Raise Their Voices: The Link Between Motivating Language and Employee Voice

References

• Ahn, J.-H., Jeon, J., & Park, K. (2017). Effects of leaders’ motivational language on employee performance: A mediation model using Korean bank tellers. International Information Institute (Tokyo) Information, 20(10A), 7241–7248.
   Google Scholar
• Arah, O. A. (2008). The role of causal reasoning in understanding Simpson’s paradox, Lord’s paradox, and the suppression effect: Covariate selection in the analysis of observational studies. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 5(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azevedo, M. C. D., Schlosser, F., & McPhee, D. (2021). Building organizational innovation through HRM, employee voice and engagement. Personnel Review, 50(2), 751–769. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2019-0687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Y., Lin, L., & Liu, J. T. (2019). Leveraging the employee voice: A multi-level social learning perspective of ethical leadership. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(12), 1869–1901. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1308414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1993). Testing structural equation models (Vol. 154). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, D., Hyde, P., Killett, A., Poland, F., & Gray, R. (2014). Participatory organizational research: Examining voice in the co‐production of knowledge. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00841.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 851–875. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. (2012). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cascio, W., & Boudreau, J. (2010). Investing in people: Financial impact of human resource initiatives. Ft Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017). A meta‐analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: Identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions. Personnel Psychology, 70(1), 11–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Change, S., Witteloostuijn, A., & Eden, L. (2010). From the editors: Common method variance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2), 178–184. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, S. Y., & Chang, T. (2020). Employee silence and silence antecedents: A theoretical classification. International Journal of Business Communication, 57(3), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417703301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1982). Set correlation as a general multivariate data-analytic method. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17(3), 301–341. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1703_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump, M. J., McDonnell, J. V., Gureckis, T. M., & Gilbert, S. (2013). Evaluating Amazon’s mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavioral research. PloS One, 8(3), e57410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54(3), 461–488. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61967925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detert, J. R., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organization Science, 21(1), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dozier, J. B., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Potential predictors of whistle-blowing: A prosocial behavior perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 823–836. https://doi.org/10.2307/258050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan, J., Li, C., Xu, Y., & Wu, C. H. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee voice behavior: A pygmalion mechanism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(5), 650–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulek, R. E., Hilton, C. B., & Campbell, K. S. (2003). Strategic messaging: The key to effective communication in the world of 21st century organizations. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O’Neill, R. M., & Lawrence, K. A. (2001). Moves that matter: Issue selling and organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 716–736. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton, J. E., Workman, K. M., & Hardin, A. E. (2014). Compassion at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091221
   Google Scholar
• Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359–1392. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1419–1452. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
   Google Scholar
• Frazier, M. L., & Fainshmidt, S. (2012). Voice climate, work outcomes, and the mediating role of psychological empowerment: A multilevel examination. Group & Organization Management, 37(6), 691–715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112463960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, A., & Jiang, J. (2019). Perceived empowering leadership, harmonious passion, and employee voice: The moderating role of job autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1484. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, J. T. (2016). Open doors and iron cages: Supervisors’ responses to employee dissent. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414525466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2013). Rocking the boat but keeping it steady: The role of emotion regulation in employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1703–1723. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, A., & Ashford, S. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 28, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanke, D. (2021). Can employees motivate themselves? The link between peer motivating language and employee outcomes. The International Trade Journal, 35(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2020.1826021
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, P., Cooper, B., & Sheehan, C. (2017). Employee voice, supervisor support, and engagement: The mediating role of trust. Human Resource Management, 56(6), 915–929. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, W. T. (2016). Motivating language theory: Antecedent variables–critical to both the success of leaders and organizations. Development & Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 30(3), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-10-2015-0085
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, W. T., & Parker, M. A. (2017). Communication: Empirically testing behavioral integrity and credibility as antecedents for the effective implementation of motivating language. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(1), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416675450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Huff, C., & Tingley, D. (2015). “Who are these people?” evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents. Research & Politics, 2(3), 2053168015604648. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015604648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., & Djurdjevic, E. (2011). Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher order multidimensional constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 744. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanfer, R., Frese, M., & Johnson, R. E. (2017). Motivation related to work: A century of progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 338. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassing, J. W. (2002). Speaking up: Identifying employees’ upward dissent strategies. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/089331802237234
   Google Scholar
• Kassing, J. W., Fanelli, S. A., & Chakravarthy, L. (2018). Full-and part-time dissent: Examining the effect of employment status on dissent expression. International Journal of Business Communication, 55(4), 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415597518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewitz, C., Restubog, S. L. D., Shoss, M. K., Garcia, P. R. J. M., & Tang, R. L. (2016). Suffering in silence: Investigating the role of fear in the relationship between abusive supervision and defensive silence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 731. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, C., So, K. K. F., DiPietro, R. B., & Grace, D. (2020). Enhancing employee voice to advance the hospitality organization’s marketing capabilities: A multilevel perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 91, 102657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kish-Gephart, J. J., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Edmondson, A. C. (2009). Silenced by fear: The nature, sources, and consequences of fear at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2009.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, C.-W. (2009). The effects of leader-member exchange on communication satisfaction and creative performance: Motivating language as a moderator. Unpublished master’s thesis. Chaoyang University of Technology, China.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, J., Farh, C. I., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: A two-wave examination. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lips-Wiersma, M., & Wright, S. (2012). Measuring the meaning of meaningful work: Development and validation of the comprehensive meaningful work scale (CMWS). Group & Organization Management, 37(5), 655–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601112461578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: Voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, E., & Gray, J. H. (2004). Validating the motivating language scale among Australian knowledge workers.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madlock, P. E., & Sexton, S. (2015). An application of motivating language theory in Mexican organizations. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415572783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majors, J. M. (2008). Motivating language: Creating a culture of job satisfaction and performance. University of South Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2007). The effects of leader communication on a worker’s intent to stay: An investigation using structural equation modeling. Human Performance, 20(2), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280701332018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2009). The role of leader motivating language in employee absenteeism. Journal of Business Communication, 46(4), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943609338665
   Google Scholar
• Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2012). The relationship between leader motivating language and self-efficacy: A partial least squares model analysis. Journal of Business Communication, 49(4), 357–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612456036
   Google Scholar
• Mayfield, J., & Mayfield, M. (2017). Motivating language theory: Effective leader talk in the workplace. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2016). The effects of leader motivating language use on employee decision making. International Journal of Business Communication, 53(4), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415572787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayfield, M., & Mayfield, J. (2017). Leader talk and the creative spark: A research note on how leader motivating language use influences follower creative environment perceptions. International Journal of Business Communication, 54(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488416687057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayfield, J., Mayfield, M., & Kopf, J. (1995). Motivating language: Exploring theory with scale development. Journal of Business Communication, 32(4), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194369503200402
   Google Scholar
• Mayfield, J., Mayfield, M., & Neck, C. P. (2021). Speaking to the self: How motivating language links with self-leadership. International Journal of Business Communication, 58(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417731861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayfield, J., Mayfield, M., & Sharbrough, W. C., III. (2015). Strategic vision and values in top leaders’ communications: Motivating language at a higher level. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(1), 97–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488414560282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClean, E. J., Burris, E. R., & Detert, J. R. (2013). When does voice lead to exit? It depends on leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K. (2013). Organizational emotions and compassion at work. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 569–587). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453–1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2015). Counterfactuals and causal inference. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.574506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328
   Google Scholar
• Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nechanska, E., Hughes, E., & Dundon, T. (2020). Towards an integration of employee voice and silence. Human Resource Management Review, 30(1), 100674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neck, C. P., & Manz, C. C. (2010). Mastering self-leadership: Empowering yourself for personal excellence. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(7), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C. N., Ning, W., Alikaj, A., & Tran, Q. N. (2021). Motivating language and employee outcomes: A multinational investigation. Management Research Review, 44(2), 268–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2020-0071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohana, M. (2016). Voice, affective commitment and citizenship behavior in teams: The moderating role of neuroticism and intrinsic motivation. British Journal of Management, 27(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. (2000). Models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 19(2), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Peer, E., Vosgerau, J., & Acquisti, A. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, H., & Wei, F. (2020). How and when does leader behavioral integrity influence employee voice? The roles of team independence climate and corporate ethical values. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(3), 505–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04114-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, J. R., & Aguinis, H. (2013). The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39(2), 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311410060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. R. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery, 1959. Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, W. M. (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe‐Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119:AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo, J. R., House, R. J., & Lirtzman, S. I. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. P. (1987). The development of a measure of perceived communication openness. Journal of Business Communication, 24(4), 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/002194368702400404
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J., Irani, L., Silberman, M. S., Zaldivar, A., & Tomlinson, B. (2010). Who are the crowdworkers? Shifting demographics in mechanical Turk. CHI'10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2863–2872.
   Google Scholar
• Rowley Mayfield, J., Mayfield, M. R., & Kopf, J. (1998). The effects of leader motivating language on subordinate performance and satisfaction. Human Resource Management: Published in Cooperation with the School of Business Administration, the University of Michigan and in Alliance with the Society of Human Resources Management, 37(3‐4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199823/24)37:3/4<235:AID-HRM6>3.0.CO;2-X
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., Thornhill, A., & Bristow, A. (2015). Understanding research philosophies and approaches: Research methods for business students. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sharbrough, W. C., Simmons, S. A., & Cantrill, D. A. (2006). Motivating language in industry: Its impact on job satisfaction and perceived supervisor effectiveness. Journal of Business Communication, 43(4), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943606291712
   Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, J. J. (1988). Three roles of language in motivation theory. The Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/258358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, P.-C., Yang, D.-L., Liao, W.-J., & Wang, S.-M. (2008). The impacts of motivating language on subordinates’ attitudes and performance: The moderating effect of leader-member exchange. International Conference on Business and Information, Seoul, South Korea
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/256902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C.-W., Hsieh, C.-T., Fan, K.-T., & Menefee, M. L. (2009). Impact of motivating language on team creative performance. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(1), 133–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2018). We can do it! Inclusive leader language promotes voice behavior in multi-professional teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerfass, A., Verčič, D., Nothhaft, H., & Werder, K. P. (2018). Strategic communication: Defining the field and its contribution to research and practice. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 12(4), 487–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2018.1493485
   Google Scholar