Clash of the Titans: Escalating Conflict Between Surrogacy Contract Provisions and the Recriminalization of Abortion

References

• Ainsworth, Sara L. 2014. “Bearing Children, Bearing Risks: Feminist Leadership for Progressive Regulation of Compensated Surrogacy in the United States Symposium: Compensated Surrogacy in the Age of Windsor: Symposium Essays.” Washington Law Review 89 (4):1077–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgaertner, Emily. 2022. “She Promised Babies at Bargain Prices Using Surrogates in Mexico. Now the FBI is Investigating.” Los Angeles Times, July 10. https://www.latimes.com/world-nation/story/2022-07-10/she-promised-customers-babies-on-the-cheap-using-surrogates-in-mexico-what-could-go-wrong
   Google Scholar
• Berk, Hillary L. 2013. The Legalization of Emotion: Risk, Gender, and the Management of Feeling in Contracts for Surrogate Labor. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berk, Hillary L. 2015. “The Legalization of Emotion: Managing Risk by Managing Feelings in Contracts for Surrogate Labor.” Law & Society Review 49 (1):143–77. doi:10.1111/lasr.12125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk, Hillary L. 2020. “Savvy Surrogates and Rock Star Parents: Compensation Provisions, Contracting Practices, and the Value of Womb Work.” Law & Social Inquiry 45 (2):398–431. doi:10.1017/lsi.2019.57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, Erin B. 2015. “Disclosure Two Ways.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (2):245–54. doi:10.1111/jlme.12239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone, June, and Naomi Cahn. 2015. “The Triple System for Regulating Women’s Reproduction.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (2):275–88. doi:10.1111/jlme.12243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron, Christina.“Surrogacy is Complicated. Just Ask New York.” The New York Times, April 8, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/18/parenting/pregnancy/surrogacy-laws-new-york.html
   Google Scholar
• Center For Reproductive Rights. 2022. “After Roe Fell: Abortion Laws by State.” Center for Reproductive Rights. https://reproductiverights.org/maps/abortion-laws-by-state/
   Google Scholar
• Cha, Ariana Eujung.2018. “From Sex Selection to Surrogates, American IVF Clinics Provide Services Outlawed Elsewhere.” The Washington Post. December 30. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/from-sex-selection-to-surrogates-american-ivf-clinics-provide-services-outlawed-elsewhere/2018/12/29/0b596668-03c0-11e9-9122-82e98f91ee6f_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Elizabeth. 2013. “Surrogate Offered $10,000 to Abort Baby.” CNN, March 6. https://www.cnn.com/2013/03/04/health/surrogacy-kelley-legal-battle/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, I. Glenn. 2013. “Transplant Tourism: The Ethics and Regulation of International Markets for Organs.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 41 (1):269–85. doi:10.1111/jlme.12018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, I. Glenn. 2015. “Are All Abortions Equal? Should There Be Exceptions to the Criminalization of Abortion for Rape and Incest?” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (1):87–104. doi:10.1111/jlme.12198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, I. Glenn, Eli Y. Adashi, and Lawrence O. Gostin. 2021. “The Supreme Court, the Texas Abortion Law (SB8), and the Beginning of the End of Roe V Wade?” JAMA 326 (15):1473–74. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.17639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockin, Susan L., Meagan A. Edmonds, and Amy Altman. 2020. “Legal Principles and Essential Surrogacy Cases Every Practitioner Should Know.” Fertility and Sterility 113 (5):908–15. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crockin, Susan L., and Howard W. Jones. 2010. Legal Conceptions: The Evolving Law and Policy of Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daar, Judith. 2017. The New Eugenics: Selective Breeding in an Era of Reproductive Technologies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donley, Greer, and Jill Wieber Lens. 2022. Abortion, Pregnancy Loss, & Subjective Fetal Personhood. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4125492.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, Lauren B. 1992. “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law.” The American Journal of Sociology 97 (6): 1531–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertman, Martha M. 2015. “The Social Life of Blood, Milk & Sperm Bodies, Contracts, Families, and Markets.” Tulsa Law Review 51 (2):393–406.
   Google Scholar
• Field, Martha A. 1990. “The Case Against Enforcement of Surrogacy Contracts.” Politics and the Life Sciences 8 (2) 199–204. doi:10.1017/S0730938400009746.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forman, Deborah L. 2015. “Abortion Clauses in Surrogacy Contracts: Insights from a Case Study Symposium on Assisted Reproductive Technology and Family Law.” Family Law Quarterly 49 (1):29–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, Dov. 2015. “The State’s Interest in Potential Life.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (2):345–57. doi:10.1111/jlme.12251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, Lori, and Tracy A Weitz. 2012. “The Politics of Motherhood Meets the Politics of Poverty.” Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 41 (1):36–42. doi:10.1177/0094306111430789c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friese, Susanne. 2012. “Qualitative Data Analysis with Atlas.Ti – Third Edition.” ATLAS.Ti - The Qualitative Data Analysis & Research Software. https://atlasti.com/research-hub/s-friese-qualitative-data-analysis-with-atlas-ti-third-edition.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstein, Josh, and Alexander Ward. 2022. “Supreme Court Has Voted to Overturn Abortion Rights, Draft Opinion Shows.” Politico, May 2. https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/02/supreme-court-abortion-draft-opinion-00029473
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Michele. 2020. Policing the Womb: Invisible Women and the Criminalization of Motherhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Michele. 2021. “Pregnancy and the New Jane Crow Lead Essay.” Connecticut Law Review 53 (3):543–70.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Michele, and Holly Fernandez Lynch. 2022. “Introduction: Health Law and Anti-Racism: Reckoning and Response.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 50 (1):10–14. doi:10.1017/jme.2022.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttmacher Institute. 2022. “Lay of the Land: Abortion Policies and Access in the United States.” Guttmacher Institute, July. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, Laura. 2018. “What’s Best for Baby? Co-Sleeping and the Politics of Inequality.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 39 (3):63–95. doi:10.1353/fro.2018.a706775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, Hayley. 2016. “Contraception, Abortion and Assisted Fertility Among Muslim Women a Look at Islamic Culture and Policy in Iran and Afghanistan.” What All Americans Should Know About Women in the Muslim World, April. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/islamandwomen/10
   Google Scholar
• Jesudason, Sujatha, and Tracy Weitz. 2015. “Eggs and Abortion: ‘Women-Protective’ Language Used by Opponents in Legislative Debates Over Reproductive Health.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (2):259–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joslin, Courtney G. 2020. “Surrogacy and the Politics of Pregnancy.” Policy Review 14:365.
   Google Scholar
• Joslin, Courtney G. 2021. “(Not) Just Surrogacy.” California Law Review 109 (2):401–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone, June, and Christina O. Miller. 2018. “Surrogacy Professionalism Evolving Families Today: Assisted Reproduction and Adoption.” The Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers 31 (1):1–54.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchener, Caroline, and Devlin Barrett. 2022. “Anti-Abortion Lawmakers Seek to Block Patients from Crossing State Lines.” Washington Post, June 30. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/29/abortion-state-lines/
   Google Scholar
• Liptak, Adam. 2021. “Critical Moment for Roe, and the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy.” The New York Times, December 4. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/04/us/politics/mississippi-supreme-court-abortion-roe-v-wade.html
   Google Scholar
• Luker, Kristin. 1984. “The War Between the Women.” Family Planning Perspectives 16 (3):105–10. doi:10.2307/2134998
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luker, Kristin. 2009. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madeira, Jody Lyneé. 2015. “Conceiving of Products and the Products of Conception: Reflections on Commodification, Consumption, ART, and Abortion.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (2):293–306. doi:10.1111/jlme.12245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohapatra, Seema. 2015. “False Framings: The Co-Opting of Sex-Selection by the Anti-Abortion Movement.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (2):270–74. doi:10.1111/jlme.12242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutcherson, Kimberly. 2015. “When Is an Abortion Not an Abortion?” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (2) 206–10. doi:10.1111/jlme.12234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette, Alicia. 2015. “Selection Against Disability: Abortion, ART, and Access.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (2):211–23. doi:10.1111/jlme.12235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, Amrita. 2014. Wombs in Labor: Transnational Commercial Surrogacy in India Wombs in Labor. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael Quinn. 2002. “Two Decades of Developments in Qualitative Inquiry: A Personal, Experiential Perspective.” Qualitative Social Work 1 (3):261–83. doi:10.1177/1473325002001003636.
   Google Scholar
• Purvis, Dara E. 2015. “Expectant Fathers, Abortion, and Embryos.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (2):330–40. doi:10.1111/jlme.12249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, Radhika. 2015. “Selective Reduction: ‘A Soft Cover for Hard Choices’ or Another Name for Abortion?” The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics: A Journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (2):196–205. doi:10.1111/jlme.12233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebouché, Rachel. 2015. “Non-Invasive Testing, Non-Invasive Counseling.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (2) 228–40. doi:10.1111/jlme.12237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebouché, Rachel. 2019. “Contracting Pregnancy.” Iowa Law Review 105 (4):1591–1642.
   Google Scholar
• Rebouché, Rachel. 2022. Bargaining About Birth: Surrogacy Contracts During a Pandemic. SSRN. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4074053.
   Google Scholar
• Roberti, Amanda. 2021. “Women Deserve Better: The Use of the Pro-Woman Frame in Anti-Abortion Policies in U.S. States.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 42 (3): 207–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Dorothy E. 1995. “The Genetic Tie.” The University of Chicago Law Review 62 (1):209–73. doi:10.2307/1600134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, Dorothy E. 2017. “Crime, Race, and Reproduction.” In Race, Law and Society, ed. Ian Haney López. New York: Routledge, 243–275.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Melody. 2011. “Pro-Life, Pro-Woman: Frame Extension in the American Antiabortion Movement.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 32 (1):1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudrappa, Sharmilla, and Caitlyn Collins. 2015. “Altruistic Agencies and Compassionate Consumers: Moral Framing of Transnational Surrogacy.” Gender & Society 29 (6):937–59. doi:10.1177/0891243215602922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana, Johnny. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, Reva. 2007. “The Right’s Reasons: Constitutional Conflict and the Spread of Woman-Protective Antiabortion Argument.” Duke Law Journal 57:1641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smulison, Justin. 2022. “The Evolving Reproductive Landscape.” Best Lawyers. December 19. https://www.bestlawyers.com/article/abortion-laws-effect-on-assisted-reproduction/4900
   Google Scholar
• Sunderam, Saswati, Dmitry M. Kissin, Sara B. Crawford, Suzanne G. Folger, Denise J. Jamieson, Lee Warner, and Wanda D. Barfield. 2015. “Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.” Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report: Surveillance Summaries 64 (6):1–29. doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6411a1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson, Judith Jarvis. 1971. “A Defense of Abortion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, Rich. 2022a. “Devastating Supreme Court Decision Strips Women of the Right to Choose.” IFLG - International Fertility Law Group [Blog], June 24. https://www.iflg.net/supreme-court-strips-women-of-the-right-to-choose/
   Google Scholar
• Vaughn, Rich. 2022b. “Overturn of Roe V. Wade Could Make Some States Hostile to Surrogacy.” IFLG - International Fertility Law Group [Blog], May 17. https://www.iflg.net/overturn-roe-could-make-states-hostile-to-surrogacy/
   Google Scholar
• Will, Jonathan F. 2015. “Membership Has Its Privileges?: Life, Personhood, and Potential in Discussions About Reproductive Choice.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (2):358–62. doi:10.1111/jlme.12252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Joseph R. 2021. “New Surrogacy Law Brings Opportunities but Practitioners Beware.” New York State Bar Association, March 9. https://nysba.org/new-surrogacy-law-brings-opportunities-but-practitioners-beware/
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, Mary. 2020. Abortion and the Law in America: Roe V. Wade to the Present. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, Mary. 2021. “Contesting the Legacy of the Nineteenth Amendment: Abortion and Equality from Roe to the Present Articles & Essays.” University of Colorado Law Review 92 (3):751–98.
   Google Scholar