Revisiting the promise of eco-political experimentation: an introduction to the Special Issue

References

• Alvedalen, J., and R. Boschma. 2017. “A Critical Review of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Research: Towards a Future Research Agenda.” European Planning Studies 25 (6): 1–12. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and M. Bartenberger. 2016. “Varieties of Experimentalism.” Ecological Economics 130 (5): 64–73. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.05.016.
   Google Scholar
• Antikainen, R., K. Alhola, and T. Jääskeläinen. 2017. “Experiments as a Means towards Sustainable Societies – Lessons Learnt and Future Outlooks from a Finnish Perspective.” Journal of Cleaner Production 169: 216–224. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asara, V. 2020. “Untangling the Radical Imaginaries of the Indignados’ Movement: Commons, Autonomy and Ecologism.” Environmental Politics 10 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1773176.
   Google Scholar
• Asara, V., and G. Kallis. 2023. “The Prefigurative Politics of Social Movements and Their Processual Production of Space: The Case of the Indignados Movement.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 41 (1): 56–76. doi:10.1177/23996544221115279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. 2019. “Extra-Capitalist Impulses in the Midst of the Crisis: Perspectives and Positions Outside of Capitalism.” Globalizations 16 (4): 371–385. doi:10.1080/14747731.2018.1558816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, M., N. Schäpke, O. Marg, F. Stelzer, D. Lang, M. Bossert, M. Gantert, et al. 2021. “Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Real-World Labs: Success Factors and Methods for Change.” Sustainability Science 16 (2): 541–564. doi:10.1007/s11625-020-00886-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. 2007. “Sustaining the Unsustainable: Symbolic Politics and the Politics of Simulation.” Environmental Politics 16 (2): 251–275. doi:10.1080/09644010701211759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. 2017. “Post-Capitalism, Post-Growth, Post-Consumerism? Eco-Political Hopes beyond Sustainability.” Global Discourse 7 (1): 42–61. doi:10.1080/23269995.2017.1300415.
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. 2023. “Recreational Experientialism at ‘the Abyss’: Rethinking the Sustainability Crisis and Experimental Politics.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1): 2155439. doi:10.1080/15487733.2022.2155439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosi, L., and L. Zamponi. 2020. “Paths Toward the Same Form of Collective Action: Direct Social Action in Times of Crisis in Italy.” Social Forces 99 (2): 847–869. doi:10.1093/sf/soz160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, U., Muraca, B., Pineault, E., Sahakian, M., et al. 2021. “From Planetary to Societal Boundaries: An Argument for Collectively Defined Self-limitation”. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 17:1, 264–291. doi: 10.1080/15487733.2021.1940754
   Google Scholar
• Brown, V., J. Russell, and J. Harris. 2010. Tackling Wicked Problems: Through the Transdisciplinary Imagination. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. 2010. “Cities and the Governing of Climate Change.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 35 (1): 229–253. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-072809-101747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. 2021. “Climate Changed Urban Futures: Environmental Politics in the Anthropocene City.” Environmental Politics 30 (1–2): 266–284. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1880713
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. 2023. “The Condition of Urban Climate Experimentation.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1): 2188726. doi:10.1080/15487733.2023.2188726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butzlaff, F., and M. Deflorian. 2021. “Direct Social Action beyond Party Politics. How New Subjectivities Change the Idea of Social Transformation.” Political Research Exchange 3 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/2474736X.2021.1896343.
   Google Scholar
• Caniglia, G., N. Schäpke, D. Lang, D. Abson, C. Luederitz, A. Wiek, M. Laubichler, et al. 2017. “Experiments and Evidence in Sustainability Science: A Typology.” Journal of Cleaner Production 169: 39–47. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassegård, C. 2023. “Activism without Hope? Four Varieties of Postapocalyptic Environmentalism.” Environmental Politics, Published online June 21. doi:10.1080/09644016.2023.2226022.
   Google Scholar
• Castán Broto, V., and H. Bulkeley. 2013. “A Survey of Urban Climate Change Experiments in 100 Cities.” Global Environmental Change 23 (1): 92–102. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannemann, H. 2023. “Experiments of Authoritarian Sustainability: Völkisch Settlers and Far-Right Prefiguration of a Climate Behemoth.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1): 2175468. doi:10.1080/15487733.2023.2175468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deflorian, M. 2021. “Refigurative Politics: Understanding the Volatile Participation of Critical Creatives in Community Gardens, Repair Cafés and Clothing Swaps.” Social Movement Studies 20 (3): 346–363. doi:10.1080/14742837.2020.1773250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1986. “Experience and Education.” The Educational Forum 50 (3): 241–252. doi:10.1080/00131728609335764.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 2016. The Public and Its Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, B. 2002. Ideas and Actions in the Green Movement. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, S., and T. Börzel. 2012. “Experimentalist Governance: An Introduction.” Regulation & Governance 6 (3): 371–377. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01163.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., A. Karvonen, and R. Raven, eds. 2016. The Experimental City. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Exner, A., and A. Strüver. 2023. “Experimenting with Experimental Urbanism: Navigating between Neoliberal Fix and Urban Glitch.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1): 2186090. doi:10.1080/15487733.2023.2186090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, K., L. Rickards, and S. Wakefield. 2023. “Becoming Non-Commensurable: Synthesis, Design, and the Politics of Urban Experimentation in Post-Superstorm Sandy New York.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1): 2225339. doi:10.1080/15487733.2023.2225339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fielitz, M., and P. Wallmeier. 2019. “Exit as Radicalization: Withdrawal as Dissident Far-Right Politics.” Behemoth 12 (2): 49–62. doi:10.6094/behemoth.2019.12.2.1026.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., Dumitru, A., Anguelovski, I., Avelino, F., et al. 2016. “Elucidating the Changing Roles of Civil Society in Urban Sustainability Transitions.” In Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22, 41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.008
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. 2019. “Socio-Technical Transitions to Sustainability: A Review of Criticisms and Elaborations of the Multi-Level Perspective.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 39: 187–201. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M. 2010. Ignorance and Surprise: Science, Society, and Ecological Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262013482.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Guterres, A. 2022. “UN Press Release by the Secretary-General, March 10th,” SG/SM/21173. https://press.un.org/en/2022/sgsm21173.doc.htm
   Google Scholar
• Haderer, M. 2023. “Experimental Climate Governance as Organized Irresponsibility? A Case for Revamping Governing (Also) through Government.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1): 2186078. doi:10.1080/15487733.2023.2186078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschl, R. 2020. City, State: Constitutionalism and the Megacity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M. 2011. Climate Governance at the Crossroads. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195390087.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R., R. Kemp, J. Schot, and B. Truffer. 2002. Experimenting for Sustainable Transport. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203994061.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, R. 2011. The Transition Companion: Making Your Community More Resilient in Uncertain Times. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2023. “Summary for Policymakers.” In Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. A Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, T., M. Bergmann, and F. Keil. 2012. “Transdisciplinarity: Between Mainstreaming and Marginalization.” Ecological Economics 79 (4): 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017.
   Google Scholar
• Kallis, G., and H. March. 2015. “Imaginaries of Hope: The Utopianism of Degrowth.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 105 (2): 360–368. doi:10.1080/00045608.2014.973803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, A., and E. Mathijs. 2014. “(De)Politicising the Local: The Case of the Transition Towns Movement in Flanders (Belgium).” Journal of Rural Studies 34: 172–183. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., F. Geels, J. Kern, J. Markard, et al. 2019. “An Agenda for Sustainability Transitions Research: State of the Art and Future Directions.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 31: 1–32. doi:10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, D., A. Wiek, M. Bergmann, M. Stauffacher, et al. 2012. “Transdisciplinary Research in Sustainability Science: Practice, Principles, and Challenges.” Sustainability Science 7 (S1): 25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D., N. Frantzeskaki, and F. Avelino. 2017. “Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42 (1): 599–626. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, S. 2021. “Finding Transformative Potential in the Cracks? The Ambiguities of Urban Environmental Activism in a Neoliberal City.” Social Movement Studies 20 (3): 329–345. doi:10.1080/14742837.2019.1677224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, A., and A. Ruser. 2023. “Introduction: Sustainability, Democracy and the Dark Sides of Civil Society.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 36 (3): 297–309. doi:10.1007/s10767-023-09445-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. 2015. Engaging the Everyday: Environmental Social Criticism and the Resonance Dilemma. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. 2020. “The Politics of the ‘Post-Political’: Contesting the Diagnosis.” Democratization 27 (3): 408–425. doi:10.1080/13510347.2019.1676737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. 2023. “Experimentalism and Its Alternatives: Toward Viable Strategies for Transformative Change and Sustainability.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1): 2166217. doi:10.1080/15487733.2023.2166217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocca, E. 2020. “The Local Dimension in the Degrowth Literature. A Critical Discussion”. Journal of Political Ideologies, 25 (1): 78–93. doi: 10.1080/13569317.2019.1696926
   Google Scholar
• Monticelli, L. 2018. “Embodying Alternatives to Capitalism in the 21st Century.” tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique 16 (2): 501–517. doi:10.31269/triplec.v16i2.1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monticelli, L. 2021. “On the Necessity of Prefigurative Politics.” Thesis Eleven 167 (1): 99–118. doi:10.1177/07255136211056992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. 2018. “Experimental Governance and Territorial Development.” Conference on Broadening Innovation Policy: New Insights for Regions and Cities, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Devempent, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Moor, J., and J. Marquardt. 2023. “Deciding Whether It’s Too Late: How Climate Activists Coordinate Alternative Futures in a Postapocalyptic Present.” Geoforum 138: 103666. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.103666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munck af Rosenschöld, J. 2019. “Inducing Institutional Change through Projects? Three Models of Projectified Governance.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21 (4): 333–344. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2019.1606702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overdevest, C., A. Bleicher, and M. Gross. 2010. “The Experimental Turn in Environmental Sociology: Pragmatism and New Forms of Governance.” In Environmental Sociology: European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges, edited by M. Gross and H. Heinrichs, 279–294. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-8730-0_16.
   Google Scholar
• Paech, N. 2012. Liberation from Excess: The Road to a Post-Growth Economy. Munich: Oekom.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, A. 2021. The Return of the State: Restructuring Britain for the Common Good. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Agenda Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, L. 2021. “Prefiguration, Subtraction and Emancipation.” Social Movement Studies 20 (3): 364–379. doi:10.1080/14742837.2020.1752169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravetz, J. 1999. “What is Post-Normal Science?” Futures 31: 647–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosol, M. 2012. “Community Volunteering as Neoliberal Strategy? Green Space Production in Berlin.” Antipode 44 (1): 239–257. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00861.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryghaug, M., M. Ornetzeder, T. Skjølsvold, and W. Throndsen. 2019. “The Role of Experiments and Demonstration Projects in Efforts of Upscaling: An Analysis of Two Projects Attempting to Reconfigure Production and Consumption in Energy and Mobility.” Sustainability 11 (20): 5771. doi:10.3390/su11205771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C., and J. Zeitlin. 2012. “Experimentalist Governance.” In The Oxford Handbook of Governance, edited by D. Lēwî-Faur, 169–184. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Savini, F., and L. Bertolini. 2019. “Urban Experimentation as a Politics of Niches.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 51 (4): 831–848. doi:10.1177/0308518X19826085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäpke, N., F. Stelzer, G. Caniglia, M. Bergmann, et al. 2018. “Jointly Experimenting for Transformation? Shaping Real-World Laboratories by Comparing Them.” GAIA 27 (1): 85–96. doi:10.14512/gaia.27.S1.16.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D., and L. Craven. 2019. Sustainable Materialism: Environmental Movements and the Politics of Everyday Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. 2017. “Über Den Stabilisierungsversuch Der Moderne: Der Wandel Des Experiments in Wissenschaft, Technik Und Gesellschaft (About the Attempt to Stabilize Modernity: The Change of the Experiment in Science, Technology, and Society).” In Experimentelle Gesellschaft: Experiment Als Wissensgesellschaftliches Dispositiv (Experimental Society: Experiment as a Knowledge Society Device), edited by S. Böschen, M. Groß, W. Krohn, and H. Heinrichs, 29–60. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Schneidewind, U. 2018. Die Große Transformation: Eine Einführung in Die Kunst Gesellschaftlichen Wandels (The Great Transformation: An Introduction to the Art of Social Change. Frankfurt/Main: Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., Turnheim, B., and Berkhout, F. 2021. “Beyond experiments: Embedding outcomes in climate governance.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39 (6): 1148–1171. doi:10.1177/2399654420953861
   Google Scholar
• Servigne, P., and R. Stevens. 2020. How Everything Can Collapse: A Manual for Our Times. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., and A. Smith. 2007. “Grassroots Innovations for Sustainable Development: Towards a New Research and Policy Agenda.” Environmental Politics 16 (4): 584–603. doi:10.1080/09644010701419121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., and A. Haxeltine. 2012. “Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 30 (3): 381–400. doi:10.1068/c10222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigl, L., U. Felt, and M. Fochler. 2020. “‘I Am Primarily Paid for Publishing…’: The Narrative Framing of Societal Responsibilities in Academic Life Science Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3): 1569–1593. doi:10.1007/s11948-020-00191-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., and R. Raven. 2012. “What is Protective Space? Reconsidering Niches in Transitions to Sustainability.” Research Policy 41 (6): 1025–1036. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., M. Fressoli, D. Abrol, E. Arond, and A. Ely. 2017. Grassroots Innovation Movements. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Soßdorf, A., and V. Burgi. 2022. “‘Listen to the Science!’ – The Role of Scientific Knowledge for the Fridays for Future Movement.” Frontiers in Communication 7: 983929. doi:10.3389/fcomm.2022.983929.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. 2019. “Alt-Right Ecology: Ecofascism and Far-Right Environmentalism in the United States.” In The Far Right and the Environment: Politics, Discourse and Communication, edited by B. Forchtner, 275–292. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Torrens, J., and T. von Wirth. 2021. “Experimentation or Projectification of Urban Change? A Critical Appraisal and Three Steps Forward.” Urban Transformations 3 (1): 8. doi:10.1186/s42854-021-00025-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) 2022. The Closing Window: Climate Crisis Calls for Rapid Transformation of Socities. Nairobi: UNEP. https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2022.
   Google Scholar
• van Dyk, S. 2018. “Post-Wage Politics and the Rise of Community Capitalism.” Work, Employment and Society 32 (3): 528–545. doi:10.1177/0950017018755663.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Wirth, T., L. Fuenfschilling, N. Frantzeskaki, and L. Coenen. 2019. “Impacts of Urban Living Labs on Sustainability Transitions: Mechanisms and Strategies for Systemic Change through Experimentation.” European Planning Studies 27 (2): 229–257. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1504895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehling, P. 2022. “Transdisciplinarity and Solutionism. A Mistaken Criticism That Nevertheless Proves to Be Instructive.” GAIA 31 (1): 19–23. doi:10.14512/gaia.31.1.6.
   Google Scholar
• Weibust, I. 2016. Green Leviathan: The Case for a Federal Role in Environmental Policy. London: Taylor and Francis. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/kxp/detail.action?docID=4512672.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L. 2021. “Prefigurative Politics and Social Movement Strategy: The Roles of Prefiguration in the Reproduction, Mobilisation and Coordination of Movements.” Political Studies 69 (4): 1033–1052. doi:10.1177/0032321720936046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar