Transforming Turkish electricity system in the context of circular economy and green deal: impacts on steel and agricultural production

References

• Acar, S., A. A. Aşıcı, and A. E. Yeldan. 2022. Potential effects of the EU’s carbon border adjustment mechanism on the Turkish economy. Environment, Development and Sustainability 24 (6):8162–94. doi:10.1007/s10668-021-01779-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, H., H. A. Khan, and M. G. Pecht. 2021. Circular economy of Li batteries: Technologies and trends. Journal of Energy Storage 40:102690. doi:10.1016/j.est.2021.102690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsaleh, A., and M. Sattler. 2019. Comprehensive life cycle assessment of large wind turbines in the US. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 21 (4):887–903. doi:10.1007/s10098-019-01678-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atilgan, B., and A. Azapagic. 2016. Renewable electricity in Turkey: Life cycle environmental impacts. Renewable Energy 89:649–57. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayvaz, B., and A. O. Kusakci. 2017. Electricity consumption forecasting for Turkey with nonhomogeneous discrete grey model. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, & Policy 12 (3):260–67. doi:10.1080/15567249.2015.1089337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgili, M., and E. Pinar. 2023. Gross electricity consumption forecasting using LSTM and SARIMA approaches: A case study of Türkiye. Energy 284:128575. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.128575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bist, N., A. Sircar, and K. Yadav. 2020. Holistic review of hybrid renewable energy in circular economy for valorization and management. Environmental Technology & Innovation 20:101054. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2020.101054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BP (British Petroleum). 2022. Statistical review of world energy 2022. US: British Petroleum.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, C. 2016. Steel’s recyclability: Demonstrating the benefits of recycling steel to achieve a circular economy. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 21 (11):1658–65. doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1081-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cekinir, S., O. Ozgener, and L. Ozgener. 2022. Türkiye’s energy projection for 2050. Renewable Energy Focus 43:93–116. doi:10.1016/j.ref.2022.09.003.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Z. Wang, Y. Wu, L. Li, B. Li, D. Pan, and T. Zuo. 2019. Environmental benefits of secondary copper from primary copper based on life cycle assessment in China. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 146:35–44. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emek, S., and G. Akkaya. 2022. Turkey’s long-term electricity consumption forecast using regression analysis. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research 81:12. 10.56042/jsir.v81i12.40731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güllü, A. B., H. Aksoy, S. Serhadlıoğlu, Y. Taranto, R. Y. Çalışkan, A. D. Vita, V. Karakousis, M. Rogner, P. Godron, and G. Dinçel. 2023. Net zero 2053: A roadmap for the Turkish electricity sector. Istanbul, Turkey: SHURA Energy Transition Center, Sabanci University.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J., Y., Chen, J. Liu, X. Ma, C. Qi, and L. Ye 2018. Life cycle assessment of copper production: A case study in China. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 23 (9):1814–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-H., and C.-S. Tan. 2014. A Review: CO2 utilization. Aerosol and Air Quality Research 14 (2):480–99. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2013.10.0326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEA (International Energy Agency). 2021. Turkey 2021 - Energy policy review. Paris, France: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IEA (International Energy Agency). 2022. Key energy statistics. Accessed June 8, 2023. https://www.iea.org/countries/turkiye.
   Google Scholar
• IEA (International Energy Agency). 2023. Key energy statistics. Accessed December 12, 2023. https://www.iea.org/countries/turkiye.
   Google Scholar
• Kılınc, A. 2022. Impact of carbon border adjustment mechanism on iron-steel and cement sectors in Turkey: A social accounting matrix multiplier analysis. Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Korkmaz, O., and B. Önöz. 2022. Modelling the potential impacts of nuclear energy and renewables in the Turkish energy system. Energies 15 (4):1392. doi:10.3390/en15041392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropff, W., A. Eitzinger, E. Hasiner, K. Schroeder, A. Juergenliemk, A. Horst, and A. Jarvis. 2021. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), 17. Rome, Italy: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., S. Verma, A. Gupta, A. R. Paul, A. Jain, and N. Haque. 2021. Life cycle analysis for the production of urea through syngas. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 795 (1):012031. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/795/1/012031.
   Google Scholar
• Kursun, B. 2022. Role of solar power in shifting the Turkish electricity sector towards sustainability. Clean Energy 6 (2):313–24. doi:10.1093/ce/zkac002.
   Google Scholar
• Kursun, B. 2023. Exploitable wind power potential in Turkey with technological advancement and resulting environmental-economic aspects. Energy Exploration & Exploitation 41 (1):187–209. doi:10.1177/01445987221115814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfred, R. 2020. Life cycle assessment of a Nordex windfarm with Delta4000 turbines. Stuttgart, Germany: Sphera Solutions.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources (MENR). 2022. Türkiye national energy plan. Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Napp, T. A., S. Few, A. Sood, D. Bernie, A. Hawkes, and A. Gambhir. 2019. The role of advanced demand-sector technologies and energy demand reduction in achieving ambitious carbon budgets. Applied Energy 238:351–67. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özdemir, A., Z. Günkaya, A. Özkan, O. Ersen, M. Bilgiç, and M. Banar. 2018. Life cycle assessment of steel rebar production with Induction melting furnace: Case study in Turkey. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste 22 (2):04017027. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000385.
   Google Scholar
• Pagliaro, M., and F. Meneguzzo. 2019. Lithium battery reusing and recycling: A circular economy insight. Heliyon 5 (6):e01866. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRé Sustainability. 2022. SimaPro. Accessed December 2, 2022. https://www.pre-sustainability.com/simapro.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Garcia, G., E. Aydin, S. De Wolf, B. Carlson, J. Kellar, and I. Celik. 2021. Life cycle assessment of coated-glass recovery from perovskite solar cells. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 9 (45):15239–48. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şahin, G., M. A. Taksim, and B. Yitgin. 2021. Effects of the European green deal on Turkey’s electricity market. İşletme Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi 4 (1):40–58. doi:10.33416/baybem.835052.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, L., L. Liu, B. Yang, G. Sheng, and T. Xu. 2020. Evaluation of industrial Urea Energy Consumption (EC) based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Sustainability 12 (9):3793. doi:10.3390/su12093793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEIAS (Turkish Electricity Transmission Corporation). 2023. Turkish electricity production and transmission statistics. Accessed May 15, 2023. https://www.teias.gov.tr/tr-TR/turkiye-elektrik-uretim-iletim-istatistikleri.
   Google Scholar
• Teimourzadeh, S., O. Tör, B. Kat, Ü. Şahin, K. Demirkol, A. Künar, E. Voyvoda, and E. Veldan. 2023. Turkey’s decarbonization pathway: Timeline and geography of the transition (2020-2050). Istanbul, Turkey: Istanbul Policy Centre (IPC), Sabanci University.
   Google Scholar
• TUIK (Turkish Statistical Institute). 2022. Turkish population projections. Accessed August 3, 2023. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=Nufus-ve-Demografi-109.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Wind Energy Association (TWEA) (2022). Turkish wind energy statistics report July 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas, C., and M. Chesney. 2021. End of life decommissioning and recycling of solar panels in the United States. A real options analysis. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment 11 (1):82–102. doi:10.1080/20430795.2019.1700723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestas. 2015. Life cycle assessment of electricity production from an onshore V110-2.0 MW wind plant – 18th December 2015. Vestas Wind Systems A/S, Hedeager 42, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Yurtkuran, S. 2021. The effect of agriculture, renewable energy production, and globalization on CO2 emissions in Turkey: A bootstrap ARDL approach. Renewable Energy 171:1236–45. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zang, G., P. Sun, A. Elgowainy, and M. Wang. 2021. Technoeconomic and life cycle analysis of synthetic methanol production from hydrogen and industrial byproduct CO2. Environmental Science & Technology 55 (8):5248–57. doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c08237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zegardlo, N., and K. Abd Druzba. 2021. Evaluation of Traditional Container Glass Recycling Systems against Selected Environmental Impact Criteria Using the LCA Method. Journal of Ecological Engineering 22 (6):2025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar