Expanding the Scope of Strategic Communication: Towards a Holistic Understanding of Organizational Complexity

References

• Aggerholm, H. K., & Asmuß, B. (2016). A practice perspective on strategic communication. Journal of Communication Management, 20(3), 195–214. doi:10.1108/JCOM-07-2015-0052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Jonsson, A. (2016). The bumpy road to exercising leadership: Fragmentations in meaning and practice. Leadership, 14(1), 40–57. doi:10.1177/1742715016644671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sveningsson, S. (2011). Management is the solution: Now what was the problem? On the fragile basis for managerialism. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(4), 349–361. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L., & Trethewey, A. (2004). Developing tension: An agenda for applied research on the organization of irrationality. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 171–181. doi:10.1080/14795752.2004.10058565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aten, K., & Thomas, G. F. (2016). Crowdsourcing strategizing: Communication technology affordances and the communicative constitution of organizational strategy. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(2), 148–180. doi:10.1177/2329488415627269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2004). Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 523–549. doi:10.2307/20159600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2011). Mixed methods in organizational research. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 516–531). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, G. (2000). Interpreting interpretive research: Toward perspectivism without relativism. In S. Corman & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational communication: Finding common ground (pp. 3–45). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. T., & Svensson, E. (2017). The nature of strategic communication: A rejoinder to Nothhaft. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 11(3), 180–183. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2017.1318883
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Matte, F., Benoit-Barné, C., & Brummans, B. H. J. M. (2013). Communication as ventriloquism: A grounded-in-action approach to the study of organizational tensions. Communication Monographs, 80(3), 255–277. doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.788255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, J. P. (2017). Preserving theoretical divergence in management research: Why the explanatory potential of qualitative research should be harnessed rather than suppressed. Journal of Management, 54(3), 368–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Development in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. A. (2000). The a priori of the communication community and the hope for solving real problems. In S. Corman & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational communication: Finding the common ground (pp. 105–112). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. A., & Putnam, L. L. (2001). Thinking about the future of communication studies. In W. Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication yearbook 24 (pp. 1–14). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fairtlough, G. (2008). Post-bureaucratic organizations. In S. R. Clegg & J. R. Bailey (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organization studies (Vol. 4, pp. 1273–1274). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2015). The role of communication executives in strategy and strategizing. In D. R. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 229–243). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frandsen, F., & Johansen, W. (2017). Strategic communication. In C. R. Scott & L. K. Lewis (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of organizational communication (pp. 2250-2258). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. (2013). Strategy: A history. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gartrell, C. D., & Gartrell, J. W. (1996). Positivism in sociological practice: 1967–1990. Canadian Review of Sociology & Anthropology, 33(2), 143–158. doi:10.1111/j.1755-618X.1996.tb00192.x
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. (2016). To start practice theorizing anew: The contribution of the concepts of agencement and formativeness. Organization, 23(5), 680–698. doi:10.1177/1350508415605174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., & Vaara, E. (2015). Introduction: What is strategy as practice? In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, I. T., & Just, S. N. (2016). In the wake of new media: Connecting the who with the how of strategizing communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(4), 223–237. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2016.1150281
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35. doi:10.1080/15531180701285244
   Google Scholar
• Heide, M., & Simonsson, C. (2015). Struggling with internal crisis communication: A balancing act between paradoxical tensions. Public Relations Inquiry, 4(2), 223–255. doi:10.1177/2046147X15570108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heide, M., Simonsson, C., von Platen, S., & Falkheimer, J. (2017). Expanding the scope of strategic communication: Going beyond communication professionals and small-scale studies. Paper presented at the ICA Pre-conference Future Directions of Strategic Communication: Towards the Second Decade of an Emerging Field, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D. R., & Zerfass, A. (2015a). Strategic communication: Opportunities and challenges of the research area. In D. R. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzhausen, D. R., & Zerfass, A. (Eds.). (2015b). The Routledge handbook of strategic communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529–560. doi:10.1177/0170840604040675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, G., Melin, L., & Whittington, R. (2003). Micro strategy and strategizing: Towards an activity-based view. Journal of Management Studies, 40(1), 3–22. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.t01-2-00002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T., & Schoeneborn, D. (2015). The pedagogy of CCO. Management Communication Quarterly, 29(2), 295–301. doi:10.1177/0893318915571348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127–149. doi:10.1177/0021886314522322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedtka, J. M. (2000). Strategic planning as a contributor to strategic change: A generative model. European Management Journal, 18(2), 195–206. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00091-2
   Google Scholar
• Marchiori, M., & Bulgacov, S. (2012). Strategy as communicational practice in organizations. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 6(3), 199–211. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2012.654550
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (2009). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations (2nd ed.). Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, metaphors and puzzle solving in organizational theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 605–622. doi:10.2307/2392283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K. (2014). Critical theory and postmodernism. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 101–126). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nothhaft, H. (2016). A framework for strategic communication research: A call for synthesis and consilience. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 10(2), 69–86. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2015.1124277
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L. (1986). Contradiction and paradoxes in organizations. In L. O. Thayer (Ed.), Organizational communication: Emerging perspectives (Vol. I, pp. 151–167). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 1–107. doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., & Nicotera, A. M. (2010). Communicative constitution of organization is a question: Critical issues for addressing it. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 158–165. doi:10.1177/0893318909351581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouleau, L., & Balogun, J. (2011). Middle managers, strategic sensemaking, and discursive competence. Journal of Management Studies, 48(5), 953–983. doi:10.1111/joms.2011.48.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schall, M. S. (1983). A communication-rules approach to organizational culture. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(4), 557–581. doi:10.2307/2393009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smircich, L., & Morgan, G. (1982). Leadership: The management of meaning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18(3), 257–273. doi:10.1177/002188638201800303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. R. (2009). Organizing from the bottom up? Reflections on the constitution of organization in communication. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building theories of organization. The constitutive role of communication (pp. 153–186). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2004). Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 119–146. doi:10.1080/0090988042000210025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H. (2017). Don’t simplify, complexify: From disjunctive to conjunctive theorizing in organization and management studies. Journal of Management Studies, 54(2), 132–153. doi:10.1111/joms.2017.54.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1999). Theory construction as disciplined reflexivity: Tradeoffs in the 90s. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 797–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2009). Making sense of the organization: The impermanent organization. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Werder, K. P., Nothhaft, H., Verčič, D., & Zerfass, A. (2018). Strategic communication as an emerging paradigm. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 333–351. doi:10.1080/1553118X.2018.1494181
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. C., & Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Thinking and acting strategically: New challenges for interrogating strategy. European Management Review, 1(1), 14–20. doi:10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar