Use analytic hierarchy and gray relational analysis for the evaluation of oily sludge treatment technology

References

• Antonopoulos, I.- S., G. Perkoulidis, D. Logothetis, and C. Karkanias. 2014. Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives considering sustainability criteria using the analytical hierarchical process tool. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 86:149–59. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balwada, J., S. Samaiya, and R. P. Mishra. 2021. Packaging plastic waste management for a circular economy and identifying a better waste collection system using analytical hierarchy process [J]Vol. 98, 270–75. Procedia CIRP
   Google Scholar
• Çelikbilek, Y., and F. Tüysüz. 2016. An integrated grey based multi-criteria decision-making approach for the evaluation of renewable energy sources. Energy 115:1246–58. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Changqing, X., T. Tang, H. Jia, M. Xu, T. Xu, Z. Liu, Y. Long, and R. Zhang. 2019. Benefits of coupled green and grey infrastructure systems: Evidence based on analytic hierarchy process and life cycle costing. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 151 (C):104478–104478. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104478.
   Google Scholar
• Chan Joseph, W. K., and K. L. Tong Thomas. 2006. Multi-criteria material selections and end-of-life product strategy: Grey relational analysis approach. Materials and Design 28 (5):1539–46. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2006.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Marinis, P., and G. Sali. 2020. Participatory analytic hierarchy process for resource allocation in agricultural development projects. Evaluation and Program Planning 80 (C):101793. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101793.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dewalkar Snehal, V., and S. Shastri Sameer. 2022. Integrated life cycle assessment and life cycle cost assessment based fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for selection of appropriate wastewater treatment system. Journal of Water Process Engineering 45:45. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos, P. H., S. M. Neves, D. O. Sant’Anna, C. H. De Oliveira, and H. D. Carvalho. 2019. The analytic hierarchy process supporting decision making for sustainable development: An overview of applications. Journal of Cleaner Production 212:119–38. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foteinopoulos, P. and A. Papacharalampopoulos and P. Stavropoulos. 2019. Block-based analytical hierarchy process applied for the evaluation of construction sector additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 81 (C):950–55. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.233.
   Google Scholar
• Gim, B., and J. Wook Kim. 2014. Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen storage systems for automobiles in Korea using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 39 (15):7852–58. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guangming, Z., R. Jiang, G. Huang, M. Xu, and J. Li. 2007. Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 82 (2):250–59. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.12.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, T., S. Tang, J. Sun, F. Gong, X. Liu, Z. Qu, and W. Zhang . 2020. A coupled thermal-hydraulic-mechanical modeling and evaluation of geothermal extraction in the enhanced geothermal system based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Applied Energy 258(C):113981–113981. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113981.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, G., H. Feng, P. He, J. Li, K. Hewage, and R. Sadiq. 2019. Comparative life-cycle assessment of traditional and emerging oily sludge treatment approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production 251:119594. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, G., J. Li, and G. Zeng. 2013. Recent development in the treatment of oily sludge from petroleum industry: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials 261:470–90. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.07.069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M. and S. Kashem and S. Morshed. 2020. Integrating spatial information technologies and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) approach for landfill siting. City and Environment Interactions 7:100045. doi:10.1016/j.cacint.2020.100045.
   Google Scholar
• Kolahi, H., M. Jahangiri, H. Ghaem, A. Rostamabadi, M. Aghabeigi, P. Farhadi, and M. Kamalinia. 2018. Evaluation of respiratory protection Program in petrochemical industries: Application of analytic hierarchy process. Safety and Health at Work 9(1):95–100. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2017.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurka, T. 2013. Application of the analytic hierarchy process to evaluate the regional sustainability of bioenergy developments. Energy 62:393–402. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., M. E. Claudia, and C. Earl. 2020. A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements. Expert Systems with Applications 161:161. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Y. Yin, and S. Yan. 2019. Research on clean energy power generation-energy storage-energy using virtual enterprise risk assessment based on fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 236 (C):117471–117471. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.302.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, W., J. Zhang, M. Jin, S. Liu, X. Chang, N. Xie, and Y. Wang. 2017. Key indices of the remanufacturing industry in China using a combined method of grey incidence analysis and grey clustering. Journal of Cleaner Production 168:1348–57. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., W. Zhang, Z. Qu, T. Guo, Y. Sun, M. Rabiei, and Q. Cao. 2020. Feasibility evaluation of hydraulic fracturing in hydrate-bearing sediments based on analytic hierarchy process-entropy method (AHP-EM). Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering 81:81. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shweta, S., U. Surya Prakash, and P. Satvasheel. 2022. Developing an integrated social, economic, environmental, and technical analysis model for sustainable development using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making methods. Applied Energy 308:308. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X., et al. 2019. Optimization of pollutant reduction system for controlling agricultural non-point-source pollution based on grey relational analysis combined with analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Environmental Management 243:370–80. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teh, K. C., R. R. Tan, K. B. Aviso, M. A. B. Promentilla, and J. Tan. 2019. An integrated analytic hierarchy process and life cycle assessment model for nanocrystalline cellulose production[J]. Food and Bioproducts Processing 118(C):13–31. doi:10.1016/j.fbp.2019.08.003.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, D., C. Du, Y. Lin, B. Chang, and Y. Wang. 2020. Thermal environment assessment of deep mine based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering 19:100618–100618. doi:10.1016/j.csite.2020.100618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., W. X. Lu, Y. Zhao, and W. B. Song. 2014. Development tendency analysis and evaluation of the water ecological carrying capacity in the Siping area of Jilin Province in China based on system dynamics and analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Modelling 275:9–21. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.11.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., R. Wang, P. Huang, X. Wang, and S. Wang. 2020. Risk evaluation of large-scale seawater desalination projects based on an integrated fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and analytic hierarchy process method. Desalination 478(C):114286–114286. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2019.114286.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., K. Maumbe, J. Deng, and S. W. Selin. 2015. Resource-based destination competitiveness evaluation using a hybrid analytic hierarchy process (AHP): The case study of West Virginia. Tourism Management Perspectives 15:72–80. doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2015.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar