The impact of indirect benefits (reduced travel time, fuel use and emissions) in cost benefit analysis of road safety countermeasures

References

• [AASHTO] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 2020. Analytical Tool User’s Manual. [accessed 2019 Dec 20]. https://developer.safetyanalyst.org/aashto/index.php/Documentation.
   Google Scholar
• Blincoe LJ, Miller TR, Zaloshnja E, Lawrence BA. 2015. The economic and societal impact of motor vehicles, 2010 (Revised). Washington (DC): National Highway Safety Administration. DOT HS 812 013.
   Google Scholar
• Byaruhanga CB, Evdorides H. 2021. A systematic review of road safety investment appraisal models. Cogent Eng. 8(1):1993521. doi:10.1080/23311916.2021.1993521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byaruhanga CB, Evdorides H. 2022. A comparison between crash and casualty economic analysis approaches of road safety infrastructure countermeasures. Int J Traffic Transp Eng. 12(1):49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels S, Martensen H, Schoeters A, Van den Berghe W, Papadimitriou E, Ziakopoulos A, Kaiser S, Aigner-Breuss E, Soteropoulos A, Wijnen W, et al. 2019. A systematic cost-benefit analysis of 29 road safety measures. Accid Anal Prev. 133:105292. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Brabander B, Vereeck L. 2007. Valuing the prevention of road accidents in Belgium. Transp Rev. 27(6):715–732. doi:10.1080/01441640701275362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2018. Cost benefit analysis. Brussels (Belgium): EC, Directorate General for Transport; [accessed 2021 Jan 17]. https://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/sites/roadsafety/files/pdf/ersosynthesis2018-costbenefitanalysis.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ejaz G. 2010. Economic evaluation of road traffic safety measures. In Proceedings of Third International Symposium on Infrastructure Engineering in Developing Countries (IEDC-2010). NED University, Karachi, Pakistan, Vol. 1, no. 1, p. 177–186.
   Google Scholar
• Elvik R. 2014. Problems in determining the optimal use of road safety measures. Res Transp Econ. 47:27–36. doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [FHWA] Federal Highway Administration. 2018. Highway safety benefit-cost analysis tool: reference guide. Washington (DC): FHWA, Office of Safety. FHWA-SA-18-027; [accessed 2019 Dec 02]. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/docs/fhwasa18027.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gorea RK. 2016. Financial impact of road traffic accidents on the society. Int J Ethics Trauma Victimol. 2(01):6–9. doi:10.18099/ijetv.v2i1.11129.
   Google Scholar
• Hakkert A, Wesemann P. 2005. The use of efficiency assessment tools: solutions to barriers: work package 3 of the European research project ROSEBUD. SWOV, Leidschendam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon T, Bahar G, Gross F. 2018. Crash costs for highway safety analysis. Washington (DC): Federal Highway Administration. Office of Safety. FHWA-SA-17-071; [accessed 2019 Dec 05]. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/docs/fhwasa17071.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Harwood DW, Torbic DJ, Richard KR, Meyer MM. 2010. SafetyAnalyst: software tools for safety management of specific highway sites. Federal Highway Administration, USA. FHWA-RT-10-063.
   Google Scholar
• Hauer E. 2011. Computing what the public wants: some issues in road safety cost-benefit analysis. Accid Anal Prev. 43(1):151–164. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2010.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [iRAP] International Road Assessment Program. 2015. iRAP Methodology Fact Sheet 13 economic analysis. London (UK): iRAP; [accessed 2019 Dec 02]. https://www.irap.org/resources/?et_open_tab=et_pb_tab_1#mytabs|1.
   Google Scholar
• [iRAP] International Road Assessment Program. 2021. iRAP safer roads investment plan. London (UK): iRAP; [accessed 2020 Jan 02]. https://vida.irap.org/en-gb/dashboard.
   Google Scholar
• Jadaan K, Al-Braizat E, Al-Rafayah S, Gammoh H, Abukahlil Y. 2018. Traffic safety in developed and developing countries: a comparative analysis. J Traffic Logist Eng. 6(1):1–5. doi:10.18178/jtle.6.1.1-5.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence M, Hachey A, Bahar G, Gross F. 2018. Highway safety benefit-cost analysis guide. Washington (DC): FHWA. FHWA-SA-18-001; [accessed 2019 Dec 02]. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/docs/fhwasa18001.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Luathep P, Tanaboriboon Y. 2005. Determination of economic losses due to road crashes in Thailand. J Eastern Asia Soc Transp Stud. 6:3413–3425.
   Google Scholar
• Martensen H, Daniels S, Van den Berghe W, Wijnen W, Weijermars W, Carnis L, Saadé J, Elvik R. 2018. Guidelines for priority setting between measures with practical examples. Deliverable Number 3.5 of the H2020 project SafetyCube. Brussels (Belgium): VIAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Martensen H, Lassarre S, editors. 2017. Methodological framework for the evaluation of road safety risk factors and countermeasures. Deliverable 3.3 of the H2020 project SafetyCube. Brussels (Belgium): VIAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• [OECD/ITF] Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development/International Transport Forum. 2015. Road infrastructure safety management. Paris (France): OECD/ITF; [accessed 2020 Dec 02]. https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/15irtadsafetymanagement.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterhaven J, Elhorst JP. 2003. Indirect economic benefits of transport infrastructure investments. In: Polak JB, Dullaert W, Jourquin BAM, editors. Across the border. Building upon a quarter century of transport research in the Benelux. Antwerpen: De Boeck. p. 143–162.
   Google Scholar
• Park S, Jang K, Park SH, Kim DK, Chon KS. 2012. Analysis of injury severity in traffic crashes: a case study of Korean Expressways. KSCE J Civ Eng. 16(7):1280–1288. doi:10.1007/s12205-012-1527-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [PIARC] Permanent Association of Road Congresses. 2020. Road Safety Manual: a manual for practitioners and decision makers on implementating safe system infrastructure. [accessed 2020 Aug 05]. https://roadsafety.piarc.org/en.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. 2021. Euro (EUR) to U.S. dollar (USD) exchange rate from January 1999 to March 11, 2021. [accessed 2021 March 10]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/412794/euro-to-u-s-dollar-annual-average-exchange-rate/.
   Google Scholar
• [SWOV] Institute for Road Safety Research. 2011. Cost benefit analysis of safety measures. SWOV Fact Sheet, SWOV, Leidschendam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• [USDOT] United States Department of Transportation. 2006. Economic analysis primer. Washington (DC): Federal Highway Administration. FHWA-IF-03-032; [accessed 2020 Aug 05]. https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/∼mlowry/Teaching/EngineeringEconomy/Supplemental/USDOT_Economic_Analysis_Primer.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• [USDOT] United States Department of Transportation. 2021. Benefit-cost analysis guidance for discretionary grant programs. Washington (DC): USDOT; [accessed 2021 Mar 20]. https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2021-02/Benefit%20Cost%20Analysis%20Guidance%202021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• [VTPI] Victoria Transport Policy Institute. 2017. Transportation cost and benefit analysis II—travel time costs. [accessed 2021 Mar 20]. https://www.vtpi.org/tca/tca0502.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wesemann P. 2000. Economic evaluation of road safety measures. Contribution to the 117th ECMT Round Table, 26 and 27 October 2000, Paris. SWOV, Leidschendam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• [WHO] World Health Organisation. 2018. Global status report on road safety. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization. Licence: CC BYNC-SA 3.0 IGO.
   Google Scholar
• Wijnen W, Weijermars W, Berghe WV, Schoeters A, Bauer R, Carnis L, Elvik R, Theofilatos A, Filtness AJ, Reed S, et al. 2017. Crash cost estimates for European countries, deliverable 3.2 of the H2020 project SafetyCube. Belgium: BRSI.
   Google Scholar
• Wijnen W. 2020. Socio-economic costs of road crashes in middle-income countries: Applying a hybrid approach to Kazakhstan. IATSS Res. 45(3):293–302.
   Google Scholar
• Wismans J, Skogsmo I, Nilsson-Ehle A, Lie A, Thynell M, Lindberg G. 2016. Commentary: status of road safety in Asia. Traffic Inj Prev. 17(3):217–225. doi:10.1080/15389588.2015.1066498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yannis G, Gitelman V, Papadimitriou E, Hakkert AS, Winkelbauer M. 2008. Testing a framework for the efficiency assessment of road safety measures. Transp Rev. 28(3):281–301. doi:10.1080/01441640701615120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar