29
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Theorizing Catholicism in International Relations: An English School Framework

References

  • Bain, William. 2020. Political Theology of International Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Barbato, Mariano. 2013. “A State, a Diplomat, and a Transnational Church: The Multi-Layered Actorness of the Holy See.” Perspectives: Review of Central European Affairs 21 (2): 27–48.
  • Bellamy, Alex. 2005. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bull, Hedley. 1966. “The Grotian Conception of International Society.” Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics 3: 51–73.
  • Bull, Hedley, and Adam Watson. 1984. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Buzan, Barry. 2001. “The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR.” Review of International Studies 27 (3): 471–488.
  • Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Buzan, Barry. 2014. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Chong, Alan, and Jodok Troy. 2011. “A Universal Sacred Mission and the Universal Secular Organization: The Holy See and the United Nations.” Politics, Religion & Ideology 12 (3): 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2011.596417.
  • Cochran, Molly. 2014. “Normative Theory in the English School.” In Guide to the English School in International Studies, edited by Cornelia Navari, and Daniel Green, 185–203. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Diez, Thomas. 2017. “Diplomacy, Papacy, and the Transformation of International Society.” The Review of Faith & International Affairs 15 (4): 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2017.1392142.
  • Epp, Roger. 2014. “The British Committee on the Theory of International Politics and Its Central Figures.” In Guide to the English School in International Studies, edited by Cornelia Navari, and Daniel Green, 25–36. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Fox, Jonathan, and Nukhet Sandal. 2013. Religion in International Relations Theory: Interactions and Possibilities. Oxford: Routledge.
  • Green, Daniel. 2014. “Introduction to the English School in International Studies.” In Guide to the English School in International Studies, edited by Cornelia Navari, and Daniel Green, 1–6. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Hall, Ian. 2001. “Still the English Patient? Closures and Inventions in the English School.” International Affairs 77 (4): 931–942. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00226.
  • Hall, Ian. 2014. “Martin Wight, Western Values, and the Whig Tradition of International Thought.” The International History Review 36 (5): 961–981. https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2014.900815.
  • Hurrell, Andrew. 2014. “Order and Justice.” In Guide to the English School in International Studies edited by Cornelia Navari and Daniel Green, 143–158. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Jackson, Robert. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jones, Charles A. 2003. “Christian Realism and the Foundations of the English School.” International Relations 17 (3): 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178030173007.
  • Linklater, Andrew, and Hidemi Suganami. 2006. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • McLarren, Katharina, and Bernhard Stahl. 2020. “The Holy See as Hybrid Actor: Religion in International, Transnational, and World Society.” In The Pope, the Public, and International Relations, edited by Mariano Barbato, 189–201. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Milbank, John, and Adrian Pabst. 2016. The Politics of Virtue: Post-Liberalism and the Human Future. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Molloy, Sean. 2003. “The Realist Logic of International Society.” Cooperation and Conflict 38 (2): 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836703038002001.
  • Navari, Cornelia, and Daniel Green. 2014. Guide to the English School in International Studies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Pabst, Adrian. 2012. “The Secularism of Post-secularity: Religion, Realism, and the Revival of Grand Theory.” Review of International Studies 38 (5): 995–1017. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210512000447.
  • Pabst, Adrian. 2017. “International Relations and the ”Modern“ Middle Ages: Rival Theological Theorisations of International Order.” In Medieval Foundations of International Relations, edited by William Bain, 166–85. London: Routledge.
  • Paipais, Vassilios. 2018. “Introduction: Political Theologies of the International—The Continued Relevance of Theology in International Relations.” Journal of International Relations and Development 22: 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-018-0160-2.
  • Rozario, Marianne. 2021. “Catholic Agency in International Society: An International Relations Analysis of The Santa Marta Group,” PhD diss. University of Notre Dame Australia.
  • Ryall, David. 1998. “How Many Divisions? The Modern Development of Catholic International Relations.” International Relations 14 (2): 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/004711789801400202.
  • Sharp, Paul. 2003. “Herbert Butterfield, the English School and the Civilizing Virtues of Diplomacy.” International Affairs 79 (4): 855–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00340.
  • Suganami, Hidemi. 2010. “The English School in a Nutshell.” Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies 9: 15–28.
  • Thomas, Scott M. 2000. “Taking Religious and Cultural Pluralism Seriously: The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Society.” Journal of International Studies 29 (3): 815–841.
  • Thomas, Scott M. 2001. “Faith, History and Martin Wight: The Role of Religion in the Historical Sociology of the English School of International Relations.” International Affairs 77 (4): 905–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00225.
  • Thomas, Scott M. 2005. The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations: The Struggle for the Soul of the Twenty-First Century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Thomas, Scott M. 2013. “Bringing Culture and Religion Back in: Rethinking the Secularization of the English School?” https://ecpr.eu/filestore/paperproposal/046dea96-0b6e-4263-b193-e5c449cfe33a.pdf.
  • Troy, Jodok. 2008a. “The Catholic Church: An Underestimated and Necessary Actor in International Affairs.” Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 9 (1): 65–73.
  • Troy, Jodok. 2008b. “Faith-Based Diplomacy Under Examination.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 3 (3): 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119108X378088.
  • Troy, Jodok. 2012. Christian Approaches to International Affairs. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Troy, Jodok. 2016. The Catholic Church and International Relations. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks Online.
  • Troy, Jodok. 2017. “Two ‘Popes’ to Speak for the World: The Pope and the United Nations Secretary General in World Politics.” The Review of Faith & International Affairs 15 (4): 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2017.1392712.
  • Troy, Jodok. 2018. “The Pope’s Own Hand Outstretched: Holy See Diplomacy as a Hybrid Mode of Diplomatic Agency.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 20 (3): 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148118772247.
  • Troy, Jodok. 2022. “Intermediation Between International Society and World Society: The Pope and the UN Secretary-General on The Figure of The Refugee.” International Studies Review 24 (3): 1–21.
  • Weigel, George. 2004. “World Order—What Catholics Forgot.” First Things (New York, N Y ) 143: 31–38.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.