647
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Brief Report

Global environmental knowledge synthesis: What’s in it for national action?

ORCID Icon, &
Article: 2291883 | Received 29 May 2023, Accepted 03 Dec 2023, Published online: 27 Dec 2023

References

  • Alcamo, J. 2017. “Evaluating the Impacts of Global Environmental Assessments.” Environmental Science & Policy 77: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.009.
  • Báldi, A., and B. Palotás. 2021. “How to Diminish the Geographical Bias in IPBES and Related Science?” Conservation Letters 14 (1): e12786. doi:10.1111/conl.12786.
  • Baste, I., and R. Watson. 2022. “Tackling the Climate, Biodiversity and Pollution Emergencies by Making Peace with Nature 50 Years after the Stockholm Conference.” Global Environmental Change 73: 102466. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102466.
  • Beck, S. 2012. “The Challenges of Building Cosmopolitan Climate Expertise: The Case of Germany.” WIREs Climate Change 3 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1002/wcc.151.
  • Beck, S., and T. Forsyth. 2020. “Who Gets to Imagine Transformative Change? Participation and Representation in Biodiversity Assessments.” Environmental Conservation 47 (4): 220–223. doi:10.1017/S0376892920000272.
  • Bennett, N., J. Blythe, A. Cisneros-Montemayor, G. Singh, and U. Sumaila. 2019. “Just Transformations to Sustainability.” Sustainability 11 (14): 3881. doi:10.3390/su11143881.
  • Castree, N., R. Bellamy, and S. Osaka. 2021. “The Future of Global Environmental Assessments: Making a Case for Fundamental Change.” The Anthropocene Review 8 (1): 56–82. doi:10.1177/2053019620971664.
  • Díaz-Reviriego, I., E. Turnhout, and S. Beck. 2019. “Participation and Inclusiveness in the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.” Nature Sustainability 2 (6): 457–464. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0290-6.
  • Fawkes, K., S. Ferse, A. Scheffers, and V. Cummins. 2021. “Learning from Experience: What the Emerging Global Marine Assessment Community Can Learn from the Social Processes of Other Global Environmental Assessments.” Anthropocene Coasts 4 (1): 87–114. doi:10.1139/anc-2020-0018.
  • Finnish Expert Panel on Sustainable Development and the National Commission on Sustainable Development. n.d. “What is Sustainable Development?” https://kestavakehitys.fi/en/sustainable-development
  • Forum for Environmental Information. 2020. “Globaalien ympäristöraporttien viestit käyttöön (Global Environmental Report Messages to Use).” Ympäristötiedon foorumin Puheenvuoroja (Speeches of the Environmental Information Forum), 3/2020. https://www.ymparistotiedonfoorumi.fi/puheenvuorot/globaalit-ymparistoraportit-kayttoon/
  • Forum for Environmental Information. 2021. “Global Synthesis of Environmental Knowledge vs. National Action for Sustainability: Challenges and Opportunities.” https://www.ymparistotiedonfoorumi.fi/uutiset/synthesis-reports-in-national-science-policy/
  • Girard, C., M. Pulido-Velazquez, J.-D. Rinaudo, C. Pagé, and Y. Caballero. 2015. “Integrating Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Design Global Change Adaptation at the River Basin Scale.” Global Environmental Change 34: 132–146. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.002.
  • Independent Group of Scientists Appointed by the Secretary-General (IGS). 2019. Global Sustainable Development Report (GDSR) 2019: The Future is Now – Science for Achieving Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/publications/future-now-science-achieving-sustainable-development-gsdr-2019-24576
  • Jabbour, J., and C. Flachsland. 2017. “40 Years of Global Environmental Assessments: A Retrospective Analysis.” Environmental Science & Policy 77: 193–202. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.001.
  • Jabbour, J., F. Keita-Ouane, C. Hunsberger, R. Sánchez-Rodríguez, P. Gilruth, N. Patel, A. Singh, M. Levy, and S. Schwarzer. 2012. “Internationally Agreed Environmental Goals: A Critical Evaluation of Progress.” Environmental Development 3: 5–24. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2012.05.002.
  • Jabbour, J. 2022. “Global Sustainability Governance: Integrated Scientific Assessment at a Critical Inflection Point.” Doctoral dissertation., Technische Universität Berlin. doi:10.14279/depositonce-15477.
  • Kaaronen, R. 2016. Scientific Support for Sustainable Development Policies: A Typology of Science Policy Interfaces with Case Studies. Helsinki: Sitra. https://www.sitra.fi/en/publications/scientific-support-sustainable-development-policies/
  • Kowarsch, M., J. Garard, P. Riousset, D. Lenzi, M. Dorsch, B. Knopf, J.-A. Harrs, and O. Edenhofer. 2016. “Scientific Assessments to Facilitate Deliberative Policy Learning.” Palgrave Communications 2 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2016.92.
  • Kowarsch, M., and J. Jabbour. 2017. “Solution-Oriented Global Environmental Assessments: Opportunities and Challenges.” Environmental Science & Policy 77: 187–192. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.013.
  • Kowarsch, M., J. Jabbour, C. Flachsland, M. Kok, R. Watson, P. Haas, J. Minx, et al. 2017. “A Road Map for Global Environmental Assessments.” Nature Climate Change 7 (6): 379–382. doi:10.1038/nclimate3307.
  • Lucas, P., T. Maas, and M. Kok. 2020. Insights from Global Environmental Assessments: Lessons for The Netherlands. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. https://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/insights-from-global-environmental-assessments.
  • Maas, T., J. Montana, S. van der Hel, M. Kowarsch, W. Tuinstra, M. Schoolenberg, M. Mahony, et al. 2021. “Effectively Empowering: A Different Look at Bolstering the Effectiveness of Global Environmental Assessments.” Environmental Science & Policy 123: 210–219. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.024.
  • Maas, T., M. Kok, and P. Lucas. 2020. Keeping Global Environmental Assessments Fit for Purpose: Challenges and Opportunities for a Changing Context. The Hague: PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency. https://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/keeping-global-environmental-assessments-fit-for-purpose
  • Mach, K., and C. Field. 2017. “Toward the Next Generation of Assessment.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42 (1): 569–597. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061007.
  • Mangnus, A., J. Vervoort, S. McGreevy, K. Ota, C. Rupprecht, M. Oga, and M. Kobayashi. 2019. “New Pathways for Governing Food System Transformations: A Pluralistic Practice-Based Futures Approach Using Visioning, Back-Casting, and Serious Gaming.” Ecology and Society 24 (4): 2. doi:10.5751/ES-11014-240402.
  • Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 2019. The National Forest Strategy 2025 – An Updated Version: Government Resolution, February 21. Helsinki: Finnish Government. https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/handle/10024/161739
  • Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 2021. New EU Forest Strategy is Partly Stepping Over the Competence of Member States on Forests, Different Aspects of Sustainability Included Better than Anticipated, July 16. Helsinki: Finnish Government. https://valtioneuvosto.fi/-/1410837/eu-n-uusi-metsastrategia-ylittaa-osin-komission-toimivallan-metsaasioissa-kokonaiskestavyys-mukana-ennakkotietoja-paremmin?languageId=en_US
  • Mitchell R, W. Clark, D. Cash, and N. Dickson, Eds. 2006. Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/3292.001.0001.
  • Pearce, W., R. Grundmann, M. Hulme, S. Raman, E. Hadley Kershaw, and J. Tsouvalis. 2017. “Beyond Counting Climate Consensus.” Environmental Communication 11 (6): 723–730. doi:10.1080/17524032.2017.1333965.
  • Pereira, L., G. Asrar, R. Bhargava, L. Fisher, A. Hsu, J. Jabbour, J. Nel, et al. 2021a. “Grounding Global Environmental Assessments Through Bottom-Up Futures Based on Local Practices and Perspectives.” Sustainability Science 16 (6): 1907–1922. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-01013-x.
  • Pereira, L., G. Asrar, and L. Fisher. 2019. “Bottom-Up Initiatives and Participatory Approaches for Outlooks.” In Global Environment Outlook – GEO-6: Healthy Planet, Healthy People, edited by United Nations Environment, 544–579. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108627146.
  • Pereira, L., K. Davies, E. den Belder, S. Ferrier, S. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, H. Kim, J. Kuiper, et al. 2020. “Developing Multiscale and Integrative Nature-People Scenarios Using the Nature Futures Framework.” People and Nature 2 (4): 1172–1195. doi:10.1002/pan3.10146.
  • Pereira, L., J. Kuiper, O. Selomane, A. Aguiar, G. Asrar, E. Bennett, R. Biggs, K. Calvin, S. Hedden, and A. Hsu. 2021b. “Advancing a Toolkit of Diverse Futures Approaches for Global Environmental Assessments.” Ecosystems and People 17 (1): 191–204. doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1901783.
  • Petersen, A., J. Blackstock, and N. Morisetti. 2015. “New Leadership for a User-Friendly IPCC.” Nature Climate Change 5 (10): 909–911. doi:10.1038/nclimate2766.
  • Pörtner, H.-O., R. Scholes, J. Agard, E. Archer, X. Bai, D. Barnes, M. Burrows, et al. 2021. IPBES-IPCC Co-Sponsored Workshop Report on Biodiversity and Climate Change. Geneva: Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4782538.
  • Raudsepp-Hearne, C., G. Peterson, E. Bennett, R. Biggs, A. Norström, L. Pereira, J. Vervoort, et al. 2020. “Seeds of Good Anthropocenes: Developing Sustainability Scenarios for Northern Europe.” Sustainability Science 15 (2): 605–617. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00714-8.
  • Riousset, P., C. Flachsland, and M. Kowarsch. 2017. “Global Environmental Assessments: Impact Mechanisms.” Environmental Science & Policy 77: 260–267. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.006.
  • Rothman, D., C. van Bers, J. Bakkes, and C. Pahl-Wostl. 2009. “How to Make Global Assessments More Effective: Lessons from the Assessment Community.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 1 (2): 214–218. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2009.09.002.
  • Solé, L., and E. Ariza. 2019. “A Wider View of Assessments of Ecosystem Services in Coastal Areas: The Perspective of Social-Ecological Complexity.” Ecology and Society 24 (2): 24. doi:10.5751/ES-10883-240224.
  • Turnhout, E., T. Metze, C. Wyborn, N. Klenk, and E. Louder. 2020. “The Politics of Co-Production: Participation, Power, and Transformation.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 42: 15–21. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009.
  • United Nations. 2022b. United Nations Environment Assembly of the United Nations Environment Programme Resolution UNEP/EA.5/Res.8 of 2 March 2022. Nairobi: UNEP. https://www.unep.org/environmentassembly/unea-5.2/proceedings-report-ministerial-declaration-resolutions-and-decisions-unea-5.2.
  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2013. Global Chemicals Outlook – Towards Sound Management of Chemicals. Nairobi: UNEP. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-chemicals-outlook-towards-sound-management-chemicals
  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2019. The Global Chemicals Outlook II: From Legacies to Innovative Solutions: Implementing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Nairobi: UNEP https://www.unep.org/resources/report/global-chemicals-outlook-ii-legacies-innovative-solutions
  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2020a. Adhoc Global Assessments Dialogue (AGAD). Nairobi: UNEP. http://www.unep.org/fr/node/27791
  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2020b. Assessment of Options for Strengthening the Science-Policy Interface at the International Level for the Sound Management of Chemicals and Waste. Nairobi: UNEP. https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/33808;jsessionid=E5E8E321F8CFB4ED7E16043C58DCC993
  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2021a. Reflecting on the Past and Imagining the Future: A Contribution to the Dialogue on the Science-Policy Interface. Nairobi: UNEP. https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/38118
  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2021b. Making Peace with Nature: A Scientific Blueprint to Tackle the Climate, Biodiversity and Pollution Emergencies. Nairobi: UNEP. https://www.unep.org/resources/making-peace-nature
  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2022a. United Nations Environment Assembly of the United Nations Environment Programme Resolution UNEP/EA.5/Res.3 of 2 March 2022. Nairobi: UNEP. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/39834/FUTURE%20OF%20THE%20GLOBAL%20ENVIRONMENT%20OUTLOOK%20-%20English.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • van Vuuren, D., M. Kok, B. Girod, P. Lucas, and B. de Vries. 2012. “Scenarios in Global Environmental Assessments: Key Characteristics and Lessons for Future Use.” Global Environmental Change 22 (4): 884–895. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.06.001.
  • Voulvoulis, N., T. Giakoumis, C. Hunt, V. Kioupi, N. Petrou, I. Souliotis, C. Vaghela, and W. Rosely. 2022. “Systems Thinking as a Paradigm Shift for Sustainability Transformation.” Global Environmental Change 75: 102544. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102544.
  • Wang, Z., R. Altenburger, T. Backhaus, A. Covaci, M. Diamond, J. Grimalt, R. Lohmann, et al. 2021. “We Need a Global Science-Policy Body on Chemicals and Waste.” Science 371 (6531): 774–776. doi:10.1126/science.abe9090.
  • Weaver, S., S. Lötjönen, and M. Ollikainen. 2019. Overview of National Climate Change Advisory Councils, Report 3/2019. Helsinki: The Finnish Climate Change Panel. https://www.ilmastopaneeli.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Overview-of-national-CCCs.pdf