In Defense of the Lecture: Revisiting and Reassessing Its Place within Management Pedagogy

References

• Adams, D. (2000). Views of academic work. Teacher Development, 4, 65–77. doi:10.1080/13664530000200097
   Google Scholar
• Åkerlind, G. S. (2004). A new dimension to understanding university teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 9, 363–375. doi:10.1080/1356251042000216679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 1–18. doi:10.1037/a0021017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althoff Fridley, C. (2009). Social implications of entitlement, a cautionary tale. Journal of Philosophy and History of Education, 59, 88–91.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., Thome, P., & Students on the Qualitative Research Methods Course Unit. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? university students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in higher education, 22, 187–203.
   Google Scholar
• Augustinien, A. (2004). Lecture as a traditional form of studies in higher school and its importance to evolve while facing knowledge society. Social Sciences, 44, 72–81.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, K. (2004). What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barkley, E., & Major, C. H. (2018). Interactive lecturing: A handbook for college faculty. Plano, TX: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Berdan Lozano, J., & Tilman, T. S. (2016, November). 2016 college senior survey. Retrieved form https://www.heri.ucla.edu/briefs/CSS/CSS-2016-Brief.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Billsberry, J. (2014). The rise and rise of management edutainment. Journal of Management Education, 38, 151–159. doi:10.1177/1052562914524696
   Google Scholar
• Boman, J. S. (2013). Graduate student teaching development: Evaluating the effectiveness of training in relation to graduate student characteristics. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 43, 100–114.
   Google Scholar
• Booth-Butterfield, S. (1988). Inhibition and student recall of instructional messages. Communication Education, 37, 312–324. doi:10.1080/03634528809378732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourhis, J., & Stubbs, J. (1991, April). Communication apprehension, learning styles, and academic achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Central States Communication Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., & Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and … tensions with professional identity? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 11, 339–346. doi:10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, R. (2018, June 20). When did the U.S. stop seeing teachers as professionals? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved form https://hbr.org/2018/06/when-did-the-u-s-stop-seeing-teachers-as-professionals
   Google Scholar
• Carrell, L. J. (2009). Communication training for clergy: Exploring impact on the transformative quality of sermon communication. Communication Education, 58, 15–34. doi:10.1080/03634520802235528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charan, R. (2012, June 21). The discipline of listening. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved form https://hbr.org/201206/the-discipline-of-listening
   Google Scholar
• Chavez, C. I., Ferris, W. P., & Gibson, L. A. (2011). Predicting values and beliefs: Learning that can last. Journal of Management Education, 35, 504–536. doi:10.1177/1052562910376238
   Google Scholar
• Chory, R. M., & Horan, S. M. (2018). [Re]negotiating power and influence in the classroom. In M. L. Houser & A. M. Hosek (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 112–125). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Chory, R. M., Horan, S. M., & Houser, M. L. (2017). Justice in the higher education classroom: Students’ perceptions of unfairness and responses to instructors. Innovative Higher Education, 42, 321–336. doi:10.1007/s10755-017-9388-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chory, R. M., & Offstein, E. H. (2017a). Outside the classroom walls: Perceptions of professor inappropriate out-of-class conduct and student classroom incivility among American business students. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15, 197–214. doi:10.1007/s10805-017-9290-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chory, R. M., & Offstein, E. H. (2017b). “Your professor will know you as a person”: Evaluating and rethinking the relational boundaries between faculty and students. Journal of Management Education, 41, 9–38. doi:10.1177/1052562916647986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chory, R. M., & Offstein, E. H. (2018). Too close for comfort? Faculty-student multiple relationships and their impact on student classroom conduct. Ethics & Behavior, 28, 23–44. doi:10.1080/10508422.2016.1206475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chory-Assad, R. M. (2002). Classroom justice: Perceptions of fairness as a predictor of student motivation, learning, and aggression. Communication Quarterly, 50, 58–77. doi:10.1080/01463370209385646
   Google Scholar
• Chory-Assad, R. M., & Paulsel, M. L. (2004). Classroom justice: Student aggression and resistance as reactions to perceived unfairness. Communication Education, 53, 253–273. doi:10.1080/0363452042000265189
   Google Scholar
• Churchill, L. R. (1982). The teaching of ethics and moral values in teaching: Some contemporary confusions. The Journal of Higher Education, 53, 296–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. E. (1982). Antagonism between achievement and enjoyment in ATI studies. Educational Psychologist, 17, 92–101. doi:10.1080/00461528209529247
   Google Scholar
• Clayson, D. E. (2009). Student evaluations of teaching: Are they related to what students learn? A meta-analysis and review of literature. Journal of Marketing Education, 31, 16–30. doi:10.1177/0273475308324086
   Google Scholar
• Condon, W. (2016). Faculty development and student learning: Assessing the connections. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. G., & Goldenberg, E. N. (2009). Off-track profs: Nontenured teaches in higher education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daimler, M. (2016, May 25). Listening is an overlooked leadership tool. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved form https://hbr.org/2016/05/listening-is-an-overlooked-leadership-tool
   Google Scholar
• Dehler, G. E., & Welsh, M. A. (2014). Against spoon-feeding. For learning. Reflections on students’ claims to knowledge. Journal of Management Education, 38, 875–893. doi:10.1177/1052562913511436
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. (2016, May 3). Why millennials struggle for success. CNN. Retrieved form http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/03/opinions/grit-is-a-gift-of-age-duckworth/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Self-control and grit: Related but separable determinants of success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 319–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, K. K. (1998). Communication apprehension and learning style preference: Correlations and implications for teaching. Communication Education, 47, 137–150. doi:10.1080/03634529809379118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagan, M. K., Stolzenberg, E. B., Berdan Lozano, J., Aragon, M. C., Suchard, M. R., & Hurtado, S. (2014). Undergraduate teaching faculty: The 2013–2014 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). Process theories of attitude formation and change: The elaboration likelihood and heuristic-systematic models. In A. H. Eagly & S. Chaiken (Eds.), The psychology of attitudes (pp. 303–350). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawell, J. (2017). Experiential learning: Some reservations. Academe, 103(6). Retrieved form https://www.aaup.org/article/experiential-learning-some-reservations#.XWk7QyhKhPY
   Google Scholar
• Ferris, W. P. (2002). Students as junior partners, professors as senior partners, the B-school as the firm: A new model for collegiate business education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1, 185–193. doi:10.5465/amle.2002.8509373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franz, R. S. (1998). Whatever you do, don’t treat your students like customers! Journal of Management Education, 22, 63–69. doi:10.1177/105256299802200105
   Google Scholar
• Grow, G. (1994). In defense of the staged self-directed learning model. Adult Education Quarterly, 44, 109–114. doi:10.1177/074171369404400206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grow, G. O. (1991). Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult Education Quarterly, 41, 125–149. doi:10.1177/0001848191041003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., Chory, R. M., & Goodboy, A. K. (2010). Understanding students’ classroom justice experiences and responses. Communication Education, 59, 453–474. doi:10.1080/03634523.2010.487282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., & Raposo, P. (2013). Priest as teacher I: Understanding source credibility. Journal of Communication and Religion, 36, 73–91.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, G. F., & Buck, J. M. (2012). The adult student and course satisfaction: What matters most? Innovative Higher Education, 37, 215–226. doi:10.1007/s10755-011-9201-0
   Google Scholar
• Huang, F. (2017). The impact of mass and universal higher education on curriculum and instruction: Case studies of China and Japan. Higher Education, 74, 507–525. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0061-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, D. (2012). What’s wrong with the completion agenda—And what we can do about it. Liberal Education, 98, 8–17.
   Google Scholar
• Jääskelä, P., Häkkinen, P., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2017). Supporting and constraining factors in the development of university teaching experienced by teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 22, 655–671. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1273206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., Tripp, T. M., & Hong, P. Y. (2017). College instruction is not so stress free after all: A qualitative and quantitative study of academic entitlement, uncivil behaviors, and instructor strain and burnout. Stress and Health, 33, 578–589. doi:10.1002/smi.2742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D. (1997). A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction, 7, 255–275. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00028-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisfalvi, V., & Oliver, D. (2015). Creating and maintaining a safe space in experiential learning. Journal of Management Education, 39, 713–716. doi:10.1177/1052562915574724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, S. (2014). Peer assessment in group projects accounting for assessor reliability by an iterative method. Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 301–314. doi:10.1080/13562517.2013.860110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193–212. doi:10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, S. W., Tomkovick, C., Wells, T., Flunker, L., & Kickul, J. (2005). Does service-learning add value? Examining the perspectives of multiple stakeholders. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 278–294. doi:10.5465/amle.2005.18122418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund Dean, K., & Fornaciari, C. J. (2014). Creating masterpieces: How course structures and routines enable student performance. Journal of Management Education, 38, 10–42. doi:10.1177/1052562912474894
   Google Scholar
• Lund Dean, K., & Forray, J. M. (2015). Breaking through without crashing through. Journal of Management Education, 39, 543–548. doi:10.1177/1052562915597941
   Google Scholar
• Lund Dean, K., & Jolly, J. P. (2012). Student identity, disengagement, and learning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 228–243. doi:10.5465/amle.2009.0081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, C. (2009). Gender, occupational prestige, and wages: A test of devaluation theory. European Sociological Review, 25, 87–101. doi:10.1093/esr/jcn035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 14–19. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllum, K. (2016). Managing imposter syndrome among the “Trophy Kids”: Creating teaching practices that develop independence in millennial students. Communication Education, 65, 363–365. doi:10.1080/03634523.2016.1177848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1984). The communication apprehension perspective. In J. Daly & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Avoiding communication (pp. 13–38). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Andersen, J. F. (1976). The relationship between communication apprehension and academic achievement among college students. Human Communication Research, 3, 73–81. doi:10.1111/hcre.1976.3.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., Booth-Butterfield, S., & Payne, S. (1989). The impact of communication apprehension on college student retention and success. Communication Quarterly, 37, 100–107. doi:10.1080/01463378909385531
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1983). Power in the classroom I: Teacher and student perceptions. Communication Education, 32, 175–184. doi:10.1080/03634528309378527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1985). Power in the classroom V: Behavior alteration techniques, communication training and learning. Communication Education, 34, 214–226. doi:10.1080/03634528509378609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., Valencic, K. M., & Richmond, V. P. (2004). Toward a general model of instructional communication. Communication Quarterly, 52, 197–210. doi:10.1080/01463370409370192
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, J. (2015). Masculinity and non-traditional occupations: Men’s talk in women’s work. Gender, Work and Organisation, 22, 273–291. doi:10.1111/gwao.12078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miretzky, D., & Stevens, S. (2012). Faculty’s perceptions of students’ characteristics: A for effort please. Current Issues in Education, 15, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, I. C. L., & Forbes, J. (2009). Education as service: The understanding of university experience through the service logic. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 19, 38–64. doi:10.1080/08841240902904703
   Google Scholar
• Offstein, E. H., & Chory, R. M. (2017). Breaking bad in business education: Impacts on student incivility and academic dishonesty. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 80, 269–295. doi:10.1177/2329490616671709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, L. E., Howell, L. A., & Wischusen, W. (2016). Perceptions of active learning between faculty and undergraduates: Differing views among departments. Journal of STEM Education, 17, 55–63.
   Google Scholar
• Päuler-Kuppinger, L., & Jucks, R. (2017). Perspectives on teaching: Conceptions of teaching and epistemological beliefs of university academics and students in different domains. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18, 63–76. doi:10.1177/1469787417693507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsel, M. L., Chory-Assad, R. M., & Dunleavy, K. N. (2005). The relationship between student perceptions of instructor power and classroom justice. Communication Research Reports, 22, 207–215. doi:10.1080/00036810500207030
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. L., & Janicki, T. (1979). Individual characteristics and children’s learning in large-group and small-group approaches. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 677–687. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.5.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. L., Janicki, T. C., & Swing, S. R. (1980). Aptitude-treatment interaction effects of three social studies teaching approaches. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 339–360. doi:10.3102/00028312017003339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, V. J., & Fitzgibbons, D. E. (2005). Being in the classroom. Journal of Management Education, 29, 333–356. doi:10.1177/1052562904271144
   Google Scholar
• Raver, S. A., & Maydosz, A. S. (2010). Impact of the provision and timing of instructor-provided notes on university students’ learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11, 189–200. doi:10.1177/1469787410379682
   Google Scholar
• Rhoades, G. (2012). Faculty engagement to enhance student attainment (Prepared for National Commission on Higher Education Attainment). Retrieved form https://www.acenet.edu/newsroom/Documents/Faculty-Engagement-to-Enhance-Student-Attainment–Rhoades.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P. (1990). Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39, 181–195. doi:10.1080/03634529009378801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1984). Power in the classroom II. Power and Learning. Communication Education, 33, 125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., Kearney, P., & Plax, T. G. (1987). Power in the classroom VII: Linking behavior alteration techniques to cognitive learning. Communication Education, 36, 1–12. doi:10.1080/03634528709378636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roblyer, M. D., Edwards, J., & Havriluk, M. A. (1997). Integrating educational technology into teaching (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, H. G., Loyens, S. M. M., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2007). Problem-based learning is compatible with human cognitive architecture: Commentary on Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42, 91–97. doi:10.1080/00461520701263350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. G. (2012). Where completion goes awry: The metrics for “success” mask mounting problems with quality. Liberal Education, 98, 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., Turman, P. D., Myers, S. A., Barton, M. H., & Jernberg, K. A. (2008). Learner empowerment and teacher evaluations as functions of teacher power use in the college classroom. Communication Education, 57, 180–200. doi:10.1080/03634520701840303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., Turman, P. D., Myers, S. A., Barton, M. H., & Jernberg, K. A. (2009). Instructor credibility as a mediator of instructors’ prosocial communication behaviors and students’ learning outcomes. Communication Education, 58, 350–371. doi:10.1080/03634520902926851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuldt, B. A., & Totten, J. W. (2008). 24/7 technology, business faculty, and stress. Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 4, 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, M. D., Yates, M. P., & Wheeless, L. R. (1975). An exploratory investigation of the effects of communication apprehension in alternative systems of instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, N. (2015, June 17). U.S. birthrate hits turning point. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved form https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-birthrate-hits-turning-point-1434513662
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J. (2017). Statistical significance and program effect: Rejoinder to “Why assessment will never work in many business schools: A call for better utilization of pedagogical research”. Journal of Management Education, 41, 206–210. doi:10.1177/1052562916688317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprague, J. (1992a). Critical perspectives on teacher empowerment. Communication Education, 41, 181–203. doi:10.1080/03634529209378879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprague, J. (1992b). Expanding the research agenda for instructional communication: Raising some unasked questions. Communication Education, 41, 1–25. doi:10.1080/03634529209378867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Higher Education Executive Officers Association. (2019). State higher education finance: FY 2018. Boulder, CO.
   Google Scholar
• Stes, A., Coertjens, L., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). Instructional development in higher education: Impact on teachers’ teaching behaviour as perceived by students. Instructional Science, 41, 1103–1126. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9267-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. C., Houghton, S. M., & Rogers, P. R. (2012). Instructional design, active learning, and student performance: Using a trading room to teach strategy. Journal of Management Education, 36, 753–776. doi:10.1177/1052562912456295
   Google Scholar
• Stibitz, S. (2015, January 30). How to really listen to your employees. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved form https://hbr.org/2015/01/how-to-really-listen-to-your-employees
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, K. (2016, May 17). These are the skills bosses say new college grads do not have. Forbes. Retrieved form https://www.forbes.com/sites/karstenstrauss/2016/05/17/these-are-the-skills-bosses-say-new-college-grads-do-not-have/#32b0bad25491
   Google Scholar
• Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Surowiecki, J. (2015, November 2). The rise and fall of for-profit schools. New Yorker. Retrieved form http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/11/02/the-rise-and-fall-of-for-profit-schools
   Google Scholar
• Tata, J. (1999). Grade distributions, grading procedures, and students’ evaluations of instructors: A justice perspective. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 263–271. doi:10.1080/00223989909599739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teeter, C., Fenton, N., Nicholson, K., Flynn, T., Kim, J., McKay, M., … Vajoczki, S. (2011). Using communities of practice to foster faculty development in higher education. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 4, 52–57. doi:10.22329/celt.v4i0.3273
   Google Scholar
• Tibbles, D., Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Weber, K. (2008). Organizational orientations in an instructional setting. Communication Education, 57, 389–407. doi:10.1080/03634520801930095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vella, F. (1992). Medical education: Capitalizing on the lecture method. FASEB Journal, 6, 811–812. doi:10.1096/fasebj.6.3.1497701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welker, R. (1991). Expertise and the leader as expert: Rethinking a questionable metaphor. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 19–35. doi:10.3102/00028312028001019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalen, Z. (2015). What is communication apprehension? Retrieved form https://canvas.umw.edu/courses/1030023/pages/what-is-communication-apprehension
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M., & Gerber, L. E. (2008). How generational theory can improve teaching: Strategies for working with the “millennials.”. Currents in Teaching and Learning, 1, 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, R., & Sarros, J. (2002). The academic work environment in Australian universities: A motivating place to work? Higher Education Research & Development, 21, 241–258. doi:10.1080/0729436022000020751
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. R. (2017, November 8). How much Hollywood glitz should colleges use in their online courses? EdSurge. Retrieved form https://www.edsurge.com/news/2017-11-08-how-much-hollywood-glitz-should-colleges-use-in-their-online-courses
   Google Scholar