Whom do we trust to lead us? effects of leaders’ dominance-based leadership, prestige-based leadership and physical formidability

References

• Andersen, C., & Kilduff, G. J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 491–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, W., Van Vugt, M., & De Vries, R. E. (2022). View from the top and leader advancement: The situated appraisal hypothesis. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Barends, A. J., & De Vries, R. E. (2019). Noncompliant responding: Comparing exclusion criteria in MTurk personality research to improve data quality. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barends, A. J., De Vries, R. E., & Van Vugt, M. (2019). Power influences the expression of honesty-humility: The power-exploitation affordances hypothesis. Journal of Research in Personality, 82, 103856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Nehr, A., & Halldorsson, F. (2010). Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaker, & Van Vugt, M. (2014). The status-size hypothesis: How cues of physical size and social status influence each other. In J. T. Cheng, (Ed.), The psychology of social status (pp. 119–137). NY: Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0867-7_6
   Google Scholar
• Brambilla, M., & Leach, C. W. (2014). On the importance of being moral: The distinctive role of morality in social judgment. Social Cognition, 32(4), 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.4.397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breevaart, K., & Zacher, H. (2019). Main and interactive effects of weekly transformational and laissez-faire leadership on followers’ trust in the leader and leader effectiveness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(2), 384–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, C. S., Sims, D. E., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E. (2007). Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(6), 606–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 334–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Waal-Andrews, W., Gregg, A. P., & Lammers, J. (2015). When status is grabbed and when status is granted: Getting ahead in dominance and prestige hierarchies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(3), 445–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Waal-Andrews, W., & Van Vugt, M. (2020). The triad model of follower needs: Theory and review. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, K. T., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2004). Trust in leaders: Existing research and emerging issues. In R. M. Kramer & K. S. Cook (Eds.), Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches (pp. 21–40). The Russel Sage Foundation. https://doi.org/10.1146/87656&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, Z. H., von Rueden, C., & Hagen, E. H. (2019). The evolutionary anthropology of political leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Chudek, M., & Boyd, R. (2015). The big man mechanism: How prestige fosters cooperation and creates prosocial leaders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 370(1683), 20150013. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapen, J. E. P., Blaker, N. M., Pollet, T. V., & Pellis, S. (2017). Size, skills, and suffrage: Motivated distortions in perceived formidability of political leaders. PLoS ONE, 12(12), E0188485. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., Petriglieri, J. L. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kordsmeyer, T. L., Freund, D., Van Vugt, M., & Penke, L. (2019). Honest signals of status: Facial and bodily dominance are related to success in physical but not nonphysical competition. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704919863164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukaszewski, A. W., Simmons, Z. L., Anderson, C., & Roney, J. R. (2016). The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K. (2017). Dominance and prestige: A tale of two hierarchies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 526–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417714323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., & Case, C. R. (2016). Dominance and prestige: Dual strategies for navigating social hierarchies. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 129–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maner, J. K., & Mead, N. L. (2010). The essential tension between leadership and power: When leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 482. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. C., Goguladinne, P. S. R., Maheshwari, M., Sathe, A., & Shipman, F. M. (2023). Who broke Amazon Mechanical Turk?: An analysis of crowdsourcing data quality over time. In 15th ACM Wb Science Conference 2023. https://doi.org/10.1145/3578503.3583622
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/256727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClanahan, K. J. (2020). Viva la evolution: Using dual-strategies theory to explain leadership in modern organizations. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvily, B., Radzevick, J. R., & Weber, R. A. (2012). Whom do you distrust and how much does it cost? An experiment on the measurement of trust. Games and Economic Behavior, 74(1), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2011.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, N. L., & Maner, J. K. (2012). On keeping your enemies close: Powerful leaders seek proximity to ingroup power threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, G. R. (2014). Evolutionary preferences for physical formidability in leaders. Politics and the Life Sciences, 33(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.2990/33_1_33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray, G. R., & Schmitz, J. D. (2011). Caveman politics: Evolutionary leadership preferences and physical stature. Social Science Quarterly, 92(5), 1215–1235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2011.00815.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naef, M., & Schupp, J. (2009). Measuring trust: Experiments and surveys in contrast and combination. Discussion paper No. 4087. https://docs.iza.org/dp4087.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D., Petersen, M. B., Nafziger, J., & Koch, A. K. (2021). Do physically stronger males prevail in non-physical conflicts? Evolution and Human Behavior, 42(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohlen, H. U., Van Harreveld, F., Rotteveel, M., Barends, A. J., & Larsen, J. T. (2016). Affective responses to ambivalence are context-dependent: A facial EMG study on the role of inconsistency and evaluative context in shaping affective responses to ambivalence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., & Laustsen, L. (2019). Upper‐body strength and political egalitarianism: Twelve conceptual replications. Political Psychology, 40(2), 375–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. B., & Laustsen, L. (2020). Dominant leaders and the political psychology of followership. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, J.L., Mende-Siedlecki, P., Gantman, A. P., & Van Bavel, J. (2021). The role of morality in social cognition. In M. Gilead & K. N. Ochsner (Eds.), The neural bases of mentalizing (pp. 555–566). Springer Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51890-5
   Google Scholar
• Ronay, R., Maddux, W. W., & Van Hippel, W. (2020). Inequality rules: Resource distribution and the evolution of dominance- and prestige-based leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(2), 101246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., Von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276(1656), 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell, A., Hone, L. S., & Pound, N. (2012). The importance of physical strength to human males. Human Nature, 23(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-012-9131-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(35), 15073–15078. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904312106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, K., Tang, N., & Liao, H. (2020). Authoritarian-benevolent leadership, moral disengagement, and follower unethical pro-organizational behavior: An investigation of the effects of ambidextrous leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A. (2007). Foundations of interpersonal trust (chapter 25). In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 587–607). The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34(4), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thielmann, I., & Hilbig, B. E. (2014). Trust in me, trust in you: A social projection account of the link between personality, cooperativeness, and trustworthiness expectations. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Erlbaum (pp. 361–386). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2005). Conceptual foundations of evolutionary Psychology. In D. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 5–67). Wiley. Downloaded 0n 29/01/2022 from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.137.3163&rep=rep1&type=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Vugt, M., & Smith, J. (2019). A dual model of leadership and hierarchy: Evolutionary synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(11), 952–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., Kaplan, H., & Stieglitz, J. (2014). Leadership in egalitarian societies. Human Nature, 25(4), 538–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-014-9213-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Rueden, C., & Van Vugt, M. (2015). Leadership in small-scale societies: Some implications for theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 978–990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer, R. (2009). Groups reward individual sacrifice: The status solution to the collective action problem. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. K. (2018). Trust experiments, trust games, and surveys. In M. U. Eric (Ed.), The oxford handbook of social and political trust (pp. 279–304). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274801.013.2
   Google Scholar
• Wright, E., Galbany, J., McFarlin, S. C., Ndayishimiye, E., Stoinski, T. S., & Robbins, M. M. (2019). Male body size, dominance rank and strategic use of aggression in a group-living mammal. Animal Behavior, 151, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar