Factors affecting injury severity in motorcycle crashes: Different age groups analysis using Catboost and SHAP techniques

References

• Afghari AP, Haque MM, Washington S. 2020. Applying a joint model of crash count and crash severity to identify road segments with high risk of fatal and serious injury crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 144:105615. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghasi NHM. 2018. Spatio-temporal analysis on urban traffic accidents: a case study of Tehran City, Iran [Article. JGIS. 10(05):603–642. doi:10.4236/jgis.2018.105032.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed A, Khan BA, Khurshid MB, Khan MB, Waheed A. 2016. Estimating national road crash fatalities using aggregate data. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 23(3):249–254. doi:10.1080/17457300.2014.992352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed I, Islam T, Ali G, Nawaz MM. 2016. Pillion riders’ cloth related injuries and helmet wearing patterns: a study of Lahore, Pakistan. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 23(4):388–394. doi:10.1080/17457300.2015.1047866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali SA, Kanpurwala MA, Aslam M, Siddiqui S, Khan S, Haider S, Tahir M. 2015. Association of motorbike accidents with behavior related factors in Karachi, Pakistan. J Stud Manage Plan. 1(3):532–539.
   Google Scholar
• Alnawmasi N, Mannering F. 2019. A statistical assessment of temporal instability in the factors determining motorcyclist injury severities. Anal Methods Accid Res. 22:100090. doi:10.1016/j.amar.2019.100090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alogaili A, Mannering F. 2020. Unobserved heterogeneity and the effects of driver nationality on crash injury severities in Saudi Arabia. Accid Anal Prev. 144:105618. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhareva N, Shukhman A, Matveev A, Polezhaev P, Ushakov Y, Legashev L. 2019. Attack detection in enterprise networks by machine learning methods. 2019 RusAutoCon. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Barman S, Bandyopadhyaya R. 2020. Crash severity analysis for low-speed roads using structural equation modeling considering shoulder- and pavement-distress conditions. J Transp Eng A-Syst. 146(7):04020065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatti JA, Ejaz K, Razzak JA, Tunio IA, Sodhar I. 2011. Influence of an enforcement campaign on seat-belt and helmet wearing. Karachi: Karachi-Hala Highway, Pakistan.
   Google Scholar
• Champahom T, Jomnonkwao S, Watthanaklang D, Karoonsoontawong A, Chatpattananan V, Ratanavaraha V. 2020. Applying hierarchical logistic models to compare urban and rural roadway modeling of severity of rear-end vehicular crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 141:105537. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang FR, Xu PP, Zhou HC, Chan AHS, Huang HL. 2019. Investigating injury severities of motorcycle riders: a two-step method integrating latent class cluster analysis and random parameters logit model. Accid Anal Prev. 131:316–326. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang FR, Yasmin S, Huang HL, Chan AHS, Haque MM. 2021. Injury severity analysis of motorcycle crashes: a comparison of latent class clustering and latent segmentation based models with unobserved heterogeneity. Anal Methods Accid Res. 32:100188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunto FJC, Ferreira S. 2017. An analysis of the injury severity of motorcycle crashes in Brazil using mixed ordered response models. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 9(sup1):33–46. doi:10.1080/19439962.2016.1162891.
   Google Scholar
• De Lapparent M. 2006. Empirical Bayesian analysis of accident severity for motorcyclists in large French urban areas. Accid Anal Prev. 38(2):260–268. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2005.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duong HT, Parker L. 2018. Going with the flow: young motorcyclists’ misperceived norms and motorcycle speeding behaviour. JSOCM. 8(3):314–332. doi:10.1108/JSOCM-10-2017-0064.
   Google Scholar
• Eustace D, Indupuru VK, Hovey P. 2011. Identification of risk factors associated with motorcycle-related fatalities in Ohio. J Transp Eng. 137(7):474–480. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geedipally SR, Turner PA, Patil S. 2011. Analysis of motorcycle crashes in Texas with multinomial logit model. Transp Res Record. 2265(1):62–69. doi:10.3141/2265-07.
   Google Scholar
• Habib MF, Bridgelall R, Motuba D, Rahman B. 2023. Exploring the robustness of alternative cluster detection and the threshold distance method for crash hot spot analysis: a study on vulnerable road users. Safety. 9(3):57. doi:10.3390/safety9030057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haleem K, Gan A. 2013. Effect of driver’s age and side of impact on crash severity along urban freeways: a mixed logit approach. J Safety Res. 46:67–76. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2013.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haque MM, Chin HC, Huang HL. 2010. Applying Bayesian hierarchical models to examine motorcycle crashes at signalized intersections. Accid Anal Prev. 42(1):203–212. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth N. 2012. Powered two wheelers in a changing world-challenges and opportunities. Accid Anal Prev. 44(1):12–18. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ijaz M, Lan L, Usman SM, Zahid M, Jamal A. 2021. Investigation of factors influencing motorcyclist injury severity using random parameters logit model with heterogeneity in means and variances. Int J Crashworthines. 27(5):1412–1422. doi:10.1080/13588265.2021.1959153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam S, Brown J. 2017. A comparative injury severity analysis of motorcycle at-fault crashes on rural and urban roadways in Alabama. Accid Anal Prev. 108:163–171. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.08.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalayer M, Zhou HG. 2016. A multiple correspondence analysis of at-fault motorcycle-involved crashes in Alabama. J Adv Transp. 50(8):2089–2099. doi:10.1002/atr.1447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung S, Xiao Q, Yoon Y. 2013. Evaluation of motorcycle safety strategies using the severity of injuries. Accid Anal Prev. 59:357–364. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan I, Khan A, Aziz F, Islam M, Shafqat S. 2008. Factors associated with helmet use among motorcycle users in Karachi, Pakistan. Acad Emerg Med. 15(4):384–387. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00049.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg SM, Erion G, Chen H, DeGrave A, Prutkin JM, Nair B, Katz R, Himmelfarb J, Bansal N, Lee SI. 2020. From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nat Mach Intell. 2(1):56–67. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mannering F, Bhat CR, Shankar V, Abdel-Aty M. 2020. Big data, traditional data and the tradeoffs between prediction and causality in highway-safety analysis. Anal Methods Accid Res. 25:100113. doi:10.1016/j.amar.2020.100113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannering FL, Shankar V, Bhat CR. 2016. Unobserved heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data. Anal Methods Accid Res. 11:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.amar.2016.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton J, Mannering F. 1998. The relationship among highway geometrics, traffic-related elements and motor-vehicle accident frequencies. Transportation. 25(4):395–413. [ Mismatch] doi:10.1023/A:1005095725001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minhas MS, Sangani MM, Mehmood K, Bhatti A, Mughal A, Kumar R. 2016. Dupatta (long scarf) related injuries in female pillion riders in Karachi Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 66(11):1458–1461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore DN, Schneider WH, Savolainen PT, Farzaneh M. 2011. Mixed logit analysis of bicyclist injury severity resulting from motor vehicle crashes at intersection and non-intersection locations. Accid Anal Prev. 43(3):621–630. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.09.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munyazikwiye BB, Karimi HR, Robbersmyr KG. 2015. Fuzzy logic approach to predict vehicle crash severity from acceleration data. 2015 International Conference on Fuzzy Theory and Its Applications (iFUZZY); 2015-11-01. doi:10.1109/iFUZZY.2015.7391892.
   Google Scholar
• NHTSA. 2015. 2013 Motorcycles traffic safety fact sheet. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [accessed 2023]. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/#!/DocumentTypeList/11.
   Google Scholar
• Prokhorenkova L, Gusev G, Vorobev A, Dorogush AV, Gulin A. 2019. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.09516
   Google Scholar
• Rahman MS, Abdel-Aty M, Hasan S, Cai Q. 2019. Applying machine learning approaches to analyze the vulnerable road-users’ crashes at statewide traffic analysis zones. J Safety Res. 70:275–288. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2019.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza S, Abaza O, Safi FR, Hussain A. 2019. The discrepancy between actual operating speed and drivers’ self-reported speed. International Conference on Transportation and Development 2019. doi:10.1061/9780784482575.020.
   Google Scholar
• Rifaat SM, Tay R, de Barros A. 2012. Severity of motorcycle crashes in Calgary. Accid Anal Prev. 49:44–49. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savolainen P, Mannering F. 2007. Probabilistic models of motorcyclists’ injury severities in single- and multi-vehicle crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 39(5):955–963. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang JJ, Liang J, Han CY, Li ZB, Huang HL. 2019. Crash injury severity analysis using a two-layer Stacking framework. Accid Anal Prev. 122:226–238. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.10.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahab L, Jiang HB. 2019. A comparative study on machine learning based algorithms for prediction of motorcycle crash severity. PLoS One. 14(4):e0214966. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahab L, Jiang HB. 2020. Severity prediction of motorcycle crashes with machine learning methods. Int J Crashworthines. 25(5):485–492. doi:10.1080/13588265.2019.1616885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner B, Misra M. 1996. Understanding neural networks as statistical tools. Am Stat. 50(4):284–293. doi:10.2307/2684922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waseem M, Ahmed A, Saeed TU. 2019. Factors affecting motorcyclists’ injury severities: an empirical assessment using random parameters logit model with heterogeneity in means and variances. Accid Anal Prev. 123:12–19. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.10.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen X, Xie YC, Jiang LM, Pu ZY, Ge TJ. 2021. Applications of machine learning methods in traffic crash severity modelling: current status and future directions. Transport Rev. 41(6):855–879. doi:10.1080/01441647.2021.1954108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 2015. Global status report on road safety 2015. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2018. Global status report on road safety 2018. Geneva: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Zambon F, Hasselberg M. 2006. Factors affecting the severity of injuries among young motorcyclists—A Swedish nationwide cohort study. Traffic Inj Prev. 7(2):143–149. doi:10.1080/15389580600555759.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou M, Chin HC. 2019. Factors affecting the injury severity of out-of-control single-vehicle crashes in Singapore. Accid Anal Prev. 124:104–112. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.01.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar