Analysis of inner flow and outflow characteristics of different scramjet elliptical holes

References

• Ahmed, S. A., S. Zhou, S. Tsegay, N. Ahmad, and Y. Zhu. 2020. Effects of hydrogen-enriched biogas on combustion and emission of a dual-fuel diesel engine. Energy Sources, Part A Recovery, Utilization, & Environmental Effects 1–16. doi:10.1080/15567036.2020.1736694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubey, G., Y. Devarajan, W. Huang, K. Mehar, M. Tiwari, and K. Pandey. 2019. Recent advances in cavity-based scramjet engine-a brief review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44 (26):13895–909. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, X., Z. Wang, F. Liu, C. Wang, Q. Sun, and C. Xu. 2019. Simulation of throttling effect on cavitation for nozzle internal flow. Fuel 243:277–87. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desantes, J. M., J. V. Pastor, R. Payri, and J. M. Pastor. 2005. Experimental characterization of internal nozzle flow and diesel spray behavior. Part II: Evaporative conditions. Atomization and Sprays 15 (5):517–44. doi:10.1615/AtomizSpr.v15.i5.30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Z., X. Tao, W. Zhong, X. Leng, Q. Wang, and P. Zhao. 2015. Experimental and numerical study of cavitation inception phenomenon in diesel injector nozzles. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 65:117–24. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2015.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J. G., K. W. Ku, and C.-W. Lee. 2011. Numerical simulation of the cavitating flow in an elliptical nozzle. Atomization and Sprays 21 (3):237–48. doi:10.1615/AtomizSpr.2011003127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, R., Q. Li, C. Li, and C. Li. 2019. Effects of an accompanied gas jet on transverse liquid injection in a supersonic crossflow. Acta Astronautica 159:440–51. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.01.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W. 2016. Transverse jet in supersonic crossflows. Aerospace Science and Technology 50:183–95. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2016.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadidi, M., V. Sreekumar, and A. Dolatabadi. 2019. Breakup of elliptical liquid jets in gaseous crossflows at low Weber numbers. Journal of Visualization 22 (2):259–71. doi:10.1007/s12650-018-0537-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, L., Z. Liu, and Y. Lyu. 2021. Internal flow and discharge coefficient characteristics of oil jet nozzles with different orifice angles under non-cavitating conditions. Aerospace Science and Technology 110:106473. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2020.106473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.-R., K.-W. Ku, J.-G. Hong, and C.-W. Lee. 2010. Experimental study of discharge coefficient and cavitation for different nozzle geometries. Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers B 34 (10):933–39. doi:10.3795/KSME-B.2010.34.10.933.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, K. W., J. G. Hong, and C.-W. Lee. 2011. Effect of internal flow structure in circular and elliptical nozzles on spray characteristics. Atomization and Sprays 21 (8):655–72. doi:10.1615/AtomizSpr.2012004192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., W. Zhang, M. Jia, Y. Yan, and Y. He. 2018. An improved method for coupling the in-nozzle cavitation with multi-fluid-quasi-VOF model for diesel spray. Computers & Fluids 177:20–32. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manigandan, S., and K. Vijayaraja. 2018. Acoustic and mixing characteristic of CD nozzle with inverted triangular tabs. International Journal of Ambient Energy 39 (8):787–91. doi:10.1080/01430750.2017.1354328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanta, P. K., and B. Sridhar. 2017. Study of decay characteristics of hexagonal and square supersonic jet. International Journal of Turbo & Jet-Engines 34 (2):115–22. doi:10.1515/tjj-2016-0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, S., F. Salvador, M. Carreres, and D. Jaramillo. 2014. A computational investigation on the influence of the use of elliptical orifices on the inner nozzle flow and cavitation development in diesel injector nozzles. Energy Conversion and Management 79:114–27. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2013.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morad, M., and H. Khosrobeygi. 2019. Penetration of elliptical liquid jets in low-speed crossflow. Journal of Fluids Engineering 141 (1):011301. doi:10.1115/1.4040373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurick, W. 1976. Orifice cavitation and its effect on spray mixing. Journal of Fluids Engineering 98 (4):681–87. doi:10.1115/1.3448452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payri, R., J. García, F. Salvador, and J. Gimeno. 2005. Using spray momentum flux measurements to understand the influence of diesel nozzle geometry on spray characteristics. Fuel 84 (5):551–61. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2004.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathakrishnan, E. 2018. AR 4 elliptic jet control with limiting tab. Fluid Dynamics Research 50 (2):025505. doi:10.1088/1873-7005/aa9b96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Z., B. Wang, G. Xiang, D. Zhao, and L. Zheng. 2019. Supersonic spray combustion subject to scramjets: Progress and challenges. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 105:40–59. doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salewski, M., D. Stankovic, and L. Fuchs. 2008. Mixing in circular and non-circular jets in crossflow. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 80 (2):255–83. doi:10.1007/s10494-007-9119-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D. P., and M. Corradini. 2001. The internal flow of diesel fuel injector nozzles: a review. International Journal of Engine Research 2 (1):1–22. doi:10.1243/1468087011545316.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, J., P. Lopez Aguado, N. Guerrassi, and G. Dober. 2017. Understanding high-pressure injection primary breakup by using large eddy simulation and x-ray spray imaging. MTZ Worldwide 78 (5):50–57. doi:10.1007/s38313-017-0039-4.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, P., G. Zhu, J. Cheng, J. Li, and X. Hou. 2023. Simulation on atomization process of gas–liquid pintle injector in LRE under periodic conditions based on the VOF to DPM method. Aerospace Science and Technology 108222. doi:10.1016/j.ast.2023.108222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sou, A., B. Biçer, and A. Tomiyama. 2014. Numerical simulation of incipient cavitation flow in a nozzle of fuel injector. Computers & Fluids 103:42–48. doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2014.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winklhofer, E., E. Kull, E. Kelz, and A. Morozov. 2001. Comprehensive hydraulic and flow field documentation in model throttle experiments under cavitation conditions. Proceedings of the ILASS-Europe conference, Zurich, 574–79.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, S., B. Yin, Q. Bi, H. Jia, and C. Chen. 2021. The influence of elliptical and circular orifices on the transverse jet characteristics at supersonic crossflow. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA 185:124–31. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.04.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., B. Yin, H. Jia, and J. Yu. 2017. Numerical research on micro diesel spray characteristics under ultra-high injection pressure by large Eddy simulation (LES). International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 64:129–36. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2017.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y.-Z., F. Xiao, Q.-L. Li, and C.-Y. Li. 2020. Simulation of elliptical liquid jet primary breakup in supersonic crossflow. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering 2020:1–12. doi:10.1155/2020/6783038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar