How Does English Encode ‘Tight’ Vs. ‘Loose-fit’ Motion Events? It’s Complicated

References

• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-Effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowerman, M. (1996). Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom & M. A. Peterson (Eds.), Language and space. Language, speech, and communication (pp. 385–436). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowerman, M., & Choi, S. (2003). Space under construction: Language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind (pp. 387–428). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brauer, M., & Curtin, J. J. (2018). Linear mixed-effects models and the analysis of nonindependent data: A unified framework to analyze categorical and continuous independent variables that vary within-subjects and/or within-items. Psychological Methods, 23(3), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasola, M. (2008). The development of infants’ spatial categories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(1), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00541.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasola, M., & Ahn, Y. A. (2017). What develops in infants’ spatial categorization? Korean infants’ categorization of containment and tight-fit relations. Child Development, 89(4), e-382-e–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12903
   Google Scholar
• Casasola, M., Bhagwat, J., & Ferguson, K. T. (2006). Precursors to verb learning: Infants’ understanding of motion events. In K. Hirsh-Pasek & R. M. Golinkoff (Eds.), Action meets word: How children learn verbs (pp. 160–190). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casasola, M., Wilbourn, M. P., & Yang, S. (2006). Can English-learning toddlers acquire and generalize a novel spatial word? First Language, 26(2), 187–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723706060746
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choi, S. (2006). Influence of language-specific input on spatial cognition: Categories of containment. First Language, 26(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723706060748
   Google Scholar
• Davis, E. E., & Landau, B. (2021). Seeing and believing: The relationship between perception and mental verbs in acquisition. Language Learning and Development, 17(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2020.1862660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessalegn, B., & Landau, B. (2008). More than meets the eye: The role of language in binding and maintaining feature conjunctions. Psychological Science, 19(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02066.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessalegn, B., & Landau, B. (2013). Interaction between language and vision: It’s momentary, abstract, and it develops. Cognition, 127(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, M. C., Everett, D. L., Fedorenko, E., & Gibson, E. (2008). Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition. Cognition, 108(3), 819–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, A., Regier, T., Kay, P., & Ivry, R. (2006). Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 103(2), 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509868103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L. R. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1(1), 3–55. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la0101_2
   Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L., Gleitman, H., Miller, C., & Ostrin, R. (1996). Similar, and similar concepts. Cognition, 58(3), 321–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00686-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L., & Papafragou, A. (2005). Language and thought. In K. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 633–661). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L., & Papafragou, A. (2012). New perspectives on language and thought. In K. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 543–568). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hespos, S. J., & Spelke, E. S. (2004). Conceptual precursors to spatial language. Nature, 430(6998), 453–456. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (1983). Semantics and cognition. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johannes, K., Wilson, C., & Landau, B. (2016). The importance of lexical verbs in the acquisition of spatial prepositions: The case of in and on. Cognition, 157, 174–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawachi, K. (2007). Korean putting verbs do not categorize space contrastively in terms of “tightness of fit”. Lingua, 117(10), 1801–1820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakusta, L., & Landau, B. (2005). Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition, 96(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakusta, L., Wagner, L., O’hearn, K., & Landau, B. (2007). Language Learning and Development, 3(3), 179–197.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, B. (2022). Language and thought: The lexicon and beyond. In A. Papafragou, L.R. Gleitman, & J. Trueswell (Eds.), The oxford handbook of the mental lexicon, Ch. 9. (pp. 236–C12.P64). Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Landau, B., & Gleitman, L. R. (1985). Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, B., Skordos, D., Johannes, K., & Papafragou, A. (2017). Containment and support: Core and complexity in spatial language learning. Cognitive science, 41, 748–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landau, B., & Zukowski, A. (2003). Objects, motions, and paths: Spatial language in children with Williams syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23(1–2), 105–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, S. C., & Wilkins, D. (Eds.). (2006). Grammars of space. Towards a semantic typology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonough, L., Choi, S., & Mandler, J. (2003). Understanding spatial relations: Flexible infants, lexical adults. Cognitive Psychology, 46(3), 229–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00514-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messenger, K., Yuan, S., & Fisher, C. (2015). Learning verb syntax via listening: New evidence from 22-month-olds. Language Learning and Development, 11(4), 356–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2014.978331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munnich, E., & Landau, B. (2003). The effects of spatial language on spatial representation: Setting some boundaries. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind (pp. 113–155). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naigles, L. (1990). Children use syntax to learn verb meanings. Journal of Child Language, 17(2), 357–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norbury, H., Waxman, S., & Song, H. -J. (2008). Tight and loose are not created equal: An asymmetry underlying the representation of fit in English and Korean speakers. Cognition, 109(3), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Regier, T., & Zheng, M. (2007). Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science, 31, 705–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701399954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmy, L. (1983). How languages structure space. In H. L. Pick & L. Acredolo (Eds.), Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application (pp. 225–282). Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S (Fourth ed.). Springer. https://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4/
   Google Scholar