Prediction of soot for pressurized turbulent kerosene-air diffusion flames using method of moments

References

• Blanquart, G., and H. Pitsch. 2009. A joint volume-surface-hydrogen multi-variate model for soot formation. Combustion generated fine carbonaceous particles. Chapter 27:437–63.
   Google Scholar
• Charest, M. R. J., H. I. Joo, Ö. L. Gülder, and C. P. T. Groth, 2011. Experimental and numerical study of soot formation in laminar ethylene diffusion flames at elevated pressures from 10 to 35 atm. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 33, 549–57. 10.1016/j.proci.2010.07.054
   Google Scholar
• Chemkin-pro Theory Manual.2019. USA: ANSYS Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Consalvi, J. L., and F. Liu. 2015. Numerical study of the effects of pressure on soot formation in laminar coflow n-heptane/air diffusion flames between 1 and 10atm. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 35 (2):1727–1734. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2014.07.045.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbins, R. A., R. A. Fletcher, and H. C. Chang. 1998. The evolution of soot precursor particles in a diffusion flame. Combustion and Flame 115 (3):285–98. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(98)00010-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckel, G., J. Grohmann, L. Cantu, N. Slavinskaya, T. Kathrotia, M. Rachner, P. Le Clercq, W. Meier, and M. Aigner. 2019. LES of a swirl-stabilized kerosene spray flame with a multi-component vaporization model and detailed chemistry. Combustion and Flame 207:134–52. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigentler, F., and P. Gerlinger. 2022. A detailed PAH and soot model for complex fuels in CFD applications. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 109 (1):225–51. doi:10.1007/s10494-022-00319-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigentler, F., P. M. Gerlinger, and R. Eggels. 2022. Soot CFD simulation of a real aero engine combustor. In AIAA 2022-0489 AIAA SCITECH 2022 forum. San Diego, CA: Virtual. doi:10.2514/6.2022-0489.
   Google Scholar
• The Engineering Toolbox. 2024. Kinematic viscosities of some common liquids. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/kinematic-viscosity-d_397.html. accessed on February 3, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Fluent Theory Guide. 2019. ANSYS Inc.USA
   Google Scholar
• Ghose, P., J. Patra, A. Datta, and A. Mukhopadhyay. 2016. Prediction of soot and thermal radiation in a model gas turbine combustor burning kerosene fuel spray at different swirl levels. Combustion Theory and Modelling 20 (3):457–485. doi:10.1080/13647830.2016.1147607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giusti, A., E. Mastorakos, C. Hassa, J. Heinze, E. Magens, and M. Zedda, 2017. Investigation of flame structure and soot formation in a single sector Model combustor using experiments and numerical simulations based on the LES/CMC approach. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2017: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. 4A: Combustion, Fuels and Emissions. 10.1115/GT2017-63620
   Google Scholar
• Gkantonas, S., J. M. Foale, A. Giusti, and E. Mastorakos. 2020. Soot emission simulations of a single sector Model combustor using incompletely stirred reactor network modeling. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 142 142 (10). doi:10.1115/1.4048408.
   Google Scholar
• Grosshandler, W. L. 1993. RADCAL: A narrow-band Model for radiation calculations in a combustion environment. NIST Technical Note 1402. doi:10.6028/NIST.TN.1402.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, J., Z. Gan, J. Li, H. Li, B. Feng, and X. Xing. 2023. Experimental study of oxygen depletion effects on soot morphology and nanostructure in coflow diffusion aviation fuel (RP-3) flames. Energies 16 (3166):1–20. doi:10.3390/en16073166.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, H., Z. Gu, K. A. Thomson, G. J. Smallwood, and F. F. Baksh. 2013. Soot formation in a laminar ethylene/air diffusion flame at pressures from 1 to 8 atm. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 34 (1):1795–1802. doi:10.1016/j.proci.2012.07.006.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, J., Y. Tang, V. Raman, and H. G. Im. 2021. Numerical investigation of pressure effects on soot formation in laminar coflow ethylene/air diffusion flames. Fuel 292:120176. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Y. He, H. Zhang, Y. Dai, and Z. Wang. 2023. Effect of pressure on burning and soot characteristics of RP‑3 kerosene droplets under sub-atmospheric pressure. American Chemical Society Omega 8 (15):14053–65. doi:10.1021/acsomega.3c00655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irimiea, C., A. Vincent-Randonnier, J. P. Dufitumukiza, S. Puggelli, J. B. May-Carle, et al. 2022. ALTERNATE: Experimental and modeling study of soot formation in high-pressure kerosene and SAF combustion. Towards sustainable aviation summit 2022 (TSAS 2022). Toulouse, France. https://hal.science/hal-03943930
   Google Scholar
• Kulakhmetov, R. F., 2020. Measurement and modeling of soot formation and deposition in fuel rich high pressure kerosene combustion. Purdue University Graduate School. PhD Thesis. 10.25394/PGS.13366178.v1
   Google Scholar
• Kurzawski, A., M. Hansen, and J. Hewson. 2021. Soot predictions with a laminar flamelet combustion model in sierra/fuego on a coflow scenario. Sandia Report SAND2021–14588. doi:10.2172/1832301.
   Google Scholar
• Lecocq, G., D. Poitou, I. Hernández, F. Duchaine, E. Riber, and B. Cuenot. 2014. A methodology for soot prediction including thermal radiation in complex industrial burners. Flow Turbulence Combust 92 (4):947–70. doi:10.1007/s10494-014-9536-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liati, A., D. Schreiber, P. A. Alpert, Y. Liao, B. T. Brem, P. Corral Arroyo, J. Hu, H. R. Jonsdottir, M. Ammann, and P. Dimopoulos Eggenschwiler. 2019. Aircraft soot from conventional fuels and biofuels during ground idle and climb-out conditions: Electron microscopy and X-ray micro-spectroscopy. Environmental Pollution 247:658–67. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., and Z. Gan. 2023. Effect of pressure on soot formation and properties in laminar RP-3 kerosene diffusion flames. Combustion Science and Technology. doi:10.1080/00102202.2023.2251664.
   Google Scholar
• Lucchesi, M., A. Abdelgadir, A. Attili, and F. Bisetti. 2017. Simulation and analysis of the soot particle size distribution in a turbulent nonpremixed flame. Combustion and Flame 178:35–45. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, J. B., and I. M. Aksit, 2007. Modelling soot formation in a laminar diffusion flame burning a surrogate kerosene fuel. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 31, 3139–46. 10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.016
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, M. E., and H. Pitsch. 2013. Large eddy simulation of soot evolution in an aircraft combustor. Physics of Fluids 25 (110812):1–20. doi:10.1063/1.4819347.
   Google Scholar
• Nakod, P., S. Patwardhan, I. Verma, and S. Orsino, 2017. Prediction of soot formation trends in turbulent kerosene-air diffusion jet flames with elevated operating pressure, Proceedings of ASME Gas Turbine India Conference: GTINDIA, Bangalore, India. 10.1115/GTINDIA2017-4736
   Google Scholar
• Neoh, K. G., J. B. Howard, and A. F. Sarofim. 1981. Soot oxidation in flames. In Particulate carbon, ed., D. C. Siegla and G. W. Smith. Boston, MA: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-6137-5_9.
   Google Scholar
• Prado, G. P., M. L. Lee, R. A. Hites, D. P. Hoult, and J. B. Howard. 1977. Soot and hydrocarbon formation in a turbulent diffusion flame. Symposium (International) on Combustion 16 (1):649–61. doi:10.1016/S0082-0784(77)80360-3.
   Google Scholar
• Saffaripour, M., A. Veshkini, M. Kholghy, and M. J. Thomson. 2014. Experimental investigation and detailed modeling of soot aggregate formation and size distribution in laminar coflow diffusion flames of jet A-1, a synthetic kerosene, and n-decane. Combustion and Flame 161 (3):848–63. doi:10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.10.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffaripour, M., P. Zabeti, M. Kholghy, and M. J. Thomson. 2011. An experimental comparison of the sooting behavior of synthetic jet fuels. Energy and Fuels 25 (12):5584–93. doi:10.1021/ef201219v.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini, R., and A. De. 2018. Soot predictions in higher order hydrocarbon flames: Assessment of semi-empirical models and method of moments. S. De, ed. Modeling and simulation of turbulent combustion, energy, environment, and sustainability. Vol. 11, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 10.1007/978-981-10-7410-3_11
   Google Scholar
• Schiener, M. A., and R. P. Lindstedt, 2019. Transported probability density function based modelling of soot particle size distributions in non-premixed turbulent jet flames. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 37, 1049–56. 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.088
   Google Scholar
• Shaddix, C. R., H. Wang, R. W. Schefer, J. C. Oefelein, and L. M. Pickett, 2011. Predicting the effects of fuel composition and flame structure on soot generation in turbulent non-premixed flames, final report, SERDP Project WP-1578
   Google Scholar
• Shahriari, B., M. Thomson, and S. Dworkin, 2015. Development and validation of a partially coupled soot model for turbulent kerosene combustion in view of application to gas turbines. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. Volume 4B: Combustion, Fuels and Emissions. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 10.1115/GT2015-43063
   Google Scholar
• Smooke, M. D., R. J. Hall, M. B. Colket, J. Fielding, M. B. Long, C. S. McEnally, and L. D. Pfefferle. 2004. Investigation of the transition from lightly sooting towards heavily sooting co-flow ethylene diffusion flames. Combustion Theory and Modelling 8 (3):593–606. doi:10.1088/1364-7830/8/3/009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, I., R. Yadav, P. Nakod, and S. Orsino, 2018. Detailed soot modeling in turbulent kerosene/air diffusion flame: Sensitivity analysis of models using moment of methods. AFRC 2018 conference. https://collections.lib.utah.edu/ark:/87278/s63c0956
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., E. Dames, B. Sirjean, D. A. Sheen, R. Tango, A. Violi, J. Y. W. Lai, F. N. Egolfopoulos, D. F. Davidson, R. K. Hanson, et al., 2010. A high-temperature chemical kinetic model of n alkane (up to n-dodecane), cyclohexane, and methyl-, ethyl-, n-propyl and n-butyl-cyclohexane oxidation at high temperatures, JetSurF version 2.0, (http://web.stanford.edu/group/haiwanglab/JetSurF/JetSurF2.0/index.html)
   Google Scholar
• Wen, Z., S. Yun, M. J. Thomson, and M. F. Lightstone. 2003. Modeling soot formation in turbulent kerosene/air jet diffusion flames. Combustion and Flame 135 (3):323–40. doi:10.1016/S0010-2180(03)00179-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, K. J., C. D. Stewart, and J. B. Moss, 1994. Soot formation in turbulent nonpremixed kerosine-air flames burning at elevated pressure: Experimental measurement. Twenty-Fifth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Irvine, CA (United States), 609–17.
   Google Scholar