Henriksson, & T. Saevi (Eds.), Hermeneutic phenomenology in education: Method and practice (pp. 1–14). Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett, S. A. (2013). Forget a mentor, get a sponsor. Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurst, J., Leberman, S., & Edwards, M. (2018). The career impacts of women managing women. Australian Journal of Management, 43(1), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896217701981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H. (2015). Act like a leader, think like a leader. Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ibarra, H., Ely, R., & Kolb, D. (2013, September) Women rising: The unseen barriers. Harvard Business Review, 91(9), 60–66. https://hbr.org/2013/09/women-rising-the-unseen-barriers
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jogulu, U., & Vijayasingham, L. (2015). Women doctors, on working with each other. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 30(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-09-2013-0115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, H. L. (2016). Pipelines, pathways, and institutional leadership: An update on the status of women in higher education. American Council on Education.
   Google Scholar
• Kassotakis, M. E. (Ed.). (2017). Women-only leadership programs: A deeper look. In S. R. Madsen (Ed.), Handbook of research on gender and leadership (pp. 395–408). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kezar, A. J., & Wheaton, M. M. (2017). The value of connective leadership: Benefiting from women’s approach to leadership while contending with traditional views. In Practice, 21(6), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.21274
   Google Scholar
• LeanIn.Org, & McKinsey. (2022). Women in the workplace 2022. https://leanin.org/women-in-the-workplace/2022
   Google Scholar
• Longman, K. A., & Anderson, P. S. (2016). Women in leadership: The future of Christian higher education. Christian Higher Education, 15(1–2), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2016.1107339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longman, K. A., Drennan, A., Beam, J., & Marble, A. F. (2019). The secret sauce: How developmental relationships shape the leadership journey of women leaders in Christian higher education. Christian Higher Education, 18(1–2), 54–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2018.1547031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maume, D. J. (2011). Meet the new boss … same as the old boss? Female supervisors and subordinate career prospects. Social Science Research, 40(1), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavin, S. (2006a). Expectations of women in leadership and management—Advancement through solidarity? In D. McTavish & K. Miller (Eds.), Women in leadership and management (pp. 71–88). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mavin, S. (2006b). Venus envy: Problematizing solidarity behaviour and queen bees. Women in Management Review, 21(4), 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420610666579
   Google Scholar
• Mavin, S. (2008). Queen bees, wannabees and afraid to bees: No more ‘best enemies’ for women in management? British Journal of Management, 19(s1), S75–S84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2008.00573.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavin, S., Grandy, G., & Williams, J. (2017). Theorizing women leaders’ negative relations with other women. In S. R. Madsen (Ed.), Handbook of research on gender and leadership (pp. 328–343). Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785363863
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, W. M., Gibson, K. R., & Kram, K. E. (2017). Advancing women through developmental relationships. In S. R. Madsen (Ed.), Handbook of research on gender and leadership (pp. 361–377). Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Offermann, L., & Foley, K. (2020, February 28). Is there a female leadership advantage? Oxford Research Encyclopedias of Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.61
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, D. A., Hopkins, M. M., & Bilimoria, D. (2015). Developing women leaders: Applications to executive coaching. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(2), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886315575550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, D. A., Brooks, M. E., & Hopkins, M. M. (2018). Women’s roles in women’s career advancement: What do women expect of each other? Career Development International, 23(3), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-10-2017-0196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, J. E. (2020). We are the leaders we’ve been waiting for. Stylus.
   Google Scholar
• Porterfield, D. L. (2013). Presidents of the Council for Christian Colleges & Universities: A study of the successful attainment of six female presidents (Publication No. 3571002) [Doctoral dissertation, University of La Verne]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J., & Omasta, M. (2018). Qualitative research: Analyzing life. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, L. D., & Aquino, K. (2013). Much ado about nothing? Observers’ problematization of women’s same-sex conflict at work. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2012.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staines, G., Tavris, C., & Jayaratne, T. E. (1974, January). The queen bee syndrome. Psychology Today, 7, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/E400562009-003
   Google Scholar
• Starr, C. S. (2021). Unlocking women’s leadership: The theology, identity, and community benefitting women leaders in Christian higher education (Publication No. 28496637) [Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern Seminary]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/unlocking-womens-leadership-theology-identity/docview/2531528767/se-2
   Google Scholar
• Stockton, C. M. (2019). Negotiating gender and reciprocity: A phenomenological study of male advocacy of women presidents in CCCU institutions (Publication No. 2195483729) [Doctoral dissertation]. Azusa Pacific University. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
   Google Scholar
• Subašić, E., Hardacre, S., Elton, B., Branscombe, N. R., Ryan, M. K., & Reynolds, K. J. (2018). “We for she”: Mobilising men and women to act in solidarity for gender equality. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(5), 707–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218763272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitford, E. (2020). College presidents’ cabinets still far from gender parity. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/04/15/pay-and-seniority-gaps-persist-women-and-minority-administrators-higher-education
   Google Scholar
• Yip, J., Trainor, L. L., Black, H., Soto-Torres, L., & Reichard, R. J. (2020). Coaching new leaders: A relational process of integrating multiple identities. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(4), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar