The price of (dis)trust – profiling believers of (dis)information in the Hungarian context

References

• Ádám, Z. (2019). Explaining Orbán: A political transaction cost theory of authoritarian populism. Problems of Post-Communism, 66(6), 385–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2019.1643249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agadullina, E. R., Lovakov, A. V., & Malysheva, N. G. (2018). Essentialist beliefs and social distance towards gay men and lesbian women: A latent profile analysis. Psychology and Sexuality, 9(4), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2018.1488764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agley, J., & Xiao, Y. (2021). Misinformation about COVID-19: Evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10103-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baptista, J. P., & Gradim, A. (2022). Who believes in fake news? Identification of political (A)symmetries. Social Sciences, 11(10), 460. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100460
   Google Scholar
• Barman, D., & Conlan, O. (2021). Exploring the links between Personality traits and susceptibility to disinformation. Proceedings of the 32st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1145/3465336.3475121
   Google Scholar
• Bjånesøy, L. L., & Ivarsflaten, E. (2016). What kind of challenge? right-wing populism in contemporary Western Europe. In Y. Peters & M. Tatham (Eds.), Democratic Transformations in Europe (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657646
   Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. (2020). Twenty years of digital media effects on civic and political participation. Communication Research, 47(7), 947–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218808186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broockman, D., & Kalla, J. (2022). The manifold effects of partisan media on viewers’ beliefs and attitudes: A field experiment with fox news viewers [preprint]. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/jrw26
   Google Scholar
• Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy mentality questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvillo, D. P., Garcia, R. J. B., Bertrand, K., & Mayers, T. A. (2021). Personality factors and self-reported political news consumption predict susceptibility to political fake news. Personality and Individual Differences, 174, 110666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvillo, D. P., Rutchick, A. M., & Garcia, R. J. B. (2021). Individual differences in belief in fake news about election fraud after the 2020 U.S. Election. Behavioral Sciences, 11(12), 175. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11120175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01246098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cichocka, A., & Jost, J. T. (2014). Stripped of illusions? Exploring system justification processes in capitalist and post-Communist societies: STRIPPED of ILLUSIONS? International Journal of Psychology, 49(1), 6–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, K., Blair, S., Busam, J. A., Forstner, S., Glance, J., Green, G., Kawata, A., Kovvuri, A., Martin, J., Morgan, E., Sandhu, M., Sang, R., Scholz-Bright, R., Welch, A. T., Wolff, A. G., Zhou, A., & Nyhan, B. (2020). Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media. Political Behavior, 42(4), 1073–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colomnia, C., Sánchez Margalef, H., & Youngs, R. (2021). The Impact of Disinformation on Democratic Processes and Human Rights in the World (P. 54) [Study]. Directorate-General for external policies - Policy department. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/653635/EXPO_STU(2021)653635_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dangubić, M., Verkuyten, M., & Stark, T. H. (2021). Understanding (in)tolerance of Muslim minority practices: A latent profile analysis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(7), 1517–1538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2020.1808450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diószegi-Horváth, N. (2022). ORBÁN ÁLLÍTÓLAGOS GRAZI ÚTJAIT SEM MÁRKI-ZAY, SEM AZ INTERNETEN KERINGŐ FOTÓK NEM TUDJÁK BIZONYÍTANI. lakmusz.hu. https://www.lakmusz.hu/orban-allitolagos-grazi-utjai/
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlich, A., & Garner, C. (2021). Is pro-kremlin disinformation effective? Evidence from Ukraine. The International Journal of Press/politics, 28(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211045221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Social Survey. (2018). European Social Survey Round 9 data. ESS ERIC. https://ess.sikt.no/en/?tab=overview
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2016). Foreign Language Skills Statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Foreign_language_skills_statistics
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2021). Digital Economy and Society Statistics—Households and Individuals. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Digital_economy_and_society_statistics_-_households_and_individuals
   Google Scholar
• Faragó, L., Kende, A., & Krekó, P. (2019). We only believe in news that we doctored ourselves: The connection between partisanship and political fake news. Social Psychology, 51(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faragó, L., Krekó, P., & Orosz, G. (2023). Hungarian, lazy, and biased: The role of analytic thinking and partisanship in fake news discernment on a Hungarian representative sample. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26724-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas, J., & Schou, J. (2018). Fake news as a floating signifier: Hegemony, antagonism and the politics of falsehood. Javnost - the Public, 25(3), 298–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2018.1463047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, M., & Imhoff, R. (2021). A uniform conspiracy mindset or differentiated reactions to specific conspiracy beliefs? Evidence from latent Profile analyses. International Review of Social Psychology, 34(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frischlich, L., Hellmann, J. H., Brinkschulte, F., Becker, M., & Back, M. D. (2021). Right-wing authoritarianism, conspiracy mentality, and susceptibility to distorted alternative news. Social Influence, 16(1), 24–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2021.1966499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelbard, R., Goldman, O., & Spiegler, I. (2007). Investigating diversity of clustering methods: An empirical comparison. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 63(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guess, A. M. Lerner, M. Lyons, B. Montgomery, J. M. Nyhan, B. Reifler, J. & Sircar, N.(2020). A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(27), 15536–15545.
   Google Scholar
• Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2018). Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 US presidential campaign. 9; European Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D., Valenzuela, S., Katz, J., & Miranda, J. P. (2019). From belief in conspiracy theories to trust in others: Which factors influence exposure, believing and sharing fake news. In G. Meiselwitz (Ed.), Social computing and social media. Design, human behavior and analytics (Vol. 11578, pp. 217–232). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21902-4_16
   Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M. (2022). Separating truth from lies: Comparing the effects of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers in response to political misinformation in the US and Netherlands. Information, Communication & Society, 25(1), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1764603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 555–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M., Cushion, S., Dragomir, M., Gutiérrez Manjón, S., & Pantti, M. (2021). A framework for assessing the role of public service media organizations in countering disinformation. Digital Journalism, 10(5), 843–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1987948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. C., & Hoffman, M. E. (2018). Variable-centered, person-centered, and person-specific approaches: Where theory meets the method. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 846–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117744021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humprecht, E., Esser, F., & Van Aelst, P. (2020). Resilience to online disinformation: A framework for cross-national comparative research. The International Journal of Press/politics, 25(3), 493–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161219900126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., & Bruder, M. (2014). Speaking (un-)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude: Conspiracy mentality. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, R., Lamberty, P., & Klein, O. (2018). Using power as a negative cue: How conspiracy mentality affects epistemic trust in sources of historical knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(9), 1364–1379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218768779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Index.hu ( Director). (2018). Hungarian PM Calls Country’s Leading News Website Fake. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lGFzBWNTKD8
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, S.-H., Cho, H., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Media literacy interventions: A meta-analytic Review. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 454–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01643.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, D. M. (2012). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection: An experimental study. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2182588
   Google Scholar
• Kent, P., Jensen, R. K., & Kongsted, A. (2014). A comparison of three clustering methods for finding subgroups in MRI, SMS or clinical data: SPSS TwoStep cluster analysis, latent gold and SNOB. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2020). The Crisis of public health and infodemic: Analyzing belief structure of fake news about COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 12(23), 9904. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KSH. (2016). A magyar népesség iskolázottsága. https://www.ksh.hu/interaktiv/storytelling/iskolazottsag/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 348–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking. Political Psychology, 42(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loos, E., & Nijenhuis, J. (2020). Consuming fake news: A matter of age? The perception of political fake news stories in Facebook Ads. In Q. Gao & J. Zhou (Eds.), Human aspects of IT for the aged population. Technology and society (Vol. 12209, pp. 69–88). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50232-4_6
   Google Scholar
• Mahmud, M. R., Bin Reza, R., & Ahmed, S. M. Z. (2021). The effects of misinformation on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Bangladesh. Global Knowledge, Memory & Communication, 72(1/2), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-05-2021-0080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meca, A., Ritchie, R. A., Beyers, W., Schwartz, S. J., Picariello, S., Zamboanga, B. L., Hardy, S. A., Luyckx, K., Kim, S. Y., Whitbourne, S. K., Crocetti, E., Brown, E. J., & Benitez, C. G. (2015). Identity centrality and psychosocial functioning: A person-centered approach. Emerging Adulthood, 3(5), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815593183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeusen, C., Meuleman, B., Abts, K., & Bergh, R. (2018). Comparing a variable-centered and a person-centered approach to the structure of prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(6), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617720273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejias, U. A., & Vokuev, N. E. (2017). Disinformation and the media: The case of Russia and Ukraine. Media, Culture & Society, 39(7), 1027–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716686672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melki, J., Tamim, H., Hadid, D., Makki, M., El Amine, J., Hitti, E., & Gesser-Edelsburg, A. (2021). Mitigating infodemics: The relationship between news exposure and trust and belief in COVID-19 fake news and social media spreading. PLOS ONE, 16(6), e0252830. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orosz, G., Krekó, P., Paskuj, B., Tóth-Király, I., Bőthe, B., & Roland-Lévy, C. (2016). Changing conspiracy beliefs through rationality and ridiculing. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmundsen, M., Bor, A., Vahlstrup, P. B., Bechmann, A., & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Partisan polarization is the primary Psychological motivation behind political fake news sharing on Twitter. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 999–1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, M. E., & Grosjean, S. (2004). Confirmation bias. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement and memory (1st ed., pp. 79–96). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palonen, E. (2018). Performing the nation: The Janus-faced populist foundations of illiberalism in Hungary. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 26(3), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2018.1498776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantazi, M., Hale, S., & Klein, O. (2021). Social and cognitive aspects of the vulnerability to political misinformation. Political Psychology, 42(S1), 267–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12797
   Google Scholar
• Pasek, J., Stark, T. H., Krosnick, J. A., & Tompson, T. (2015). What motivates a conspiracy theory? Birther beliefs, partisanship, liberal-conservative ideology, and anti-black attitudes. Electoral Studies, 40, 482–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2017). Who falls for fake news? The roles of analytic thinking, motivated reasoning, political ideology, and bullshit receptivity. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3023545
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The Psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plenta, P. (2020). Conspiracy theories as a political instrument: Utilization of anti-Soros narratives in Central Europe. Contemporary Politics, 26(5), 512–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2020.1781332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyák, G. (2019). Media in Hungary: Three pillars of an illiberal democracy. In E. Połońska & C. Beckett (Eds.), Public service broadcasting and media systems in troubled European democracies (pp. 279–303). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02710-0_13
   Google Scholar
• Renvik, T. A., Manner, J., Vetik, R., Sam, D. L., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2020). Citizenship and socio-political integration: A person-oriented analysis among Russian-speaking minorities in Estonia, Finland and Norway. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8(1), 53–77. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v8i1.1140
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, L. D., McPhetres, J., Pennycook, G., Kempe, A., Allen, L. A., Knoepke, C. E., Tate, C. E., & Matlock, D. D. (2021). Who is susceptible to online health misinformation? A test of four psychosocial hypotheses. Health Psychology, 40(4), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. J., Luyckx, K., & Vignoles, V. L. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of identity theory and research. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9
   Google Scholar
• Sindermann, C., Cooper, A., & Montag, C. (2020). A short review on susceptibility to falling for fake political news. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J. B. (2014). User-generated visibility: Secondary gatekeeping in a shared media space. New Media & Society, 16(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813477833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Special Eurobarometer 516. (2021). European citizens’ Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Science and Technology. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2237
   Google Scholar
• Stempel, C., Hargrove, T., & Stempel, G. H. (2007). Media use, social structure, and belief in 9/11 conspiracy theories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(2), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900708400210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swire, B., Berinsky, A. J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Processing political misinformation: Comprehending the Trump phenomenon. Royal Society Open Science, 4(3), 160802. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szebeni, Z., Lönnqvist, J.-E., & Jasinskaja-Lahti, I. (2021). Social Psychological predictors of belief in fake news in the run-up to the 2019 Hungarian elections: The importance of conspiracy mentality supports the notion of ideological symmetry in fake news belief. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 790848. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.790848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szebeni, Z., & Salojärvi, V. (2022). “Authentically” maintaining populism in Hungary – visual analysis of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s instagram. Mass Communication & Society, 25(6), 812–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2022.2111265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szicherle, P., & Krekó, P. (2021, July 6). Disinformation in Hungary: From Fabricated News to Discriminatory Legislation. https://eu.boell.org/en/2021/06/07/disinformation-hungary-fabricated-news-discriminatory-legislation
   Google Scholar
• Szurovecz, I. (2022). Az EBESZ-hez fordul az ellenzék a közmédia álhírei miatt. 444.hu. https://444.hu/2022/02/28/az-ebesz-hez-fordul-az-ellenzek-a-kozmedia-alhirei-miatt
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, J., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A Review of the scientific literature. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3144139
   Google Scholar
• Wardle, C. (2017). Information disorder (DGI(2017)09). Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/information-disorder-toward-an-interdisciplinary-framework-for-researc/168076277c
   Google Scholar
• Weller, B. E., Bowen, N. K., & Faubert, S. J. (2020). Latent class analysis: A guide to best practice. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4), 287–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798420930932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, X., Borah, P., & Su, Y. (2021). The dangers of blind trust: Examining the interplay among social media news use, misinformation identification, and news trust on conspiracy beliefs. Public Understanding of Science, 30(8), 977–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521998025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonis, M., & Joseph, C. M. (1994). Conspiracy thinking in the Middle East. Political Psychology, 15(3), 443. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar