Frontal NCAP performance and field injury over 40 years

References

• Bean JD, Kahane CJ, Mynatt M, Rudd RW, Rush CJ, Wiacek C., September 2009. Fatalities in frontal crashes despite seat belts and air bags review of all CDS cases, model and calendar years 2000-2007, 122 fatalities. DOT HS 811 202. Washington (DC): NHTSA.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz A. 2001. Evaluation of the effect of air bags in multi-year light truck NCAP tests. 17th ESV, paper # 392, Washington (DC): NHTSA.
   Google Scholar
• Brumbelow ML, Jermakian JS, Arbelaez RA. 2022. Predicting real-world thoracic injury using THOR and hybrid III crash tests. IRCOBI conference. IRC-22-46, 264-287.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen DS, Simeone LF, Crane DJ. 1989. Identification of safety problems for restrained passengers in frontal impacts. 12th ESV. Washington (DC): NHTSA; p. 333–348.
   Google Scholar
• Evans L, Frick MC. 1993. Apr Mass ratio and relative driver fatality risk in two-vehicle crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 25(2):213–224. doi:10.1016/0001-4575(93)90062-2.PMID: 8471120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans L. 1991. Traffic safety and the driver. New York (NY): Van Nostrand Reinhold.
   Google Scholar
• Funk JR, Cormier JM, Gabler HC. 2008. Effect of Delta-V errors in NASS on frontal crash risk calculations. 52nd AAAM Conference, October.
   Google Scholar
• Gabler HC, Hampton CE, Hinch J. 2004. Crash Severity: a comparison of event data recorder measurements with accident reconstruction estimates. SAE 2004-01-1194. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Grush ES, Marsh IVJC, South NE. 1983. Comparison of high speed crash test results with fatality rates. 27th AAAM.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney J, Ellyson C. 1985. A review of the effect of belt systems, steering assemblies, and structural design on the safety performance of vehicles in the New Car Assessment Program. 10th ESV, Washington (DC): NHTSA; p. 380–413.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney J, Hollowell WT, Cohen DS. 1989. Analysis of frontal crash safety performance of passenger cars, light trucks and vans and outline of future research requirements. 12th ESV. Washington (DC): NHTSA; p. 233–240.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney J, Kahane CJ, Chan R. 1996. Activities of the new car assessment program in the United States. 15th ESV. Washington (DC): NHTSA; p. 1998–2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney J, Kahane CJ, Quarles VR. 1994. The new car assessment program-historic review and effect. SAE 941052. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney J, Quarles V. 1982. The new car assessment program–status and effect. 9th ESV. Washington (DC): NHTSA; p. 809–824.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney J. 1991. The effect of FMVSS No. 208 and NCAP on safety as determined from crash test results. 13th ESV, Washington (DC): NHTSA; p. 993–1012.
   Google Scholar
• Hackney JR, Kahane CJ. 1995. The New Car Assessment Program: five star rating system and vehicle safety performance characteristics. SAE 950888. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Hampton CE, Gabler HC. 2009. NASS/CDS Delta-V estimates: the influence of enhancements to the WinSmash crash reconstruction code. Ann Adv Automot Med. 53:91–102. PMCID: PMC3256790, PMID: 20184836.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hertz EA. 1993. Note on the head injury criterion (HIC) as a predictor of risk of skull fracture. 37th AAAM.
   Google Scholar
• Horsch JD. 1987. Evaluation of occupant protection from responses measured in laboratory tests. SAE 870222. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Jones IS, Whitfield RA, Carroll DM. 1985. New car assessment program results and the risk of injury in actual crashes. 10th ESV. Washington (DC): NHTSA; p. 371–380.
   Google Scholar
• Jones IS, Whitfield RA. 1988. Predicting injury risk with "New Car Assessment Program" crashworthiness ratings. Accid Anal Prev. 20(6):411–419. Dec doi:10.1016/0001-4575(88)90039-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahane CJ, Hackney JR, Berkowitz AM. 1994. Correlation of vehicle performance in the New Car Assessment Program with fatality risk in actual head-on collisions. 14th ESV. Washington (DC): NHTSA; p. 94. S8-O-11.
   Google Scholar
• Kahane CJ., January 1994. Correlation of NCAP performance with fatality risk in actual head-on collisions. DOT HS 808 061. Washington (DC): NHTSA.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman RP, Ching RP, Willis MM, Mack CD, Gross JA, Bulger EM. 2013. Burst fractures of the lumbar spine in frontal crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 59:153–163. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.05.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavelle JP. 2001. NCAP – field relevance of the metrics. 17th ESV, #211 Washington (DC): NHTSA.
   Google Scholar
• Libertiny GZ. 1995. An assessment of the reliability of the NHTSA New Car Assessment Program. SAE 950825. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Machey JM, Gauthier CL. 1984. Results, analysis and conclusions of NHTSA's 35 mph frontal crash test repeatability program. SAE 840201. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Maclaughlin TF, Sau RA. 1982. Analysis of 35 mph barrier crash test data. 9th ESV. Washington (DC): NHTSA; p. 782–797.
   Google Scholar
• Mertz HJ, Prasad P, Nusholtz G. 1996. Head injury risk assessment for forehead impacts. SAE 960099. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Nahum AM, Smith R. 1976. An experimental model for closed head impact injury. SAE 760825. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Nahum AM, Smith R, Ward CC. 1976. Intracranial pressure dynamics during head impact. SAE 770922. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Nirula R, Mock CN, Nathens AB, Grossman DC. 2004. The new car assessment program: does it predict the relative safety of vehicles in actual crashes? J Trauma. 57(4):779–786. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000106506.34691.b6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parenteau CS, Viano DC, Campbell I. 2022. Occupant age and size characteristics by seating location in tow-away crashes involving light vehicles in the United States. IRC-22-76, IRCOBI Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Parenteau CS, Viano DC. 2014. Spinal fracture-dislocations and spinal cord injuries in motor vehicle crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. 15(7):694–700. doi:10.1080/15389588.2013.867434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S, Smith D, Prasad A, Mohan M. 2007. NHTSA’s recent vehicle crash test program on compatibility in front-to-front impacts. 20th ESV. Washington (DC): NHTSA; #07-0231.
   Google Scholar
• Petitjean A, Trosseille X. 2011. Statistical simulations to evaluate the methods of the construction of injury risk curves. Stapp Car Crash J. 55:411–440.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prasad P, Barbat SD, Kalra A, Kim AS, Dalmotas DD, Zhang L. 2024. Evaluation of Brain Rotational Injury Criteria (BrIC) in vehicle frontal crashes. Traffic Inj Prev. 25(1):57–64. Epub 2023 Sep 14. doi:10.1080/15389588.2023.2255913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad P, Mertz HJ, Dalmotas D, Augenstein JS, Digges K. November 2010. Evaluation of the relevance of several injury risk functions. Stapp Car Crash J. 54:49–72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prasad P, Mertz HJ. 1985. The position of the United States delegation to the ISO working group 6 on the use of HIC in the automotive environment. SAE 85124. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad P. 1990. Comparative evaluation of the dynamic responses of the hybrid II and hybrid III dummies. 34th Strapp Car Crash Conference, SAE 902318. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad P. 1990. Comparative evaluation of the dynamic responses of the hybrid II and the hybrid III dummies. SAE 902318. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Richards D, Carhart M, Raasch C, Pierce J, Steffey D, Ostarello A. 2006. Incidence of thoracic and lumbar spine injuries for restrained occupants in frontal collisions. 50th AAAM.
   Google Scholar
• Sahraei E, Digges K, Marzougui D. 2013. Effects of vehicle front-end stiffness on rear seat dummies in NCAP and FMVSS208 tests. Traffic Inj Prev. 14(6):602–606. doi:10.1080/15389588.2012.742516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samaha RR, Digges K, Fesich T, Authaler M. 2010. Frontal crash testing and vehicle safety designs: A historical perspective based on crash test studies. SAE 2010-01-1024. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders J, Strashny A, Wiacek C. 2008. Relationship between frontal stiffness and occupant compartment intrusion in frontal crash tests. SAE 200801-0815. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson J, Rockwell T, Beuse N, Summers L, Summers, S, Park. 2003. Evaluation of stiffness measures from the U.S. New Car Assessment Program. 18th ESV. Washington (DC): NHTSA; #527,
   Google Scholar
• Tang L, Zheng J, Hu J. 2020. Mar A numerical investigation of factors affecting lumbar spine injuries in frontal crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 136:105400. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Arepally S. 1990. Assessing the safety performance of occupant restraint systems. 34th Stapp Car Crash Conference, P-236:301-328, SAE 902328, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA. doi:10.4271/902328.
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Casson IR, Pellman EJ, Bir CA, Zhang L, Sherman D, Boitano M. 2005. Concussion in professional football: comparison with boxing head impacts – part 10. Neurosurgery. 57(6):1154–1172. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000187541.87937.d9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS. 2018. Belted driver fatalities: risk by injury severity and time of death. Traffic Inj Prev. 19(2):153–158. doi:10.1080/15389588.2017.1355053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS. 2023. Fetal deaths and maternal injury in motor-vehicle crashes from 2008-2020 using NASS-CDS and CISS field data. Traffic Inj Prev. 24(1):14–20. doi:10.1080/15389588.2022.2140409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS. 2022. Injury by delta V in front, near-side, far-side and rear impacts: analysis of 1994-2015 NASS-CDS. SAE 2022-01-0835. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC, Parenteau CS. 2010. Injury risks in frontal crashes by delta V and body region with focus on head injuries. Traffic Inj Prev. 11(4):382–390. doi:10.1080/15389581003751623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viano DC. 1987. Evaluation of the benefit of energy-absorbing material for side impact protection: part II. 31st Stapp, SAE 872213. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC. 2024. Frontal NCAP crash tests with rear-seat occupant. Traff Injury Prev. doi:10.1080/15389588.2024.2315892.
   Google Scholar
• Viano DC. 1991. Live fire testing: assessing blunt impact and acceleration injury. Military Med. 156(11):589–595. doi:10.1093/milmed/156.11.589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viano DC. 2023. Safety priorities for occupant protection in rear impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 24(3):155–172. doi:10.1080/15389588.2023.2171177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Banglmaier R, Prasad P. 2003. Injury risk assessment of several crash data sets. SAE 2003-01-1214. Warrendale (PA): Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Tu H, Sze NN, Li H, Ruan X. 2022. A novel traffic conflict risk measure considering the effect of vehicle weight. J Safety Res. 80:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2021.09.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Shi Y, Beaudet B. 2020. Analysis of vehicle front impact pulse severity in US NCAP. SAE Int J Adv Curr Prac Mobil. 2(4):2125–2134. doi:10.4271/2020-01-0986.
   Google Scholar