Rated load state performance assessment and analysis of ultra-supercritical coal-fired power plant

References

• Ahmad Sammour, A., O. V. Komarov, M. A. Qasim, S. Almalghouj, A. Mazen Al Dakkak, and Y. Du. 2023. Ambient conditions impact on combined cycle gas turbine power plant performance, energy sources, part A: Recovery. Utilization, and Environmental Effects 45 (1):557–74. doi:10.1080/15567036.2023.2172100.
   Google Scholar
• Angui, Z., L. Jiping, Z. Zhonghua, et al. 2023. Operation problems of ammonia desulfurization plant and solutions. Energy Science and Technology 21 (1):67–70.
   Google Scholar
• Camaraza-Medina, Y., Y. Retirado-Mediaceja, A. Hernandez-Guerrero, and J. Luis Luviano-Ortiz. 2021. Energy efficiency indicators of the steam boiler in a power plant of Cuba. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress 23:100880. ISSN 2451-9049. doi:10.1016/j.tsep.2021.100880.
   Google Scholar
• Chandrakant Nikam, K., R. Kumar, and R. Jilte. 2020. Thermodynamic modeling and performance evaluation of a supercritical coal-fired power plant situated in Western India, energy sources, part A: Recovery. Utilization, and Environmental Effects. doi:10.1080/15567036.2020.1806410.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., M. Zhang, Y. Wu, G. Xu, and W. Liu. 2020. Tong Liu, design and performance evaluation of a new waste incineration power system integrated with a supercritical CO2 power cycle and a coal-fired power plant. Energy Conversion and Management 210:112715. ISSN 0196-8904. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dianfa, W. 2019. General energy consumption evaluation methods of large coal-fired power generation units[D]. Beijing: North China Electric Power University. doi:10.27140/d.cnki.ghbbu.2019.000028.
   Google Scholar
• Filiz Tumen Ozdil, N., A. Tantekin, and A. Pekdur. 2020. Thermodynamic, economic and environmental assessments in a cogeneration power plant, energy sources, part A: Recovery. Utilization, and Environmental Effects 1–21. doi:10.1080/15567036.2020.1754532.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, J. 2005. Fuzzy AHP synthetical appraise method and application[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University.
   Google Scholar
• Guangshui, Z., L. Wenbo, and R. Ma. 2021. Research on the safety evaluation of ash dams in coal-fired power plants based on fuzzy mathematics. Safety and Health (9):66–68. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Haihua, C., S. Weifeng, Z. Xiaoxin, H. Danhua, Y. Tianbao, and S. Wenyan. 2022. Evaluation method of power source reaching service term based on fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and the entropy weight method. Journal of Power Supply:1–13. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Hong, F., J. Chen, R. Wang, D. Long, H. Yu, and M. Gao. 2021. Realization and performance evaluation for long-term low-load operation of a CFB boiler unit. Energy 214:118877. ISSN 0360-5442. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagtap, H., A. Bewoor, R. Kumar, M. Hossein Ahmadi, and G. Lorenzini. 2020. Markov-based performance evaluation and availability optimization of the boiler–furnace system in coal-fired thermal power plant using PSO. Energy Reports 6:1124–34. ISSN 2352-4847. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2020.04.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jianzhong, L. 1992. Reasons for high power consumption in powder production systems and measures to reduce power consumption. North China Electric Power 12:13–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jifang, W., and L. Zhengding. 2000. The determine method of membership function in fuzzy control. Henan Sciences (4):348–51. doi:10.13537/j.issn.1004-3918.2000.04.005. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Kabeyi, M., and O. Olanrewaju. 2021. Performance analysis and evaluation of muhoroni 60MW gas turbine power plant. 1–8. doi:10.1109/ICECCME52200.2021.9591134.
   Google Scholar
• Kabiri, S., M. Hasan Khoshgoftar Manesh, and M. Amidpour. 2020. 4E analysis and evaluation of a steam power plant full repowering in various operations, energy sources, part A: Recovery. Utilization, and Environmental Effects 1–21. doi:10.1080/15567036.2020.1761484.
   Google Scholar
• Kun, L. 2023. Analysis of the application of environmental protection technologies in ultra-supercritical 1000MW thermal power units. Electrical Equipment and Economy 8:87–89. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8845.2023.08.030.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, L., and W. Yunfei. 2023. Research on the ecological construction of forestry in Northeast China based on AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Forest Engineering 39 (3):82–90. (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-8023.2023.03.010.
   Google Scholar
• Miaoyuan, W., H. Jieping, and N. Yiheng. 2022. Comprehensive benefit assessment of CCUS project for coal-fired power plants based on AHP-Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approach. Technology and Industry Across the Straits 35 (7):88–91. (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-3013.2022.07.023.
   Google Scholar
• Si, T., C. Wang, R. Liu, Y. Guo, S. Yue, and Y. Ren. 2020. Multi-criteria comprehensive energy efficiency assessment based on fuzzy-AHP method: A case study of post-treatment technologies for coal-fired units. Energy 200 (117533):117533. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.117533. ISSN 0360-5442
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. S. 2013. The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: The AHP/ANP approach. Operations Research 61 (5):1101–18. doi:10.1287/opre.2013.1197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiantian, H., L. Changxing, W. Shengjie, and G. Yifan. 2021. Comprehensive evaluation of mine geological environment based on multiplicative integration method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. China Energy and Environmental Protection 43 (7):31–37. (in Chinese). doi:10.19389/j.cnki.1003-0506.2021.07.006.
   Google Scholar
• Uma Maheswari, G., N. Shankar Ganesh, T. Srinivas, and B. V. Reddy. 2023. Exergoenvironmental evaluation of kalina power generation system, energy sources, part A: Recovery. Utilization, and Environmental Effects 45 (1):3170–88. doi:10.1080/15567036.2023.2193160.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., P. Fu, Z. Yang, T.-E. Lin, and Y. Yang. 2020. George Tsatsaronis, Advanced Exergoeconomic Evaluation of Large-Scale Coal-Fired Power Plant, 2020. Journal of Energy Engineering 146 (1):1. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EY.1943-7897.0000633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, L., and N. Sai. 2021. Study on multi-layer evaluation system of source-grid-load under carbon-neutral goal. Proceedings of the CSEE 41 (S1):178–84. (in Chinese). doi:10.13334/j.0258-8013.pcsee.211576.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, L., W. Jie, W. Shaorong, C. Feng, Z. Xu, and T. Jing. 2018. Research on evaluation indices of new energy generation characteristics and membership functions. Power System Protection and Control 46 (8):43–49. (in Chinese). doi:10.7667/PSPC170462.
   Google Scholar
• Yongjun, L., and B. Qingfei. 2021. Evaluation of thermal power plant operation index based on combined weight and TOPSIS method. Shandong Electric Power 48 (8):61–65. (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9904.2021.08.011.
   Google Scholar
• Yongping, Y., W. Dianfa, and W. Ningling. 2016. Comprehensive evaluation for large scale coal-fired power units based on combined weight and TOPSIS method. Thermal Power Generation 45 (2):10–15. in Chinese. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3364.2016.02.010.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Z., and T. Liang. 2023. Comprehensive evaluation of operation of thermal power units based on PCA and improved TOPSIS method. Journal of North China Electric Power University 50 (3):110–6+26. (in Chinese). doi:10.3969/j.ISSN.1007-2691.2023.03.11.
   Google Scholar