Validated numerical unrestrained occupant-seat crash scenarios for high-speed trains integrating experimental, computational, and inverse methods

References

• Ambrósio J, Carvalho M, Milho J, Escalante S, Martín R. 2022. A validated railway vehicle interior layout with multibody dummies and finite element seats models for crash analysis. Multibody Syst Dyn. 54(2):179–212. doi:10.1007/s11044-021-09794-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbat S, Fu Y, Zhan Z, Yang RJ, Gehre C. 2013. Objective rating metric for dynamic systems. International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference (ESV), Seoul, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• BS EN 15227. 2020. Railway applications – crashworthiness requirements for rail vehicles.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho M, Ambrosio J, Milho J. 2011. Implications of the inline seating layout on the protection of occupants of railway coach interiors. Int J Crashworthiness. 16(5):557–568. doi:10.1080/13588265.2011.611399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho M, Milho J, Ambrosio J, Ramos N. 2017. Railway occupant passive safety improvement by optimal design. Int J Crashworthiness. 22(6):624–634. doi:10.1080/13588265.2016.1221332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng G, Gan S, Chen W, Zhou Q, Peng Y, Cui T, Nie B. 2021. Effect of simulated muscle activation level on driver neck response in frontal motor vehicle crashes (No. 2021-01-5008). SAE Technical Paper. doi:10.4271/2021-01-5008.
   Google Scholar
• Deng G, Peng Y, Hou L, Li Z, Li B, Yu C, Simms C. 2022. A novel simplified FE rail vehicle model in longitudinal and lateral collisions. Machines. 10(12):1214. doi:10.3390/machines10121214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng G, Peng Y, Li B, Wang K, Simms C. 2023. Assessment of high-speed train interactions with containment walls in post-derailment collisions. 29th International Conference on Computational & Experimental Engineering and Sciences (ICCES2023). doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44947-5_77.
   Google Scholar
• Deng G, Peng Y, Yan C, Wen B. 2021. Running safety evaluation of a 350 km/h high-speed freight train negotiating a curve based on the arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method. P I Mech Eng F-J Rai. 235(9):1143–1157. doi:10.1177/0954409720986283.
   Google Scholar
• Deng G, Simms C, Xu T, Peng Y, Li Z, Hou L, Liu Z. 2022. Occupant head injury assessment for bullet trains using dummy crash tests. 2022 International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Europe Conference (IRCOBI).
   Google Scholar
• Deng G, Wang F, Yu C, Peng Y, Xu H, Li Z, Hou L, Wang Z. 2022. Assessment of standing passenger traumatic brain injury caused by ground impact in subway collisions. Accid Anal Prev. 166:106547. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esat V, Acar BS. 2012. Effects of table design in railway carriages on pregnant occupant safety. Int J Crashworthiness. 17(3):337–343. doi:10.1080/13588265.2012.664009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman JL, Lopez-Valdes FJ, Duprey S, Bose D, Del Pozo de Dios E, Subit D, Gillispie T, Crandall JR, Segui-Gomez M. 2015. The tolerance of the human body to automobile collision impact–a systematic review of injury biomechanics research, 1990–2009. Accid Anal Prev. 80:7–17. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hault-Dubrulle A, Robache F, Drazetic P, Morvan H, Landsheere C, Duhem F. 2013. Analysis of train driver protection in rail collisions: part I. Evaluation of injury outcome for train driver in desk impact. Int J Crashworthiness. 18(2):183–193. doi:10.1080/13588265.2013.769484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hault-Dubrulle A, Robache F, Drazetic P, Morvan H, Landsheere C, Luc O. 2013. Analysis of train driver protection in rail collisions: part II. Design of a desk with improved crashworthiness performance. Int J Crashworthiness. 18(2):194–205. doi:10.1080/13588265.2013.769485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou L, Peng Y, Sun D. 2020. Neck injury mechanisms in train collisions: dynamic analysis and data mining of the driver impact injury. Accid Anal Prev. 146:105725. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2020.105725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou L, Zhang H, Peng Y, Wang S, Yao S, Li Z, Deng G. 2021. An integrated multi-objective optimization method with application to train crashworthiness design. Struct Multidisc Optim. 63(3):1513–1532. doi:10.1007/s00158-020-02758-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Flannagan CA, Bao S, McCoy RW, Siasoco KM, Barbat S. 2015. Integration of active and passive safety technologies—a method to study and estimate field capability. Stapp Car Crash J. 59:269–296. doi:10.4271/2015-22-0010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• International Union of Railways (UIC). 2020. UIC safety report. https://safetydb.uic.org/IMG/pdf/sdb_report_2020_public.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 3386-1. 1986. Polymeric materials, cellular flexible–determination of stress–strain characteristic in compression–part 1 low–density materials. Geneva: ISO International.
   Google Scholar
• Jing L, Liu K, Wang C. 2021. Recent advances in the collision passive safety of trains and impact biological damage of drivers and passengers. Explosion Shock Waves. 41(12):1–33. doi:10.11883/bzycj-2021-0330.
   Google Scholar
• Li Z, Ma W, Yao S, Xu P, Hou L, Deng G. 2021. A machine learning based optimization method towards removing undesired deformation of energy-absorbing structures. Struct Multidisc Optim. 64(2):919–934. doi:10.1007/s00158-021-02896-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LSTC. 2014. LSTC_NCAC hybrid III 50th dummy.
   Google Scholar
• Nie B, Crandall JR, Panzer MB. 2017. Computational investigation of the effects of knee airbag design on the interaction with occupant lower extremity in frontal and oblique impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 18(2):207–215. doi:10.1080/15389588.2016.1219728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng Y, Hou L, Yang M, Tian H. 2017. Investigation of the train driver injuries and the optimization design of driver workspace during a collision. P I Mech Eng F-J Rai. 231(8):902–915. doi:10.1177/0954409716647418.
   Google Scholar
• Peng Y, Wang S, Yao S, Xu P. 2017. Crashworthiness analysis and optimization of a cutting-style energy absorbing structure for subway vehicles. Thin Wall Struct. 120:225–235. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2017.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholes A, Lewis JH. 1993. Development of crashworthiness for railway vehicle structures. P I Mech Eng F-J Rai. 207(1):1–16. doi:10.1243/PIME_PROC_1993_207_222_02.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Severson KJ, Parent DP. 2006. Train-to-train impact test of crash energy management passenger rail equipment: occupant experiments. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Vol. 47780; p. 75–86. doi:10.1115/IMECE2006-14420.
   Google Scholar
• Simons JW, Kirkpatrick SW. 1999. High-speed passenger train crashworthiness and occupant survivability. Int J Crashworthiness. 4(2):121–132. doi:10.1533/cras.1999.0095.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki D, Nakai K, Enami S, Okino T, Takano J, Palacin R. 2015. Proposal of simulation method for behaviour analysis of passengers on longitudinal seating in railway collision. International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury Europe Conference (IRCOBI).
   Google Scholar
• TNO. 2013. Model manual-version 7.5.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrell D, Severson KJ, Marquis BP. 1995. Analysis of occupant protection strategies in train collisions. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrell D, Zolock J, VanIngen-Dunn C. 2000. Rail passenger equipment collision tests: analysis of occupant protection measurements. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition. doi:10.1115/IMECE2000-2140.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrell D, Zolock J, VanIngen-Dunn C. 2002. Train-to-train impact test: occupant protection experiments. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition. doi:10.1115/IMECE2002-39611.
   Google Scholar
• Wei L, Zhang L. 2018. Evaluation and improvement of crashworthiness for high-speed train seats. Int J Crashworthiness. 23(5):561–568. doi:10.1080/13588265.2017.1367354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Xie S, Li H, Chen Z. 2019. Design and injury analysis of the seated occupant protection posture in train collision. Safety Sci. 117:263–275. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao S, Li Z, Yan J, Xu P, Peng Y. 2018. Analysis and parameters optimization of an expanding energy-absorbing structure for a rail vehicle coupler. Thin Wall Struct. 125:129–139. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2018.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Nahum AM, Melvin JW. 2014. Accidental injury: biomechanics and prevention. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Zhang J, Baisden JL. 2009. Physical properties of the human head: mass, center of gravity and moment of inertia. J Biomech. 42(9):1177–1192. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C, Wang F, Wang B, Li G, Li F. 2020. A computational biomechanics human body model coupling finite element and multibody segments for assessment of head/brain injuries in car-to-pedestrian collisions. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 17(2):492. doi:10.3390/ijerph17020492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Zheng S, Liu K, Gao Z, Zhao L, Jing L. 2023. A modified finite element dummy model of Chinese adult male used for train collision simulations. Int J Rail Transp. 1–24. doi:10.1080/23248378.2023.2201585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar