https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7939-7930
References
- Bachman, L. F. (2007). What is the construct? The dialectic of abilities and contexts in defining constructs in language assessment. Language Testing Reconsidered, 22(1), 41–71.
- Chalhoub-Deville, M., & O’Sullivan, B. (2020). Validity: Theoretical development and integrated arguments. British Council Monographs.
- Davies, A. (1990). Principles of language testing.
- Fox, J., & Artemeva, N. (2022). Reconsidering context in language assessment: Transdisciplinary perspectives, social theories, and validity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351184571
- Isaacs, T., Hunt, D., Ward, D., Rooshenas, L., & Edwards, L. (2016). The inclusion of ethnic minority patients and the role of language in telehealth trials for type 2 diabetes: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(9), e256. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6374
- Isaacs, T., Murdoch, J., Demjén, Z., & Stevenson, F. (2022). Examining the language demands of informed consent documents in patient recruitment to cancer trials using tools from corpus and computational linguistics. Health, 26(4), 431–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459320963431
- Lawrence, R. J. (2010). Deciphering interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary contributions. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.22545/2010/0003
- Lazaraton, A., & Taylor, L. (2007). Qualitative research methods in language test development and validation. In D. F. Janna, M. W. Doreen, B. Liying, C. Carolyn, E. T., & D. Christine, (Eds.), Language Testing Reconsidered (pp. 113–130).
- Liddicoat, A. J. (2010). Applied linguistics in its disciplinary context. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 14–1. https://doi.org/10.2104/aral1014
- Markus, K. A. (1998). Science, measurement, and validity: Is completion of Samuel Messick’s synthesis possible? Social Indicators Research, 45(1/3), 7–34. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006960823277
- Messick, S. (1998). Test validity: A matter of consequence. Social Indicators Research, 45(1/3), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006964925094
- Moss, P. A., & Haertel, E. H. (2016. Engaging methodological pluralism. In D. Gitomer & C. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (5th ed., pp. 127–247). Washington, DC: AERA. https://doi.org/10.3102/978-0-935302-48-6_3
- Roever, C., & McNamara, T. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 242–258.
- Tett, G. (2015). The silo effect: The peril of expertise and the promise of breaking down barriers. Simon & Schuster.
- Weir, C. J. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. Research and practice in applied linguistics (ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Widdowson, H. (2003). Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford University Press.