Foregrounding invisible foundations: (eco-)feminist perspectives on provisioning systems

Bibliography

• Agarwal, B. 1988. “Who Sows? Who Reaps? Women and Land Rights in India.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 15 (4): 1–14. doi:10.1080/03066158808438377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B. 1992. “The Gender and Environment Debate: Lessons from India.” Feminist Studies 18 (1): 119–158. doi:10.2307/3178217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, B., P. Anthwal, and M. Mahesh. 2021. “How Many and Which Women Own Land in India? Inter-Gender and Intra-Gender Gaps.” The Journal of Development Studies 57 (11): 1807–1829. doi:10.1080/00220388.2021.1887478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ančić, B., M. Domazet, and D. Župarić-Iljić. 2019. “For My Health and For My Friends’: Exploring Motivation, Sharing, Environmentalism, Resilience and Class Structure of Food Self-Provisioning.” Geoforum 106: 68–77. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.07.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, M. 2019. “A Case Study of the Southern African Rural Women’s Assembly: ‘We Can Bend the Stick.” Agenda 33 (1): 48–58. doi:10.1080/10130950.2019.1598275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrzejewska, J., and J. Rye. 2012. “Lost in Transnational Space? Migrant Farm Workers in Rural Districts.” Mobilities 7 (2): 247–268. doi:10.1080/17450101.2012.654996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antal, M., B. Plank, J. Mokos, and D. Wiedenhofer. 2021. “Is Working Less Really Good for the Environment? A Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence for Resource Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Ecological Footprint.” Environmental Research Letters 16 (1): 013002. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abceec.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, N. 2020. “Black Women in the United States and Unpaid Collective Work: Theorizing the Community as a Site of Production.” The Review of Black Political Economy 47 (4): 343–362. doi:10.1177/0034644620962811.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, N. 2021. “Intersectional Identities and Analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Economics, edited by G. Berik and E. Kongar, 118–126. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bärnthaler, R., and C. Dengler. 2023. “Universal Basic Income, Services, or Time Politics? A Critical Realist Analysis of (Potentially) Transformative Responses to the Care Crisis.” Journal of Critical Realism 22 (4): 670–691. doi:10.1080/14767430.2023.2229179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bärnthaler, R., A. Novy, and L. Plank. 2021. “The Foundational Economy as a Cornerstone for a Social-Ecological Transformation.” Sustainability 13 (18): 10460. doi:10.3390/su131810460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bärnthaler, R., and I. Gough. 2023. “Provisioning for Sufficiency: Envisaging Production Corridors.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1): 2218690. doi:10.1080/15487733.2023.2218690.
   Google Scholar
• Bayliss, K., G. Mattioli, and J. Steinberger. 2021. “Inequality, Poverty and the Privatization of Essential Services: A ‘Systems of Provision’ Study of Water, Energy and Local Buses in the UK.” Competition & Change 25 (3–4): 478–500. doi:10.1177/1024529420964933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behr, D. 2013. Landwirtschaft – Migration – Supermärkte: Ausbeutung und Widerstand entlang der Wertschöpfungskette von Obst und Gemüse (Agriculture – Migration – Supermarkets: Exploitation and Resistance along the Fruit and Vegetable Value Chain). PhD Dissertation, University of Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Benería, L., G. Berik, and M. Floro. 2016. Gender, Development, and Globalization: Economics as If All People Mattered. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J., A. Bowman, M. de la Cuesta, E. Engelen, I. Ertürk, P. Fokman, J. Froud, S. Johal, J. Law, A. Leaver, M. Moran, and K. Williams. 2013. “Manifesto for the Foundational Economy.” CRESC Working Paper 131. Manchester: Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change.
   Google Scholar
• Berik, G., and E. Kongar. 2021. “The Social Provisioning Approach in Feminist Economics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Feminist Economics, edited by G. Berik and E. Kongar, 3–21. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biesecker, A., and S. Hofmeister. 2010. “(Re)Productivity: Sustainable Relations Both Between Society and Nature and Between the Genders.” Ecological Economics 69 (8): 1703–1711. (doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulding, K. 1986. “What Went Wrong with Economics.” American Economist 30 (1): 5–12. doi:10.1177/056943458603000101.
   Google Scholar
• Brand-Correa, L., and J. Steinberger. 2017. “A Framework for Decoupling Human Need Satisfaction from Energy Use.” Ecological Economics 141: 43–52. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchs, M. 2021. “Sustainable Welfare: How Do Universal Basic Income and Universal Basic Services Compare?” Ecological Economics 189: 107152. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P., and S. Bilge. 2020. Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Combahee River Collective 1977. “A Black Feminist Statement.” In The Second Wave: A Reader in Feminist Theory, edited by L. Nicolson. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, R., and E. Kongar. 2017. Gender and Time Use in a Global Context: The Economics of Employment and Unpaid Labor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Coote, A. 2021. “Universal Basic Services and Sustainable Consumption.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 17 (1): 32–46. doi:10.1080/15487733.2020.1843854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coote, A., and A. Percy. 2020. The Case for Universal Basic Services. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corrado, A., C. Castro, and D. Perrotta, eds. 2018. Migration and Agriculture: Mobility and Change in the Mediterranean Area. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum 1: 139–167. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf.
   Google Scholar
• Daněk, P., L. Sovová, P. Jehlička, J. Vávra, and M. Lapka. 2022. “From Coping Strategy to Hopeful Everyday Practice: Changing Interpretations of Food Self-Provisioning.” Sociologia Ruralis 62 (3): 651–671. doi:10.1111/soru.12395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, K. 2008. “Intersectionality  as  Buzzword:  A  Sociology  of  Science  Perspective  on  what  Makes  a  Feminist Theory  Successful.” Feminist Theory 9  (1):  67–85. doi:10.1177/1464700108086364.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, K. 2008. “Intersectionality as Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What Makes a Feminist Theory Successful.” Feminist Theory 9 (1): 67–85. doi:10.1177/1464700108086364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengler, C., and M. Lang. 2022. “Commoning Care: Feminist Degrowth Visions for a Socio-Ecological Transformation.” Feminist Economics 28 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1080/13545701.2021.1942511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengler, C., and B. Strunk. 2018. “The Monetized Economy Versus Care and the Environment: Degrowth Perspectives on Reconciling an Antagonism.” Feminist Economics 24 (3): 160–183. doi:10.1080/13545701.2017.1383620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengler, C., and B. Strunk. 2022. “Feminisms and the Environment.” In Handbook of Critical Environmental Politics, edited by L. Pellizzoni, E. Leonardi, and V. Asara, 58–70. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dorn, F., R. Hafner, and C. Plank. 2022. “Towards A Climate Change Consensus: How Mining and Agriculture Legitimize Green Extractivism in Argentina.” The Extractive Industries and Society 11: 101130. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2022.101130.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, A., I. Buck, B. Hayward, and T. Jackson. 2012. “Time, Gender and Carbon: A Study of the Carbon Implications of British Adults’ Use of Time.” Ecological Economics 84: 153–163. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugger, W. 1996. “Redefining Economics: From Market Allocation to Social Provisioning.” In Political Economy for the 21st Century: Contemporary Views on the Trend of Economics, edited by C. Whalen, 31–43. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Elson, D. 2017. “Recognize, Reduce, and Redistribute Unpaid Care Work: How to Close the Gender Gap.” New Labor Forum 26 (2): 52–61. doi:10.1177/1095796017700135.
   Google Scholar
• European CSA Research Group 2016. “Overview of Community Supported Agriculture in Europe.” https://urgenci.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Overview-of-Community-Supported-Agriculture-in-Europe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fanning, A., D. O’Neil, and M. Büchs. 2020. “Provisioning Systems for a Good Life within Planetary Boundaries.” Global Environmental Change 64: 102135. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, B., K. Bayliss, and M. Robertson. 2018. “The Systems of Provision Approach to Understanding Consumption.” In The Sage Handbook of Consumer Culture, edited by O. Kravets, P. Maclaran, S. Miles, and A. Venkatesh, 27–42. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, B., and E. Leopold. 1993. The World of Consumption. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foundational Economy Collective (FEC). 2018. Foundational Economy: The Infrastructure of Everyday Life. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foundational Economy Collective (FEC). 2020. “The Foundational Approach.” https://foundationaleconomycom.files.wordpress. com/2020/08/fe-approach-2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Franck, A., and A. Prapha. 2021. Not in This Together: How Supermarkets Became Pandemic Winners While Women Workers Are Losing Out. Oxford: Oxfam. https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/not-in-this-together-how-supermarkets-became-pandemic-winners-while-women-worke-621194.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, E., and C. Wember. 2019. “The Power of Food to Bring People Together and Create Common Ground’: Affektive Dissonanz Und Transnationale Solidarität in Einem Ernährungsnetzwerk (Affective Dissonance and Transnational Solidarity in a Food Network).” Femina Politica 28 (2): 17–18. https://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/feminapolitica/article/view/34454.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 2017. “Behind Marx’s Hidden Abode: For an Expanded Conception of Capitalism.” In Critical Theory in Critical Times, edited by P. Deutscher and C. Lafont, 141–159. New York: Colombia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstel, N. 2000. “The Third Shift: Gender and Care Work Outside the Home.” Qualitative Sociology 23 (4): 467–483. doi:10.1023/A:1005530909739.
   Google Scholar
• Gliessman, S. 2015. Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gruchy, A. 1987. The Reconstruction of Economics: An Analysis of the Fundamentals of Institutional Economics. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanbury, H., P. Illien, E. Ming, S. Moser, C. Bader, and S. Neubert. 2023. “Working Less for More? A Systematic Review of the Social, Economic, and Ecological Effects of Working Time Reduction Policies in the Global North.” Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19 (1): 2222595. doi:10.1080/15487733.2023.2222595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug, F. 2008. Die Vier-in-einem-Perspektive: Politik von Frauen für eine neue Linke (The Four-in-One Perspective: Politics by Women for a New Left. Hamburg: Argument.
   Google Scholar
• Himmelweit, S. 2006. “The Prospects for Caring: Economic Theory and Policy Analysis.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 31 (4): 581–599. doi:10.1093/cje/bem011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. 1989. The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A., and B. Ehrenreich. 2004. Global Woman: Nannies, Maids and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: Owl Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, D., C. Hertler, S. Niemann, A. Lux, and C. Janowicz. 2004. Versorgungssysteme als Gegenstand sozial-ökologischer Forschung (Supply Systems as a Subject of Social-Ecological Research). Frankfurt: Ernährung und Wasser.
   Google Scholar
• Hummel, D., T. Jahn, F. Keil, S. Liehr, and I. Stieß. 2017. “Social Ecology as Critical Transdisciplinary Science – Conceptualizing, Analyzing and Shaping Societal Relations to Nature.” Sustainability 9 (7): 1050. doi:10.3390/su9071050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Labour Organization (ILO). 2018. Care Work and Care Jobs for the Future of Decent Work. Geneva: ILO. https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_633135/lang–en/index.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Jo, T.-H., and Z. Todorova. 2018. “Social Provisioning Processes: A Heterodox View of the Economy.” In The Routledge Handbook of Heterodox Economics: Theorizing, Analyzing, and Transforming Capitalism, edited by T.-H. Jo, L. Chester, and C. D’Ippoliti, 29–40. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jochimsen, M., and U. Knobloch. 1997. “Making the Hidden Visible: The Importance of Caring Activities and Their Principles for Any Economy.” Ecological Economics 20 (2): 107–112. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(95)00099-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, L. 2021. Feminist City: Claiming Space in a Man-Made World. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Kleine Zeitung. 2022. “Ukraine: Österreich droht Komplettausfall bei Erntehelfern (Ukraine: Austria is Threatened with a Complete Loss of Harvest Workers).” Kleine Zeitung, March 24. https://www.kleinezeitung.at/wirtschaft/6116285/Suche-nach-Ersatz_Ukraine_Oesterreich-droht-Komplettausfall-bei
   Google Scholar
• Knight, K., E. Rosa, and J. Schor. 2013. “Could Working Less Reduce Pressures on the Environment? A Cross-National Panel Analysis of OECD Countries, 1970–2007.” Global Environmental Change 23 (4): 691–700. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch, U. 2019. “Feminist Economics and Ethics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ethics and Economics, edited by M. White, 248–269. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liehr, S., J. Röhrig, M. Mehring, and T. Kluge. 2017. “How the Social-Ecological Systems Concept Can Guide Transdisciplinary Research and Implementation: Addressing Water Challenges in Central Northern Namibia.” Sustainability 9 (7): 1109. doi:10.3390/su9071109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiLi 2022. “About the LiLi Project.” https://lili.leeds.ac.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Little, J. 1997. “Constructions of Rural Women’s Voluntary Work.” Gender, Place & Culture 4 (2): 197–210. doi:10.1080/09663699725431.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, H., and E. Palenga-Möllenbeck. 2012. “Care Workers, Care Drain, and Care Chains: Reflections on Care, Migration, and Citizenship.” Social Politics 19 (1): 15–37. doi:10.1093/sp/jxr026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune, N., and P. Rosset. 2021. “Agroecology.” In Critical Agrarian Studies, edited by H. Akram‐Lodhi, K. Dietz, B. Engels, and B. McKay, 438–452. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mehring, M., B. Bernard, D. Hummel, S. Liehr, and A. Lux. 2017. “Halting Biodiversity Loss: How Social-Ecological Biodiversity Research Makes a Difference.” International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 13 (1): 172–180. doi:10.1080/21513732.2017.1289246.
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, M. 2009. “Ecofeminist Political Economy and the Politics of Money.” In Eco-Sufficiency & Global Justice: Women Write Political Ecology, edited by A. Salleh, 251–267. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mies, M. 1986. Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Millward-Hopkins, J., J. Steinberger, N. Rao, and Y. Oswald. 2020. “Providing Decent Living with Minimum Energy: A Global Scenario.” Global Environmental Change 65: 102168. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, P., and B. Kelly. 2009. “Community Participation and Inclusion: People with Disabilities Defining Their Place.” Disability & Society 24 (1): 47–62. doi:10.1080/09687590802535410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales, H. 2021. “Agroecological Feminism: Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems.” Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 45 (7): 955–956. doi:10.1080/21683565.2021.1927544.
   Google Scholar
• Mullens, F., and I. Glorieux. 2024. “Reducing Working Hours: Shorter Days or Fewer Days Per Week? Insights from a 30-Hour Workweek Experiment.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 48 (1): 41–68. doi:10.1093/cje/bead049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. 1993. “The Study of Choice or the Study of Provisioning? Gender and the Definition of Economics.” In Beyond Economic Man: Feminist Theory and Economics, edited by M. Ferber and J. Nelson, 23–36. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neysmith, S., M. Reitsma-Street, S. Baker Collins, and E. Porter. 2012. Beyond Caring Labour to Provisioning Work. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, D., A. Fanning, W. Lamb, and J. Steinberger. 2018. “A Good Life for All Within Planetary Boundaries.” Nature Sustainability 1 (2): 88–95. doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oedl-Wieser, T. 2015. “Gender Equality: A Core Dimension in Rural Development Programmes in Austria?” Gender, Place & Culture 22 (5): 685–699. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2013.879103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S., A. Novy, and Y. Kazepov. 2019. Local Social Innovation to Combat Poverty and Exclusion: A Critical Appraisal. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, R. 2009. “Food Sovereignty.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (3): 663–706. doi:10.1080/03066150903143079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plank, C. 2017. “The Agrofuels Project in Ukraine: How Oligarchs and the EU Foster Agrarian Injustice.” In Fairness and Justice in Natural Resource Politics, edited by M. Pichler, C. Staritz, K. Küblböck, C. Plank, W. Raza, and F. Ruiz Peyré, 218–236. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Plank, C. 2022. “An Overview of Strategies for Social-Ecological Transformation in the Field of Food.” In Degrowth & Strategy: How to Bring About Social-Ecological Transformation, edited by N. Barlow, L. Regen, N. Cadiou, E. Chertkovskaya, M. Hollweg, C. Plank, M. Schulken, and V. Wolf, 200–210. Colchester: Mayfly.
   Google Scholar
• Plank, C., R. Hafner, and R. Stotten. 2020. “Analyzing Values-Based Modes of Production and Consumption: Community-Supported Agriculture in the Austrian Third Food Regime.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 45 (1): 49–68. doi:10.1007/s11614-020-00393-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plank, C., S. Liehr, D. Hummel, D. Wiedenhofer, H. Haberl, and C. Görg. 2021. “Doing More With Less: Provisioning Systems and the Transformation of the Stock-Flow-Service Nexus.” Ecological Economics 187: 107093. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. 2004. “Social Provisioning as a Starting Point for Feminist Economics.” Feminist Economics 10 (3): 3–19. doi:10.1080/1354570042000267608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pungas, L. 2021. “Caring Dachas – Food Self-Provisioning in Eastern Europe Through the Lens of Care.” In Food for Degrowth: Perspectives and Practices, edited by A. Nelson and F. Edwards, 59–74. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pungas, L. 2023. “Invisible (Bio)Economies: A Framework to Assess the ‘Blind Spots’ of Dominant Bioeconomy Models.” Sustainability Science 18 (2): 689–706. doi:10.1007/s11625-023-01292-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reigada, A. 2021. “Collective Action, Experience and Identity in Global Agrarian Enclaves: The Case of Andalusia, Spain.” In Migrant Organising: Community Unionism, Solidarity and Bricolage, edited by E. Martín-Díaz and B. Roca, 154–180. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Ruelle, M., and P. Claeys. 2016. “Human Rights and the Food Sovereignty Movement.” Agriculture and Human Values 33 (3): 737–738. doi:10.1007/s10460-016-9708-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, B., D. Beel, I. Rees Jones, and M. Jones. 2022. “Placing the Foundational Economy: An Emerging Discourse for Post-Neoliberal Economic Development.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 54 (6): 1069–1085. doi:10.1177/0308518X221098745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffartzik, A., M. Pichler, E. Pineault, D. Wiedenhofer, R. Gross, and H. Haberl. 2021. “The Transformation of Provisioning Systems from an Integrated Perspective of Social Metabolism and Political Economy: A Conceptual Framework.” Sustainability Science 16 (5): 1405–1421. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-00952-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiu, C., A. Muraco, and K. Fredriksen-Goldsen. 2016. “Invisible Care: Friend and Partner Care Among Older Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT) Adults.” Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research 7 (3): 527–546. doi:10.1086/687325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. 2016. Who Really Feeds the World? The Failures of Agribusiness and the Promise of Agroecology. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Skarðhamar Olsen, E., and R. Whittle. 2018. “Transcending Binaries: A Participatory Political Ecology of the Faroese Foodscape.” Nordia Geographical Publications 47 (5): 55–73. https://nordia.journal.fi/article/view/79934.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., and P. Jehlička. 2013. “Quiet Sustainability: Fertile Lessons from Europe’s Productive Gardeners.” Journal of Rural Studies 32: 148–157. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovová, L., P. Jehlicka, and P. Danek. 2021. “Growing the Beautiful Anthropocene: Ethics of Care in East European Food Gardens.” Sustainability 13 (9): 5193. doi:10.3390/su13095193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spash, C., and A. Guisan. 2021. “A Future Social-Ecological Economics.” Real World Economics Review 96: 203–216.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas, T. 2021. “Swiggy It!’ Food Delivery, Gastro Geographies, and the Shifting Meaning of the Local in Pandemic India.” Gastronomica 21 (4): 17–30. doi:10.1525/gfc.2021.21.4.17.
   Google Scholar
• Stevano, S., R. Ali, and M. Jamieson. 2021. “Essential for What? A Global Social Reproduction View on the Re-Organisation of Work During the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne D’études Du Développement 42 (1–2): 178–199. doi:10.1080/02255189.2020.1834362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelewa, D., and M. Polakowski. 2022. “European Solidarity and ‘Free Movement of Labour’ During the Pandemic: Exposing the Contradictions Amid East–West Migration.” Comparative European Politics 20 (2): 238–256. doi:10.1057/s41295-022-00287-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorova, Z. 2015. “Social Provisioning within a Culture-Nature Life Process.” Review of Political Economy 27 (3): 390–409. doi:10.1080/09538259.2015.1058090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torry, M., ed. 2019. The Palgrave International Handbook of Basic Income: Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Varvarousis, A., G. Kallis, et al. 2017. “Commoning Against the Crisis.” In Another Economy is Possible, edited by M. Castells, 128–159. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, J., G. Guerin, D. O’Neill, and J. Steinberger. 2024. “Safeguarding Livelihoods Against Reductions in Economic Output.” Ecological Economics 215: 107977. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Werlhof, C. 1988. “The Proletarian is Dead: Long Live the Housewife.” In Women: The Last Colony, edited by C. von Werlhof, M. Mies, and V. Bennholdt-Thomsen. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Winker, G. 2021. Solidarische Care-Ökonomie: Revolutionäre Realpolitik für Care und Klima (Solidarity Care Economy: Revolutionary Realpolitik for Care and Climate). Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Yen Liu, Y., and D. Apollon. 2011. “The Color of Food.” https://foodchainworkers.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Color-of-Food_021611_F.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zoll, F., K. Specht, and R. Siebert. 2021. “Alternative = Transformative? Investigating Drivers of Transformation in Alternative Food Networks in Germany.” Sociologica Ruralis 61 (3): 638–659. doi:10.1111/soru.12350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar