A text mining analysis of the change in status of the Hagia Sophia on Twitter: the political discourse and its reflections on the public opinion

References

• Akan, E. (2020). Ayasofya Camisi’nin müzeye çevrilmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Türk Dünyası Araştırmaları, 125(247), 313–328.
   Google Scholar
• Akgül, S., Pazarbaşı, B., & Yıldız, G. (2016). Dış politika alanında siyasal iletişim aracı olarak sosyal ağ Twitter kullanımının karar alma sürecine etkisi: Su 24 Rus uçağının düşürülmesi ile ilgili Türk ve Rus siyasi haber aktörlerinin tweet iletilerinin analizi. AJIT-e: Bilişim Teknolojileri Online Dergisi, 7(25), 37–70. doi:10.5824/1309-1581.2016.4.003.x
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. (2015). Rhetoric. W. R. Roberts Trans., Mockingbird Classics Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, A., Della Pietra, S. A., & Della Pietra, V. J. (1996). A maximum entropy approach to natural language processing. Computational Linguistics, 22(1), 39–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (2013). Contagious, why things catch on. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H. (1948). Public opinion and public opinion polling. American Sociological Review, 13(5), 542–549. doi:10.2307/2087146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolgov, R., Chernov, I., Ivannikov, I., & Katsy, D. (2019). Battle in Twitter: Comparative analysis of online political discourse (cases of Macron, Trump, Putin, and Medvedev). In A. Chugunov, Y. Misnikov, E. Roshchin, & D. Trutnev (Eds.), Electronic governance and open society: Challenges in Eurasia (pp. 374–384). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2006). Social Network Sites: My definition. Retrieved from:https://www.zephoria.org/thoughts/archives/2006/11/10/social_network-2.html
   Google Scholar
• Carpini, M. X. D., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, E., Deb, A., & Ferrara, E. (2021). #Election2020: The first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election. Journal of Computational Social Science, 5(1), 1–18. doi:10.1007/s42001-021-00117-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, H. (2020). The modern online democracy: An evaluation of social media’s ability to facilitate political discourse. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 12, 277–289.
   Google Scholar
• Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64(2), 317–332. doi:10.1111/jcom.12084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, W. E. (1993). The terms of political discourse (3rd ed.). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coşkun, B. S. (2019). Türkiye’de anıtsal yapıların korunmasında uygulama boyutunda yaşanan sorunlar: Ayasofya Müzesi ve Fatih Camii örnekleri. Sanat Tarihi Dergisi, 28(1), 39–65. doi:10.29135/std.507263
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dugan, J. (2013). Cicero’s rhetorical theory. In C. Steel (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Cicero (pp. 25–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Federico, C. M., & Hunt, C. V. (2013). Political information, political involvement, and reliance on ideology in political evaluation. Political Behavior, 35(1), 89–112. doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9184-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetzer, A. (2013). The multilayered and multifaceted nature of political discourse. In A. Fetzer (Ed.), The pragmatics of political discourse: Explorations across cultures (pp. 1–18). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, A., Peterson, J. V., & Halcrow, S. E. (2021). Social media and public perception as core aspect of public health: The cautionary case of @realdonaldtrump and COVID-19. PLoS ONE, 16(5), 1–10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Sanchez, E., Benetti, P. R., Higa, G. L., Alvarez, M. C., & Gomez-Nieto, E. (2021). Political discourses, ideologies, and online coalitions in the Brazilian Congress on Twitter during 2019. New Media & Society, 1–23. doi:10.1177/14614448211017920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garimella, K., Weber, I., & De Choudhury, M. (2016). Quote RTs on Twitter: Usage of the new feature for political discourse. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science, Web Sci’ 16, 200–204. doi:10.1145/2908131.2908170
   Google Scholar
• Garimella, K., Gionis, A., De Francisci Morales, G., & Mathioudakis, M. (2018). Political discourse on social media: Echo chambers, gatekeepers, and the price of bipartisanship. In The Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference (pp.913–922), Geneva: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, C. J., Herbst, S., Lindeman, M., O’Keefe, G. J., & Shapiro, R. Y. (2018). Public Opinion (3rd ed.). New York, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gorodnichenko, Y., Pham, T., & Talavera, O. (2021). Social media, sentiment and public opinions: Evidence from #Brexit and #USElection. European Economic Review, 136, 1–40. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grefenstette, G. (1999). Tokenization. In H. van Halteren (Ed.), Syntactic Wordclass Tagging. Text, Speech and Language Technology (Vol. 9, pp. 117–133). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-9273-4_9
   Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., Wellman, B., & Takhteyev, Y. (2011). Imagining Twitter as an imagined community. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(10), 1294–1318. doi:10.1177/0002764211409378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurak, L. J., & Antonijevic, S. (2009). Digital rhetoric and public discourse. In A. A. Lunsford, K. H. Wilson, & R. A. Eberly (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Rhetorical Studies (pp. 497–508). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Haselmayer, M., & Jenny, M. (2017). Sentiment analysis of political communication: Combining a dictionary approach with crowdcoding. Quality & Quantity, 51(6), 2623–2646. doi:10.1007/s11135-016-0412-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, K. (2011). Introduction: Political discourse and conflict resolution. In K. Hayward & C. O’Donnell (Eds.), Political discourse and conflict resolution: Debating peace in Northern Ireland (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E. (2014). VADER: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis on social media text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1), 216–225.
   Google Scholar
• Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., & Tseng, B. (2007). Why we Twitter: Understanding microblogging usage and communities. In Proceedings Joint 9th WEBKDD and 1st SNA-KDD Workshop 2007, 56–65. doi:10.1145/1348549.1348556
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. (2016). Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 72–91. doi:10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoo, C. S., & Johnkhan, S. B. (2018). Lexicon-based sentiment analysis: Comparative evaluation of six sentiment lexicons. Journal of Information Science, 44(4), 491–511. doi:10.1177/2F0165551517703514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirelli, Y., & Arslankaya, S. (2020). Sentiment analysis of shared tweets on global warming on Twitter with data mining methods: A case study on Turkish language. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2020, 1–9. doi:10.1155/2020/1904172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurt, Ş. K. (2021). Enformasyonun duygu boyutu: Duygusal bulaşıcılık perspektifinden sosyal ağlarda duygu çalışmaları. İletişim Kuram ve Araştırma Dergisi, 53, 109–136. doi:10.47998/ikad.863473
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, K. (2011). Twitter marketing for dummies. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.-R., Keegan, B., Margolin, D., & Lazer, D. (2014). Rising tides and rising stars? Dynamics of shared attention on Twitter during media events. PLoS ONE, 9(5), 1–12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W. (2004). Public opinion. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B. (2012). Sentiment analysis and opinion mining. Synthesis Lectures On Human Language Technologies, 5(1), 1–167. doi:10.2200/S00416ED1V01Y201204HLT016
   Google Scholar
• Liu, B. (2015). Sentiment analysis: Mining opinions, sentiments, and emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luskin, R. C. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior, 12(4), 331–361. doi:10.1007/BF00992793
   Google Scholar
• Matalon, Y., Magdaci, O., Almozlino, A., & Yamin, D. (2021 1). Using sentiment analysis to predict opinion inversion in Tweets of political communication. Nature Scientific Reports, 11. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86510-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, J. M. (2002). Brill’s companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2013). Crowdsourcing a word–emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3), 436–465. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00460.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mozetič, I., Grčar, M., Smailović, J. (2016). Multilingual Twitter sentiment classification: The role of human annotators. PloS one, 11(5), 1–26. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naldi, M. (2019). A review of sentiment computation methods with R packages. arXiv preprint. arXiv:1901.08319.
   Google Scholar
• Nasukawa, T., & Yi, J. (2003). Sentiment analysis capturing favorability using natural language processing. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture, 1–10. doi:10.1145/945645.945658
   Google Scholar
• Neogi, A. S., Garg, K. A., Mishra, R. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Sentiment analysis and classification of Indian farmers’ protest using twitter data. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 1(2), 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2021.100019
   Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T., & Milstein, S. (2011). The Twitter Book. Sebastopol, California: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Osakwe, Z. T., Ikhapoh, I., Arora, B. K., & Bubu, O. M. (2020). Identifying public concerns and reactions during the COVID-19 pandemic on Twitter: A text-mining analysis. Public Health Nursing, 38(2), 145–151. doi:10.1111/phn.12843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak, A., & Paroubek, P. (2010). Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on language resources and evaluation, 1320–1326.doi:10.17148/ijarcce.2016.51274
   Google Scholar
• Raisinghani, M. S., & Weiss, R. (2011). The impact of the internet on politics: The “net effect” on political campaigns and elections. International Journal of E-politics, 2(4), 29–40. doi:10.4018/jep.2011100103
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, F. N., Araujo, M., Gonçalves, P., Gonçalves, M. A., & Benevenuto, F. (2016). SentiBench-a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. EPJ Data Science, 5(23), 1–29. doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-016-0085-1
   Google Scholar
• Silge J and Robinson D. (2016). tidytext: Text Mining and Analysis Using Tidy Data Principles in R. JOSS, 1(3), 37. doi:10.21105/joss.00037
   Google Scholar
• Silge, J., & Robinson, D. (2017). Text mining with R: A tidy approach. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, A., Singh, V., & Drall, G. S. (2019). Sentiment analysis of twitter data: A hybrid approach. International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics, 14(2), 1–16. doi:10.4018/IJHISI.2019040101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Twitter usage. (2021, September 7). Statista. Retrieved September, 7, 2021, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/242606/number-of-active-twitter-users-in-selected-countries/.
   Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, S., & Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Social media and political communication: A social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 3(4), 1277–1291. doi:10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A. I. (2021). Hagia Sophia through the ages. Phronema, 36(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A. I. (2021). Hagia Sophia through the ages. Phronema, 36(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? In J. Bloomaert & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Political linguistics (pp. 11–52). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? In J. Bloomaert & C. Bulcaen (Eds.), Political linguistics (pp. 11–52). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Van Klingeren, M., Trilling, D., & Möller, J. (2021). Public opinion on Twitter? How vote choice and arguments on Twitter comply with patterns in survey data, evidence from the 2016 Ukraine referendum in the Netherlands. Acta Politica, 56, 436–455. doi:10.1057/s41269-020-00160-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Klingeren, M., Trilling, D., & Möller, J. (2021). Public opinion on Twitter? How vote choice and arguments on Twitter comply with patterns in survey data, evidence from the 2016 Ukraine referendum in the Netherlands. Acta Politica, 56(3), 436–455. doi:10.1057/s41269-020-00160-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijayarani, S., & Janani, R. (2016). Text mining: Open source tokenization tools-an analysis. Advanced Computational Intelligence: An International Journal (ACII), 3(1), 37–47. doi:10.5121/acii.2016.3104
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J. J., & Kit, C. (1992). Tokenization as the initial phase in NLP. In COLING ’92: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Vol. 4, 1106–1110.
   Google Scholar
• Welbers, K., Van Atteveldt, W., & Benoit, K. (2017). Text Analysis in R. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(4), 245–265. doi:10.1080/19312458.2017.1387238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hoffmann, P. (2005). Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase- level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 347–354.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (2015). Political discourse. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 775–794). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wodak, R. (2011). The discourse of politics in action: Politics as usual (Paperback ed.). United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, B., & Shen, H. (2015). Analyzing and predicting news popularity on Twitter. International Journal of Information Management, 35(6), 702–711. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K.-C., Ferrara, E., & Menczer, F. (2022). Botometer 101: Social bot practicum for computational social scientists. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2201.01608
   Google Scholar
• Yaqub, U., Chun, S. A., Atluri, V., & Vaidya, J. (2017). Analysis of political discourse on twitter in the context of the 2016 US presidential elections. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 613–626. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zagidullin, M., Aziz, N., & Kozhakhmet, S. (2021). Government policies and attitudes to social media use among users in Turkey: The role of awareness of policies, political involvement, online trust, and party identification. Technology in Society, 67, 1–28. doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., & Vos, M. (2015). How and why some issues spread fast in social media. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 5(1), 90–113. doi:10.29333/ojcmt/2497
   Google Scholar