Framing the Energy Transition: The Case of Poland’s Turów Lignite Mine

References

• Althaus, M. (2005). Kampagne/Campaigning. In M. Althaus (Ed.), Public affairs und Politikmanagement: Vol. 1. Handlexikon public affairs (pp. 114–119). Lit.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, M. (2015). Kampagnen. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110410372
   Google Scholar
• Cha, J. M., & Pastor, M. (2022). Just transition: Framing, organizing, and power-building for decarbonization. Energy Research & Social Science, 90, 102588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkheimer, J., & Heide, M. (2022). Introduction: The emergent field of strategic communication. In J. Falkheimer & M. Heide (Eds.), Research handbook on strategic communication (pp. 1–12). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fraas, C., & Pentzold, C. (2015). Big data vs. slow understanding? Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik, 43(1), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2015-0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, S., & McCauley, D. (2016). Framing energy justice: Perspectives from activism and advocacy. Energy Research & Social Science, 11, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Verhees, B. (2011). Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys: A cultural-performative perspective and a case study of Dutch nuclear energy (1945–1986). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(6), 910–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallahan, K. (2008). Strategic framing. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 41, p. 51). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecs107
   Google Scholar
• Hallahan, K., Holtzhausen, D., van Ruler, B., Verčič, D., & Sriramesh, K. (2007). Defining Strategic Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180701285244
   Google Scholar
• Halttunen, K., Slade, R., & Staffell, I. (2022). “We don’t want to be the bad guys”: Oil industry’s sensemaking of the sustainability transition paradox. Energy Research & Social Science, 92. online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heide, M., Platen, S. V., Simonsson, C., & Falkheimer, J. (2018). Expanding the scope of strategic communication: Towards a holistic understanding of organizational complexity. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 452–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1456434
   Google Scholar
• Kapranov, O. (2018). The framing of climate change discourse by Statoil. Topics in Linguistics, 19(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2018-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, W. J. (2015). Rearticulating nuclear power: Energy activism and contested common sense. Environmental Communication, 9(3), 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.978348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. (2018). Frame und Framing: Frametheoretische Konsequenzen aus der Praxis und Analyse strategischen politischen Framings. In A. Ziem, L. Inderelst, & D. Wulf (Eds.), Frames interdisziplinär: Modelle, Anwendungsfelder, Methoden (pp. 289–330). Berlin, Boston: Düsseldorf University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Ethnic and civic conceptions of nationhood and the differential success of the extreme right in germany and Italy. In M. Giugni (Ed.), Social movements, protest, and contention: Vol. 10. How social movements matter (pp. 225–251). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaBelle, M. C. (2020). Energy cultures. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788975766
   Google Scholar
• Lempiälä, T., Apajalahti, E.-L., Haukkala, T., & Lovio, R. (2019). Socio-cultural framing during the emergence of a technological field: Creating cultural resonance for solar technology. Research Policy, 48(9), 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macagno, F. (2022). Argumentation profiles and the manipulation of common ground. The arguments of populist leaders on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macgilchrist, F. (2007). Positive discourse analysis: Contesting dominant discourses by reframing the issues. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 1(1), 74–94. https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/journals/cadaad/volume-1-1/
   Google Scholar
• Madden, W. (2018). Public affairs. In R. L. Heath & W. Johansen (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of strategic communication (pp. 665–666). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mahlberg, M. (2014). “8. Corpus linguistics and discourse analysis”. In K. P. Schneider & A. Barron (Eds.), Pragmatics of discourse (pp. 215–238). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214406-009
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2014). Framing. Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845260259
   Google Scholar
• McCammon, H. (2013a). Discursive opportunity structure. In D. A. Snow, D. D. Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements (pp. 371–373). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm073
   Google Scholar
• McCammon, H. (2013b). Resonance, frame. In D. A. Snow, D. D. Porta, B. Klandermans, & D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements (Vol. 61, pp. 1092–1096). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm180
   Google Scholar
• Megura, M., & Gunderson, R. (2022). Better poison is the cure? Critically examining fossil fuel companies, climate change framing, and corporate sustainability reports. Energy Research & Social Science, 85, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooffitt, M. A. (2018). Campaign. In R. L. Heath & W. Johansen (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of strategic communication (pp. 109–111). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Nag, R., Hambrick, D. C., & Chen, M.-J. (2007). What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28(9), 935–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, M. (2021). Strategisches Framing: Eine Einführung. Springer VS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36205-8
   Google Scholar
• Pavel, C., & Bell, G. (2022). Advancing socially responsible strategies through earned social media. In J. Marques (Ed.), Business with a conscience: A research companion (pp. 225–236). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. (2018). Framing low-carbon pathways: A discursive analysis of contending storylines surrounding the phase-out of coal-fired power in Ontario. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 27, 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Röttger, U. (2021). Public Campaigning als öffentliche Form der Public Affairs. In U. Röttger, P. Donges, & A. Zerfaß (Eds.), Handbuch Public Affairs (pp. 437–455). Springer Gabler.
   Google Scholar
• Schlichting, I. (2013). Strategic framing of climate change by industry actors: A meta-analysis. Environmental Communication, 7(4), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.812974
   Google Scholar
• Schlichting, I. (2014). Consumer campaigns in corporate public affairs management. Journal of Communication Management, 18(4), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-02-2011-0020
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–218.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, C. L. (1938). Persuasive definitions. Mind, XLVII(187), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XLVII.187.331
   Google Scholar
• Supran, G., & Oreskes, N. (2021). Rhetoric and frame analysis of ExxonMobil’s climate change communications. One Earth, 4(5), 696–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.014
   Google Scholar
• Weder, F., Koinig, I., & Voci, D. (2019). Antagonistic framing of sustainability by energy suppliers. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(2), 368–390. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-01-2018-0014
   Google Scholar
• Weller, S. A. (2019). Just transition? Strategic framing and the challenges facing coal dependent communities. Environment & Planning C: Politics & Space, 37(2), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418784304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werder, K. P., Nothhaft, H., Verčič, D., & Zerfass, A. (2018). Strategic communication as an emerging interdisciplinary paradigm. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1494181
   Google Scholar
• Wiersum, L. (2022, September 1). State Sovereignty, Anti-Elitism and Coal: How National Politics Affect the Implementation of the EU Green Deal in Poland. (Retrieved from 1 9, 2022). https://europedebate.ie/2022/01/11/state-sovereignty-anti-elitism-and-coal-how-national-politics-affect-the-implementation-of-the-eu-green-deal-in-poland%EF%BF%BC/.
   Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (2020). Framing in renewable energy policies: A glossary. Energies, 13(2871), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112871
   Google Scholar
• Wyrzykowski, M. (2013). When sovereignty means so much: The concept(s) of sovereignty, european union membership and the interpretation of the constitution of the Republic of Poland. In A. Rosas (Ed.), The court of justice and the construction of Europe: analyses and perspectives on sixty years of case-law -la cour de justice et la construction de l’Europe (pp. 229–255). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Nothhaft, H., & Werder, K. P. (2018). Strategic communication: defining the field and its contribution to research and practice. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1493485
   Google Scholar
• Zerka, P. (2022, September 1). The European sentiment compass 2022. ECFR/447. Published 5 May 2022 (Retrieved from 1 9, 2022). https://ecfr.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/sentiment-compass.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Żuk, P., & Szulecki, K. (2020). Unpacking the right-populist threat to climate action: Poland’s pro-governmental media on energy transition and climate change. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 101485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar